The thubmnail looked fishy so I decided to go to the comments to check if this one's a clickbait. Turns out it is. Thank you random people on the internet for saving my time.
I did to....(but it was worth it I learnt a new dinosaur (the pro is I can still beat my friends with name the most creatures challenge cons: I may forget the name))
In terms of the Voynich manuscript, they've now come to the conclusion and have been translating it from an old form and dialect of the Turkish language. It's taking them alot of time, but work on it is progressing rather quickly in comparison to previous years. If I remember correctly, I believe they started roughly a year and a half ago and it's a father/son team that was approached by one of the researchers on the primary team that has been given access to the book. The father wrote to the researcher to say that he would be able to translate the entire thing if he'd be able to look through it all and be given access rights. It'll be amazing if they ever get it finished :)
We don’t give ancient civilisations enough credit. They’ve discovered so much with so little and yet we a quick to write them of as “can’t be explained”, “must be a sign of extraterrestrials”, “a hoax”. Maybe one day people will look back on our time and write us off but yet this stuff is all concrete to us.
When people start discussing this, I always love to bring up Gobleke Tepe. In short, people in Turkey lived in the stone age around 10.000 years ago. They had no writing, no pottery, no domestic animals, no farms or anything. They all lived in nomadic tribes, gathering food from nature and hunting wild animals. Now, here's the fun fact. Gobleke Tepe is a stone monument with huge stone blocks that weight several tons each. They are carved precisely and placed perfectly in circles and on top of each other, and are covered in all sorts of images of people, animals and what not. The monument itself is impressive... but it's also around 12.000 years old. It's two thousand years older than the stone age. How is that even possible? Personally, I think the solution is fairly obvious. It's not possible that the people back then could have made it, and even we say they could, why on earth would they? It makes no sense. If you live in a small, nomadic tribe, barely able to survive by hunting and gathering food, you have no writing system to organize anything, no tools other than crude stone tools and so on, why go through all the trouble to make a huge monument like that? For religious purposes, like most people say? Hahahaha, no. My theory is that the people back then couldn't have made it... but it could have been made by people living *before* them. They knew a disaster was coming (great flood?), so they built the monument out of stone to make sure it would stand the test of time. It was their only way to preserve their knowledge to their decendants. They would have had the tools and means to build a monument like that, and writing down all they knew on paper, leather or something like that would be a waste. It would be destroyed soon anyway, even if simply by time. But carving it in stone would make it last forever.
+Arthur Mandisodza - What on earth are you talking about??? No one is claiming extraterrestrials or a hoax. Saying something can't be explained does NOT take credit from ancient civilisations. Quite the opposite in fact! We don't know exactly how the Ancient Egyptians build the Great Pyramid, but we know they did it. In other words it can't be explained. There is nothing wrong with the fact that we can't explain certain things and it does NOT imply any disrespect to the ancients.
+PikachuchuTrain - What YOU are talking about is off in La La Land. The Stone Age lasted for roughly 3 million years, so Gobleke Tepe was NOT built beforehand. Gobleke Tepe was built right near the END of the Stone Age. Of course it is possible for the people back then to have built it. What possible reason can there be for jumping to the wild conclusion that they didn't? There was NO great flood and there is ZERO evidence of an advanced civilisation living tens of thousands of years ago. Why is it that people like you think we have discovered fossils of animals dating back hundreds of millions of years, yet somehow an advanced civilisation left no trace of themselves? Oh ... sorry ... that's right ... according to you they did leave a trace of themselves - deliberately building massive stone monuments intended to hand down knowledge - but for some reason wiped out every other trace of themselves. Don't be ridiculous! Why on earth do you laugh at the suggestion of religion being the purpose? Clearly you have no understanding of ancient cultures. To the Ancient Egyptians - to use them as an example - religion and the afterlife was of the utmost importance to their culture. They believed - with all their hearts, because it was a long time before modern science - that the gods were in charge of the world. It was the Pharaoh's job to intercede with the gods to ensure good tidings for the people. When a Pharaoh died, the people didn't mourn, they rejoiced. Then the new Pharaoh immediately set about preparing for his own death and passage to the afterlife, where he would become a god, intercede on behalf of the people, and help to ensure their passage to the afterlife. Khufu was arguable the most powerful ruler in all of history. He was basically a god on earth. That is how he was able to get an enormous workforce to build one of the greatest monuments in history. People are mystified by the Great Pyramid because it just doesn't seem possible for ancient people to have built it with the resources they had, and people incorrectly believe the ridiculous assertion that we couldn't replicate them nowadays. Of course we could! We built the Large Hadron Collider - a building that is about a billion time more complex and precise than the Great Pyramid - and that is only one example of the amazing constructions that modern humans have built. If, for some reason, we decided to build a new Great Pyramid, and we had some driving force to do so - one that was as important to us as the Pharaoh's tomb was to the Ancient Egyptians - then we could build a bigger, more precise, better version of the Great Pyramid in much less time. It would be EASY for us if we were properly motivated. The point is that you are vastly underestimating the importance of the gods to these ancient people, and you are underestimating their intelligence. If you could go back in time and bring one of their babies forward to our time, it could go to school, and get a university degree, and potentially be just as much a part of our society as anyone else. So there is nothing mysterious about ancient people, who thought that these giant stone monuments were absolutely essential to their ongoing lives, being able to build the things they built.
Update: The Voynich manuscript has been identified as a book written in ancient Turkish. A family has managed to translate a few pages, and is finishing the rest of the book.
If i remember correctly, its actually a pseudo-arabic language that was only spoken in a small part of the middle east area. The main page that helped with the translation was a page of an astronomical event that occured at or around the same time the book would have been created. It was an astronomer who figured it out finally.
You have any sources of the actual translations? All I can find are articles about how this turkish father and son claim to have solved 30% of the manuscript, but no actual translations or what it's supposed to say.
A spicies not changing over a long time doesn't cast any doubt over evolution. If there a creature is well suited for an enviroment, and that enviroment doesn't change in a way significant for the creature there's no pressure for it to change either. take a look at sharks and crocodiles, through millions of years they've only had minimal changes
true and the drepanosaurus one didt seam all that our there too convention evolution is a thing plus this was in the Triassic right? there were plenty of anime's that looked alike like anime's now
@@ClownWhisper Guys, evolution is in question. Wake up. By design, a scientific theory will generate questions. So, if you ridicule anyone who would question science, you're effectively accepting indoctrination. I am a scientist, by the way.
@@beanlegume9965 Finally some sense has been spoken, so many take scientific theories as gospel. Science for the majority has become a religion they have just replaced belief with theory.
The Voynich manuscript has been found to be stylized Turkish. What threw most people off was the use of pictographs within the stylized letters. I feel the best way to describe it is sort of like the first letter of a fairy tale story, now only for every letter, and combine them in strange ways
For number one it's likely that somebody stepped in the river after the dinosaurs. Besides, how a foot print can survive MILLIONS of years on a river bed seems highly unlikely.
My dad said all LIFE began with the milk MAN ! If you come home from a long day of work and you notice that THE fridge is fill with bunch of bottle milk ? BINGO ! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Well. "Opening Pandoras box" often reffer to something thats really bad or extremly confusing. It itself has nothing to do with Pandoras box except for using as a way of saying.
Number 10 the swords, yeah, carbonised steel has been found through-out the world dating a couple of thousand years. It is indicated that smiths knew out the method for about the same time and when iron smelting you can't not produce carbonised steel, which was traded for significant amounts... The thing about the industrial revolution being the start of carbonised steel is a myth, a 19th century myth... When they knew carp all about the old world...
New research brings us closer to the source of the swords, to the kiln in which these legendary weapons were forged. A previous theory held that the swords may have their origin in the Middle East or Asia, but surprisingly it seems the materials were sourced closer to where they were found, in Central Europe.
Honestly everyone completely disregarding the theory of evolution because of the finding of drepanosaurus has not the slightest idea of how evolution works at all, rather it is even more proof of evolution, because creatures evolve in a way best suited for the situation. So chameleons and drepanosaurus evolved in a similar way, because there was of living was extremely similar. A different example are ichtyosaurus and dolphins. Two completely different kinds of animals evolved in a similar way, because of a similar way of living and their environment.
I am not doubting evolution, but there was technically many ways the evolution could have gone and its pretty much random. It is however possible for two species go evolve in a similar way
connect clientele a theory that has a hell of a lot of evidence to back it up. If you knew anything about science you'd know that in order for something to even be considered a theory it must be repeatedly confirmed through both observation and experimentation. In science, theories are a bit of a misnomer because they aren't guesses, they are extremely reliable observations about the world. In short, if something is a theory, it is accurate or very close to accurate. We just don't know all the details yet.
The rat thing was explained when it was discovered. Sometimes rats get their tail knoted up. The "bundle" is an extreme example. They were probably fighting/mating.
I have a question: if it's still called the THEORY of Evolution, then why do schools and such treat it as a concrete fact and discard all other origin theories?
@Ericka’s Exotics Well having evidence doesn't necessarily make evolution a concrete fact. A theory is a hypothesis that is accepted by many scientists but still isn't a proven fact, and even though all of the experiments that were conducted seem to imply that evolution took place, we have to realize that those outcomes required human involvement - which there was obviously none at the time. Also it's true that an intelligent God is not a lazy one, let's take Jehovah for instance (mainly because He's the one I know most about). The Bible has laws to protect human beings and laws to understand Him right? So a God who creates laws must also create a world under law, such as the laws that say that earth is immense enough to pull us to its center preventing us from floating out into space. And the laws that state that plants must take in sunlight to convert into fuel for themselves and feed the rest of the ecosystem. That's science. When the Bible states that, "In the beginning, God created the Heavens and the earth," (Gen. 1:1) it means that He has created matter out of nothing, stabilized elements in space and created a massive rock where the atmosphere will gradually decrease in order to not crush any beings God might put -- that just might seem a bit too long to put in there. It's our job to figure out how He did it. Not to mention that there's also evidence of Bible occurrences taking place. The Bible states, "Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being," (Gen 2:7) scientists have found that many of the elements that are found in the soil are found in us too, such as oxygen and H2O. Or for instance, the romans have account that "Yeshua" was a real man and that "the Hebrews call him a Messiah". However, God is still a theory too, has evidence but not enough to be declared the truth. I accept it because of what I have gone through in my life, other people accept the theory of evolution, all I'm saying is that schools should take into consideration every theory to give students the option to decide. (Sorry for the long reply, easier said than typed).
Hi there, I enjoy your videos a lot. Keep up the great work. Thanks bunches for using your natural voice! Your voice holds much more charisma than the robotic one that's floating around RU-vid.
Antarctica wasn't ice free 6 thousand years ago. It has been frozen for several million years as it very slowly moved from near where Australia is, down to the pole.
You know.... 1000 or more years in future, people will be founding US, our technologies, buildings, villages, animals.... And that will be MIND BLOWING to them
The Piri Reis map, the most mysterious discovery, I mean, how could anyone during that era reached the accuracy??? If you find anything new information about this please let me know!!! 😊😊😊😂😂😂🤔🤔🤔☀️☀️☀️
I think they did a talk about this map I think . It was shown in a show named ANCIENT ALIEN in HISTORY CHANNEL I don't know if I was rigHt . Because it's been a year I watched that show I HOPE THIS WOULD HELP YOU
The Voynich Manuscript was essentially found to be an ancient regional Turkish dialect a few years ago by a father-son team of Middle Eastern (primarily Turkish and Ottoman) scholars and covers a variety of topics including very old (and previously unknown) medicinal herbalism, astrology, and mythology. Time to update the script(s) already..
I'm pretty sure that last photo "do you see a human foot here or not?" is the photo from a site where there were VERY CLEAR human footprints along with the dinosaur prints, but the human ones were defaced. This video only showed a pic from AFTER they were defaced. There ARE PICTURES of the prints beforehand and they are VERY obviously human. Sad that they used the post-vandalization pic rather than the really clear beautiful one.
I think you are confused. There are no fossil records that actually show human footprints next to dinosaurs. Here is a video explaining why you might think there are footprints. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HThKTXrINHc.html I doubt you'll believe it though because all scientists are out to prove their own agenda of evolution.
Dragons must be real because most cultures in the world talk of a flying creature with huge wings and talons. Giants are as real as they can get. They are mentioned in many cultures through stories and through time they were thought to be myths. Whenever something is gone for a thousand years 'NOT MILLION YEARS' it does'nt mean it does not exist
I think that's just gonna turn out to be nothing again, there have been similar news about it in the past and it's risen in popularity in the recent years, so it doesn't surprise me in the least that muslims are trying to make it their own, like so many other discoveries and inventions.
@JackSpeed 439 Batteries, astronomy, and even computers pre-date Islam existing by a good 1000+ years, in other parts of the world than the middle east. And Islam had plenty of bad times, it just didn't line up with a new wave of bad times in Christian countries at that time. The random timing of those events relative to each other, has nothing to do with how good either religion is.
@@wyterabitt2149 People like taking half proofs and theories to futher advocate and as "proof" of what they belive instead of acctually have a non biased opinion.
Regarding the coexisting footprints of dinosaurs and humans, one theory I once read hypothesized that the dino tracks were actually made long before those of the humans, and that when the humans ran across them, they ran away in fear, which explains the length of the strides between prints.
In all my years, I have not figured out how science can say that a certain object that is not a part of our earth, such as a meteorite, can be said to come from a certain place; without it being picked up from that location. Case in point, "Martian metiorites".
Piri Reis map is not as mysterious as people claim, there is evidence of ancient Chinese maps and stories about seeing a possible land mass far to the south. Most think it meant Australia, except there is evidence they already knew about Australia are were talking about something else. Same with western European voyages to the new world shortly after Columbus. It is know that some vessels sailed to the tip of South America looking for treasure or other preciousness metals/stones in the new world. Those same voyages claim to have seen another land to the South of the farthest point of South America. But the ships never dared venture any further since it would have taken them too far from coast of South America. The Voynich Manuscript was solved, it a medical text from the middle ages on women health. The strange writing is a form of short hand used by students in central European middle age medical schools. This was discovered when a text known to be from students of this era was realized to look exactly like the Manuscript. When they compared it, they realized it was also from student. Though there is evidence that parts may have been copied from other students notes. Which is why its so confusing at times and took forever to put together. We have discovered large mammals that lived in the time of non-Avian dinosaurs, odds are their paws and our feet could have been similarly shaped. The prints don't show human toes or skin impressions, just the general shape. Since most likely they were the mammals that survived the asteroid and could be some of our ancient mammal ancestors.
I have one thing to say that conflicts with your statement, the tracks aren't mammalian, they were a mix of hoaxes, tricks of the light, and eroded ornithomimid trackways.
About 5 years ago man heard a mass of squirming crying baby squirrels and their mother. With difficulty he got them out of the hole in the tree. He said they were all stuck together, mostly by their tails, by tree resin. He said they looked like"rat kings". He got something to soften the resin and carefully removed and cleaned one squirrel at a time and saved them.
I'm gonna try not to think about the mispronunciation of the word "Paluxy", but the video is great! We have found many things here in Texas, such as: The dinosaur footprints discovered in what is now, "Dinosaur Valley State Park" and even several fossils! In Waco, Texas, we have also unearthed an entire herd of Mammoths and even the tooth from a Sabre Cat! Such amazing discoveries found everyday!
