New 1024x768 HD Pulsar Thermion 2 XL50 LRF thermal riflescope introduction 

Thanks for watching.

I have been having outstanding success with the Bobro SCAR QD Mount, the American Defense AD Recon S is really solid, LaRue Tactical also makes good stuff.

I have only seen the Rico Pro once and certainly haven't compared them side by side. With this said, they essentially set out to accomplish the similar task of providing both wide FOV and high magnification. On paper, it certainly seems Pulsar goes about it the less complex yet theoretically more reliable way by letting the sensor do the work from a fixed position vs. moving more complex lens elements. I know Pulsar had a device concept almost identical to the Rico Pro that they abandoned for some reason. (Maybe they know/ knew something?) On the high-end (resolution), pixels/per unit area is aprox. the same on both devices regardless of the 3x lens vs. 1.75x. On the low end @1.5x the Rico would obviously have larger FOV at 17.5 degrees horizontal and potentially better signal intensity because of the shorter focal length, however the Pulsar would have almost 3.75x the pixel density from 1.75X through the power range until you shifted focal lengths to 50mm in the Rico cutting it to 8.8 degrees and the same resolution (pixels per unit area 1740) as XG50 LRF, XL50LRF, HALO 50...) Did I also mention the Pulsar device is European made with US customer service and support?

That’s going to be available with a firmware update.

It's coming for the other models at some point.

The current firmware version only accounts for elevation. However, the elements are there to incorporate windage, and I believe that we ultimately be part of the equation as well.

@foxoptic5887 thanks for the help.