@S. M. Earth's demise in inevitable. There is so much co2 in the atmosphere that planting trees can't even save us now. That's why elon is trying to colonise mars so we can have a place to go once the earth start dying. The world will end one way or another.
@S. M. Do you really think that the people will listen? There are hundreds of millions of people that live on poverty they're not gonna worry about climate change. The priority they have is making ends meet no matter earth damaging it may be as long as they live they're okay.
There's no need to for two companys with the same goal and passion to compete against each other . So the fact that nasa and space x work together is amazing. They both have the same goal and supporting each other is key . Plus working together is great for business because if one company falls short there's always a helping hand . Good on space x and nasa for working together and supporting each other .
Two organizations competing against each other creates competition which leads to advancement. Look at the results of WWI. They entered with horses and left on planes
NASA is a customer while spaceX is a launch provider... Of course spaceX is it's own customer for starlink and maybe for their mars city if they decide to use their own money...
Don’t know if Space X will ever have enough money for a Mars city. The biggest hope for Space X is if China announces plans to go to Mars then the US government will be willing to one up it by funding the Mars trip.
Let's not forget that without NASA and their extensive studying and knowledge there would be no SpaceX. Never forget those who pave our way. I do think SpaceX is doing unbelievable things and has great ideas for the future of humanity. They're both pretty awesome in my opinion.
spacex only wants give the visionary without invention, the reason why many ppl loves spacex is because their shitty elon musk knows what ppl wanted to hear and believe
I don’t know why people dislike him so much. If you can do better, do better. Maybe it’s because he doesn’t sit around and wait to be told what he can and can’t do by the media. Elon does things because they are hard, not because they are easy. And true, he doesn’t always have the answer just like NASA in the beginning. They had to create brand new math. Elon seems to have that same spirit and drive. I mean come on. The man created self driving electric cars. We are living in the future but can’t enjoy it because the media told you not too. 🤣
@@msgsgt Exactly. I think a lot of people hate on Musk because they haven’t accomplished much of anything in their own life and they feel envy or resentment towards him for being extremely successful. I haven’t done much either in life but I love and respect the hell out of Musk’s passion and work ethic. He just keeps doing.
Nonsense, they came exactly when the technology was already ripe, nasa in the past had to work with almost no computers or very slow ones, plus nasa helps spacex
@@TravTrevTV Agreed, Going directly to Mars to Earth is quite challenging especially if you are bringing a human. Probably going Moon first is the good stop or a checkpoint for going to Mars.
@@nuruddin1991 well it's kinda true u know, since NASA focuses on everything ranging from aeronautics to space missions to any and all planets in our solar system, whereas spacex is just focused on Mars. Atleast that is what we know
They write deliberate inaccuracies into the script to drive comments, I was chatting to the narrator Simon Alison about doing some work for my employer and he explained how the team behind the channel use contradictions it to drive discussion and somewhere out of that growth I guess?
@@chandankuamr8887 because spaceX isn’t government funded and doesn’t needs hundreds of government appeals and verification. They’re private and don’t rely on the government.
@@sreerajr6470 yes, but the politicians who often don't know anything about space,decide what nasa does, unlike spacex which gets their satellites and astronauts up
Why is nobody talking about Cruptocurrency at this moment? It's on a bull run and a lot of people are defintely gonna miss out on that just like the last time
NASA doesn't say that. For starters, NASA doesn't build rockets. NASA didn't build the SLS or the Saturn V anymore than they have built the Falcon 9, Falcon Heavy, or Starship. In other words, thinking NASA built the Saturn V is no different than thinking NASA built the Falcon 9 simply because they contracted the engineering and development of those rockets out to aeronautics/aviation companies. That's always been what NASA does, so NASA does indeed reuse rockets - because they contract SpaceX for various missions. Though it is worth considering that SpaceX did not get contracted to engineer and develop the Falcon 9 for NASA; NASA just paid them to use their Falcon 9 for various missions.
Whatttt... Starship by itself is insanely weak compared to SLS or Saturn V. If you add in the booster, they could be in the same league. Starship requires in orbit fueling to go to Mars so Starship isn't as good as people think and it's insanely over hyped lol
70% of NASA's budget goes to figuring out new ways to define the borders of the solar system so that Voyager can 'Exit/leave the solar system' by some metric, every 2 years for the next 100 years.
That isn’t so much true actually, NASA actually has a lot of great people and their researchers are coming up with many new and creative ideas for faster and cheaper space travel..even SpaceX hires bunch of people from NASA..we shouldn’t compare them..we should come together and innovate to make the future exciting and inspiring for humanity..
@@NeelTigers Yeah NASA still has bright people and is doing important things. SpacEX is doing only exciting things tho and they’re a private company which just makes them more exciting. I think NASA and SpaceEX working together is great tho
NASA went to the moon, building a vehicle to go to the Moon and Mars in the future, Assembled the ISS, built a reusable vehicle that landed on a runway without coming apart at the end, multiple rovers already on Mars. . What has SpaceX accomplished that is imagination that NASA is not already working on or has done?
NASA is more like researcher facility now rather than having a certain big goal to achieve, yes they have the same goal but innovatively they are not the same
Wait so by the space station traveling at 17k mph means it could be vertically over California at 12:00pm PDT then vertically over New York by 12:17pm ???
I see so many nasa vs spacex comparisons. The fact however is that nasa does not build rockets, but is just a customer to many space companies such as spacex. Would be much better to compare spacex to boeing, lockheed martin, ula etc. For an example: In the case of sls boeing is offering a product to nasa. In the case of starship spacex is offering a service to nasa.
Hmm, interesting how they blissfully overlook the 1st man in space and go straight to the moon landing. I like space - let's acknowledge them all, including the Russians.
@@beluwuga2229 The video is about NASA and space x, the are both American. It's like making a video called BMW Vs Mecerdes cars and the saying didn't you bring up Ford.
@@vincentmcbride6210 Fair point, only, the producer went into the “brief history” & that history includes the failed attempt at beating Russia into space and only focusing on the landing of the moon. Cutting out the main “why” is revisionist history in my view. Hey, I’m not a fan of what happened either, but that’s the truth, let’s face it.
Well that's like someone in Europe in the 13th century saying "Why we even bother to explore America, when we haven't even explored all forests in Europe."
@MI, U And I well there have been many discourses about building cities on the ocean floor etc, or build subterranean cities. We as human race can do these huge projects as well if we really mean it.
@@jacobsmith4453 but the starship,superheavy,f9, falcon heavy and the engines kestral, merlin and raptor were developed with there own money and without this there would be no affordable rockets for buyers or rideshare users however NASA funded the vehicles dragon cargo and dragon crew and funded a new lunar variant of starship plus a dragon xl cargo spacecraft.
Despite popular belief, Elon Musk did *not* found Tesla. Tesla started in 2003 and Musk joined in 2004. A lawsuit resulted in Musk being able to refer to himself as a founder.
A billion isn't much if you want to build a space fleet and fund colonies on other planets. That's why he's hard at work trying to make space travel more affordable.
The opposite is far more accurate. The only thing we know about the development of SpaceX's rockets is from photographs people have taken with telephoto lenses from afar. People have to guess what this or that gizmo is for - and every now and then Elon will Tweet out something - but there is no mechanism through which SpaceX communicates to the public what they are up to. That's fine - they are a private company and have every right to not have a P.R. department. NASA on the other hand - very much has a public relations department, and media have offices at various NASA facilities for them to view and report on the goings on there.
It's a shame. NASA is doing many great things and if it wasn't for them, companies like SpaceX would be further behind and would not have anyone doing the science to learn the impacts of long space flight which Elon brags they will do in just a few years. Also, Some forget that NASA helped fund some of the human flight development which without, SpaceX may be further behind.
The things you say don't always match what's being shown, which is confusing. Like you're talking about SpaceX's moon lander, but you are showing SLS 🤔...
"NASA and SpaceX, two very different companies"... yes totally, not an administrative agency under the executive branch of the United States Government, just a company competing against SpaceX... This is just embarrassing
Some comments here, bloody hell. I don't like when people trying to say which is the better one. Especially when both of them are completely different. This whole cancel culture where people "must" choose one side or another, man...
@@Sinistatnt Elon is way more worried about running out of oil than global warming. He also openly invite people to make more babies because he thinks there are not enough people on this planet. And I strongly agree with him.
@@johntheux9238 Whenever 7 billion humans want somthing at once such as avocados, it ends in disaster. Factories are made to pander to overpopulation and they keep getting g bigger and bigger. Europe is running out of forest, there is a tree shortage in America. WHAT EVEN IS A GOOD POPULATION ON EARTH IF THIS ISN'T????
Lmfao the person who actually think at this point we can "take care" of the earth to the point it can sustain human without us having to colonize other planet is the stupid one
To think that the money spent by these companies over the years could have supplied water and food the the entire world disgusts me. I think we should focus on improving our own planet before finding new ones.
Compare a government agency to a government agency, e.g. NASA vs JAXA, or a private company to another private company, e.g. Space X vs ULA. This is an unfair comparison. Dislike!
I don't know how anyone can contemplate going to Mars before we can tackle the impact to humans we such a flight. NASA is the one doing the research which without, we could not risk anyone's lives to get there.
