NEW MAP! - How Did I Manage To Do THIS?! 

why didnt he killguard orange in hawaii? just to be sure

​@@cordyluscataphractus5863lol

U mean like farm

Maybe they were used to other game modes or maps, seen people who overspecialize that they are useless outside their niche

I think they played better than purple or green green was clearly a newbie you can see it in the playstyle

​@v0cal true but still, sitting in the corner and not breaking green was not the play

@@Finnh1 that is true but it doesn’t change the fact that his plsystyle was better

@v0cal in that situation no, in other situations maybe

No. The game is just a multiplayer game. One mans game can always be ruined by 1 person no matter what. Green wastes all their troop but in return black and orange dies but green cant win.

The top strategy largely depends on the cards. In progressive, there can be huge sets late game, so holding bonuses is less important than being able to eliminate others for cards. The masters were probably more used to this mode, where doomstacking is much more helpful for kills. In fixed, the sets stay small all game, so bonuses are much more important to hold. The idea behind doomstacking in fixed is to threaten others to not break you and not lose a big stack in the event you get broken, while splitting allows you to make it much harder to break you with stacks on all points. Never being allowed to hold or losing a big stack is usually game over in fixed, so they both have their benefits and problems. I find it is usually best to do a combination of the two, with one big stack on one point and the rest with small stacks.

There's blizzards in the goddamn subsaharan Africa in some other maps. Don't overthink it.

ikr! lmk if u find it

dont think so... if i had to guess would be US or Can.

i have now watched further and he explained it, but still think it would've been worth

The troop bonuses were too low. It wasn’t worth it.

⁠@@getass3290the card trade in was +12, while black had 9 troops (all 1’s touching his territories) which is worth it when you also get attackers bonus. + you deny any other player from getting the cards. But maybe I’m wrong idk, just seemed like a good play to me😅

​@@StormpjuhIt wasn't worth it

How would you do that though? With geographical maps, things are what they are. Middle territories will always be surrounded by land on all sides, and are thus going to be harder to hold by default. Of course, they mostly give bigger bonuses too, so fair's fair

Its easy. For example you could make Texas it's own territory. You can just divide the big territories in the middle into smaller ones.

@@luisleongaming1776 yeah they're harder to hold by default, which is why they need to be smaller to balance it out. If there's a big bonus in the middle, it's unbalanced because it's hard to hold, but if they do hold it they can eliminate anyone. I don't understand what you mean by not being able to make them smaller? Just divide the territories into smaller bonuses lmao.

No this game is more strategic

fyi he has said that he finds risk more fun to do/simulating, so sadly for u dont expect much :(