My Zelda: Echoes of Wisdom Reaction! 

YEEEAAAHHHH

YEEEAAAHHHH

nom nom nom

yummy

Yea

Lel

Finally a person that’s first without saying FIRST🎉🎉🎉

We’ve waited 38 goddamn years!!!

Not really

I have been waiting YEARS for this I’m soooooo excited!!!!!

True yay🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

I didn't notice that! That's so cute

that sounds about right

You'd rather her point it at a person?

@@WhisperingWisp357 thats fair

I feel like they would have to have proper dungeons in this because the isometric zelda fundamentally can't work without major locations like that. Even with a proper jump ability there isn't an inbuilt way to completely destroy navigation like botw/totk had thus rendering a proper dungeon too easy to break, though they will still probably retain the multi-resolution way to solve problems. Even the means they showed off that do show how easy navigation is with the echo (gliding with a bird and climbing up water cubes) has its limits since the echoes appear to start dissipating within seconds of creation making them harder to abuse (which is frankly probably a good thing if we want proper dungeons to work). I could be wrong but I really feel the repeat minidungeon shrine approach they leaned into the past two games isnt even remotely viable in an isometric zelda where movement was always more classic and limited compared to full-range 3D zeldas by design.

@@OsnosisBones climbing isnt the reason they removed traditional dungeons in botw/totk since you cant climb in dungeons. navigation isnt "broken" in those games. i dont know the real reason since they have keys in those games just never use them but i feel like it was a design decision that the higher ups liked because copying and pasting requires less management. i could absolutely see them doing it in this game too and its terrifying, there is nothing really stopping them. the only hope is that since the world seems to be based on alttp that they will base the dungeons on that world too.

@@jibodagrey6500 You seem to be misunderstanding what I was getting at with my comment. I wasn't saying the navigation was broken, just that a lot of elements in it make it possible to break or make dungeon structure in the classic style nearly impossible. I never said climbing is the reason they didnt make expansive dungeons, only that, unless restricted, climbing (and using devices) absolutely render dungeon design pointless if not designed around it. However, you are right that alone is not an excuse (The divine beasts limit your ability to climb walls and stuff but are still rather short, barren, and easy for a dungeon). The sequel dungeons arent much better but excepting the water dungeon most of them do much more approach a proper dungeon structure in Totk, but are hindered by that fact that the way the game is built fundamentally makes it nothing but a giant playground because you can climb so much and outright skip or break puzzles because there is something approaching too much freedom. It's no secret you can break the entire fire dungeon by just having enough balloons on hand, and there are similar means to break the structure of the (still lackluster admittedly) dungeons. The closest to a proper dungeon in BotW was definitely Hyrule Castle because of its sheer scale and the fact that entire segments have blockades that open up through facing enemies or solving mechanism puzzles, and the closest thing to a proper dungeon in Totk was probably the thunder temple, largely because of its focus on traps and puzzles, but also because the way the floors and rooms were built they had a large enough scale to them so that you could not abuse the powers you had to ignore what was laid out too much, which again kinda adds to my point. By design, a more traditional dungeon with proper puzzles only works if proper blockades are made or something is done to limit the utility of the ultrahand in the case of Totk. If you make something too powerful or make the toolbelt of the player near limitless it makes it very easy to render any sort of puzzle meaningless, ignoring the annoying repetitious aesthetic the shrines did at least understand this because they do in fact limit a lot of what you can do by comparison (their main issue is they're too short and too prevalent, basically all 1 or a couples rooms big) but the sequel kinda leans into the too much player autonomy territory as a majority of the playerbase defaulted to just utterly breaking or ignoring puzzles by utilizing the time power to create platforms as a universal solution, even though the game tried to apply a limit on the device abilities by locking them to what is given. It's a common saying that limitations breed creativity. With a greater understanding of what a player can and cannot do comes an ironically wider list of options for how to build a dungeon/puzzle depending on how you approach it. They absolutely didnt make the dungeons complex or big enough even in TotK but even if they did it wouldnt have mattered if they didnt fully commit to limiting the player's abilities compared to when outside either through scale or actual locks on what they could do, because what they gave the players, while situationally really fun, probably does give them too much they can abuse their surroundings with. The past 2 games' issues is they leaned so heavy into the full freedom open air design approach for even dungeons that they didnt feel too different from another overworld area, just with a new aesthetic, but a isometric zelda by design is a lot harder to screw up and fall into this same sort of trap because of the inbuilt limitations with movement and what you can see at any given time. They COULD still lean too much into that new style, but it's incredibly unlikely imo.

My wife was sleeping so I had to be quiet 🤫

@@JustinBae 😂😂😂😂😂

Ur not