They should have also included one theoretical physicist in the panel. As Janet said, particle physics is progressing due to cyclic nature of experimental and theoretical discoveries. These experimental physicists did not know much about what theoretical physicists are up to.
The Dirac equation developed by Paul Dirac actually predicted antimatter a year earlier in 1928 since it came out before the discovery of the positron in 1929. Sad to see that detail missed and one directly related to the solutions being thrown away because "they aren't physical" yet they actually were physical other than that I think it was fairly good.
Stephen Hawking said in his "A brief history of time", 2005 edition, p.111-112, and also in "Nature of Space and Time" 20l0 edition, p.53-59, that an electron moving on a closed loop in an electric field is equivalent to two oppositely charged particles accelerating away from each other in Minkowski space. If you take this literally, not just as an analogy, then there is a natural answer to the question why no anti-matter have ever been found except during particle collision in a cyclotron, and why a particle and its anti-particle so generated are so short-lived.
Before I watch this video. "Scalable Aether Universe"! Aether's CW vortex is Matter/Electrons. Aether's CCW vortex is Mass/Positrons. Where these vortices combine into Hyperboloids is Zero Point/absolute zero/"Condensate of Universe"/Neutrino. Neutrinos are oscillating Inertial planes.
Weren't Majorana particles discovered in 2018!? Meaning that it is no longer a fact that everything has an antiparticle partner. Shou-Cheng Zhang and a team of scientists working in conjunction with him actually found the Majorana particles (he referred to them as the "Angel particles" because of the lacking antiparticle).
Do we ever get an answer regarding where Fermi mysteriously disappeared to during Winslow’s Enrico Fermi bio that was going to be answered before the rank amateur host interrupted him for no good reason. I’m 25 min in now and nothin so far. I don’t expect a Brian Greene or Sean Carrol every event, but the person hosting / “guiding” conversations is what I’d expect from a reasonably competent but inexperienced and shy high school student in the debate club...
The Sky is Blue. What does that tell you? Spirituality exists. I find this has a wonderful tempering effect on the Scientific Data. In my 51 years of searching for Spiritual truths, the only one that I know of that mentions anti-matter is the Bhagavad Gita.
I haven't started the video yet, but I was just over on Janet Conrad's Wiki page and it says she helped with an inexpensive tabletop muon detector? If we had one of these things at every home, we could turn the world into one gigantic muon detector? 🤔🌍Hmmm.....
Watched for 50 minutes and still not quite sure why 10^26 years is the meme. E: I guess neutrino decay in which Fry is his own grandfather, I loved that Futurama episode.
No one said anything about how neutrinos interact inside the human and animal when breathed in or is this another video? Despite of exciting video...made my mind wonders far and wider. If ghosts interact within and outside of our bodies then neutrinos which comes from sun then we can then absorb neutrinos, no? If yes as in “we do absorb neutrinos...? Would it explain types of emotions and behaviors of human beings and nature that at times is looked at as violating natural and balanced laws (Serial killers for example). And a fruit tree that produces tomatoes? Thank you.
This is unreal. The video starts with the claim that anti matter was a surprise, not expected at all. On the contrary, it was predicted by Dirac from his famous equation for a relativistic electron - one of the greatest results of the 20th century physics - it required the existence of the anti electron, or positron as we call it. This is the first thing that a student learns in a relativistic quantum mechanics course. Although every experimentalist show know it - I have never met before anyone who did not - it shows that you also need a theorist on such a panel. I for one never fail to speak about the great work of Dirac even in my public talks, since his prediction of anti matter is arguably a beginning of modern elementary particle physics and a glorious example of a surprise that a theory may carry, an analog of say black holes that Einstein theory of gravity predicted.
I really hope the moderator won’t keep interfering and babystep holding hands through every concept, we all know what the double slit experiment, the standard model, quarks, and the basic principles behind quantum theory.
Agreed, but they also have to break it down for introductory purposes too. Making it relatable and understandable. Scientific interest cant have a high bar of entry otherwise we get... Well, we get the American south lol
@The Truth of the Matter "Neutrinos, Matter, and Antimatter: The Yin Yang of the Big Bang". Yeah, that's totally a topic for a layman who does not know physics. Typical popcorn stuff. Next on World Science Festival: "Calabi-Yau manifolds in String Theory". Moderator: "And what is a manifold?". Science populariser: "Manifolds are like spaghetti or doughnuts, but multi-dimensional". Layman: "I know -kungfu- String Theory!"
Maybe the journey from mater to antimatter can't be seen in liner time & in fact each intersect on that graph represents a particular dimension in our multiverse & the vibration rate is equal to variations in history due to entropy or something
Kick out a electron have chR=13.6*e energy equal to me*c^2/(2*137^2), me=9.109*10^-31 electron's mass, equal to a positron as a hole in negative energy sea ch=2*3.14*A*me*c^2/137(A=5.29*10^-11 Atom's radius) which equal to 299792458*6.626*10^-34/(4*3.14*5.29*10^-11*137)=chR.
due to anti-matter haveing an oppisite charge, would it act differntly to electo-magnatism and would that effect that combonations these molicules can produce?
Maybe we live on the matter side of a chart mapping the journey from nuteno 2 antinutrino making the journey from one to another make the each integer representing entire Multiverse
Wow, a lot of women in this panel. We all know men outnumber women in STEM fields at least 10-1, so seems like this group may be seeded for politics more than actual scientific value.
What does she mean about not knowing if a neutrino or anti neutrino was detected based on the lack of magnetic field at detector? I thought neutrinos were, well, neutral, so they wouldn't be affected anyways... @ 20:20
I think it’s because when it interacts with matter, it would produce an electron or a positron depending on wether it’s a neutrino or anti-neutrino. Thus it’s not the neutrino per se that is detected, but the product of the interaction, which are electrically charged and so detectable with a magnet. At least that is what I understood of the presentation.
@@spacefreedomfighter1897 It looks like the detector she is part of, IceCube, uses Chernenkov radiation to indirectly detect neutrinos--so that makes sense.
Matter = Energy (E=MC2).....Destroyed is the wrong word. When they say "annihilate", they mean the matter and/or antimatter is converted to energy. In the end, the total amount of matter AND energy is the same, it just changed form. With a big bang !!!
Are we basically getting better? you know, like over the length of the last seven-thousand years of time? 'Not' 'Duh?' and 'Yes' are the only answers accepted 🧐
We DONT want to listen about basic principles of physics or math. All who watch this channel sick and tired of this primitive explanations. We came here to see new ideas and understand some recent discoveries.
Vladimir, don't forget that in the United States half the population is scientifically illiterate (close to 50% of disbeleive the Theory of Evolution, and The Big Bang Theory, often in lieu of childish, absurd myths). The clearest symptom for the ignorance and gullibility of Americans is seen in the election and support of a corrupt buffoon as their leader. As for me, a humble "scholar of the universe", I have learned valuable new ideas and understanding from this learned panel. BTW, don't assume that your hyperbole speaks for ALL viewers as you have declared.
@@jrhunter007 I have to agree with you. It was said from my subjective perspective. It is not interesting for me, but ,probably, could be useful for others.
Who is the "we" to whom you refer? As a n intelligent and interested non-scientist, I appreciate the "primitive" explanations. Perhaps you are not WSF's target audience, but I am sure there are sources and channels which produce material more suited to your more advanced knowledge/technical baseline.
Amazing how limited as observers we are and humble we are not. More specifically, observers limited by the interactions of photons and matter alike who are comically attempting to explain a universe wherein 99% of it is beyond their ability to observe it. Observers who they themselves can't even explain their own origin and existence! If one were to make an attempt to understand how we may appear to the next greater observers above us but still very far beyond our best imaginations we are collectively a 1 legged duck surrounded by a sphere of an infinite Sea!
Very interesting and thanks for the response seems these days intellectual conversation on social media can be very illusive! I would like to point out that for you to have such an awareness and understanding of anything it had to at some point be observed during it's cycle and within it's local environment. Regardless if that either are classified within CM or QM because at the fundamental level all that exists is information. Furthermore, and unfortunately for us its very possible that even mathematics is merely an emergence from another layer of information that's completely unknown, not observable and unimaginable to us. Biological observers and their technological counterparts have limited understanding of their reality. A constraint thats unknown and directly related to how they observe and decode the available information within their reality. More specifically, a reality wherein the observers understanding is merely an illusion masking it's true nature. Which I have labeled The Observers Paradox!
What if there are very many independent observers who happen to be creative and imaginative and who cross check and review each others work. That's one way to move the boundary of our limitations .
The Search For TRUTH Often we have heard from those who seek to know TRUTH in scientific ways by verifying theory based on rather short-sighted information. “Where pride is, there also shall be reproach: but where humility is, there also is wisdom.” [Proverbs 11:2] “And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be humbled: and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.” [Matthew 23:12] The search for TRUTH cannot be ultimately determined by limited information confirming limited theories. As a specie, we humans will never know all there is to know about TRUTH. For as one door opens, we find illumination shining under a multitude of closed doorways each one ready to be opened into the beautiful light of new discoveries and new doorways- a very exciting, never ending process! Our Creator began our universe, and possibly an uncountable number of other unique universes, within the Infinite Eternal Conscious Bliss of its own BEING. Thus, every form of energy is known by and communicates its unique being with its Creator. All that manifests lives within the infinite awareness of its Creator. All forms of life “swim within” and are totally dependent upon the will and consciousness of the Creator. Our Creator has endowed innumerable life forms with free will to make responsible decisions for which they are held accountable. Each created set of species live within a unique universe governed by unique interwinding laws at various levels of awareness, and each specie will have the opportunity to eventually pass through “the narrow gate” into a very special “mansion” in paradise. “In my Father’s house there are many mansions. If not, I would have told you: because I go to prepare a place for you.” [John 14:2] The being who says that it is not necessary to have faith in our Creator searches with its head in the quicksand to discover a very limited spectrum of “sandy truth”- missing the limitless vistas of possible discoveries in the world above his/her created quicksand-filled hole. And so let us bow before our Creator giving Praise, Adoration and Thanks for the unmerited gift of grace- of living awareness that IAM bestows equally upon each one of us. We have but to love our Creator and our neighbours as we are loved unconditionally-treating all with patience, gentleness and kindness! “Be you therefore perfect, as also your heavenly Father is perfect.” [Matthew 5:48] That is our challenge and our destiny- the choice is yours.4
Yeah, yeah... It's just Manicheism. Every culture in the entire universe has invented things viewed as all black or all white with no nuances in between.
I feel they all have a childish compulsive urge they are suppressing to put their knees to their chest and kick one leg and foot unto the floor and spin on the chair yelling "weeeeeeeee!"
