NASB HIStory Bible Review 

Thank you!!

Who been lying about as you said this is an honest review

@@claudiabailey5302 Tim Wildsmith. It is now well known that the Publisher knew about all the errors and typos before it went to print. His review video is nothing short of an advertisement for Humble Lamb. The bias in his review is staggering. He cannot be trusted. BBG pointed out most of the errors in question. I was banned from a well known Facebook group for even mentioning that fact. Bibles are big business and these men will protect their interests at all costs, usually by deleting all comments that point out a short coming or flaw about the review they are doing. Randy Brown is the only reviewer I trust as I spend a tremendous amount of money on premium Bibles, as a collector. Now the only question is, who do I see about a refund on my Humble Lamb HIStory that I purchased based on Tim Wildsmith's review?

Some reviewers only say positive things because they want publishers to continue sending them Bibles. They also know how the YoutTube algorithm works so they are the first that pop up if you search for bible reviews@@claudiabailey5302

Me too!!

Thanks Ruby!!

Thank you!!

Thanks! Tim is awesome!

There's an option to get it without the art on the page edges

Thanks Sean! I appreciate it.

Good idea. Are there any specific features you're looking for?

@@BibleBuyingGuideyea I love humble bibles but they have what I want in different versions of their bibles. So I like the lion version kjv but I want the gilt edge painting from the history version where Christ is in the middle…. And I want the ornate drop cap again like in the history version in the lion. Lol

Thanks! It's me. I recorded this with my cell phone and I'm not that good with video. My photos are more accurate. It's actually darker than what HL shows. Here are my photos: biblebuyingguide.com/nasb-history-bible-review/

@@BibleBuyingGuide thanks. Just had a read of your review and colour is more what I was expecting. Think it’s time to put an order in :-)

They need to make that blue and little bolder so it stands out more

You'll like my next video. :-)

In a simpler design, they're placed in the outer margin to keep your eyes from having to gloss over non-biblical text to read the Scriptures on both pages. The Bible text is together and everything else is away from it. That's why the Clarion and Topaz have the layouts they do. I don't think that would matter so much in a design like this one since there's already a lot of non-biblical content within the text.

@@BibleBuyingGuide Thanks for the reply. I’m sure you know a lot more about it than me. :) My main reason for saying that is because having the references in the gutter makes the primary text easier to see, especially near the middle of the book. Ever since I first got a Bible with that layout I have preferred it!

@@MO-bo2du the text is definitely easier to see. Placing them in the margins is excellent for usability because it keeps the text on the flatter part of the page. This is especially important for thicker Bibles with a large bend into the gutter.