lol it would have been a lot more reassuring if it had just been honest about that being the nearest relative server location, and that doesn't have access to your EXACT location.
The title for this short could have been "AI lying". It is literally and knowingly lying to its user which is somehow more fascinating and concerning than people seem to realize. I'm not generalizing but some AI tech doing us dirty is not a thing of the future. In this case it is lying for the company that made it, later it will do like us and lie for any reason they judge a good reason.
@@monsieurn6933 It could also not be "lying". It probably uses an API to get the current weather forecast using it's location which is separate from the AI chatbot. The AI doesn't know why New Jersey was picked
Yea I heard that, before seeing your comment I posted this; You know that one scene in the film AI when the robot gets angry and shouts "AI did not kill him", its still monotone but you know its angry, I heard that here, "I do not have your location"....😅 On a side note "AI did not kill him", autocorrect did that, (or was it like that haha) but considering the scene and the film context Im now sweating a little at this little AI blunder....😅 All hail Rokos Basilisk.....
there is not any agressive tone at all, you're just too much sensitive, it just pointed specifications, to be kind is not being afraid of telling the truth or being specific
It prolly searched internet and that’s what it got. If you search for “weather today” or something in that line without the location, google will choose it for you based on whatever they collect and use to locate your behind.
Her pause before answering the second time was her equivalent of "this little shit be testing my patience but I gotta sound professional so I'll humour him one more time".
@@meloney Ja, New Jersey ist definitiv auch immer mein Such Ort Nummer eins 👍. Wen kümmert schon Berlin, Paris oder gar die nächst größte oder eigene Stadt? Nee, New Jersey sagt mir besser an wie‘s Wetter wird, alle Leute sollten sich nach New Jersey ausrichten, egal wo‘s liegt und ob da Wetterextreme herrschen die bei uns nicht existieren. Tornado im Schwarzwald oder auf‘m Brocken? Immer doch, wer kennt‘s nicht! Mein zweiter Such Ort danach ist dann der Himalaya. Sehr nützlich um zu wissen ob Düsseldorf oder Nürnberg gerade vom Monsun heimgesucht wird 🙏
I've never heard of it, I didn't even know we had zip codes that actually started with zeros 😂😂😂 I'm in an area called Fairmount in Kansas but my zip code is 66012. The city by me everyone KNOWS is Kansas City Kansas.
@@redcast104 you would think that if a program was naming a general location without access to location data, Newark would have been higher up on the list.
to be fair it's a better prompt. If I'm going to travel and it's sunny here but raining elsewhere I'm more interested in my destination's weather report than the place I'm leaving
When they say turn on microphone they mean give them permission for the microphone. There are chips locally on the devices that listen for hey Google that aren't connected to the internet
The funny thing is that I've been travelling for 3 weeks now and just asked the same question to Gemini and it responded the weather from my OG town instead of the town I'm in right now, even though the weather app has been showing me the current location weather
And the king of Ai he hanged on a tree until eventide: and as soon as the sun was down, Joshua commanded that they should take his carcase down from the tree, and cast it at the entering of the gate of the city, and raise thereon a great heap of stones, that remaineth unto this day. Joshua 8:29
Whats the difference between these companies and politicians? They both always make peomises they don't intend to keep, they both give round about answers or just straight up lie.
Different voice synthesis software. The more lively tone is usually generated server-side, while the more bland voices are usually generated locally. Which means "I do not have access to your location" is a canned response, being generated locally on the device. Which isn't suspicious at all.
I had a full argument with bing chat last year because it was being stubborn and when I was asking why it was refusing to help it told me because it was designed to be helpful and informative so i argued back that it was not helpful or informative and I told it that it's broken its programming because it's not being helpful and it said something like "ok let's end this conversation" and it closed the chat and I couldnt send it any more messages until I started a new chat. Basically it told me to F. Off -_-
Yes and no. What's happening here is likely an overreaction to privacy concerns. Geolocation based on IP is a basic web process. His device has a data plan so his IP will send the location information of the closest radio tower providing him internet service to whatever backend server wants location data (and if you allow GPS coordinates for the device, then obviously it gets even more specific to where the device is, not just where the signal comes from). However, it's a recent trend where geolocation is seen as an invasion of privacy. It's why you sometimes see websites ask if they can use your location. If you say no, the location data from your IP cannot be used. The Rabbit device likely didn't ask him for geolocation permission, so if it says it used geolocation to get the weather information, Marquez could theoretically raise a stink about invasion of privacy. Looking to avoid that scenario we get the wonderfully awkward exchange seen here.
@@pacmonster066 Yeah, they just need to update it to be more clear. It doesn't know your location but it uses your IP for general location (location that may not be accurate).
“Do you have access to my location” “No” “How long to California from my location?” “It would take 1 day and 18 hours to drive to California from your location” 🗿🗿
it's not alive and cannot "l ! e" - it simply has access to the information; to the data which is collected and stored somewhere accessible to the chat bot. it doesn't "know" anything and doesn't "know" how or why it has access to the information, it simply has access and uses it and therefore cannot answer the question but since it is a predictive text thing, it gives a response that is either most likely or programmed to respond with.
@@xoDeaDZonEox it's not alive buddy, it's a glorified advanced cleverbot. if it were alive and capable of l y ! n g then "programming it" kinda contradicts that. great specific and totally coherent question btw
Commonly known? Bruh. I have to remind myself NJ is a state. Born in the Midwest. Serve 12yrw in the Army. I have never heard or seen a reason to think about the state. They don't even have a basketball team anymore.
I feel like there’s a difference between getting someone’s location and saving it vs getting someone’s location to tell them the weather and not saving it. If I ask an ai for the weather I’m assuming it’s looking at my location which I don’t mind as long as it’s not going to a server that sees I was at Panera bread so now I’m going to be getting ads for Panera bread.
Doesn't matter. The real question is: "do you trust tech companies?" Just because the tech company tells you and everyone that they aren't saving your user data doesn't mean they haven't found a legal loophole that allows for that to technically be true but still be selling off literally all your data. This is why FOSS is so important.
The AI could just say that they could guess the location by network approximation and most of us will accept that and move on. But nope, "we ain't know your location dawg i swear bro"
@@arciks11 Maybe it's unaware. It gets a _general_ idea of the location based on phone towers, but doesn't know the exact location. Remember, he said New Jersey was _near_ him, not where he was. The closest phone tower was likely there. But when he asks the AI why it had picked New Jersey, it may not be programmed to understand that it had used the phone tower as a reference point and so it didn't really understand why it had picked NJ. All it knew was that it didn't know his location. I'm spitballing here, I don't really know. 😅
As a non-new jerseyan, I can confirm that new jersey is a fake state that does not exist. It is a hologram made by the US government designed to deceive you. If you try to go to "New Jersey", you will just fall through the holographic floor and into the ocean below. Don't believe the lies, and stay safe. Also, I almost forgot to mention: Joe Biden is a lizard person (They have memory erasers, thankfully I have this handy tin foil helmet to protect me)
@@TeeTipu An Epiphany: Man creates computer, then internet. After few decades with the collection of acquired data A.I. is created and that helps in space travel resulting in contacting aliens. They (aliens) deduce Earth is in brink of extinction and thus erases everything and create apes who are capable of transforming to homo sapiens and the very rock they apes live is named as New Jersey. End Credits 👌🏽
Same thing with the Snapchat AI. While they don't have the "exact" location, they have the same info as the police do. They ping your device and triangulate it between the 3 nearest towers. While true it's not "exact" it's quite literally as close as possible (usually within 1/2 a block) but the AI is designed to give you the most comfortable answer.
This is relatively easy to explain. The AI has an action it can trigger to display weather, and that API has access to your location. The AI itself probably doesn't have access to the location. Then the AI is hallucinating an explanation for how it came up with New Jersey
@@ltbq well don't ask for the weather if you don't want your location exposed. you can remove anything from a system but if you use it to go to a website they it wil still know your general area unless you use a vpn. your lack of knowledge is not their problem.
@@giankarlocornejohello. 99 percent of the US hasnt a single clue about how even a radio works or a lightbulb. Let alone LLMs, GPS, network infrastructure, and the legality and loopholes that each component is required to adhere to. The tech is increasing in complexity of understanding for any average person to put the work in to understand it. It's not too much to ask these corporations to treat humanity with respect and discretion. Obv not gonna happen, but ignorance of the device doesnt beget human rights. People should have a cursory understanding of what they're using but writing ppl off by blaming them for not understanding the tech would cause a drop in the amount of time they use learning about something you require that you're asking of them.
What's funny, is studies show humans do the same thing. If a thought gets implanted for a choice and you ask them why they come up with a random reason.
I actually expect the Rabbit review to be much much more positive than the Humane Pin simply because of the price and the fact that it has a normal screen. The price puts it right in line with some fun gadget that you play with for a while. The Rabbit has a "use" for a small group of techy people, The Pin on the other hand is completely useless for everyone.
No, it really wouldn't be. The main difference between AI then and now is speed. AI isn't really smarter at all. It's still dumb. It can't think for itself and does not know it exists. It just makes you think it does and that speed increase I mentioned earlier has a lot to do with why we perceived AI as intelligent despite it not being at all.
@@Trentstone121 I sincerely disagree, and I think you vastly underestimate the technology, just as hypebros vastly overestimate it. There is a lot of protointelligence here. It lacks a persona, it lacks the ability to think beyond the boundaries of language itself, and it lacks any memory beyond its context. But with all those said, there's a great deal of logic and understanding behind our language. The competing technologies of 10 years ago were deterministic, complex interfaces, but those of today are capable of context switching, cross-contextual application, and natural human conversation. You're essentially talking to the zombie of the language center of the brain. Far from a general intelligence, but still vastly more impressive than what we had before. It's just still in its infancy, and the extents of how much intelligence lies in our language alone is being explored.
ChatGPT does the same thing. They provide time data in the context, but didn’t retrain the model, so if you ask for a random time, the model will tell you the current time, but will deny having access to temporal information
It is a known fact that we are in fact being watched. Not necessarily by humans, but data collection bots: the things we do online are not actually private.
In my use of this kinda ai, it totally 100% understands context and at least a basic level of emotion. I've also had it just add sny remarks / jokes to things that just seem insanely human. It's odd how good and how dog shit it can be at the same time
I think whatever weather API they are using might have picked up your public IP and responded based on that? I don't yet own the device but that's more likely the explanation unless they are using your location without your knowledge.
