Commander Matthew Dominick, pilot Michael Barratt, mission specialists Jeanette Epps and Aleksandr Grebenkin have arrived at the International Space Station after docking on March 5, 2024. Credit: NASA
I was watching the whole thing, it took them about an hour and twenty minutes from touching the ISS to actually entering it. That was a wild wait time.
Yeah they have to check for leaks, match the same pressure on both vehicles. It’s a very precise procedure that takes a lot of time. Space is deadly, gotta be very cautious.
@@maximusmilo5170 The three of them trained in the same batch together for 3 years, I don’t think there was any bad intention tbh, there are pics on Instagram where they’re hanging out with each others families and children too.
I watch every time the decolalge, the arrivals in the iss, I never tire of it, as a Frenchman, the most beautiful emotions were when Thomas Pesquet arrived, but it's so beautiful to see humans arrived in this station which is proof of human success as a team. God bless you. From France;
The only problem on Earth, is that the wrong people are in charge in certain countries. Around the world, the vast majority of folks just want to enjoy life with their families, work hard, and live in peace.
Problem is there is too many different countries, with their politics,every country thinks only about yourself . Must be 1 country and no borders, 1 language for all ,1 religion , 1 president ..
Boeing has not just screwed up with the 737 Max, but also Starliner. They were supposed to be launching crew to the ISS years ago. Thankfully SpaceX is holding things down for NASA.
They way they all start hugging each other the moment the new crew enters the space station makes me tear up a little :’) it’s such a sweet moment to see how happy they are to be together.
Can somebody Tell me whats the reason of the mission ? I found nothing about it , only that they changing the crew members( sorry my English isn’t fluent) hope someone understands my question
it was interesting that you speak and talk about everything possible with space and everything, I think it's fun to watch on the live stream from Nasa and very funny and very good and extremely good and I was impressed by you and it was interesting that you are so good at lots of things and inspiring also from Nasa and space and I watch you on web tv and I find it very interesting too
@@shintaro797They’re all married and the dude and one of the women have kids too😂😂😂 I don’t think it was weird, the three of them in the same batch and probably very close, training together for 3 years or so. I think he wrapped his legs because he meant to catch them from floating away and hurting themselves or something 😊
I have always wondered if American astronauts learned or knew Russian to make communication with fellow cosmonauts easier. It looked to me as though Jeanette understood what Alexandr was saying
still amazes me how these guys build something like that and make it connect in space basically to an inch precisely. I wonder where our guys here make same mistakes our roads are wrecked after each winter, my car breaks down every now and then yet rover is years on mars still working.
@@jozefmrkvicka4223 And this has what to with the mars rover? Your argument, presumably is that some things are built better than others? I agree. But your argument doesn’t necessarily compare like conditions for like conditions. Any given road is affected by any given amount of unique weathering, loading and/or geological factors. Some roads with identical construction will wear much faster than each other. Sun, shade, traffic volume, traffic weight, speed, rain, ice, water, roots, underground water, etc etc… Furthermore - how orbital docking equates or contrasts with the quality and construction of asphalt or concrete is beyond my reckoning.
@@tubecated_development you reading too much into this bro. Just saying how some things are built to last(quality) and some are not. If that much of expertise and focus went into our daily used appliances we would not need so much of it.
@@jozefmrkvicka4223 Can’t speak for roads, but if we built consumer goods to last, then capitalism would look different. Capitalism and planned obsolescence are connected in the sense that planned obsolescence, the practice of designing products with a limited lifespan to encourage repeat purchases, can be seen as a byproduct of capitalist economic systems. In a capitalist economy, companies are often driven by the need to maximize profits, and one way to achieve this is by creating products that need to be replaced or upgraded frequently. This can lead to the intentional design of products with shorter lifespans, which can contribute to consumerism and the continuous consumption of goods.