Relive the Artemis 1 mission with highlights from launch on Nov. 16 to splashdown on Dec. 11. Full Story: www.space.com/artemis-1-orion... Credit: NASA Johnson Space Center
What a historic achievement for NASA and ESA scientists and engineers! SLS is the most powerful rocket in the world! All of Orion's flight was preprogramed and executed flawlessly! So glad the focus is back on science!
Well they have to cut to the most important part. It’s pivotal the people see the rocket booster encompassing 85% of the shot and just a small portion of earth to demonstrate how spherical it is
@@jetpond7904 absolutely not, and also don’t believe we are on a globe . I do believe the world is a bigger than we led to believe. As well as that we are made in the image of our creator and most high.
Got chills watching the entire sequence and those clear, sharp and clear cut images of the moon surface are spectacular Also, the image of planet earth surrounded by all that darkness puts our human nature in perspective.
It's very easy to believe this con because it's all designed to leave you in awe and admiration. Inspiring you to fantasize something that doesn't exist, thereby conning you psychologically and financially in taxes. Yes, the hard fact remains: the space programme is all fake unfortunately.
@@YouMustQuestionEverything depends on your personal view of the glass of water. Some fellas want to believe in the good will of the human spirit, wich btw, is where ALL GOOD comes from. Not from religion or ideologies. I'd rather live a happy life with optimistic personal views and be aware of the skepticism and negativity because this is who we are as human beings. Without hope and good will we'd still have diseases running rampant and bigotry would rule the world in the name of few. But most important, it'd be hard for you and I to state our personal opinions publicly... Peace mate.
Great video. But can you do one with all the footage but spead up 2x 5x so that we see the movement of the craft moving the full trip but really spead up?
@0:57 she says the rocket is being propelled at 128 mph. But a rocket needs to reach a speed of 128,000 mph, approx to get into earth orbit. At what point and celing of its journey does it get to that speed?
Why 7.28 into the vid is the moon bigger than the earth the moon is quarter of the size of the earth so how does the moon eclipse the earth doesn't make sense someone help me if I'm being thick tho???
He says at 7:09 Artemis is 38,000 miles away from the moon in that shot, meanwhile the Earth is another 238,000 miles away behind the moon on the other side of Artemis. It's like if you look up people who take pictures at the Leaning Tower of Pisa in Italy where they're standing hundreds of meters in front of the tower in order to get the illusion that they are the same height and are holding the tower up. It's basically the same illusion happening here. Hope that helps.
@@Emdee5632 It seems you don't know what exposure is, it takes seconds to look that up. It's precisely because stars are faint compared to the sun that you need more exposure in order capture more light from the stars.
@@SuperFinGuy As you can see for yourself in these images, the camera is looking at brightly lit objects like the spacecraft and the moon. The camera cannot see stars at the same time because they arent bright enough. Of course, the camera could change its sttings so that stars should become visible - but the images would become overexposed because the spacecraft and the moon are still much brighter. It would be of no practical use. the stars are irrelevant in these images. Your question is not unlike the question asked by people who deny the Apollo moon landings took place: why can't you see stars on pictures taken by the astrnauts on the lunar surface? Because the cameras were set for the brightness of the objects on the moon.
@@Emdee5632 Oh boy you got me, I'm a moon landing denier lol Ever heard of a thing called dynamic range too? It is the thing that allows a camera to switch between extreme brightness and blackness, allowing you to capture, for example, the inside and outside of a sunny window simultaneously.
This is amazing.. ‘this’ is what we should be doing. Cooperating, pushing new boundaries of exploration.. not fighting, killing each other over land, energy reserves, politics & religion! Carl Sagan said it best ~ Pale Blue Dot.. the only home we’ve ever known.
Orion continuously makes little course corrections using maneuvering thrusters repurposed from the Space Shuttle. Between that and the various longer orbit burns, the panels will wobble around a bit, probably for even longer than they would in atmospheric conditions, as there is no damping effect of air resistance in the vacuum of space.
The important thing for them is that corrupt senators can make money out of this garbage SLS rocket. We should have nuclear interplanetary vehicles by now but we're stuck with 60s Apollo-tech. GARBAGE!
Not good cameras on board because there is no way the earth and the moon in the same video and the moon looks bigger or same size as the earth 🌍 when in fact the moon is only about 1/4 the size of earth
I think you'll find this is previously filmed stock library.footage from a cargo plane drop. There would have been steam coming off of that thing when it hit the water if it was genuine.
I’m from the year 2100 and we all left earth because of a super virus. We lost billions of people were living on a spaceship now looking for a new planet to call home.
Great quick monologue! aside from data, the craft hopefully *stored a video & audio version* Red box rec. So we can witness *authenticly all* of the before, during & after radio reception lost moments in its journey. (Something ALL space mechs should). 📷 EVERYWHERE, solar, planet, stations and surface. A 🙌 *VRLive* remoting service private & N/\S/\ could profit.
Do you mean the service module? The capsule separates from it. The heat shield is on the capsule because there's no point in bringing the service module back to earth.
Can't wait to see Artemis go back to Moon with Astronauts on board coping with huge radiation spikes which will probably be fatal at this point in time. I think we are at least 20 years from any manned missions to the Moon, never mind Mars and beyond.
No man has breached the exosphere (6,200 miles) and the last layer of earth's atmosphere which fades into "space." The ISS orbits our wonderful planet (home) at a mere 264 miles or so where corrections have to be made to stay in orbit as it is continually decayed by the earth's gravity. YET, in 1969, space allowed a "500,000" mile round trip with a pit-stop at the moon. Until this day, it seems "common sense" has been told to leave the room. "Mars," what a joke.
we went to the moon 50+ years ago and overcame those problems with the technologies back then, today we are even more advanced in tech and you want to say we need another 20 years from any mission to the moon?
@@zarahalora7567 Hey Zarah, the premise you used here, though intentional and do understand why. It is a "contradiction in terms" and certainly gets your message across. Here is another one mentioned by Gary D which isn't intentional at all but a sincere one, although, based on what? "Astronauts on board coping with huge radiation spikes which will probably be fatal at this point in time." If I am to understand this correctly, space has become even more inhospitable.......got it. In closing, Nasa has claimed those technologies used in 1969 were magically lost, surely for me that statement is nonsensical.✌ Happy New Year and have a wonderful 2023!!!!!
@@russellmckernan oh i understand now, yes that makes more sense here, ive watched videos of life on the ISS and i saw that whenever a CME from the sun occur the people on board huddle around in the storage rooms that have alot of equipment to try ease the amount of radiation they pick up. and ive heard in a couple old documentaries that space can change almost as much as our weather can, so yeah, your right. but, im positive they can get through this. hopefully
Space exploration is very similar to nuclear weaponry. In WWII, the U.S. was hoping to develop it first, so that all the naughty communist and fascist countries wouldn’t bomb them first. Imagine the CCP, but on an entire planet. It would be better for the U.S. (and any other democratic country) to get to space first.
They need to add cameras to everything it won't cost much just cheep cell phones or something add them to the solar wings add them to the stages that sperate so we can see the whole capsule so the deniers can't deny it happened
Nothing will convince those ppl. They’ve long ago givin up on letting in any new information. And NASA isn’t in the least bit interested in proving anything to flat earthers. They just keep doing what they do.
Going to the moon and space is very cool but I can not believe after 50 yrs later we are still going to space and the moon in the same way and the same type of rockets ????? In 50 yrs we did not make a better type of space craft that can go to and from space ????????
@@Alloneword-cp2xw It's simple to believe that.. but the fact remains, it's all fake. A hoax, unfortunately. I know how you must be passionate about space as I was once.. until I dug deep and found out the truth. :(
Looking at the technology and engineering makes me conclude that the 1968 moon landing never happened. It was impossible. Then watching Buzz Aldren tipsely staggering and lying about going to the moon..... shocking
@@andrewhillis9544 compartmentalism. Only a few need to know more than what is before them. Besides a ton of people know that no one has been to the moon. Oh, and they lost the telemetry of the greatest feat of all of mankind? What kind of fool believes that? The moon is a light in the sky as is the sun and the stars. No one will ever land on the moon. It is truly shocking what people will believe. People are so gullible.
@@andrewhillis9544 arguing with a fool makes two fools arguing. Your not the only fool that thinks someone has been to the moon so take solace in that . The truth will come out someday. In the meantime NASA and Elon and many others are ripping off the American public. So is there a Tesla floating around somewhere in space also? How much bullshit can a person take? Mars? CGI.
@@kimsand53 The moon is a light in the sky?? Have you ever looked at the moon? You can easily see shadows on the surface which visibly move in perfect alignment with the position of the Sun.
Apollo 11 landed on the Moon just before my sophomore year in college. I was majoring in astronomy and followed it all the way, breathlessly. Now comes this Artemis thing. A flacid, lifeless, soulless, ginned-up repetition of events more than a half-century ago. Above all: pointless. Why go back to the Moon? There is no reason, so NASA cooks up one: to get to Mars. Why Mars? We dunno. To wander round looking for interesting rocks, or water, or something.
It’s our duty, that’s why. There may (probably will) come a time when human survival depends on this technology. Of course not in our lifetimes but we owe it to future generations to keep going. What’s this planet going to be like with 50 billion...100 billion ppl for instance?
It's up to you what you want to believe, I simply beg just don't burn down the libraries again like y'all did 1,000 years ago in Alexander pretty please. It's taken a long time for the smart people to legally be smart again without fear of death by congregational mob. If it were up to us dummies we'd still think the earth is a snow globe.
This is a cargo plane drop. If that thing had just experienced re-entry there would have been steam coming off of it as it hit the water 💦 Do they really take us ALL for fools?
*_"If that thing had just experienced re-entry there would have been steam coming off of it as it hit the water"_* Should it? Because you said so? You people are hilarious. You know shit about the subjects that you claim armchair expertise over then you make these absurd decrees based upon nothing more than your own personal incredulity and childlike insistence. After its plummet through the plasma charged heat wave of reentry, the Orion capsule had an 8 minute descent through the Earth’s frigid upper atmosphere. An ablative heat shield is designed to shed heat, not retain it whilst their burning actually creates a shield of comparatively cooler air from the hot plasma created by super compacting the atmosphere ahead of the capsule. The Orion capsule didn’t stay at 5000 degrees nor the initial mach 32 velocity upon first encountering the upper atmosphere. By the time the capsule had reached the lower atmosphere, it had slowed to about 320 Mph, at which point they deployed the first parachute. The first “drogue” chutes were deployed at about 25,000 feet altitude. The main chutes at about 10,000 feet. The capsule had cooled down substantially by that time. The stainless steel outer hull and the aluminium-lithium alloy of Orion cools rapidly after spending several minutes in a moving airstream in the stratosphere, ambient air temperature that falls to as little as -65°c with descent. *_"Do they really take us ALL for fools?"_* Believers in online conspiracy theory? The answer to that is a resounding yes.
The parachutes opened at 25,000ft, and the heat of re-entry was finished at much higher altitude. Do you know how cold it is up there? It has cooled off completely by the time it splashes down.
Tell me you don't understand thermodynamics without telling me you don't understand thermodynamics. Why are the dumbest people always the loudest about a subject they are not smart enough to understand?
yea right, just because you said so.... stupid idiot!!!! Show some respect to hard working people among the world so you can watch all of this on your phone.... Stupid idiot! Your parent must be " proud" of you
@@silviosarunic3234 triggered cannon ball delusionist. I have no respect for people who think this is real or the people who design rockets that are nothing but a firework show. I also have no respect for the people at the top of nasa who know its all fake. Then again their fakery is obvious but gullable people like yourself still believe and defend it
Sure, scientists and engineers from all over the world faking another moon mission for no reason. The fake would be more complex than going to the moon.
Said the clueless and insignificant, attention seeking non-achieving nobody in a desperate and tragic bid for significance over the comments section of a video entertainment platform.
Flat earthers make me laugh. They claim the earth is flat because of what some crazy fire and brimstone preachers says is a passage in the Jewish Torah.
