Natasha Hausdorff corrects the reporting of the ICJ's Order of 24 May & developments in Rafah 

Natasha Hausdorff has made many valauble points but of cource the BBC do not want the truth, only headlines and viewers. I stand with Israel.

Typical journalism from BBC.

I bet they won’t ask her back,she is far more intelligent and informed than the interviewer

He tries to ambush her with an unrelated incident and as soon as she addresses it, he starts to talk over her then says "but you're here to talk about the law" and not "what happened on Sunday". Disgusting, but it is the BBC. But Natasha shot down all of his gotchas, as usual. How embarrassing for them.

The amazing Natasha Hausdorff. Thank you Natasha for all that you are doing, the sane world owes you a debt of gratitude.

Thank you, brilliant Natasha, heroically standing against evil, lies and hatred.

Rude ..rude..rude..you stop the lady from stating the facts. Bbc👎

BBC guy blown away by facts... no surprise.

Ms. Hausdorff burned your britches bud. She knows what she’s talking about-more than I can say for you. Do your home work.

We have to keep in mind that not only is Christian Fraser biased, but all these legal concepts are way too complicated for him to comprehend.

Nobody lets Natasha finish what she has to say because it's not what they want to hear.

As ever Natasha is in complete command of the facts. Brilliantly prepared. And just generally rather wonderful.

Wow . She destroyed all his talking points

Can the BBC talk about it's fine for Egypt to close it's side of the border to aid and not help refugees from Gaza and the media and protestors are silent??? It's bizarre.

Natasha Hausdorff is a treasure. I can hardly believe he let finish her last points there. Vital points.

The ICJ seems to have no demands at all about the activities of Hamas who are 100% responsible for the war.

Natasha 🙌🙌🙌 schooling the journalists

The BBC ideologues love to cut short guest responses in their feeble attempts to pass off their editorial views as news. Just another flavor of Al Jazeera propaganda. All "questions" are in fact rhetorical, and the sole purpose of the guests is to take criticism without an opportunity for defense. Natasha holds her own as always. She's truly amazing.

God bless and protect Israel, from a South African supporter 🇮🇱🇿🇦

This guy tried hard to dominate the conversation with accusation after accusation. Ms Hausdorf sent him packing.

How does this guy not know medical facilities have been set up in the safe zones?.

Once again, Ms Hausdorff has given a brilliant explanation of the issues being discussed; once again, Christian Fraser has constantly interrupted her while she's attempting to explain these issues.

I hate when they interrupt their guest, just when they're about to make a profound point.

He asked about the strike and then said you're not here to talk about that when she replied 😂 what a small lump of butter

On such an important and complicated issue, it's absolutely absurd how biased the BBC is.

God has blessed you Israel with Natasha Hausdorff.

Love it!!!! Let’s not mix apples & oranges!!!

Very good replies by Natasha despite (at times) continued distraction-type interruptions (unfortunately, as usual!) by the interviewer, who also put undue time pressure on her replies; it appeared that the interviewer simply wished to put an anti Israeli message out, without actually listening to the responses.

❤ how clearly Natasha explains the law in spite of being bombarded by random questions and then being told she can't answer it because she us here to, "talk about the law". Don't ask questions you don't want to hear the answers to.

Christian Fraser should ask about the hostages

Thank you so much, Natasha! Always clear and calm.

Can he talk about the rockets fired at Tel Aviv from this area a couple of hours before?

If you had the choice to hear only one person in this conflict, my vote would be for Natasha. She is great at delivering a calm and intellectual answer that is not riddled with complexities that loses the point. Always clears up any misunderstandings and is overall just respectful to everyone. These are the people worth listening to.

Every time shes on the BBC, she shows them how wrong they always are

"You're here to talk about the law" and when she attempts to go into detail "just quickly". She managed to get her points across anyway because she is very very smart. How she keeps her cool is a total mystery.

Dear Mr Fraser, What is the point of your interview, when it is clear your only purpose is to mislead the public. Did you really become a journalist to do that? The BBC used to be respected worldwide. Not any more. And you clearly do not wish to raise the standard.

in other words, the ICC holds to the belief that Israel has no right to defend itself... what a shock

When hammas took israelis hostages. Muslim says they are heroes. But when israelis fight back. Muslim says genocide. The real problem is in islam teaching..

Your so professional Natasha thanks

He seemed eager to interrupt her before she could even get a thought out there. Very rude indeed. Glad she insisted. She's so polite. Yet tough as nails when she has to be. Very impressed!

Excellent Natasha - well done for putting the biased in favour of Hamas BBC straight!!!!!!!

Natasha Hausdorff is my hero

Well said again, Natasha. You set this reporter right on track albeit he is not bright enough to know that.

Natasha you have the patience of Job, these media mouthpieces routinely interrupt and change course without letting you complete an answer.

Tell Hamas to stop fighting and release the hostages

When the reporter tries to misrepresent the context for the number of aid trucks by using a comparative figure of ALL border traffic before the conflict, ms. Hausdorff instantly picks up this crucial difference and shuts him down. Well done! how often would that kind of factual error just go without correction in most of the media reporting!

Piss poor interviewer constantly talking over the guest.

Well said, Natasha 👏 🇬🇧

would love to see a debate between the two barristers, Natasha and Amal Clooney.....I bet that Ms. Hausdorff would win it easily

Yeah. Will you not interrupt her with irrelevant points n then stop her to tell her why she's there, when she's actually trying to answer your question. Please.

He got owned by facts!

come on Host, when U invite an Expert..U 🤐 !! ...let the Expert talk...!!

Well done for correcting that incredibly rude interviewer.

Natasha destroys people with facts and logic

I like it how he said, "but the same number of trucks were going into Gaza before the war", and she quickly retorted, "except those carried building materials" (for Hama$ tunnels,).

At a recent US Congress hearing, witnesses stated Hamas are taking some of the Humanitarian aid for themselves and imposing a 16% tax on all humanitarian aid. The secondary explosions which Natasha Hausdorff mentioned during this interview was completely ignored by the BBC presenter. It would appear maybe, Hamas was stockpiling their ammunition within or around the the Rafah camp, it would not be the first reported event where they have used the people of Palestine as a human shield. But the BBC presenter simply and quickly brushed that aside.

Haha he didnt want her to say anything besides the answers he was looking for haha

Go Israel, 💯🇳🇿🇳🇿🇳🇿

He is rude and has already asked his next question before allowing her to complete her answer. We have to remember that the BBC has a reputation to keep up. Well Done BBC you are acting as yiu always do! We are still waiting to see the Balen report that you buried!!!!

This woman is so intelligent and clued up that she wipes the floor with anyone that takes her on .

The referenced event is a clear outcome of the human-shield strategy used by Hamas. This is a tragedy that just waits to happen because Hamas commanders not only hide among civilians, but also store ammunition in designated sheltered zones. In this case, the secondary explosions feeding the fire and the intercepted phone conversations provide clear evidence for Hamas’s successful human-shield strategy, which seeks to amplify Gazan’ casualties, and thereby shift public opinion against Israel. It is also notable that the BBC interviewer is twisting the facts and even cites casualty numbers which exceed by several folds the numbers reported by Hamas.

He didn’t want to talk about the strike on Sunday, although he introduced the subject, because Natasha was correcting him on what had actually happened which indicates a Hamas arms dump right next to the civillian safe zone which changes the narrative he was trying to convey.

why do they stop her in the middle of her speaking?

He thought he could throw so much crap st her and she would be overwhelmed but no he found himself lacking, Natasha goes in focussed and comes out clear. Good for her.

He makes me realise that stopping my TV Licence was a very good move.

This lady Natasha is highly objective in her analysis and presentation. She is highly logical.

She’s great… lol his face at the end 🤣🤣🤣🤣🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇱🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇱

More BS from BBC

Natasha is a superb advocate: precise, concise and knowledgeable.

Good to see the biased broadcasting corporation getting a dose of reality and facts

Ms Hausdorff with clarity corrects a political narrative of the BBC.

Thank you for publishing

That was impressive.

You’re great. Good talking points. Just need to make more bite sized

The anchor brings up the fire incident when Natasha tries to state the obvious fact that the strike took place over 1.7 km away from the humanitarian zone ,the same anchor runs her off with the statement that Natasha was only there to speak on the law. Such bias is unbelievable. Not to mention the complete silence on the fire that broke out after the Russian bombing of a civilian area in Ukraine same day

Nice job Natasha , he entered the interview believing he was up to sparring with you , He learned as so many others have !

I have watched a few interviews with Natasha and in all cases the interviewer interrupts her and doesn’t let her finish her points. Same here. Don’t know how she keeps so calm.

The BbC presenter is not listening to this brilliant lawyer

The BBC is only after one thing and that is to undermine Isreal. Nathasha, well spoken! I Admire her calmness and professionalism

My like is for Natasha 👏🏻 not the interviewer ....🇮🇱

Daaamn Natasha don't play. Dude wasn't ready to be hit with facts 😂

She rocks.

The BBC … the UK’s greatest embarrassment. This interviewer, much like ALL BBC interviewers & journalists are completely out of their depth with Natasha Hausdorff. This is WAR, NO cease fire!

Natasha, thank you for standing for Israel!

Despite the disgraceful BBC journalism, Natasha Hausdorff brilliantly delivers the material and the point, as usual. Thank you!

We are watching the wet dream of a Libanese President at the ICJ, in place since february 2024.

What a joke! If she clarifies the media's lies, then better interrupt her!

Natasha you speak so much sense this guy could learn a lot from you

(1602) 🚨 LIVE: Evidence EXPOSES Islamists Behind Rafah Chaos - RU-vid

I hope she writes a book after this is all done, so we can all have clarity regarding what are the facts and not distortions, to put it kindly.

People everywhere, almost whatever the subject and their inclinations towards that subject, have complained again and again about the presenter interrupting after asking a question, and thus not giving time for a comprehensive (and thus comprehensible) answer. It is understandable in the context of a busy bulletin, but this was not one of those. "The Context" is precisely the type of programme that Public Service broadcasters should and are delivering, we just have to look for them. There is no excuse at all in this case, especially interrupting a renowned international lawyer on a matter of international law. We have to be clear, this is nothing to do with Christian Fraser, I've seen him many times on various shows, he is as sharp as a tack. This is the call of the Editors and Producers in his ear. That is where the rot is, and it has been getting progressively worse since the 1980s, to the point now where the Director of the show will have a permanent committee meeting going on their ear. To which I would add that the main qualification to be an Editor or Producer is to be a Guardian reader.

Natasha always expresses herself with such intelligence and clarity...even with the rude interruptions from the presenter.

I admire the patience of this lady. I lost mine months ago dealing with clowns that surround us

At around 4:30 listen to BBC guy say, 'the strike was outside...maybe inside'. Typical attempt to cast some easy doubt on what has been shown to be true - the strike was outside. Watch Natasha's raised eyebrow when she hears this bias!

The bbc being put straight on any subject by a person who knows what they are on about, not exactly a shock I would suggest.

I’m surprised she was even invited by the BBC, who doesn’t give f.. all about facts

Well done Natasha!

Thank you Natasha…brilliant stamina and factual presentation

Apples and oranges. So easily disprove that fallacy of the amount of aid comparison. Natasha Hausdorff, the one and only!

He couldn't hide his annoyance that Natasha easily batted away his every remark.