New Experiments Show Consciousness Affects Matter ~ Dean Radin, PhD

Подписаться 50 тыс.

Просмотров 1,6 млн

50% 1

Dean Radin, PhD, chief scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS), speaking at the 2016 Science of Consciousness Conference in Tucson, AZ.
Our new e-course dives deeper into Consciousness and other fascinating noetic topics. Register for free today: noetic.org/experience/noetics...

Опубликовано:

6 июн 2016

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 4 тыс.

@skipeveryday7282 3 года назад

"The day science begins to study non physical phenomena,it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of it's existence." Nikola Tesla

@DavidFMayerPhD 3 года назад

This statement shows that Tesla had a wacky side.

@st8vie282 3 года назад

@@DavidFMayerPhD the guy was smarter than all this

@lukidurer28 3 года назад

Which is a plain bs if you are using a common sense definition of physics - meaning "everything that exists". There is per definition no non-physical phenomenon. And by the way, science has indeed made enormous progress in the last decades and centuries: It's the very reason you and I can write comments

@robertwalsh5461 3 года назад

Imagination with emotion can and does create reality. This is the first that is beaten and or bullied out of us when we are children...resultantly most children give in to this crime in order to fit in. The worst thing is that it is mostly the children’s very parents who force mediocrity opon them. The result of this is that the very best, most imaginative and emotionally strongest children are made into their own worst enemy in this way... when they could have gone on to make a better world for everyone, including themselves. Best, A guy trying to reprogram himself after decades of suffering this type of abuse.

@skipeveryday7282 3 года назад

@@lukidurer28 I think by physical he meant "local" meaning directly linked. So he's talking about things that interact non locally like quantum entanglement. So maybe don't come here claiming genius's are talking "bullshit". Just a word of advice.

@jtmacri1 6 лет назад

When I studied tom Campbell’s stuff I liked the idea that the universe exists as a probability field until we measure it and it then has to become something. This reminds me of that.

@downwithputinsaveukraine1313 3 года назад

That is... EXACTLY correct according to all peer reviews. The thing already is, even if we don't know it. Think of it like this, there are no such thing as colors; it's just light at different points of a wavelength. It represents our measurement at a given moment. Can consciousness affect certain things? OF Course it can, but it cannot change all things universally.

@jonyxy777 3 года назад

@@downwithputinsaveukraine1313 Spirit can, say, stop the earth from rotating or dematerialise the moon if it can BELIEVE for those things.

@cristianm7097 3 года назад

Maybe both the observers and the electrons are the product of a Cosmic Mind

@AwareLife 8 месяцев назад

Is Dean Radin the Einstein of this era, and no-one is recognising him?. This is ground-breaking real science at the boundary between mind and matter!!

@SYSM71 3 месяца назад

During a paradigm shift they attack the people like him. Radin made a huge step in a new field of science ❤

@CarloRossiTheGreat 2 месяца назад

No he is not. He is unable to adequately prove his claims and preys on people that don't understand how to properly read a methodology.

@AwareLife 2 месяца назад

@@CarloRossiTheGreat Are you able to defend the claim that "He is unable to adequately prove his claims". Which is btw an overtstement when using the term "prove". He and some others have replicated his findings with standards accepted on many other theoretical stances accepted by the scientific comunity and the basis of further investigation. These standard put down claims is not working. Have you actually read any of his statistical output with rigorous scientific attention to anything that may influence? What's with the ego-centred sh*t? Where's the SCIENCE in refuting his claims?

@terijune3307 6 лет назад

I am a believer in Quantum Physics to help lift our world up. Dr. Radin, you are the first who show experiments to help show that consciousness creates reality. Thanks.

@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 3 года назад

Joseph and Kevin The physicist Barbara Brennan has not disappeared. She proved in 1987 when she published her book "Hands of Light" that we are holographic projections. Before then, the writer Jane Roberts proved that reality IS consciousness itself. How else could quarks be constantly bursting forth as energy and light forming 3 points of light called protons and neutrons? This by itself proves constant creation AND the fact that death is a lie. They can't hide this because we are measured in clinics and hospitals with electricity. It was proven a long time ago that we are not physical or solid or material or biological. When you speak of suppression, it is the federal reserve cartel and the medical cartel and the military industrial cartel that you speak of. True they want to rule the world because they don't know it is a holographic projection. I have read about Bohm. He spoke of explicate and implicate dimensions. Jane Roberts channeled Seth whom spoke of unlimited dimensions. Barbara Brennan says we are multidimensional. There will always be coming forth "people" like me that have had NDEs or near death experiences to keep this knowledge alive.

@thetruthchannel349 6 месяцев назад

@@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 *You guys get this all wrong. The 'Holographic' Universe concept presents a MODEL. It is not to say literally that 'We are Holographic Projections.' Physics presents MODELS to communicate concepts much in the same way the New Testament presents Parables. IT is a MODEL.*

@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 6 месяцев назад

@@thetruthchannel349 Physics says quarks and the atoms they are creating constantly are neither solid or physical. In the book Hands of Light are many pictures/diagrams of what we look like as holograms. Barbara Brennan is the physicist that has spent many studying this subject. She has built a college system around the world proving it.

@thetruthchannel349 6 месяцев назад

@@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 *A quark is theoretical. They are hypothesized to be the build blocks of subatomic particles that 'create' protons & neutrons or 'hadrons.' The simplest way to look at the 'Holographic' Model is to understand that during the 19th & very early 20th centuries the Universe was thought to be Naturalistic or comprised of different kinds of Matter. The Holographic Model is based on a Plasma or Energy based Universe who's fundamental essence or Quantum 'substance' is actually interacting with Our Space/Time from a source outside of our Space/Time. Thats why its called 'Projection.' Quantum Gravity is a great example. What we experience of Gravity & how we interact with Gravity in our Space/Time is the result of something else happening somewhere 'else.' Our Gravity isn't simply a function of Mass. Mass causes an interaction WITH Gravity that we can measure & it can interact with space/time by warping it & doing other things BUT Gravity as far as what Gravity IS? It is QUANTUM & being 'Projected' into our Space/Time from outside.*

@thetruthchannel349 6 месяцев назад

@@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 'quarks and the atoms they are creating constantly are neither solid or physical' *Right. Energy not matter & in some cases Quantum Energy Fields which can be measured but we know virtually nothing about. We can barely detect their presence. We know virtually nothing about them other than the are Quantum Energy Fields*

@Semaviro 7 лет назад

It'd be interesting to test whether the number of people focusing their attention on a single device at once affects the results.

@LoveAndPeaceOccurs 5 лет назад

Thank You ... All of you who are/where involved and to those who brings it here. Standing ovations!!!!! This was posted 2 years ago ... so now I get to look around to see what has happened since then ... really hoping the guy in France has had significant results by now. Love & Peace to All

@12201185234 5 лет назад

If the claimed results of 5-8 sigma in dozens of rounds and variations of the experiment is accurate, then these guys are onto something. Before anyone calls "woo," they need to examine the results and attempt to replicate them. I'm not going to make a judgement either way, but I really hope we see experiments follow these results.

@liquidbraino 4 года назад

You have the best user name ever. Also, I think Dean Radin mentioned in a comment that this experiment has been replicated at other labs.

@jondavis6302 4 года назад

Fuck You Google this exact experiment was replicated twice at the time of video. Over 60 times in other experiments over past 30 yrs.

@fizzicist7678 4 года назад

www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01891/full According to this, there is nothing.

@brubrusuryoutube 6 дней назад

@liquidbraino where are the published study and the replication

@MuriloPerrone 3 года назад

I believe there may be a big flaw in all of those tests. You may have shielded it against selective-reporting, but it doesn’t look like you have shield it against *selective-testing*. Except in case of robot testings, where all tests are previously scheduled, and even worse if robot tests were performed subsequently. I’ll explain what seems to have happened. 1) Subsequent testing: First, the double slit unit is subjected an increase in temperature of its components along the 30 seconds of testing. However, if those tests are done subsequently, then this effect will be cancelled, since the unit will just “keep warm” through the entire set of tests. The unit may also be subjected to other changes along the test, such as the accumulation of static, but that also tends to stabilise at given level when a subsequent set of tests are performed. So one hypothesis is that all robot testings were done subsequently, while human testings were not. 2) Scheduled testing: Second, we know that there are a number of external factors which may interfere with the double slit unit results, possibly reducing the interference pattern along the test. Examples are: - ambient temperature - electromagnetic force of the moon (depending on it's phase) - moisture? I’m assuming the testings took weeks or months and during this period, the external factors above fluctuated in magnitude. Now the thing is that robot observers were not choosing when to perform their tests, while human observers can always make a choice. So the second hypothesis is that human observers were making choices about when to start their tests, and how many tests to perform, and their choices were made based on the feedback they got, biasing the test schedule towards ways that provide positive feedbacks. In other words, when receiving a positive feedback, humans became more exited about repeating it, and even about inviting other test candidates. By contrast, when receiving negative feedbacks, the test participants would become frustrated and then tend to withdraw from the experiment. The Linux robot observers, however, are not subjected to that because they have no feelings and no freedom of choice about their schedules. Now why did meditators perform better? Well they have strong faith in the power of meditation, so their motivation to do more tests was being more strongly modulated by the test’s feedback. Hence, they increased the test schedule selectiveness. To eliminate all of those experiment biases, my suggestion is to always use two double slit units, both at the same time, one being observed by a human, and the other being observed by Linux robot. This way, the robot schedule and testing selectivity will precisely match with the corresponding human choices of when to perform the test and how many times to perform it. Additionally, to avoid any possible difference between those two units, the choice of which unit will be observed by humans and which will be observed by the linux robot must be an alternated choice. That means humans will observe unit A in all odd numbered tests and unit B in all even numbered tests. I predict that in such case robot results will match with human results and you’ll, both of them apparently influencing the test results in the way they were instructed to do. But don’t jump into the conclusion that linux robots do have consciousness too. It’s just that their results are also biased by selective-testing. Please do tell me if my hypothesis might be acceptable.

@beccc598 3 года назад

This ^ One of the few comment with an impressive amount of thought put into it.

@MuriloPerrone 3 года назад

@Sepher Agon hi please clarify if your comment was directed to my original comment or to Dean Radin, the speaker in the video.

@jgquinton 3 года назад

Did you even watch the entire video?

@MuriloPerrone 3 года назад

@Sepher Agon biased? I won't report your comments because I undertand your anger, and it won't affect me. Instead, I bring something that can be useful for you. This is not a provocation, just a sincere effort to help: "Social psychologists have identified two tendencies in the way people seek or interpret information about themselves. Self-verification is the drive to reinforce the existing self-image and self-enhancement is the drive to seek positive feedback. Both are served by confirmation biases." Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias#Social_psychology

@skipeveryday7282 3 года назад

@@MuriloPerrone "I won't report your comments because I understand your anger" Dude could you try harder to appear to be taking the moral high ground?

@deanradin4839 7 лет назад

Journal articles associated with the work described in this video: Radin, D. I., Michel, L, Wendland, P., Rickenbach, R., Delorme, A., Galdamez, K. (2012). Consciousness and the double-slit interference pattern: Six experiments. Physics Essays, 25 (2), 157-171. Radin, D. I., Delorme, A.., Michel, L., Johnston, J. (2013). Psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern: Experiments and a model. Physics Essays. 26 (4), 553-566. Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays. 29 (1), 14-22. Radin, D. Michel, L., Pierce, A. Delorme, A. (2015). Psychophysical interactions with a single-photon double-slit optical system. Quantum Biosystems. 6 (1), 82-98. Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2015). Reassessment of an independent verification of psychophysical interactions with a double-slit interference pattern. Physics Essays. 28 (4), 415-416. Radin, D. Michel, L., Delorme, A. (2016). Psychophysical modulation of fringe visibility in a distant double-slit optical system. Physics Essays. 29 (1), 14-22.

@jeremyyarbro8749 7 лет назад

Good stuff Dean. Your work is important, and you are more of a 'real' scientist than most of those who call themselves that.

@LaughingStock71 7 лет назад

Absolutely excellent work and presentation, Dean! I hope these research results will put the right amount of stress and embarrassment onto the mainstream physicists that they deserve after decades of ducking away from their responsibility to conduct these obvious kinds of experiments themselves.

@piotrczary4072 7 лет назад

do not use linux as observer - use some neuron network algotihm that make some prediction based on what foton do, it should work. Consciousness is back prop algorithm Universe is one big neuron network (class of neutrons) of smaller classes of neuron networks connected whithin Quantum physics is result of that Variance is result of that everything interact with each other and there is delay in adjusting one class of neuron network with each other Big Bang - consiousness got a neural network to work on Universe can be just small neuron network of some bigger neuron network It expands until it gets more energy that it uses, then it will shrink until it dies back to Consciousness (back prop algorithm that may be thought oh as energy governing that algorithm) Clairvoyance is just efficient neuron network of our brain (some people have better than others)

@deanradin4839 7 лет назад

It's an interesting suggestion. The Linux control was, of course, testing the null hypothesis that the form of the observer makes no difference.

@piotrczary4072 7 лет назад

Sure. And it should be easy to get good sample size quick as alorithm do not have to meditate and focus:)

@Jow315 6 лет назад

The University of São Paulo guy's name is Gabriel Guerrer, he actually crowdfounded this Project and it's running tests about this experiment.

@pearz420 3 года назад

no wonder they weren't being honest

@ubergeraldine 5 лет назад

I know it’s considered a bit woo woo but it’s worth looking at the work on esoteric chemistry by Annie Besant. Through meditation she was able to observe elements at atomic level, some of which had not been discovered at the time. It would be amazing to do these experiments with people who are very advanced meditators.

@vibaj16 2 года назад

This is all delusional meaningless psuedoscience that is a waste of time

@rblibit 6 лет назад

This is great information! Here is something EVERYONE can do. I show all the kids on holiday get-together days (usually pool parties here in Florida) that they can directly control matter in their universe. I show them that they can evaporate condensed clouds (make them disappear through evaporation) in under 5 to 6 minutes 98% of the time. Try it yourself, and get witnesses for the SHOCK & AWE value (grin). Find 3 or 4 small SLOW moving clouds (not touching each other) and pick one of them (and make sure everyone knows what cloud you selected), then literally stare at that particular cloud and tell it to evaporate, disappear, go away! Repeat it aloud to ensure no one interrupts your thought processes (not needed when you are alone, obviously). You must set your honest intention that the cloud WILL EVAPORATE and disappear. And it does, sometimes as quickly as 3 to 4 minute, but usually 5 minutes on average, a few can take as long as 7 minutes (larger clouds). You could do one cloud by itself, but it is better to have "Control" clouds next to your cloud (that disappears). Sometimes we try to cut a cloud in half (and state that is what we are doing) then do each half. If there are planes with grayish exhausts (yes, "chem-trails") and this is mixed in with the clouds, don't bother since you will NOT evaporate metal particulates no matter how much you concentrate. It is called "Cloud Busting" and my theory is that we radiate vibrations in the ether (aether, source field - pick your favorite name) from our eyes and also from the crown of our heads and this energy (and your emotion) is absorbed in the condensed water. I suspect that most of you have heard recent discoveries on the ability of water to become structured and hold energy (and specific emotions, as well)? If not, search the Internet and learn. As long as they are old enough to have the patience, children are usually VERY good at it. Keep in mind that a small cloud may contain several gallons of water! That is a lot of energy you are controlling. And one good thing is, even people who are not sure they can do it (and state so), almost always CAN do it. "Try it, You'll like it!"

@spiritualanarchist8162 7 лет назад

But how do i 'influence' my bank account? I just want to collapse my ' debt wave function' into a positive money mass. (PS this comment was mend to be cynical and fun , so please stop giving me law of attraction advise or that i need a 2nd job )

@hanniffydinn6019 5 лет назад

Spiritual Anarchist you can, I have, it's called law of attraction. Many great books on this. Get in touch if you are serious and want some book recommendations, I've collected all books on law of attraction.

@hanniffydinn6019 5 лет назад

Lenus Tek Typs it doesn't matter what money is, reality is a holographic simulation, you can create anything in the simulation

@hanniffydinn6019 5 лет назад

EnigMa AGODAMi You need to deeply understand law of attraction. There is plenty of basic mainstream info on this. But it's not detailed enough. Most books and courses just cover the basics. Mainstream stuff like "the secret" DO NOT tell you the exact techniques and practical method. The most *** detailed *** best law of attraction book / course is by Stuart lichtman, " How to get lots of money fast ". Don't be fooled by the simple title. This is the most detailed practical course I have found, and I've got all of them! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UTtpcnZLrI8.html I'm quite happy to send you the book. My Skype chat ID is : " Haniff Din". It's a tough read, and even tougher to learn and apply. But I absolutely guarantee if you follow the instructions in the book, your life will completely change. Most people don't understand or Apply the techniques in the book. They are too lazy. I know plenty of wealthy people and they all do what's described in the book NATURALLY ! That really is the only difference. They build it into their daily routine. Most people won't have the patience and focus required to read this book, never mind apply the techniques daily! But the few 1% that make all the wealth on earth, I guarantee you apply the principles in this book. Once you focus, apply the techniques in the book,get results, those people who have put the effort in keep applying the principles daily. It's not easy because you have to understand yourself, as well do plenty of other work, but it describes the core practical principles. I've made 1 million in 18 months. Trust me, virtually no one recommend this book, because most people have no clue what law attraction really is, or have seriously researched it, or seriously asked the question what is the best practical guaranteed method.

@rubyblu21 5 лет назад

Would i be able to grab a copy? Im very interested

@hanniffydinn6019 5 лет назад

Ruby well get your email to me, I can send you a digital copy. Get in touch via Skype chat if you can, my ID is " haniffdin ", you can get my smart phone there and use other chat apps too ! Always happy to help a serious law of attraction person ! 😎😎😎👍👍👍

@dagoth77 7 лет назад

"If you think you understand quantum theory . . . you don't understand quantum theory." -Richard Feynman

@pureenergy5051 6 лет назад

Brayden Argue that with Barbara Brennan, the physicist and healer that has trained herself to see people as holograms. You should read the book Hands of Light.

@jjk2one 5 лет назад

“WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF WE COULD REARRANGE ATOMS ONE BY ONE, THE WAY WE WANT THEM?” -RICHARD FEYNMAN They want your freewill completely. The people follow down the path they are led...

@TaunellE 5 лет назад

Because "The only true knowledge is knowing you know nothing." - Socrates

@TaunellE 5 лет назад

@@jjk2one Yes,b exactly what we are doing! ♡

@Rickswars 5 лет назад

because it's a hoax. let that sink in a minute.

@charlesmichael2806 4 года назад

I got a OH MY GOD feeling too when I was watching this. I feel I am blessed by the fact that I had the chance to watch this observation by Dr. Radin. Thank you doctor for your enthusiasm and your effort to take advantage of your knowledge and the current technology to decode our universe. It demystifies the once mystical and illustrates that our minds are far more powerful than we thought. I am hopeful about our future after watching your study!

@vibaj16 2 года назад

Nope, this is just meaningless psuedoscience

@abhishekshah11 3 года назад

You might be interested to know that there is a type of buddhist meditation, where some monk might imagine an image in their mind, and suddenly, all the other meditators in the room pop the same image in their minds later on. After the meditation session, they get together and discuss about their visions and this is how they found it out.

@shadyganem5448 Месяц назад

Whatttttt. Why don't they study that.

@TheACG22 8 лет назад

When we start developing AI, this will be a good way to test whether they are actually becoming conscious.

@foxlinx 7 лет назад

AI won't exist :(

@TheACG22 7 лет назад

LinX Dogmátic That remains to be seen.

@TheACG22 7 лет назад

Quantum Mechanics? At this point, we really can't say whether self-aware robots are possible, whether QM is involved or not. Our brain does it, so why couldn't we reverse engineer the brain?

@lilianchello 7 лет назад

even with classic cognitive impression modelling alone, an AI is pretty much viable, if not inefficient. I do agree with you. anything exist can be reverse engineered.

@TheACG22 7 лет назад

LinX Dogmátic How are you so sure? There may yet be some paradigms that haven't even been imagined yet that will allow us to do it. I'm just wondering where your confidence is coming from?

@herosmantle 8 лет назад

I don't think this has yet received the attention it deserves. This is amazing.

@ianblack5264 8 лет назад

But they would wouldn't they... I mean, if you don't BELIEVE then it wouldn't work! :-)

@macmarc6661 8 лет назад

I think it will be the Most important topic in Science-Ficton of the 21st century. I mean, if that's true and could have gigantic effects

@olmen375 7 лет назад

Yeah well I guess that it hasn't received any attention because made up science rarely does. Using one's fantasy is fun and all, and I love speculating about quantum phenomena and consiousness as much as the next guy. But I rarely take the stage with my fantasies and claim it to be science. Titles, statistics and words doesn't make one a scientist.

@herosmantle 7 лет назад

+olmen375 Does that mean you suspect the quality of the data collected is bad or just the interpretation? The data alone is pretty fascinating

@olmen375 7 лет назад

Liam Williams I laugh at the methodology and basic assumptions made here. The whole concept of consciousness is axiomatically undefined. It's like me, proving to you that there's an actual duck named Donald or something similar. The data alone means absolutely nothing because none of us can verify it's validity or how it was collected and manicured. If something like this was real, don't you think everyone in the scientific community wouldn't claw each other's eyes out to be the one to nail it? If some random human consciousness thing could actually affect the outcome of an experiement like this it would be the hugest most earth shattering discovery since wonderbread. But it's not. And that's why no one cares to spend their carreer and other people's resources at it. It's similar to flat-earth theories. People love to make bold claims, bot no one (not even the most dedicated flat earthers!) loves to make bold expeditions, apparently. One would assume that proving that the earth was flat by simply going to the edge would be the easiest and most rewarding thing in the world. And you can bet your butt that no one will be able to replicate these results either. Ever. Anyone who continue to dabble in this question without the serious intent to replicate these results are idiots. Myself included =)

@MarcelGodfrey 5 лет назад

Cant believe I have only just found this experiment showing Consciousness affecting Matter. Nice to know I am not mad!

@eliteextremophile8895 3 года назад

There's also other experiment you could do with your friend. Wigner's friend -experiment, just do it like this: Start the experiment and both look at the same monitor which tells you where in the detection screen the electron hits. If you both see different outcome, then your minds were able to affect quantum mechanics. If not, well, bad news for mr. Dean.

@dahur 2 года назад

How very interesting. If someone can figure how, (and why) the Universe is doing this, well there is a Nobel Prize waiting for you. It's simply mind boggling.

@louiscipher5861 7 лет назад

This video disappeared when I focused on it.

@layton3503 3 года назад

Only when I started thinking did that happen

@lukostello 5 лет назад

Here is an interesting thing to try: have each person participating in the experiment create a profile then see if some users generate better results more consistently. Ideally that profile would be connected to a bunch of data about them preferably including how large their frontal cortex is, how meditative, intelligent, empathetic, etc they are, how high of a concentration of rose-hip neurons they have, probably include their genome. If these experiments mean anything we could effectively quantify the potency of a soul and perhaps determine if that potency is related to physical factors.

@MrDarius4444 3 года назад

The variables are infinite and the number ways to arrange the experiment is infinite therefore it will take infinite amount of time to compute something meaningful out of it

@liquidbraino 2 года назад

I don't think you understand the way science works. The variables in ANY experiment are potentially infinite. The question is which are the significant variables? The phases of the moon at the time of the experiment might be significant; the time of day might be significant; whether or not they drank a cup of coffee before the experiment might be significant. I'm pretty sure the size of the turd that came out of his dogs ass three days prior to the experiment are not going to be significant to the experiment. Even if there are two thousand different variables that they want to look at, it's not like a person is going to have to sit there reading over these variables for the next thirty years in order to determine which ones seem to play a role in the outcome - because there this thing called "computers". They can punch all of that data into a database and have the computer automatically look for the common denominators where the participants get a high score.

@deep_fried_analysis Год назад

Why? This is an absolutely horrendous idea that most probably will give even more reasons for people to discriminate each other. Hierachies are superficial anyway. In addition, IQ tests results suffer greatly from confirmation bias and this is like an IQ test on steroids. Including one's genome in a database that is coupled to your mental score? Are you insane?!

@SYSM71 3 месяца назад

During a paradigm shift they attack the people like him. Radin made a huge step in a new field of science ❤

@jartonponed8330 6 лет назад

Extremely fascinating. I'm curious to see a double-slit experiment done with observers placed within a sensory deprivation tank while the experiment is conducted, so as to remove sensory distortion to one's consciousness and focus.

@bettygoncalves8333 4 года назад

This was sooooo PERFECT 👌!!! I loved it !!! I’ve been waiting for an explanation like this for a long time !!! Many thanks 🙏

@dneuman7455 6 лет назад

Awareness of multiple levels of reality is awesome, its like the brink of anxiety. Its a systemic overload of feelings (synaptic information) within 1 millisecond. Only "Lucy" knows or those who have felt this.

@willyum1208 2 года назад

what do you mean by this? I've experienced this.

@induborahdutta9786 Год назад

The 'DOUBLE SLIT ' Experiment result is shown beautifully and symbolically in the HINDU temple in INDIA specially in "SHIVA TEMPLE". The Conscious observer is depicted as "NANDI, The Bull. "THE SHIVLING " inside the sanctum sanatorium is the union of SHIV- SHAKTI that is Mass and Energy leading to particle form which in turn gives rise to this Universe.

@donaldbass6737 Год назад

I do Trial Design and Analysis for a fortune 15 company and I can tell you all that we rarely if ever see 5 Sigma results. 5 Sigma is only 233 DPMO (Defects per Million Opportunities). He has checked for p-hacking and moved the experiment to the internet to remove possible Trial Group interactions. This is very persuasive.

@MaxLaingDMP 5 лет назад

Dean, you are deeply appreciated and Miceal says, "Hello!"

@harryknickerbocker9889 4 года назад

This result is amazing. People who meditate know that clearing your mind brings you into an immediate awareness of the moment. Thoughts are like a smoke screen that conceals reality. I wonder if this awareness of whatever is occurring in the moment increases the probability of collapsing the wave function...which suggests that mental activity which is involved with the usual flow of abstract thoughts actually negates our awareness of momentary reality. In other words, we only observe the real world (collapsing the wave function) when our minds are clear and we are focused on the moment....not the future or the past or abstract thoughts.

@aliceinwonderland887 Год назад

We can be free from the veil of Maya through meditation or by death or with pure DMT crystals.

@whattowatchrightnow 5 лет назад

So, Linux is not conscious - yet. That's good to know. We should test Linux yearly and Windows every ten years just to be safe.

@albertoossola1481 5 лет назад

..Every ten years, nice one ;)

@danielj1063 5 лет назад

Can Hal run program? ☺

@stopandlisten6070 5 лет назад

Don't worry, if Windows handles too many complex tasks, it will just blue screen instead.

@Khepramancer 5 лет назад

With decent graphics drivers still over the horizon, I'm not holding my breath for a Linux consciousness driver anytime soon.

@danielash3576 4 года назад

But it has to be started by someone or a self time test standard for a conscience to consciousness.

@kennethkitchin6538 2 года назад

Imagine if all of humanity stopped and meditated for world peace

@get-out-there2 7 лет назад

what about testing 3 meditators focusing all at once?

@christinearmington 3 года назад

So thoughts and prayers matter.

@alvaroxex 3 года назад

Anything you believe to be true

@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 3 года назад

Thoughts ARE images. Each time someone thinks, they are imaging with the energy frequencies we are, which form into pictures. We are some of the pictures we are forming with our own thought images. We are literally holograms creating our own selves.

@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 3 года назад

@Zeek Banistor We ARE gods. Every frequency we consist of vibrates into the images we are. We are holographic projections. We are not creating energy itself.

@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 3 года назад

@Zeek Banistor We are the Lord you speak of. So you are waiting on yourself.

@bradbryant332 3 года назад

I would just stick with "thoughts"...........as prayers may just be "thoughts"....

@kj9219 6 лет назад

This confirms my belief that our thoughts do affect the outside world and how are lives progress with conscious direction, or lack of. This has been proven itself many times over in my life. Exciting stuff.

@dirkryan5962 3 года назад

i'd love to see someone like Wim Hof, the _Dutch extreme athlete noted for his ability to withstand freezing temperatures,_ participate in this experiment! he has _amazing_ control over his own body's response to the cold and could possibly use those same capabilities to affect the results in _this_ experiment as well.

@deanchovan6604 2 года назад

yoga

@stevemilk5523 2 года назад

Is tu

@aphysique 8 лет назад

I hosetly believe Dean Radin will bring Remote Viewing to the forefront of the science community...Such an incredibly smart n astute man to lead this to the very front of non locality & Quantum Entanglement!! Always interesting & intelligent presentations done by this man right here!!! Thanks for all your endless & painstaking experiments!!!

@rproctor83 8 лет назад

Oh one more thing, Id like to see the results with people on psychedelics, specifically dmt

@hvanmegen 8 лет назад

you mean "above normale, elevated levels of dmt" since the brain already creates the so-called 'spirit molecule'?

@SessleIsosceles 8 лет назад

same here ! it woukd be off rhe charts ! I have lots of experience with both

@Thijzekneiz 7 лет назад

i wuz thinkin the same

@TiffanyGrey 7 лет назад

yaaas this!

@LaughingStock71 7 лет назад

It seems to me that one important aspect in these studies was that the subjects were well able to focus on a single spot in space or a mental idea for a prolonged period of time, at least that's what is suggested by the fact that the overall effect size of experienced meditators was well above that of non-meditators. I wonder how well this ability is available when on psychedelics?

@MariaDorlandInes 5 лет назад

I think what we miss is that consciousness affects all experiments.

@christopherdirham8340 4 года назад

And all experiments effect consciousness. Collapse duality and see the whole. Which is still just another piece.

@hellooutthere8956 4 года назад

Good point. Least I think so.

@Hero-oz9gx 4 года назад

im not going to acknowledge your statement's existence therefore it is not true.

@liquidbraino 4 года назад

Exactly. Isn't that called the "Recursion problem"? Consciousness is exactly what we use to look at the experimental results. If you weren't conscious you wouldn't even be able to think of an experiment - much less conduct it and observe the results. Observation is a function of consciousness.

@renatocamo 4 года назад

Hahahahaha hohohoho!!

@sngscratcher 2 года назад

We always knew that consciousness affects matter. Say you have a conscious thought to snap your fingers, and than SNAP, matter moves!

@itsame1277 6 лет назад

Absolutely fascinating. I look forward to further evidence. We always believe what appears to be obvious to our senses until we discover with the power of reason that it is not so.

@TThoWo 5 лет назад

waiting for light switches having double slit systems installed, concentrate on it and a light goes on, telekinesis!

@tmadden4951 3 года назад

Yaaas

@jonyxy777 3 года назад

You don't need that to do telekinesis. You can switch on or off any light simply with intent if you believe.

@DikkieDikism 9 месяцев назад

This was 7 years ago. A more recent experiment showed that consciousness can extent. This by testing and monitoring neuron activity by having people work on something together, like a puzzle or maybe even watching a movie together. Now we always assumed people copy behavior to improve cooperation for example, but this isn’t what happens. What happens is that the brain synchronizes like a clock.. this means very specifically that somehow one consciousness has to tell the other what it’s clock is saying. The illusion of consciousness seems to be that it’s individual. When in reality it’s part of a larger whole, almost like an eco system. You can also test this rather easily, done decades ago, by splitting the left and right half of the brain. (Which in severe epilepsy cases has to be done) You now quite literally see 2 consciousness reactions from the same person even though the individual isn’t aware of this.

@smo302 5 лет назад

After watching this, it made me think of all of the talk about thoughts, and how positive/negative thoughts can manifest positive/negative outcomes in our lives. If I take what I learned from this video, and break down my comment based off this videos explanations, then if everything are waves (Random outcomes), until a conscious observation of it ('It' being thoughts about a situation in my life), then this could be the reason why, if what we give thought to (i.e., a conscious observation to a possible outcome of a current situation in our lives), then we stop the randomness, and pull into our lives the quantum's that we see (Or in most cases fear). So if we choose to see things (Or give conscious observation), to positive outcomes, then the latter is what we will pull into our lives to manifest..... very interesting.

@Ratty2480 4 года назад

Nice comment. Not just a shit post. This troll approves

@01107345 4 года назад

Same line of thought as "The Secret", and way before that was "Think and Grow Rich" in 1937 by Napolean Hill, and there's been a bunch of other material on the same idea. It's interesting to note that the only way Napolean Hill got rich was from selling self-help books, and before that, he was a failed businessman who was accused of fraud on multiple occasions. So it's best to be cautious of 'law of attraction' type stuff, even if there's some degree of truth to it.

@PhenomenalWonOne 4 года назад

@@01107345 The Bible originated this concept. The secret just replaced God with "The universe". Basically ask God and accept it in your mind and heart without doubt and prepare for it because if you're not prepared it could happen a dozen times and you won't be ready to accept. Same concept of faith vs fear. Manifesting your thoughts and heart into reality.

@PhenomenalWonOne 4 года назад

@@01107345 an important distinction is "prepare for it". It isn't just wishful thinking. If you're sitting in your mom's basement thinking I'm a loser no one will ever love me, you're manifesting that reality out of fear. If you set your mind on "I want a life partner" you just believe that is in the cards and prepare for it. Clean your room if you'd be to embarrassed to show a potential partner, or work on getting a job and moving out of you feel that is necessary. Shower / hygiene if that makes you insecure and unable to socialize. Exercise if you feel that's necessary. All the things you would do if by chance someone gave you a chance. So when you finally to meet him or her by chance you're clean and feel okay about yourself and not insecure and embarrassed about your current state. If they say it doesn't bother them that you live with your mom and want to come hang out in your room it's not in utter disarray to the point you'd be embarrassed and would rather make up an excuse not to. Instead although not ideal (having a job and your own place) by working towards something (basic hygiene and getting out of the house to give yourself a chance of meeting someone) you've now accepted that this is going to happen and prepared for it as best you could. This is just an example to illustrate the difference between wishful thinking and hoping magically a partner will just fall into your lap and accept that you haven't cleaned your room in months or showered in days and developing this routine of maintaining basic hygiene and sanitation practices. Ultimately it may end up being that the person would accept you even being over weight and not showing for 3 days living in your mom's basement which you haven't cleaned in months, but you would allow fear and insecurity to ruin that opportunity if it came or simply wouldn't put yourself out there for it to happen in the first place and the only reason you needed to prepare was for your own insecurities and fear to take a back seat to your faith and positive attributes and allow those to shine through just long enough for that person to see something in you. It may be that having that person around motivates you to do the bigger steps of finding work and getting stable income, losing weight, practicing daily basic hygiene, getting your own place etc. And those can all be individual things you ask for / focus on, have faith in, prepare for, and in a couple years you might even exceed those basic minimums you're asking for but not by just wishing it'll happen magically but by having faith and preparing.

@christopherdirham8340 4 года назад

That and your brain wires itself as you think, so we really do create reality but then so does everything else. We and everything else equally. We shouldn't put ourselves on top we are only a tiny fraction of an astounding whole. Which is another piece.

@VeronicaFullerJacobsen 6 лет назад

Thank you Institute of Noetic Sciences!!!! I appreciate this type of science being explained in a beautifully understandable manner. I am a nurse and a believer in consciousness" affects on a quantum level. You have scientifically moved forward the theory surrounding how thoughts become things, basically. I would love to furher understand how vibrations, especially Solfeggio frequencies opposed to other frequencies, affect our physical and consciousness selfs, anyone working on something like this?

@mosthigh1007 3 года назад

😉

@lifewasgiventous1614 6 лет назад

Consciousness is fundamental, as in a mind and agency...wow. I’m not gonna say it but I’m sure some people are thinking the same thing.

@peterjones6507 Год назад

This is a fascinating and excellent talk. Regarding the pyramid model shown towards the end: To understand how we get from consciousness to physics it would be necessary to pass through metaphysics. Specifically, it would be necessary to study a neutral metaphysical theory, the theory required for non-dualism, and explore its implications for physics. This builds a bridge between the two levels of the model. which otherwise are very difficult to connect. Perhaps research of this sort will eventually lead physicists to overcome their fears and prejudices and start to take the Buddha's description of reality seriously. It surely ought to lead to renewed interest in metaphysics and a wider recognition that the phrase 'fundamental physics' is an oxymoron. It is a strange world in which scientists are surprised to discover that consciousness is an active participant in reality. Future generations will shake their heads in wonder that anyone ever thought otherwise.

@matthewrandall9833 5 лет назад

I tried cloudbusting and found it quite easy to do, and every time I did it it worked on the cloud I was focused on and not the surrounding clouds, so the chances that the wind caused the exact same cloud I was focusing on to dissipate and not to effect the clouds around it is very slim

@sirvilhelmofyonderland Год назад

😆, you have brain powers . Lol. Still gotta pay your taxes bro. Bunch of mumbo jumbo

@KanedaSyndrome 5 лет назад

Eitherway, if possible, I'd love to attend a talk/setup/convention whatever where you're showcasing this experiment.

@jarrysmith5788 7 лет назад

This is really interesting. The fact that "distance" doesnt seem to affect the experiment is a clue itself. Maye "distance" is becoming more of "classical physics", we dont understand how two things can affect each other when they are faraway, but thats is a classical physics concept, that was born out of our common sense. I dont know if if common sense works very good in the quatum level. There must be a new way to think this, a change in paradigm.

@hanniffydinn6019 7 лет назад

Jarry Smith take some LSD to truly understand everything is connected

@jarrysmith5788 7 лет назад

Maybe DMT is ever better (tried psilocibine long time ago)

@eskpetri 7 лет назад

How to make a bond between two distance systems. IE bonding an idea vs bonding two physical objects. Shouldn't there be something to make a stronger connection? Connection by feeling...

@pureenergy5051 6 лет назад

Nonlocality has been proven. What one photon knows, they all know. We are saturated in a oneness existence. E=mcsquared. Energy equals mass equals energy. They are interchangeable.

@MiccaPhone 6 лет назад

Question: if we attach a photon detector to each individual slit, but do NOT record the result (or record and immediately delete it again before any human can read it), will this collapse the wave function or not?

@jaimaraj4059 3 года назад

This aligns with Vedanta philosophy.

@jllarivee60 7 лет назад

Sooo... As people concentrate more and more as to which slit the photon passed through, it sounds like the theory is human consciousness would be able to collapse the wave function and create a non interference pattern simply by meditating. Is that the theory? That would be most impressive!

@kaneltube 7 лет назад

"The institute is on Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch list of questionable organizations.[27]"

@TheFadingWhite 6 лет назад

The results show that introducing a human observer to the double slit experiment causes an average of 1% difference in collapse of interference vs no human observers.

@truthandthelight4041 6 лет назад

James Last Light and matter. you need a witness to turn light into matter. The father is the light and Jesus is the witness or vice versa E=mc2 light and matter is squared because at any time light can be matter and matter can be light. Jesus hung on the cross in the flesh/matter and asked Light to forgive matter for He and his father are one I am living in the actual body of Christ:-)

@whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 6 лет назад

1%? 5 sigma results suggest a 1:3.5million chance.

@silence439 5 лет назад

pitthepig have you heard of the quantum eraser experiment?

@ama-tu-an-ki 8 лет назад

Radin is in a class of his own. Very few people, even in physics or so-called normal psychology, can match him for presentation, design and carrying out experiments.

@efisgpr 7 лет назад

Exactly.

@Dadecorban 7 лет назад

The class he is in, is the top tier of reasonably sounding crackpots.

@jasonpatrickries 7 лет назад

The double slit is not a crackpot experiment.

@henrysiegertsz8204 7 лет назад

His sample is tiny, and he doesn't quantify anything that can account for his so called findings! Sounds plausible but not convincing beyond doubt!

@efisgpr 7 лет назад

+Henry Siegertsz ...many decades...over several sigma. you just refuse to look at it truly scientifically. If you did, you'd see what is clearly a monstrously obvious effect.

@bridad 4 года назад

I can't help noticing that they sought repetition and confirmation from some outside scientist who seemed excited about the results, but who seems yet to have published anything. You'd think that such astonishing initial results would be discussed everywhere by now.

@mosthigh1007 3 года назад

They can't replicate the Creator. That why they are in the mess there in.

@makemake3749 3 года назад

This is huge. How is it not talked aboout more ?!!

@sadeepweerasinghe 3 года назад

this can't be real

@Nova_1945 3 года назад

Cuz people are delusional

@ramakanth5270 7 лет назад

great work... unbelievable efforts.... kudoa

@matthewrandall9833 5 лет назад

By the way love ur books Dean I have three and will be getting more keep up the good work

@andylane7142 3 года назад

This is so far outside classical physics and the understanding it has given us that its blowing my face off that more resources haven’t been allocated to checking verifying and then expanding on these findings. If there is something here, it tells us something incredible about reality. That needs more examination.

@henger1398 2 года назад

hello good day i just want to share my Good news with you my husband left me for 4 years i was hope less until i found dr muazu , who help me got my husband back to me he can help you with all problems

@henger1398 2 года назад

+234

@henger1398 2 года назад

9155

@henger1398 2 года назад

2898

@robertbarney8635 4 года назад

I observed changes with an ICP atomic spectrometer during analysis of specific metal impurities in water if certain individuals came into my lab during testing. I always found that to be odd. There was always variation in the number of photon count.

@robertharlton3850 7 лет назад

I've known for a long time that our consciousness filters our reality. For example, when you look at a blue sky, that's filtered by our consciousness. Put a color-analyzer on the sky, at it will tell you the sky is green. Further, I discovered while connected to a heart monitor, the feedback enabled me to control my heart rate. Gawd we live in a wonderful reality.

@Badboyifier 7 лет назад

Hi, can you describe where can one get such a device? and what type of technique did you use to control your heart or is it intuitive and comes naturally once you have the feedback?

@einarasjuodelis3142 6 лет назад

The fact that the sky is blue doesn’t mean our consciousness filters reality as you consciousness is not the reason for why you see the sky as blue, it is your visual cortex which is a part of your physical brain. Your brain is not consciousness, we only know that it resides somewhere IN the brain, and anyway the fact that science knows so little about consciousness does not mean you can make claims like this. PROPER studies have to be done to address this problem.

@pureenergy5051 6 лет назад

Einaras Study the book "Hands of Light" written by the physicist and healer Barbara Brennan. Consciousness creates everything. That is evident in E=mcsquared. Nothing is solid. Classical physics is being pushed onto so many people that the fact atoms spin super fast as light is being forgotten. Brennan proved that we are holograms. She trained herself to see people as holograms. Science has been talking about consciousness at least since 1918 when Max Planck won his Nobel Prize for his work with quanta.

@CaptJofaz 6 лет назад

the examples you've given are nothing like the results found in this experiment.

@isaakvandaalen3899 6 лет назад

Pure Energy Look dude, saying consciousness creates everything is like saying eyes create light, or ears create sound. What does Einstein's equation, or atomic spin for that matter, have to do with the effects of the mind on the universe? Consciousness is simply a tool our minds use to experience reality. Just because you can see color doesn't mean it's there to be seen. Just because you can hear sound doesn't mean it's there to be heard. Just because you can experience reality doesn't mean it's there to be experienced. Or measured for that matter. This is one of the core philosophies of a true scientist. You must completely remove yourself from the experiment otherwise bias is inevitable. To say consciousness creates everything... it's like saying "Cars exist, and people only exist to drive them".

@boomonkey551 7 лет назад

First, thank you for using physics to explore the relationship between matter and consciousness, expanding our understanding of consciousness and reality. That is quite an achievement! I'm curious to know if you've conducted studies where there are longer periods of time for the meditator to focus on a task. As mentioned in your talk, there is an adjustment period between resting and focusing, each fluctuation will dampen the intensity of the meditative state. As a long term meditator, (20 years with anywhere from 1-16 hours per day), I've learned that the deeper meditative state takes time to achieve, and that this state progressively deepens to a certain point until you start to leave the meditative state, or start to ascend--sort of surface from the depths. I find that if I'm in a very deep meditative state, when something outside of myself interrupts the meditation, it can be extremely jarring--like a very loud and unexpected noise would jolt you from a deep sleep--almost painful, and you can't just pop back to the same depth instantaneously. You have to descend. So going quickly from resting to observing would greatly weaken the intensity and focus of the meditative state, making it fairly superficial. Yet even that yields remarkable results. Would those results change significantly if you removed the fluctuations in and out of the meditative states? Also, there is a lot of variation in meditators. Some people are naturals, some meditate for half an hour a few days a week, some for 16 or more hours daily. Some people meditate and access the exact same information (a lot of quantum mechanics) people accessed thousands of years ago, as documented in Vedic scriptures. And others meditate all their lives and never reach that place. It would be really interesting to see a study comparing the magnitude of change registered while very skilled, experienced meditators--like monks--are deeply immersed in the meditative state, without the fluctuation (between focus and resting) deadening the intensity or depth of the meditation. Would the depth of the meditation affect the magnitude of the change? Is the magnitude of change affected by the skill level of the meditator? What happens if you have many meditators at the same time focus on the same thing?

@jdvcomputing 2 года назад

I have experienced mind/matter results in my life. This is absolutely true.

@Sapientiaa 2 года назад

That’s purely psychosomatic, its the placebo effect. “The secret” is a load of nonsense. This came from “The Kybalion”, and “The Master Key System”; the authors simply took theurgy out of Neoplatonic metaphysics to sell books during the New Thought Movement.

@tolkienfan1972 2 года назад

Doesn't this mean people could break quantum computers by thought alone?

@DaFlashGuy7 Год назад

yes, if you have enough "faith" or mental ability to "know" how to do these things. There are recorded "pieces of history" in which men have done "supernatural" feats with their consciousness, as mentioned in Egyptian lore. Now we know that not everybody was able to do this by simply "thinking", however. Take a look at the "eye of Horus". it should be noted that the Eye of Horus symbol corresponds to the location of the Third Eye, represented by the sixth chakra. The sixth chakra represents the seat of intuition and clairvoyance (including the ability to “see” things usually hidden). Consciousness is often associated with the called "Third Eye", aka the Pineal Gland. People who have taken psilocybin or other substances that alter this organ have seen many subjective experiences they claim to be metaphysical but is then taken with a grain of salt because it is purely anecdotal. Perhaps it will all by connected now, in this age, and we just might witness it unfold in our lifetime!

@lukebristol3136 5 лет назад

collective Imagineering is creating the universe of which we are the eyes and ears.

@strike-attack 5 лет назад

Very very interesting. There does seem to be a statistical trend in consciousness being able to collapse a wave function. Why use one observer? Hire 100 meditators, have them all work at the same time, and collapse those wave functions!

@simonbottrill 5 лет назад

Awesome work. I consciousness wish my conscious mind was clever enough to understand it all however. Wonderfully delivered

@opensourceradionics 4 года назад

In digital radionics using TRNG this phenomena is already used since decades for analysis. Interesting is, that when you don't analyze a person / animal / agriculture aera, then the result really makes no sense, it tends always to show a normal random distribution. But if you for example analyze a person or animal then the result deviates from random chance and it represents a meaning inside of a specific context.

@consciousnessapp 8 лет назад

Great talk!

@Duncan_1971 6 лет назад

This is very interesting. I wonder if we also have the ability to turn particles back into waves in addition to the converse? Telekinesis?

@irondoc4565 5 лет назад

I think Dr. Radin should do an experiment with Psychics which I think have more powerful minds than the meditators. There are some people who strongly believe psychics have extraordinary mind powers.

@aemiliuskai14 2 года назад

Lol "psychics" are frauds.

@DoubleRaven00 2 года назад

Excelent video. Have you tried asking the meditators questions to try to narrow who is most likely to have an effect? 1. Are you a spiritual person? 2. Do you believe in God? 3. Do you pray? 4. Are you creative? 5. Are you a scientist? 6. Do you believe in free will? Etc. Perhapse a pattern can be found… To identify Precogs? Then a study conducted with highly effective minds only…

@Ehennings10 2 года назад

If this is something that interests you, you should look up John Vervaeke's Awakening From The Meaning Crisis Series. He founded the department of Cognitive Science in Toronto, and he's approaching problems related to this from the other way: Consciousness -> Material.

@dkk8996 7 лет назад

Not here supporting Radin blindly or arguing that such findings are completely impossible. but lets face it guys, most of you are denying these findings like a bunch of Pre Renaissance catholics. Radin might be wrong, maybe he made errors or made up those statistics, as most of you claim. if so prove it. and not by trolling, i mean trolling is fun no doubt when you have nothing better to do, but by experimenting such a probability again and again till its perfect or plain bs.(if you cant, then shut up, wait, watch and let others do) Theories are proven wrong all the time, Newton was proven wrong by Einstein, Einstein by Bohr. i am not saying that Radin is correct with 100% certainty or that he is Einstein, and i also agree that this research needs revision and requires taking into account possible other factors. but i am questioning those people who claim that this cannot be science in any way, like some religious fanatics. if he is wrong, prove it. if he is right, accept it. learn to have unbiased opinions if you believe in science, or else, join a cult. hardcore evidence falsifying these claims in the reply section would be greatly appreciated.

@sonofcy 7 лет назад

At last a balanced opinion, as you say, the answer lies in observed results and empirical interpretation and above all in independent fair replication. If this bloke's wrong/fraudulent or whatever, let the scientific method prove it one way or another.

@chbrules 6 лет назад

This dingus is cherry picking and misrepresenting science and math findings to argue his point. He is begging the question (logical fallacy). He went out to prove his hypothesis any way he could, even breaking logic and science to do so.

@VperVendetta1992 5 лет назад

Prove it.

@nickdrapela8294 5 лет назад

DKK, you have it backwards. Pre-Renaissance Catholics were not skeptical, they believed whatever they were told without thinking. People here who don’t buy this “experiment” are being skeptical. We’re asking for more proof. That’s what scientists are supposed to do. (Even though 21st century scientists are fairly often now charmed into belief by faith in other scientists without evidence, but that is a whole separate topic.) scientist = skeptic

@wakerickman 5 лет назад

the onus of proff is on those who want to say there stupatsendios claims are true, not the other way round

@jeremygutierrez4083 3 года назад

To answer the second gentleman's question at the end, is "intent". The action of "intent" is what influences the outcome.

@bryanlewis8777 3 года назад

how about attention?

@hummingbirdbumblebee4618 3 года назад

Incog Exactly what I have been reading for the last 40 years. Intent is why quarks burst forth spinning billions of times a second as 3 points of light forming protons and neutrons. We are in the middle of constant creation as we are projected holograms of our own electrical selves. With each thought image we have, we create our own selves as holograms. We spin and pulsate so fast, that we don't even know we are creating our own blood vessels, etc. We are NOT physical or biological or material or solid. Therefore, covid is a lie with a patent created with intent to scare people into compliance. What I say is "what is there to own?" Imagine oligarchs managing holographic "people" with fear when the whole time we are not even solid and don't even die.

@ryandowney3577 3 года назад

Intent is decidedly not the same thing as consciousness. In any case, this experiment is fraudulent.

@apollolasky2104 6 лет назад

I think it is more accurate to conclude consciousness, is an electromagnetic spectral interference that is in a penetrating energetic state similar to an x-ray. I.E is able to pass soft material, and Or to the way a neutrino is able to pass through the earth. The the mind "bending" the wave like water does to light via refraction.

@coopergates9680 5 лет назад

Next test to avoid some of the placebo effect: Try the meditators again, and do it all the same, except ask them to concentrate on things totally unrelated to the double slit process. See if their effect goes away.

@matthewmackenzie3504 7 лет назад

does this mean that light and all forms of energy "act" differently when we either don't know if them or don't think of them?

@ketherwhale6126 4 года назад

The Theorist of Everything YES

@DavidFMayerPhD 3 года назад

@seepooha 7 лет назад

Buddha:"I've told you so" )))

@mrbeyonder6081 3 года назад

ancient hindu scriptures told way before buddha

@romrebel1855 3 года назад

@@mrbeyonder6081 they are not hindu.

@leethomson5733 3 года назад

@@romrebel1855 so what bloon

@romrebel1855 3 года назад

beyond religion

@Heybuddy101 3 года назад

this stuff is not religion ''siddha sankalpa'' Perfect Thought, which is origin of all these law of attraction/manifestation/thought affect matter stuff most likely these are going into pseudoscience stuff which is I don't like to talk about much also if you look at the human beings' creation you can see that everything started with thoughts and physical action that came along the way to manifest particular outcome that is desired to be achieved so I can tell you that you don't need to put your faith/belief to work for you instead having clarity like you really understood the material that is being talked around those who actually percieved bits and pieces plus you can put your physical action to create certain things with positive attitude which will for sure you'll manifest what you want or/but you can acquire certain physic abilities like siddhas did. They consider thought and object as same which caused them to have no time lag at all in their manifestation which is not easy thing to do since people are filled their own mind with other people's opinion and decided to make their past and future literally the same. For these people will always be hard to acquire Perfect Thought capability.

@colinwhite5355 10 месяцев назад

I’m imaging a traveler on a train journey around the world. He has his eyes closed. For one second he is allowed to open his eyes. After the journey he is asked to describe the world based on what he saw. Is this where we are? It’s a start and utterly exhilarating.

@davincimemes3631 2 года назад

Very good Colloquium! Thanks for sharing!

@IrakliShengelia 5 лет назад

Is there any followup on this? More independent replications, critic...etc?

@lungflogger9 7 лет назад

I am now sending a mental image that the presenter is Donald Duck.....not working yet but I'm going to keep trying.

@0ooTheMAXXoo0 7 лет назад

Your post makes you seem a fool of the highest order. I guess we should all just ignore science, the bible tells you all you need to know, right? Don't be afraid to learn about science. The more you learn the more you will understand. People involved in science usually love to share so there is no excuse to be ignorant of facts.

@lungflogger9 7 лет назад

It was just a joke. I am an atheist. I love science and I believe the discipline of science has delivered far more in the past 200 years than over 2000 years of mythology.

@kscottvarga9606 7 лет назад

You should imagine a sense of humor...

@silentgrove7670 3 года назад

I hope more physicists investigate this phenomena. I know this is not a very scientific statement though my sense of all of this is "Everything is connected." Consciousness is part of reality and you cannot separate them.

@DaFlashGuy7 Год назад

lots of us around! I've always been an intuitive type and have questioned this even in the 4th grade. There seems to be a function within us that pushes us toward the "connectedness" of everything. As if the universe sought to know itself very well, as if already connected at the same time.

@Li.Siyuan 5 лет назад

Fascinating!

@ericswain4177 3 года назад

Wow finally ! Humanity may make that next leap in evolution. There are a few that discovered this fact many years ago I am happy to say I am able to follow the path set by one.

@lmtlsss 5 лет назад

This should be front page news. I’m stunned it’s even here on YT.

@newfreenayshaun6651 Год назад

When the majority of people start understanding this, we will no longer ever need a doctor again.

@KingaGorski 3 года назад

These experiments are always so intriguing. Double slit gets me every time!

@chuckjohnson5985 7 лет назад

I remember the future it is like it happened before i was born.I can only remember big events and only 1 or 2 days before they happen.

@harmhoeks5996 7 лет назад

Seeing the comment section I think we should just replicate the experiment and see who is right.

@0xAV 3 года назад

Amazing job sir 🙏🏻

@namonymus Месяц назад

As a scientifically educated materialist, I never believed in metaphysics until I learned spiritual techniques and accidentally tested telekinesis and mind control. I succeeded in performing small tasks in telekinesis and predicting details like shapes and colors with closed eyes. Over the past decade, I conducted extensive research on both quantum physics and the spirituality of consciousness powers. It's worth noting that certain authorities may suppress knowledge about these abilities. Even chatbots like GPT dismiss them due to lack of scientific evidence."

@valeforedark 6 лет назад

Shows that consciousness "possibly" affects matter.

@eliteextremophile8895 3 года назад

Unfortunately this doesn't show anything.

@danielmcgregor8803 3 года назад

Phenomenal work and presentation.

@ashtonmitchell9065 5 лет назад

This guy has a really soothing voice

@Gunandrunandgun 3 года назад

Let me guess without watching this video. It talks about quantum physics experiments while misinterpreting what physicists mean by the word "observer" when they talk about how the wave function collapses when observed.

@Museko 3 года назад

Bingo. It even uses anecdotes of what sciencetists think is going on after the experiment and presenting it as truth even though this was disproven long ago.

@alwaysright237 3 года назад

@@Museko where was this disproved

@Museko 3 года назад

@@alwaysright237 In a lot of places? Any scientist with quantum physics knowledge who is worth their salt knows this is nonsense. You can learn about this from any physics textbook that covers quantum. Any experiment that uses a camera "observes" the experiment and changes the result. A camera observes no differently from a human. If the experiment is performed with no interference, you'll see the electrons behave as a wave. If you observe them with either a human or ANY OTHER observation device, interference is introduced, collapsing the wave equation and producing results that appear akin to classical physics. Here's a version of the experiment you can perform at home: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-kKdaRJ3vAmA.html This modifies the experiment a bit but still maintains the concept in a smart way that doesn't require hard-to-acquire equipment. One way to perform this is to only fire one electron at a time so a multitude of electrons won't interfere with each other and collapse the wave equation. Firing many can collapse it and allow one to obtain the classical results. By interference, I mean anything that causes an interaction between particles, whether that is a collision or a force via some field. You can also think of this as anything that can be used to obtain information about the particle.

@alwaysright237 3 года назад

@@Museko very good and detailed response , thank you ....question...do you believe this is a simulation/V.R. or not and why ?

@Museko 3 года назад

@@alwaysright237 I have no idea, I've thought about that a lot several times though. It's kind of a cop-out reply, but I have no way of knowing. I've tried arguing for and against and it just feels improbable that we will ever know without outside help. It gets especially strange to think about when you consider that if we are in a simulation, the physics of the universe "above" ours could be completely different. What if that universe is also simulated and the one above it? How far would this chain of simulation continue? It is odd how our universe is so finely-tuned for life. However, it's a little less odd if you think about how we are only here due to the fact that our universe can support life. There are some great PBS Space Time videos that cover some of these topics that you may be interested in. Some of them cover some hypotheses about how universes can birth new universes, but whether that's true or not is highly debateable. Off the top of my head, these ones are particularly interesting, but I always find every video pretty entertaining: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-T4oYvSH6jJ8.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rFgpKlcpzNM.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-K8gV05nS7mc.html You may want to check out some of their videos about theories for the structure of our universe. Without getting a masters in physics or studying hardcore physics textbooks, this is a pretty good alternative to learn about the basics of our universe. I feel that this is the best way at the moment to satiate the how, what, why, and where of life.

@Teacher_Sal 5 лет назад

Love it!!

@cmvamerica9011 5 лет назад

Consciousness can become entangled with other parts of the universe within the universal mind. Everything is connected to everything else. We only see things as separate entities because time separates things in space. Everything was once packed into an unimaginably small space, therefore everything is entangled from the beginning. So payer works, positive thoughts work, forgiveness works, compassion works, and all of these are entangled with Love. Thankyou Jesus.

@heyarno 5 лет назад

Having the Interferometer on top of some Servers would be a big source for vibration. Some may be mechanically induced, others inductive.

@0ooTheMAXXoo0 4 года назад

So? If vibrations are a problem then they isolate the equipment. Also, not sure why you think random vibrations affect the system coincidentally with human interactions. That would be really strange.

@0ooTheMAXXoo0 4 года назад

They describe testing conditions and they are isolating the equipment from vibrations and EMF. The picture is not representative of testing conditions and there was no indication to make the viewer think so, especially with the details of the many, many tests being in the same video...

@base12universe 7 лет назад

Excellent presentation and thought provoking, well researched findings. I believe that consciousness will be proven to be a quantum force that is every bit as real as the other four known forces of physics. We just don't understand it well enough yet, but leading edge work such as yours is helping to resolve that. Thanks and keep up the great work!