Тёмный

Naval Academy - Aircraft Carriers 

World of Warships Official Channel
Подписаться 784 тыс.
Просмотров 109 тыс.
50% 1

Provide support using Scouts and Fighter Planes or destroy your enemies using Dive and Torpedo Bombers! Learn more about Aircraft Carriers in this episode of Naval Academy.
Twitter:
/ worldofwarships
Facebook:
/ worldofwarships.na
Want more info? Check out the World of Warships website!
North America Portal: worldofwarships...

Игры

Опубликовано:

 

15 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 170   
@oli3544
@oli3544 4 года назад
I miss the good carrier days like this video
@dohxi3874
@dohxi3874 3 года назад
damn, aircraft carriers were like this. Wish they can send multiple squadrons like the video shows
@YScript
@YScript Год назад
I want old cvs back 😭
@Fighterpilot555
@Fighterpilot555 9 лет назад
I wonder if the Super Carrier ex-Yamato class Shinano will be added into this. They mentioned her previously in developer videos.
@xuanquang9815
@xuanquang9815 9 лет назад
Fighterpilot555 well, they haven't add Kaga and Akagi yet, so dont expect too much
@pakinpoolkaew3933
@pakinpoolkaew3933 5 лет назад
Hiryu&Zuikaku too
@sankyu3950
@sankyu3950 4 года назад
@@pakinpoolkaew3933 they had hiryu but cv rework removed her and tier 7, 5 and tier 9 carrier
@lanz2828
@lanz2828 3 года назад
Likely won’t for while Shinano is nearly the same size as Yamato, therefore the devs would mostly only have to edit the Yamato model in-game, but still this poses a problem for concealment, so when it gets added it’s likely going to go through a lot of changes to find the best concealment.
@frencisshuen1054
@frencisshuen1054 Год назад
​​​@@lanz2828think ot would be good to add her as a premium ship Because many of her characteristics are simular to Hakuryu. And I think we can give her a special abilitly to make her difference.
@stevemc01
@stevemc01 2 года назад
I look back at this vid and the style of playing the planes, and I want these old days I never experienced back… Controlling the air groups is fun, but…
@schoolsundefiable4643
@schoolsundefiable4643 9 лет назад
Fun history fact: The Taiho was hit by an American submariner's torpedo (1 out of the 6 it launched hit). The attack did virtually no damage to the ship. However it cracked a fuel tank designated for fighters. A few hours later she blew up.
@zam023
@zam023 9 лет назад
Schools Undefiable You forgot to mention that the Taiho was undergoing sea trials and thus didn't have a full crew, especially damage control parties.
@Magicannon_
@Magicannon_ 9 лет назад
***** No, this was during the Battle of the Philippine Sea. She was sunk by USS Albacore. You're likely thinking of how Shinano was sunk by the submarine USS Archerfish (with 4 torpedoes).
@1993Crag
@1993Crag 9 лет назад
***** At the time of sinking the Taiho was effectively fully complete, manned and trained. Might want to check your ship there.
@schoolsundefiable4643
@schoolsundefiable4643 9 лет назад
Please re-read what I wrote. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_aircraft_carrier_Taih%C5%8D#Fate everything I said was accurate.
@RelativeGalaxy7
@RelativeGalaxy7 9 лет назад
Schools Undefiable If the attack did almost no damage, why did it explode? That is contradictory.
@tardarsauce1842
@tardarsauce1842 5 лет назад
**Graf Zeppelin is sitting in the corner**
@walkerjoins6420
@walkerjoins6420 3 года назад
so is the akaiga and the kaga
@undrakhgonchig8663
@undrakhgonchig8663 3 года назад
@@walkerjoins6420 do you mean akagi and Kaga?
@victory7996
@victory7996 2 года назад
The old carriers were so much better than the new ones. I dont think anyone likes the change. Please revert the carriers to their original tactical and interesting gameplay.
@Fiasco3
@Fiasco3 9 лет назад
I don't think they realise the heavy casualties taken by torpedo bombers against AA fire. There's a reason later in the war Dive-Bombers became more used. Sure you have a torpedo that's going to do a lot of damage,(Bombs don't do enough presently) but in real-life you'd be lucky to survive the attack run. And here is an advantage to the Japanese Carriers, longer running torps, your planes aren't under fire as long.
@whitedragon1204
@whitedragon1204 9 лет назад
I would love to see Aircraft Carriers VS Aircraft Carriers ONLY.
@SirFelyne
@SirFelyne 9 лет назад
Whitedragonking Ocola Wait for custom battles then :)
@01DOGG01
@01DOGG01 9 лет назад
Whitedragonking Ocola They had a 12v12 CV match. Check the US forums.
@QuantumShock1
@QuantumShock1 9 лет назад
Whitedragonking Ocola I would love to see a no carrier game mode.
@whitedragon1204
@whitedragon1204 9 лет назад
Quantum Shock They do jerk.
@QuantumShock1
@QuantumShock1 9 лет назад
Whitedragonking Ocola >Click on torpeado squadron. >Click on enemy ship. >Profit They don't jerk.
@Cheeseybeaver45
@Cheeseybeaver45 Год назад
Crazy how much carriers have changes since this
@aerospacenews
@aerospacenews 9 лет назад
It would be great to have the choice to change the loadout on your air groups before each match without (instead of) having it be a module purchase requirement. How nice to say "I'll be in attack mode this match" and not be stuck with it in the future without paying to make a change.
@archwaldo
@archwaldo 9 лет назад
AeroSpaceNews.com Oh yeah! it'd also be cool if there's a similar option that can be done in WoT as well. Like the pz4h for example; you can decide whether you'd go for the standard l/43 for orthodox med gameplay, or the 105mm if there are are a lot of low tier enemies - right before the match! OAO
@Avenger2099
@Avenger2099 9 лет назад
AeroSpaceNews.com You can change your modules at no cost.
@aerospacenews
@aerospacenews 9 лет назад
Matthew Moen But only after the initial purchase, right? You can't change from the default configuration unless you first purchase the other air wing package module. Or am I missing something?
@Avenger2099
@Avenger2099 9 лет назад
Oh, yeah, you have to buy the module first; than you can swap between them.
@aerospacenews
@aerospacenews 9 лет назад
That's what I thought. I'd tried to explain the without purchase thing in my OP - just seems kinda uncool to have to pay for it as it is not an upgrade - just a different mission configuration.
@AriePratamaSatriadi
@AriePratamaSatriadi 5 лет назад
2:59 where's the pilot?
@nimarogames8218
@nimarogames8218 4 года назад
Arie Pratama XDDDDDDD
@walkerjoins6420
@walkerjoins6420 3 года назад
its a ghost plane
@afjsns
@afjsns 4 года назад
Old CVs.... you will be missed....
@sirchicken5642
@sirchicken5642 3 года назад
I do really miss the old carriers, they were very fun to play and I still dont understand why they reworked them
@afjsns
@afjsns 3 года назад
Too complicated, half the playerbase couldn't play them, we can't make money off of them
@cuddlebuff
@cuddlebuff 9 лет назад
Thank You guys for these fantastic videos.
@TheZdrack
@TheZdrack 9 лет назад
you forgot to mention the part about how mm screws you a lot as a carrier captain. Enemy carrier has a tier up on you and has fighters? well you're screwed. They have a tier 6 and a tier 5 against your tier 5 and a 4? you're screwed.
@denniswiggins3816
@denniswiggins3816 9 лет назад
Dive bombers need AP bombs with the ability to due citadel hits as an option. They carried them in real life. Also its long past time to restore carrier divisions.
@NotNXTr
@NotNXTr 9 лет назад
Dennis Wiggins AP bombs used to be available back in Alpha, but was taken out. Reasons? only WG knows.
@psychoaztecs
@psychoaztecs 9 лет назад
Maree Printemps game balance i think, but DB is pure RNG like only 1 - 2 bombs only hit.
@GintaPPE1000
@GintaPPE1000 9 лет назад
"United States and Japan" were the first to realize the power of carrier aviation? It was actually Britain. Jackie Fisher had HMS Glorious (I might be wrong on the name) converted to a fighter carrier before any of the carriers in the game were commissioned. And the US didn't realize it until after Pearl Harbor...
@AlexNguyen138
@AlexNguyen138 9 лет назад
GintaPPE1000 Well, the Japanese see the true potential of naval aviation when their world first light carrier Hosho commissioned (built by the British as well), in early Pacific War, Kido Butai (1st Carrier Fleet) considered the world most powerful carrier fleet with 6 large carriers and 4 light carriers with over 400 aircrafts, 1500 veterans and experiences pilots, they utilizing their fast fighter, TBs and DBs and successfully decimated entire British Eastern Fleets (somewhat half of the Royal Navy power) and some Dutch Colonies Navy as well, they're unstoppable, sad to see how Royal Navy has grown weak at end of WW1 and begining of WW2. Prime minister Winston Churchill have to announced that Japanese and their air superiorty and powerful warplanes dominated the sky of Pacific, marking the end of Royal Navy power.
@Goirdy
@Goirdy 7 лет назад
(I realize this is a REALLY late response, but work with me here lol) "And the US didn't realize it until after Pearl Harbor..." That's not entirely true. While the US was still building a few Battleships, They had started putting a lot more effort into Carrier design than Battleship design. That's why the 5th Iowa class wasn't finished and the 6th Iowa class and Montana Class were never built. Hell, the only reason the Iowas were built was because the US felt they needed a response to the Yamato and Musashi, as well as a powerful platform for Anti-Air support for Carriers. That's why the Iowas ended up being the fastest Battleships ever made. To keep up with and effectively support the Carriers. on top of that, the US had plenty of carriers at the start of world war 2. On December 7th 1941, the U.S. Navy had seven aircraft carriers and one aircraft escort vessel in commission. In addition to these eight ships, the keels of five other CVs had been laid.
@jarogniewtheconqueror2804
@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 6 лет назад
They had carriers before Pearl Harbour, you know that right?
@cardiv5zuikaku944
@cardiv5zuikaku944 4 года назад
You know it was US that's the first testing on planes landing on ships
@michaelm9975
@michaelm9975 7 лет назад
Since a number of interceptor/fighter aircraft were capable of carrying rockets and bombs in WWII why cant we modify the individual fighter aircraft? It would be quite nice to have some versatility with the fighter aircraft though.
@Hotsauce1999
@Hotsauce1999 10 месяцев назад
Does aircraft attack on its own when the enemy is near the aircraft carrier, since sometimes you need to use your main gun.
@riojonmejares8996
@riojonmejares8996 6 лет назад
I love aerial torpedo since the IJN were the best at it using the Nakajima B5N
@stuartluo
@stuartluo 5 лет назад
Sad since they removed RTS gameplay :((
@mayz2255
@mayz2255 4 года назад
Though monoplanes Zero hold my beer
@crashstudi0s
@crashstudi0s 9 лет назад
it is rated T? i mean, yes, it got some explosions... and ships sinking and getting fire meaning people dying... but kids play with toy ship on the bathroom and usually play that it is on a storm or sinking...
@ashipnerdoffical4260
@ashipnerdoffical4260 7 лет назад
This needs to be updated. Like, really really badly.
@BasMolenaarSnuckleBuckle
@BasMolenaarSnuckleBuckle 9 лет назад
When will the KM Bismarck be released? This July?
@ISAFMobius18
@ISAFMobius18 9 лет назад
bas molenaar they said during testing, so sometime between now and final launch
@rewesicherheitsdienst1018
@rewesicherheitsdienst1018 9 лет назад
The thing is: Wargaming has a really nice idea to make Profit in WoWs without Premium Ammo. The Bismark will, like the Warspite, be a Premium. The ship class however, will be added to the game as normal Ship. I guess they will name it after it's sister ship.
@veteranassassin4591
@veteranassassin4591 2 года назад
0:22 What is that Soundtrack?
@xuanquang9815
@xuanquang9815 9 лет назад
where are Kaga, Akagi? My Waifu? where are they?
@jarogniewtheconqueror2804
@jarogniewtheconqueror2804 6 лет назад
xuan quang, they died honourably
@yourlocalt72
@yourlocalt72 6 лет назад
xuan quang at the bottom of pacific
@cardiv5zuikaku944
@cardiv5zuikaku944 5 лет назад
Kaga was ingame. _Inferior to Cardiv 5 huhue_ *run
@user-ro9zf9kz1h
@user-ro9zf9kz1h 4 года назад
@@cardiv5zuikaku944 oh, then you may not know that the enterprise is in the game
@cardiv5zuikaku944
@cardiv5zuikaku944 4 года назад
@@user-ro9zf9kz1h already know.
@mauriciocampos3519
@mauriciocampos3519 9 лет назад
Awesome imagens and important info, thanks for sharing.
@Blackleafdragon
@Blackleafdragon 9 лет назад
Hmm the production quality of these episodes is quite high :)
@bukiyouneko9863
@bukiyouneko9863 4 года назад
Has the UI changed? I need to find a video on CV operation because I can't put more than 1 squadron in the air at 1 time!
@incognitotomato9061
@incognitotomato9061 4 года назад
Yeah this video is from before the cv rework.
@premikadevi7207
@premikadevi7207 2 года назад
What about Uss yorktown
@arandombear5665
@arandombear5665 5 лет назад
R.I.P bouge independence essex
@TheSoldo1
@TheSoldo1 4 года назад
Anyone here watching when CV class got screwed
@arandombear5665
@arandombear5665 5 лет назад
We have the HMS Hermès now looks like a actual aircraft carrier
@dabestv
@dabestv 3 года назад
ENTY DA BEST IN MY HEAAAAAAAART
@maciejkarolczak462
@maciejkarolczak462 5 лет назад
What is The soundtrack at 2:06?
@billymurphy4332
@billymurphy4332 5 лет назад
How meny plans has hosho
@Xbox_helldiver
@Xbox_helldiver 4 месяца назад
Id like to play an rts mode of wow carrier v carrier v cruser
@安安-e9j
@安安-e9j Год назад
I NEED RTS CV !!!!!!
@1993Crag
@1993Crag 9 лет назад
I wouldn't say it was US and Japan been the first ones to see the first true advantages of carrier aviation... It was the Royal Navy been the first ones with carriers and the first ones to effectively use them at Taranto (what peal harbor was based off)... Oh thats right, WoWS seems to think even the Russian navy was more important then the Royal Navy...
@DrMacintosh
@DrMacintosh 9 лет назад
Crag_r WoWs is very biased to the US imo. After all, the game is being made by americans. 'Merica
@zam023
@zam023 9 лет назад
Crag_r If the British did see the true potential why didn't they develop and expand their carrier groups. I think that was the whole point.
@1993Crag
@1993Crag 9 лет назад
***** They did... quite a lot.
@denniswiggins3816
@denniswiggins3816 9 лет назад
Eric Melendez game is being made by Russians.
@DrMacintosh
@DrMacintosh 9 лет назад
Dennis Wiggins I heard they hired American devs.
@chrismrugala6696
@chrismrugala6696 11 месяцев назад
i know this video is WAY outdated because the U.S.S. Ranger is not hear and now there are no tier V or VII carrier's there are only tier IV Langley tier VI Ranger Tier VIII Lexington Teir X Midway and Super Carier U.S.S. United states in the tech tree plus the premium carriers.
@n0ideawhattoput
@n0ideawhattoput 5 месяцев назад
I love how u didn’t mention that the play style is completely different and only the tech tree lmao
@freegamers1893
@freegamers1893 Год назад
Where is Akagi and Kaga
@HiddenLoasmo
@HiddenLoasmo 9 лет назад
Please make sure your matchmaker doesnt fuck up as often (matching 2vs1 CV or 0vs1 or even 1vs1 with tier differences!!!) BEFORE enabling even more derps to play these kind of ships!?
@deyvisonteles
@deyvisonteles 9 лет назад
Adicionem mais um novo modelo de porta aviões.(Por favor) Adoro essas classes de navios.
@ghr501able
@ghr501able 9 лет назад
so which is more op though in game
@notcommunist5702
@notcommunist5702 5 лет назад
i also liked to get midway in wows blitz
@GuinnessIsGoodFor
@GuinnessIsGoodFor 6 лет назад
3 Years Later, still waiting for the CV rework ^^
@montanaapproves1044
@montanaapproves1044 5 лет назад
Was it worth it?
@xtrm_7271
@xtrm_7271 5 лет назад
Nope in my opinion since CVs are meant to deal damage and now they are not a great option as it depends on opponents tier or they made the AA in high tier God level
@user-or2ff4tx3m
@user-or2ff4tx3m 5 лет назад
What is the planes like at 1:05 ?
@BlandSpagetti
@BlandSpagetti 5 лет назад
Mitsubishi G4M nicknames Betty by the Americans
@sankyu3950
@sankyu3950 4 года назад
@@BlandSpagetti looks like its a J1N gekko twin engine heavy fighter
@mattkensethfanaccount6365
@mattkensethfanaccount6365 4 года назад
Why was essex removed again?
@SausageWithOranges
@SausageWithOranges 3 года назад
Why were any of them removed? Especially Essex.
@mattkensethfanaccount6365
@mattkensethfanaccount6365 3 года назад
@@SausageWithOranges all I know is it was some balancing thing
@SausageWithOranges
@SausageWithOranges 3 года назад
@@mattkensethfanaccount6365 That would make sense.
@radioactiveboi842
@radioactiveboi842 3 года назад
Please update
@bagelsecelle9308
@bagelsecelle9308 9 лет назад
So in other words, no matter what happen, Japanese always loses to U.S.?? Cause most of U.S. ships totally out play a Japanese ship.... like seriously, Japan ain't weak, they did destroy Asia with ease....
@AlexNguyen138
@AlexNguyen138 9 лет назад
Lelouch Vi Britannia Japanese only dominate half Asia during the early Pacific War (probably somewhere at 1930-1941), most of the countries they invaded are weak, defenseless and lack of resistances.
@bagelsecelle9308
@bagelsecelle9308 9 лет назад
AlexNguyen138 True but still, my point is, if there's a 1 v 1 Carrier match, U.S. vs. Japan, they will lose?? even though the guy using the Jap is a pro or experienced? like seriously.. I think only the Yamato can really match a Montana or Iowa in 1 v 1 game
@AlexNguyen138
@AlexNguyen138 9 лет назад
Lelouch Vi Britannia In the game Yamato can solo any battleships depending on player skills and experience. But irl, Yamato and her sister's design were obsoleted, remember japanese AA guns are poorly design and vastly inferior against Bofors, despite Yamato have tons of AA guns, she only shot down 10 aircrafts, her 18.1 inch turret is big, long range and powerful but the san-shiki shells design were flaws, incorporate with poor qualities materials these shells fire multiple times will damage or explode her turrets. Lack of radar and optics never allow her turret can achieve long range distances. And again these problem in her history were all fixed by Wargaming, she can 1v1 any battleships but depending on captain's skills. Sorry for long wall text.
@bagelsecelle9308
@bagelsecelle9308 9 лет назад
AlexNguyen138 Yeah,only the Japanese Battleship Yamato can really beat a American ship... but U.S. ships in the Game are more powerful even if same tier, like Ohama against the Furutaka
@mariofan1ish
@mariofan1ish 8 лет назад
Back then, maybe. Today? No. The IJN Wins nearly every time.
@captain_noobbg2875
@captain_noobbg2875 4 года назад
I wish i have aircraft carriers in my world of war ships
@theepicthunder4529
@theepicthunder4529 9 лет назад
Give us Bismarck.
@trietnguyencao4280
@trietnguyencao4280 2 года назад
This video by now is basically useless as too much nerf and changes to how you play carriers, now aircraft carriers are just annoying (tho I am a CV main) as you are only able to launch a single squadron per flight. I kinda want their primetime back but then CVs will be too OP making me understand why they made this change.
@raygiordano1045
@raygiordano1045 9 лет назад
Some ocean so your carrier isn't trapped like a rat would be nice. Nobody protects carriers, so a few bot escorts would be great too. Or make them more points so they are worth protecting. I doubt that would work though because I have escorted carriers and it sucks. You get no XP/credits and waste most of your time waiting. Totally predictable spawn points, no time to maneuver, nowhere to run, and no help from the team during the enemy's air attacks makes the match maker's role decisive in who wins the carrier duel. Later as your "team" is busy far away a DD or CA will eventually find you and blow you away provided you survive the initial air attack(s). But who cares if you survive? I prefer to be destroyed since the stupid victory conditions end the game just as it get interesting. I can't count the number of times I am really having a blast and then victory or defeat ends it suddenly. I'd rather get blown away so I can take another ship out and try to have as much fun with it as the major limitations of the game allow. I couldn't care less about the idiotic victory conditions. Domination? Stupid. Besides making zero sense and lacking imagination, the victory conditions and timer assure that you don't have time to maneuver any ships, carriers or otherwise. So the tactics have to be rush in and shoot. Maneuver and you often lose and always score no points. WoWS could be a good game, but from what I have seen from wargaming, they couldn't give a crap about improving their products. Their games provide a fair amount of entertainment, but they don't make new maps, they hate large maps, and the match making algorithm will eventually make you rage quit over and over until you realize that you are burnt out on their games. Unless grinding the tech tree does it to you first.
@oliveirajunior4059
@oliveirajunior4059 9 лет назад
Will have a mobile version?
@iridium_LC
@iridium_LC 4 года назад
den u gone screwd it up
@nevermind3364
@nevermind3364 9 лет назад
im sorry to be mean but why the blody heck do we only get 6 free ship slots i mean dont get me wrong getting people to buy premium currensi is good and all but atleast let us choose to buy a ship spot with premium or non premium where the non premium path is much more like 1 000 000 credits fore 1 ship spot please if nothing else you will get less haiters about the ship capassaty abaut how limitating it is thats all sorry for wasting your time
@lightningflamestrike
@lightningflamestrike 9 лет назад
NVM i like this idea
@RedShirtGuy96
@RedShirtGuy96 7 лет назад
I've had this game for about 5 months and i'm in the tier 9 japanese ships. I still refuse to play carriers. I got into this game to be in a ship shooting other ships with guns. because of this, carriers are not that fun of an idea to me. No i'm not bitching about them in the game. Although they do enjoy some perks that other ship types do not. I'm not saying playing them is no skill, but you have to admit there is just something about being only remote support that takes away a good portion of risk that the other ships have to go through to deal damage.
@darkispace2913
@darkispace2913 9 лет назад
alguien habla español?
@PzGsephy
@PzGsephy 9 лет назад
US carriers are OP as shit
@sandermangelschots8566
@sandermangelschots8566 6 лет назад
Welcome people and u Will be happy to find out manual dropping is gone😁
@geebers_
@geebers_ 9 лет назад
Just a suggestion, but could you guys consider reworking the carrier gameplay? I feels a bit like wot artillery. Also, the carrier is often op or useless, but that's what I've seen. Thanks
@scarcetortillia7004
@scarcetortillia7004 2 года назад
Oh how wrong this was
@hungnhat2602
@hungnhat2602 6 лет назад
One time my Langley have full hp .when my team are losing a destroyers shoot me .. it took My 1/2 hp
@AkigumoCH
@AkigumoCH 9 лет назад
No shinano :(
@AlexNguyen138
@AlexNguyen138 9 лет назад
Neon Dagger She probably somewhere at future second line CVs. No offical information from devs yet.
@kedua2004
@kedua2004 9 лет назад
Neon Dagger maybe shinano is the hakuryu class
@AlexNguyen138
@AlexNguyen138 9 лет назад
m aulia akbar lol, hakuryu is a paper ship. Shinano is Yamato-class battleships that converted to aircraft carrier, read history carefully.
@nickles978
@nickles978 9 лет назад
lol just uploaded
@Kotius_
@Kotius_ 5 лет назад
Later i am gonna research and buy U.S.S bogue
@Calvbread
@Calvbread 5 лет назад
Japanese > american
@congbu7369
@congbu7369 8 месяцев назад
8 year❤
Далее
Naval Academy - IJN Cruisers
6:48
Просмотров 90 тыс.
Naval Academy - Torpedoes
5:03
Просмотров 137 тыс.
Soviet Aircraft Carriers Review | World of Warships
7:25
How to Play: US Aircraft Carriers
3:47
Просмотров 63 тыс.
Sea Smackdown: Gneisenau | World of Warships
15:39
Просмотров 27 тыс.
Naval Academy - United States Cruisers
6:33
Просмотров 137 тыс.
Naval Academy - Types of Shells
5:29
Просмотров 140 тыс.