MY FIRST EVER GAME! // Code Review 

Здравствуйте, вы знаете русский язык?

;)

@The Cherno, PERVERT!!! 😡😡😡

This was a bit easier to follow along, than your other video's.

well i am warming egg in case of CS , is it that scary ? ,

You talk like his daddy

@@MrHuman-iy5lw so we're not allowed to Express our proudness for others !

@@akramdiafat9380 of course you are but he is not his child or helped him grow strong. Just watched he has no right to be proud but happy for him.

@@MrHuman-iy5lw?? Bro u can be proud of people even if u didn’t do shit for them tf 😂😂 did you see your parents build their lives ?? No because you wasn’t born you didn’t see it you didn’t contribute to anything . But yet you should still be proud and happy .

Bro found the solution

Look into the Gang of Four Design Patterns book (or the many online re-creations). Also, look into planning out your classes and their relations with UML diagrams if you're working with very complex systems

In the case of a menu setting options for the game to load, I think I would populate a struct and pass it as an argument into your game initialization function. This is with C in mind (and C++ by extension). You could pass a pointer to conserve memory, or you could pass the actual struct so that the function gets its own copy of it. Adding options is as simple as adding values to the struct, and by using sizeof() anywhere the size of the struct is referenced, you don't need to rewrite any existing code to implement new options. I don't know how this would best be accomplished with classes; I avoid OOP where it isn't necessary, which is the reason I write and gave examples in C.

people who complain about cancel culture need to realize that it really doesn't do all that much. People get mad when people do something bad... isn't it obvious? Obviously I don't agree when people take something out of context or try to "cancel" for something stupid, but at the end of the day it's just people spreading the word on something they perceive as bad that someone did. After that it's up to you to decide if what they did is something you disagree with and if it's bad enough for you to consider pulling support for them. It really is that simple. I don't see what's so wrong with it.

@@minneelyyyy That's obviously a joke but if you insist on debating ^^ What you are saying makes me think of persons that say "Privacy? who cares? I don't see the harm, only people that are guilty of something care" which is largely an uneducated opinion. As for cancel culture in particular, people can loose their job or revenue upon cancel culture, like creators being demonetized or loosing sponsorship, not because those sponsors really do think they did something wrong but because they can't be associated with what is currently considered "bad". The innocent until proven guilt is mostly gone, as long as the mass thinks you are guilty, you can loose access to revenue or the right to express yourself on major platforms without any recourse or trial and pretty much indefinitely sometime. Of course as long as you are on the "right" side of things I can see how you would not see the issue, until you are targeted that is... Yea people get mad but that's a totally different context, you cannot transpose real life relationships with social networks, it's at a much bigger scale and has much larger consequences up to be socially sentenced to death. A friend or a close collaborator, you may make up your mind after a while or forgive, they know you the context. In social network once your image is stained is pretty much for life and it's based on people biases, over-sensitivity and taking things out of context. Philosophically speaking I don't like banning or canceling at a personal/individual level as well anyway.

​@@reup6943 As far as I've seen nobody has been hurt very significantly from a cancellation that wasn't serious. Pewdiepie has been cancelled 3 different times (probably more that I haven't heard of) for various things he's said and done and yet he is doing just fine. Additionally, fucking Matpat has had his fair share of controversies and most people laugh at them (even me, that stuff is so out of context its ridiculous). As for the time he accidentally supported a bad autism "charity", there hasn't been much. I think you've just heard that "ooooh people are losing their livelyhoods to hyper-sensitive cancel culture" but I've not seen anyone get cancelled and it mean much where they didn't actually deserve it. The one example I can come up with is when Tommyinit got harassed so much that he needed to get offline and go to therapy for a bit (obviously, not cool). I've never seen a person get cancelled over something insignificant actually see very much in the way of losses, just a bunch of angry people on Twitter. Of course it can go way too far, as can a lot of things (I wonder what you think about the people who specifically target transgender streamers who've done nothing wrong except be transgender for harassment? what a great use of human energy!) but in general it is a relatively painless experience getting cancelled by twitter. "waah youre just too sensitive" is a bad argument.

@@minneelyyyy (answering a deleted post basically stating "cancel culture barely hurts anyone") Well that's your evaluation, a bit like saying screaming on people never killed anybody, so we should never make a fuss about it no matter the situation. My inclination is to not condone a fundamentally toxic behavior, same for more general harassement or blatant discrimination.

@@reup6943 seems like they're not up for debate which is nice because it becomes a mess in most cases when you argue in RU-vid comments

hell nah

HOLY COW, I would absolutely LOVE THAT

Надеюсь, теперь ты работаешь в ЕА или рокстар гамес?

@@ivanivenskii6942 Too early right now, still only 17, but I am hoping for a future where I can work in that place :)

u remember it from 10-12 years?

@@patil-abhishek sus af

@@patil-abhishek Yeah hard to believe anyone was born before the early 2000s right?

Yes. Especially that "accessing from different classes" thing. I always wing it in a similarly ugly way (global or passing way more than I should in a function).

check out programming patterns, but agree

I believe the "()->" syntax just internally creates a class that extends Runnable under the hood.

@@bluesillybeard yep, java is still all classes under the hood, even arrays are objects

you didn’t even watch it

@@akiyprum how do you know? 🤔

Who said that?💀

@@balern4 i did

Yandere was written in c#

@@johnblunt6693 yes i know it was unity based but my phasing is little off i see but still C# is just java with better experience.

In Linux you can just write to the file descriptor "0" .. no idea if that works on windows

@@LiEnby It should work because printf basically is fprintf to stdout.

I think what you have to do is play a snippet of audio for 1/60 s for every iteration of the game loop if you have fps as 60.

break is faster in a way that it terminates the entire loop whereas continue just starts a new iteration; if there's nothing to do beyond that point (like out of bounds), breaking is faster because you don't do anything.

No, they aren't. I saw Java code which used prefixes but such code doesn't follow Java coding style.

Nah

@@cybyrd9615whos u

@@akiyprum pathetic

@@HycrosxGladeum I didn’t. It was just a typo.

Like a true sigma male 💀