Hey guys! If you liked the video, we would love for you to share it on social networks like Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, Tik Tok and Twitter.(Since the algorithm is not helping us in terms of views). You will greatly help the Insane Curiosity community to grow and improve more and more our upcoming content. A big thank you from all of us!
NASA admits our axis began shifting in 2010 your moon is rolling wax to wane each night . Your best efforts are sad , speaking as top senatorial investigator your research is bull crap
It's one of two theories:a Nemesis Star,a red dwarf companion of the Sun,or a Nemesis Planet,A Huge Gas Giant Planet with a elongated orbit. Neither have been proven.
sorry but you are extremely wrong , nemesis is no theory , it is our sun's brown dwarf star ....it went past us about 8 months ago , but we are not out of the woods yet ! if we are on the same side of the sun when nemesis rounds the sun to go back out into space , take your protein pill and put your helmet on
All I hear are theories, which will never get proven but still called "science gospel". If you don't follow it you're a heretic. Which means you don't follow the cult of "science" and get burned at the stake of social media, another cult.
Yeah, any star is going to be giving off lots of obvious radiation of all kinds Planets generally reflect radio. How much is dependent on how much the planet receives, absorbs and scatters compared to what gets reflected at us.
The more we learn, the less we know. The fascinating thing about astronomy is with each discovery, scientists are almost always surprised and have to reevaluate their own models. I remember such statements with each observation by the Voyager probes. Not to mention all of the surprises provided by Hubble. Now the James Webb is doing the same thing. How do we know there isn't an object at or beyond the Oort cloud that isn't following the currently accepted rules and models? Makes you wonder if it is worth the time to point the James Webb at the suspected location of the object that is effecting the orbits of the Kuiper Belt?
The stars we see at night, with the naked eye, are within 4000 light years meaning unless they died within the last 4000 years, they are very much still there. Even hyper giants last for millions of years.
@@kananaskiscountry8191 4000 light years is 4000 light years. Light travels at the same velocity no matter where you are (in the vacuum of space). It's the distance that light travels in 4000 years.
Makes you wonder if life would only exist in single star systems. Because we know that single star system seem to be less common, I mean stars systems with suns like ours. Multiply stars would mean more radiation and if one is a red star now you have a much more violent star. I think finding life might be some what common but intelligent life is probably really rare and traveling through space is probably much harder than most people think. Life or intelligent life is probable so rare that it would be almost impossible for them to exist at the same time and then meeting is unlikely.
As far as a red dwarf is concerned, if we kind find Proxima Centauri from Earth 4 light years away, then it stands to reason we should be able to find one 1.5 light-years from us. Yes, it moves slowly, but it certainly moves faster than Proxima dos in our sky, and will be more than 4 times brighter simply because it is closer. Whoa, hold up. 17:42 - "deuterium, which is a lighter isotope of hydrogen" Dittoed by the same sentence on the screen. Yeah, it's lighter than tritium, but it is twice the density of unium, that is H-1, normal hydrogen, which is well over 99% of all hydrogen in the universe. As a scientist and a hydrogen-phile, I object to such a description.
@sexgod57able sometimes sure, but it also flings some into the inner solar system. jury is out if it's a net positive or not. thinking about it logically I would think a very slight positive, but not a huge one
@@nostrum6410 I'd argue having four large outer planets, an arrangement which seems rare in our known universe, may have uniquely shielded the inner ones giving time for life
I've got a strange question: What if all the mass in the Oort cloud was pulled to one point at the outer edge of the Oort cloud? How big of an impact on Earth? And how big of a strar would that be?
5:40 Only in a pure technical sense is Proxima Centauri part of the Alpha-Centauri star system, in that it's gravitationally bound. To look at the star, one needs to aim one's telescope in a different direction -- two degrees away from Alpha Centauri, four lunar diameters. One could aim in a different direction from Alpha Centauri if one chose to go to Proxima Centauri. 13:40 Wikipedia gives the mass of EBLM J0555-57Ab as about 1/12 solar mass. 20:00 I'm going to think the best of Arthur Clark and assume that science progressed after the book was written. Turning Jupiter into a star is way, way off.
I mean..i really feel like something like this would explain why venus is upside down and why uranus is turned the other way too its like something literary came thru and knocked the planets crooked
We probably did at some point. Stars are born in stellar nurseries of many gravitationally bound stars that are eventually scattered by their unstable tidal interactions. It's easy for stable binary systems to form. Common. However syzygy, a stable 3 body orbit is a very rare occurrence A stable 4 body system is virtually impossible. At least, incalculable and has never observed. The sun certainly formed in one of these stellar nurseries that scattered about 4bya. Not all stars retain a companion/sibling star. Stars like the Sun. Science.
If nemesis was a star, we would have seen it. The closest star apart from the sun is Proxima Centauri. Now, if Nemesis is a brown dwarf, then it doesn't deserve any more attention. It doesn't affect us in any way. I personally don't believe it exists.
nasa photographed nemesis in dec. 1983 with our space probe called I.R.A.S. the story made front page of the washington post ...the main problem is that people dont have a clue that nasa is run by the nazis of wwii ..and nazis tend to not always tell the truth ..that's what the nasa nazis do
It wasn't. It was just a story about possible anomalous gravitational effects on some Oort cloud objects. It was also a long time ago before anything whatsoever had been to space. Did you bother reading the story? Astronomers around the world have been scouring the skies in increasing numbers with continuously advancing technologies for the 70 years since then and still have nothing but some possible anomalous gravitational effects on some Oort cloud objects. There may be another planet out there, I think it would be cool if there is, but wishful imagineering isn't objective evidence. Science.
It wasn't. It was an article about astronomers detecting some possible anomalous gravitational effects on some Oort Cloud objects. Did you bother to read the article? It was a long time ago before anything whatsoever had been to space from earth. Astronomers have been scouring the skies in increasing numbers with continuously advancing technologies for the 70 years since that article was written and have only detected some possible anomalous gravitational effects on some Oort cloud objects. There may be a planet in a distant, long period orbit around the Sun. I think it would be cool if there is, but wishful imagineering isn't objective evidence. If you want to know if it exists become an astronomer/cosmologist and get access to the most advanced astronomic technologies to look for it yourself. You just might be the one to find it. That would be freaking awesome. Science.
I used to lay on my porch a lot and look at the night sky..now that I'm seeing this, I wonder how many times in those moments have I looked at what has been responsible for earths mass extinxtions. Also, I wonder what the response would be during the next mass extinction with what advancements weve made by then.
Seems like a supernova would be needed to form all the heavier than iron elements present in the solar system. A larger, more massive binary partner to the sun that eventually went supernova?? All the theories mentioned in the video don't explain how the solar system obtained the heavier than iron elements.
They're not mutually exclusive. God created stars and set The Universe in motion. Stars go super nova and release heavy elements. Reform as smaller stars and new solar systems. Happens again and again.
@@sexgod57able Certainly entitled to your opinion. Appreciate the fact that you were courteous and respectful. After all, can't expect to be treated with courtesy and respect when you're not willing to give it to others.
Why didn't a full sky survey, with Infrared Telescopes ever find Nemesis? BECAUSE it does not exist! I'll be frikken dead, before there is a Nemesis! 😂
@@lujanana We would know if there was a brown dwarf within several light years of our solar system, let alone one orbiting the sun at any distance. Any object within 20ly engaging in gravitational fusion at any scale would be a glaring source of electromagnetic radiation, impossible to miss.
When you do the math, you'll find that even at its maximum distance, Nemesis would still be within the confines of the Oort Cloud and well within our solar system. The Oort Cloud itself is believed to extend from about 0.03 to 1.2 light-years (or more) from the Sun. A light-year is a vast distance, and even a very elliptical orbit would likely not take Nemesis beyond this range if we're working under the constraints of the 26-million-year orbital period. If it existed even if it was an old brown dwarf WISE telescope can and would detect it. It detects nothing. The theory is considered to be debunked.
The existence of a large dark object beyond the edge of the Solar System would explain the anomalous readings I have been receiving in my astronomical studies. If I am reading them correctly, it does not bode well for humanity on Earth in the near future.
There are a lot of scientist that don't understand science. I am one. I have a degree that says I'm a scientist somewhere around rocket type. I love science. I study, I learn. Sometimes I make observations, most are wrong, but until or unless someone comes along with absolute proof to unset my findings, my findings are firm.
@@satanicmicrochipv5656 - So, you're saying that controlling carbon emissions will ensure a stable climate if a large asteroid impacts Earth. Hmmm. Interesting. I'd like to hear more on how, exactly, you came to that conclusion.
@@satanicmicrochipv5656 - you replied "no it isn't" to my suggestion that controlling carbon emissions will not guarantee a stable Earth climate in the face of solar system or extra planetary events that will have a much greater impact on Earth's climate.
@@Texas240 You didn't say anything about catastrophic cosmic events. Were you trying to say that protecting the environment we depend on from a home made extinction event is pointless because Nibiru or whatever is coming to get us anyway, or that climate change/global warming is being caused by this phantom star hiding behind the sun, not by atmospheric GHG saturation? Of course there's no way to counter the atmospheric effects of a global impact event, silly. But we can control our emission of GHG's negatively effecting the current global atmosphere, just in case all this Nibiru/Nemisis stuff turns out to be BS. Right?
And in theory, if there was a nemesis star twin of the Sun, it would not go through the solar system because if it was linked to a lot of cataclysms it would cause all of the planets to go out of orbit. So in theory it would be outside the solar system and outside the orc cloud if anything
It IS possible, however, for our sun to have a cold twin after 4 billion years, one that went nova 65 million years ago. It is further possible that said dead star was pushed closer to our sun 780,000 years ago which started our interglaciation periods
The sixth Sephira, in the Kabbalistic "Tree of Life," corresponds to the Elohim- (or Exousiai-) hierarchy (Creator of the ego); as a deity it corresponds to YHWH; in the solar system (as a heavenly body) it corresponds to the Sun; of the planetary angels it represents Michael; as a system of man it represents the "superego," or rather the divine spark of the ego; in the elements it represents air/light-ether etc... The sixth Sephira has a malevolent counterpart; reverse reflection; It represents the fallen Elohim-hierarchy (creator of the body, Yaldabaoth); as a deity it represents Moloch-Baal; within the solar system its counterpart is the Moon/Saturn, and outside the solar system (as a heavenly body) it is matched by a "failed sun" (brown dwarf), whose deity is the solar demon Sorat (who don't incarnate as a human); of the planetary angels it represents Samael; and as a human system it represents the fallen (luciferian) ego; In the elements it represents polluted air (smoke)/and lack of light (darkness) etc... Both the sun and the failed sun were born from the same original nebula.
@@Lund.J As were we all. Born from a nebula created by a super nova made from a massive star that was made from a nebula that was made by a massive star... ..all the way down to you, and me, and everyone alive right now. And every single living thing spirals just like the planets, and the galaxies. Fractalverse.
@@TheRotnflesh No, it isn't The nebula of stellar material and the stellar remnant would still be obvious after only 65my. However, our solar system is currently inside the bubble of a much older super nova remnant that's older than our Sun. Old enough that it's stellar remnant has cooled to the point it is no longer radiating detectible amounts of energy, is an undetected black hole or was ejected from the nebula by the force of the super nova. Any super nova within 100ly at any time in Earth's past, or future would blow off the atmosphere and boil the oceans into space. The Earth was hit by a gamma ray burst that caused the "Great Dying" extinction event hundreds of millions of years ago, but the super nova that generated it was in another galaxy.
What would happen if we found out that the Sun and Alpha Centauri orbit around each other with Proxima being exchanged between them over periodic episodes of time?
What about the 1980's NASA's Iris probe that did find a red planet that was named Nibiru and after that, all mention of it was deleted! This is also depicted in Egyptian writing as a a sun with flaming wings!
there is an order in the universes, some natural and others are variables caused by a phenomenons that have a history, we can track, all other is just a theory true science repeats itself all else is speculation for what we don't know " yet" but it will all be in the Order whether we understand ir not...all notes given are important think outside of the box, so to say
The sun was created in a stellar nursery, like almost basically every star. Not only would the sun have a twin, but would also have many other siblings. The issue is that we haven't found them yet.
Go to Mathew Lacroix website, he still has the information from the 1980s about it, and the 2 scientists that came out with the information both magically died from extreme aggressive throat cancer shortly after. There is writing about our 2nd sun in several ancient cultures from around the world. It's what I believe Adam's calendar in South Africa, serpent mound, gobeki Tempe in turkey just to name a few ancient megalithic sites are tracking. Don't forget to date them by the alignment of the stars and true north. Not the B.S. time-line of the elites that want us blind to what's to come.
Suitable for colonization except Europa. As stated in the novel. If jupiter were to have been aided by astronomical engineering by an intelligent unknown power, anything smart enough to transmutate jupiter into a star, would also be smart enough to consider and thus, avert the cosmic consequences of that transformation.
Nice enough video, but deuterium is NOT a lighter isotope of hydrogen! Hydrogen has ONE proton, and NO neutron(s) in it's nucleus. Deuterium has one proton and one NEUTRON, making it (almost) twice the mass of hydrogen. (Both isotopes have only one electron, accounting for the "almost twice the mass" difference. A third isotope, tritium, has one proton and two neutrons. This is first year of high school stuff.
The increased gravitational effects of Jupiter having the extra mass necessary for gravitational fusion would drastically effect Jupiter's orbit and have drastic effects on the orbits of the planets between it and the Sun and alter the orbits of the planets beyond Jupiter's orbit as they stabilize into orbits around the Sun/Jupiter gravitational vericenter. Then there's the extra radiation/energy/stellar material being added to the solar system. If the "Jupiter star" was closer to the Sun, like the orbit of Earth/Mars, or further out, like the Oort Cloud it's gravitational effects would be more hospitable to stable planetary orbits including within the "Goldilock Zone".
The Dogone tribe in Africa have legends of celestial visitors from proxima centauri and they knew of the 3 stars making up that system even though 2 of those stars arenr visible to the naked eye
@@PathtoYahawah No. Their knowledge of Sirius most likely came from contact with Europeans, probably from the authors of the original paper that served as the basis for _The Sirius Mystery._ For example, there’s no evidence that the knowledge of the Sirius star system was part of Dogon mythology before the 1920s; Sirius B was discovered in 1862. Google “dogon sirius mystery” for details.
@@diogeneslamp8004Yes. They had a completely spoken history. No writing. They told stories of their ancestors like The Native Americans did. In their origin stories they knew about the three star system that we didn't prove until 100's of years later.
@@sexgod57able They played back to the first Europeans the tale of Sirius, which had been discovered by European scientists within the prior 50 years. The anthropologists who published the story of the astronomical beliefs of the Dogon people weren’t the first Europeans with knowledge of the Sirius system that they encountered. The source of their knowledge isn’t as cut and dried as you make it out to be.
What's the Oort cloud? Another "theory" that's being called "science fact"? When it's proven I'll believe it, not until then. All I hear about the universe is all theory, which keeps changing just like evolution.
@@davidmundy2906 Tell me you skipped science class without telling me you skipped science class. Let’s say science has an explanation for something, based on the evidence that was at hand at the time, that is now contradicted by new evidence. Should science develops new explanation that incorporates the latest information or should it hang on to the old explanation just for the sake of continuity?
Lil facts that is real. The solar system bobbles up and down every 30 min years and even though we are 2 mil years in that means we are 10 light years up, gleis the red dwarf is coming 3.81 centimeters per year so it will take about 5 mil years.
Rev 13 18 let him who understands calculate the number. Adding and subtracting to calculate the number appears to write many things that are or could be true. It tells of Nemesis and Nibiru and this end of times. All you have to do is add the numbers of each word to make sentences. ........ As an example...20 15 76 This is code 56 28 27 111... Being gematra 37 74 Being simple, 37 74 Being English, 37 74 Make lines of a 30 59 21 1 sentence each add 85 17 9 111 as way to be 20 49 35 7 knowing 6 6 6. / 93 18 Dual suns? 38 73 A Dwarf Stsr? 1 52 58 This pass 56 55 by Nemesis 27 84 perihelion 111 harms Earth. 59. 52 On a fate of Man... 29 1 32 21 28 Earth dying; 52 59 Time has come 47 28 36 for saving 39 72 Humanity. 111 Heaven will 55 56 let the Meek be 37 33 34 7 Heaven lifted 55 56 until to 76 35 coming when 61 50 Earth of change 52. 21 38 becomes way 62 49 more habitable. 51 60
Proxima Centauri B has its own Aliens living in that twin system. In fact they have reached our planet Earth in the year 1961-1962 and met Sps Barney and Betty Hill from New Hampshire USA.
Maybe if we fly far enough away from our solar system we will see the second star in the past since we see all the past stars when we look at stars in the sky. 😂
how did they know its a girl star??did they see a vagina inside the star??and f our star has a sister star i wonder whre s the parents of our sun??and how big the parents of our sun??🤔🤔
Jupiter a brown dwarf?! No, just gassy. Jupiter may be ‘large’ (to us, at least) but it also has the lowest overall average density. Earth, as beautiful as it is with its white fluffy clouds, is overall the densest average body in our solar system (other than the behemoth that birthed everything else). I believe we are then followed by Venus, Mercury, and Mars... I love writing an entire lovely comment just to be eclipsed by the end of the video.
the name Nemesis is the only part of this video that is true ..all the rest is a great big lie told to you by a paid liar who's coning you like a goddamn snake oil salesman ...if you notice all that was said about Nemesis was in the first 3 minute that this paid liar said is a myth .that is a delibrate
is there any possibility that the sun ate its twin long ago but the gravity well from that twin still exists, or the leftover from that star became some if not all the gas giants?
no! nemesis is real ! nasa in dec. 1983 took pictures of nemesis with the space probe called I.R.A.S. that had binocular set of infrared camera lens ..nemesis is a huge ball of molten iron left over from the forming of the sun ..nemesis can only be seen in the infrared spectrum ...my cousin was contracted by nasa to develop the infrared lens on the cameras ...i remeber we had a big family blow out to celebrate cousin larry's success in capturing nemesis on film .. the story made headline new on the front page of the washington post world wide ..SEE HOW FAST "THEY" CHANGE HISTORY ON YOU KID
@@donniebaker5984 nice I was just trying to go through experiments of how both being real and not there anymore could work. Just wondering where did they find it at in relation to the sun and planets?
@@donniebaker5984 Bonjour le télescope James Webb a spécialement été conçu pour observer " cet objet " , qui est probablement une naine brune en effet 👍
You can't have a gravity well without a mass to create that gravity. Nemesis, or whatever causes the disturbance every 26 million years, gravity is out near the kuiper belt. So, a long LONG way from the sun, much closer to the edge of the solar system than to the sun.
