@@dynaa4168 There's 1,6 million of Japanese descendants in Brazil (2017), most of them being from São Paulo city. Take a look at "Bairro da Liberdade" In São Paulo, It's hard to guess that this place is in Brazil. There's also descendants of Koreans and Chinese here, but not as large as Japanese. And it's kinda hard to a Brazilian be 100% something, so even Asians here have something from Europe or Africa. It's not like, a *really* large numbers of Eurasians, If we compare with the total population of Brasil, but there are.
One of the main problems with this idea is that in most of Europe and North America, native reproduction is not the main driver of population growth. It's immigration. So significant ethnic enclaves will remain.
SWeRP StormTracking America is open to anyone coming legally but no one voted to have illegal immigration. Not fair I have to pay taxes. If someone wants to come here, by all means, please come-but come legally!
@Oricand A portuguese person raised in portugal wouldn't use that argument... because lots of Portuguese nationals leave to go countries that pays more, do you even know what's the minimum salary??? Is ridiculous compared to other European countries
@philip Trevor Any new generation has new genetic combinations and potential mutations. So within the same racial group or not there would be evolution
@@abrahamgonzalez3382 Amerindians are Proto Mongoloid and Asians (china, japan, south korea, modern day siberians)are Neo MongoIoid, and from what i seen the Amerindian genes are way stronger than the European genes. why you think most Mestizos from latin america have straight bIack hair, dark eyes and bronze skin. those are not european features. zambos have curly hair.
Gabriel Barrueco Euro-Americans More than Africans. The main exemple were the heros, bandeirantes. Much more in my opinion. They were the greatest heros os brazilian históry. Some euro-asians
Not only that just take a look at the history of America's , American Indians of the past 500 years before the current imposters of today's so called native Americans. The past American Indians clearly look like an admixture of African and Asian.
@@VSLS06 *7 million people used to live here and now its a ghost town* 50,000 to the past 7 million (and thats moderate estimates) prior to 1492 is an insubstantial amount of people, especially compared to the US population of 331 million people right now.
I have read that marriages across cultures in New York city can be somewhat explained by sex ratios in the immigrant populations. A greater ratio of irish women and a greater ratio of Italian men led to this being a common combination. Whereas Russian immigrants to NY had equal proportions of men and women, therefore remaining homogeneous in marriages.
@@XavierbTM1221 Pure native American and Turkic culture have also been eradicated. The reason you think only white will be affected is because you love to be the victim
@Quīrıtsu修 Wow, you're completely wrong my friend. There is no valid data that supports that. Try again to justify not liking brown people coming to European countries.
My grandfather, Daniel LeBlanc, spoke only French in Lousiana until age 12 when his new school beat him until he spoke English. I am 36 years old in 2020. We are not far removed from this stuff it's amazing.
More like some modern Central Asian Turks like Uzbeks, Uyghurs, Turkmens and even some Kazaks, however the Old-turkic speakers were Asiatic, just like the rest of the East Siberian populations.
In maybe a hundred years, I'm sure many labels will become less relevant but some communities will continue to remain pretty much intact while others undergo changes. It's more useful to look at communal inertia to understand rates of in-group marriage vs. outgroup marriage. Every culture and ethnic group you can divide into some communities with high outgroup marriage rates who will all contribute to the blurring of races but another component will have high inertia for religious, political, social, economic, ethnic, or cultural reasons. Many African Americans, Jews, Amerindians, Mennnonites, and rural white Americans will have a component that will stay in the community even over generational time as a marriage is a marriage and people cluster with people who they can understand.
@Sodomite AnnihilatorStop fear mongering, jesus christ. Those charts that you're looking at don't account for demographical changes that is connected with development, higher education, secularism or education on contraceptives. And btw, if I was you, I'd look up term "genocide", not this bullshit term that white nationalists spew out
@Sodomite Annihilator what is an european? Hegel thought that the heart of europe was the scandinavian contries, nor Tacitus or Suetonio in the roman empire considered the germanic tribes as eurepeans brothers, either Julius Caesar, the caroligian empire of Charlemangne (father of Europe) did not have control over the east and north europe, so can we consider the UK and the scandinavian and rusians as "not european" ? When the caucasicans went out of the caucasus they took europe and the land that we know today as Iran, are the Iranies europeans? In what we know today as europe there has been migrations since prehistoric times of subsaharian tribes, semitic tribes, mongolias, huns and more, that the main reason why europeans are so diverse. Each country does whatever it wants with the inmigration policy, but considering 2 cm of cheeks or 1 cm of lips as the biggest achivement of european society is kind of stupid. Pd: enthicide has more to do with culture destrution than the mixing of two people with diferent features, English, Spanish, Portuguese and French were spread (with steel) through all the continents, how would be possible to change that?
Speak for yourself I'm Britain our genes are a perfect blend of west euro and northern genes , that's mixed I can get behind not half Africans and Asians that's just white people going extint in thier own continent
The American implies nationality not race aka a Australian (non indigenous Australian) Morraccan ( African of Asian descent) American ( where they live now)
In the Expanse, Mars is primarily influenced by it's three biggest colonizers, India, China and Texas. So the Martians have caramel skin, monolids and always say y'all.
Those group is situated in the mariner valley(large canyon that looks like a scar across Mars) region of Mars. Other races are situated at different regions on Mars in the The Expanse.
Crick1952 why mention only an American state, why not also name the province that is launching the most rockets in China and the state of India which launches the most rockets?
Bruh, could the greens(not food😜), whites(not the usual people we're used to seein), & greys b our future offspring with so advanced technology they come back to visit someX for like a historical/educational expedition?👽😲
@philip Trevor lol there's no discussion going on in the comments. its a bunch of Nazis jerking eachother off These losers in the comments are doing a better job ending the white race than their Jewish boogeymen supposedly are.
@@jaredjones1752 I'm usually not a political person at all, but seeing comments like these pisses me off and you should know I'm European and proud and we aren't going anywhere
ok, this is my new favorite channel. I love how you chimed in on the idea that Homo sapiens might diverge into different species at the end, that won't even be genetically compatible. I have always believed we were already in the process of doing this prior to the age of mass transit when we see things like the Rh factor.
@@M16A1-nw4jy rh factor is when 2 different people are not compatible by blood type. And without modern day science, if 2 people who try to reproduce fall into this category, it results in a miscarriage. ie, anyone who falls into this category can't reproduce for the most part unless the female gets a shot in early pregnancy.
@@M16A1-nw4jy no problem. I'm actually the result of rh factor. My mother had to get a shot when she got pregnant with me. I would have been miscarried if she hadn't. In other words, my parents were not genetically compatible, and I am only here because of modern day medicine.
00:04 - "Reproduction is not biased, it doesn't care about morals or ethics or politics, and it isn't selective outside of dominant and recessive traits"; There are historic social taboos against incest (genetic proximity), bestiality (genetic distance), and miscegenation (genetic distance), indicative of reproduction being a a) replication, and b) fitness maximisation process for any given genome, coupled with c) social contract (one cannot expect their tribe to invest resources in genetically distant or unfit members). We also observe consistent discrimination towards intra-population couplings (genetic similarity), despite "unbiasing" attempts to the contrary in modern/western media. a) Hamilton's rule as extended to lineages should theoretically affect reproductive selection (mate preference): the relative genetic distance between two persons affects evolutionary incentive to invest a) genetically and c) monetarily in others, not just their b) fitness. For example, two members of a particular race (population) may be genetically (and therefore altruistically) equivalent to first/second cousins, as compared to members of another race (population). a/b) There is a trade-off between maintaining a full copy of one's genome per replication (asexual reproduction) [maximising replication], and being able to diversify their genome by shuffling variant alleles/mutations between like organisms (sexual reproduction) [maximising fitness], providing protection against extinction (www.nature.com/articles/nature14419), and arguably accelerating speciation under conditions of high environmental stress (death). b) With respect to fitness maximisation, there is a further trade-off between risking an accumulation of deleterious mutations (genetic proximity) [e.g. recessive traits] and risking the loss of advantageous mutations (genetic distance) [e.g. complex non-additive/epistatic effects]; cf the evolution of ashkenazi intelligence through strong ingroup selection (note this high intelligence is linked with recessive deleterious mutations also). c) In males, their short-term reproduction strategy isn't strongly selective outside of fitness ("dominant and recessive traits"), since they are not limited by carrying capacity. Only under conditions of limited resources and commitment (long-term reproductive strategy: paternal investment) should males become particularly selective of genetic proximity. Moreover, when they are bound by a social contract, they are socially motivated to select a mate of relatively close genetic proximity (or all members of the tribe must be allowed similar levels of diversification in their offspring).
@Excalibur The European crusaders beat Arabs in Jerusalem, hundreds of miles away from Europe. They would have been able to beat Zulus and samurais too. And of course we must not forget the vastly outnumbered Spartans who so valiantly fought the thousands of Persians.
Well if you consider Neolithic ancestry as “Middle Eastern,” then sure, but all Europeans have varying degrees of that Neolithic farmer ancestry, but more so in Southern/SE Europe, which would be Italians, Greeks, etc. It has much less to do with more recent historical invasions like from Carthaginians or Arabs/Moors, who had much less of an impact on the gene pool. In any event, Middle Easterners are still “Caucasian” if you will and genetically (and phenotypically) cluster with Europeans way more than any other human population group. So to sum it all up, the vast majority of ethnic Italians look very European, just with a higher percentage of darker hair and eyes than what you’d see in Northern Europe.
@@EdTowel-ww7yh Go back to school bro. Latin America have african, native, asian, and europeans heritage. I have most than 5 ethnicity in my heritage, portuguese, bantos from Africa, native American from Brasil, jews, north africans and other that I don't know exacly . People from US don't know nothing about history and geography. And Asia still is very most diversity than Africa.
8:46 that’s an interesting point that I’ve noticed. Social media makes everyone start acting the same. Used to be you get a different dialect, dance, way of dressing etc., from say NY vs LA and in between...now everyone tries to be the same. It’s weird.
The process began with widespread literacy and newspapers. Radio and then television then accelerated it, social media is just the icing on the cake. Even 30 years ago I found vox pop pieces on the television in which people from Liverpool or some parts of Scotland were interviewed were very difficult to understand. While people from those regions still have distinct accents, it is much rarer for me to hear ones that are completely incomprehensible. The same thing is true of travelling interstate in Australia. When I was a child and even a young women, going interstate meant new road rules, different coloured road markings, different brands of food and drink. There was even the unique square milk bottle in one part of South Eastern Queensland (in those days milk bottles were glass and returned to the milko to be re-used) and milkos in other parts of the country wouldn't take the square bottles off you. These days you don't even get that much sense of travelling to a foreign country when you go overseas. The style of road signs, the supermarkets, etc are all the same. On the plus side, the growing uniformity has led to some decidedly unpleasant and anti-social behaviours becoming less fashionable. I can live without people chewing with their mouths open or spitting in the street or not using deodorant. However, the social media can be a bit of a double-edged sword. Misogyny and racism are on the rise, encouraged by some sleazebags who are active in social media. Similarly, there are those who use social media to peddle ignorance (anti-vaxxers, flat-earthers, young earth creationists and so on). Also on the negative side, I think we are losing languages, dialects and customs and that makes us all poorer.
@@resourcedragon honestly you're right. I really think a lot people overlook the media idea and how cultures interchanged with different ideas, resources, and information for over thousands of years. Also, Globalization was always inevitable, humans loved to venture, migrate, or conquer certain places around the globe.
@WhiteNationalist Portugal Bison False. Racially pure people are those who were geographically isolated for millenia like Aborigines or Andamese. Europeans(which is not a race) who had trade with Mediterranean basin and Asia enjoyed more racial/ethnical diversity than the aforementioned people.
yeah, but you guys have no predominant phenotype or shared distinguishing morphology to put you in a clearly separate category. You're still just a mixture of many peoples.
@@randomindividual7704 You've never encountered a national socialist. You only fight normie conservatives. And the fact that you're so offended by a person wanting to preserve their people is disgusting. But you're probably just a sock account in any case.
@@SeraphimGoose lmao preserve their people? from who? race mixing has been for thousands of years and there's still distinct (only in appearence) races
This is something that I have thought about for years. I would absolutely love it if you did a few more videos on future ethnic groups. Additionally it would be great if you could speculate on what might future human races/species look like on other planets based on the environmental conditions that they might be subject to.
"and self segregated ethnic groups or autonomous regions are often looked down with great scrutiny... with a few exceptions such as Quebec" wait what? We are still generaly openly looked down upon with great scrutiny in Canada XD
Found out a ton about my French-Canadian ancestors recently. Fascinating how they really preserved the culture and stayed within their own. Huge families, too. Excited to learn more.
Exist in the Caribbean. Not new. Jamaican county motto is Out of Many one People. Why do Americans believe that they know everything about the world 🌎 when all that they talk about re race already exist in parts of the world.
I like the way he discusses possible human colonisation/settlement of other interplanetary bodies in outer space. We would be discussing differences between Mooners, Earthers (or Earthlings), Martians, Venusians, Jupiterians, Saturnians. Even other planets and moons as far up as *Uranus!*
Interesting video! Speaking of humans evolving differently in other planets, I did watch a Star Wars theory video a while back about how the different non-human alien species came to be in the lore and it suggests that they came from humans migrating to different planets and that might be somewhat true in our reality if it does actually play out many generations from now.
I’m a mix of 6 nationalities, Asian & Euro-Native American; my mom is Korean, my dad is French & Native American(Cherokee) from my grandpa & Irish, English, Polish from my grandma. My twins are all that plus African American 🌍
Beautiful! You can mark that one "complete" on my usual list of reiterations lol. Here's a few more ideas: 1. In the same regard, asking what a Pan-Earth ethnicity would like would fit into this. 2. Do a video on the ethnic groups of the rebooted "Battlestar Galactica" pre-Cylon attack in the 12 colonies of Kobal. I always found that fascinating because each of the ethnic groups is based on a planet that has a name from the Greek zodiac, and the ethnic groups are named from that. They also take aspects of Earth cultures and re-brand them with different names that fits their civilization. I won't give out to many spoilers of why this is. Even if you didn't like the show, this aspect of it is fascinating. I suggest doing this in the same manner as how you did the "Game of Thrones" universe map. *In addition, if you wanted to do more on fictional genres, another good one that represents a hypothetical Earth is Jules Verne's "The Time Machine", especially in relation to this video! 3. What if the Earth were inverted in geography so that wherever there is land, there is water, and the tallest point is the lowest point and vice versa? While it'd be a stretch to say we may even be able to breath on a world like this, what would human civilization of "Inversia" look like? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yl-6-Yzt--A.html 4. While I am not suggesting doing this idea as an actual "what if?" video, the theoretical scenario would present some interesting analysis. You might also want to do a thought analysis on the short lived TV show "Terra Nova". (Note: I do not take the "dinosauroid" presented with scientific legitimacy; however, I am suggesting this because this could lead to brainstorming of some fascinating topics!) -ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yTnzYeKZQrI.html -en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stenonychosaurus -blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/dinosauroids-revisited-revisited/ 5. *Un-contacted peoples of the world beyond the Sentilinese. In addition to the Amazon, Papua New Guinea, and the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, are there any un-contacted people in the Congo River Basin? 6. What if extinct language families survived to today and became their own nations? This would be in the same format as the "what if these languages united into a country" videos.
I disagree. As a 3rd generation mixed race person I noticed my family members appear as one race or another. Mixed race is a temporary state that eventually goes back to one race or another.
I get what your saying but not when you as a mixed raced person have a child with another mixed raced person you will see your child has the “mixed state” tooz
Tessellation actually it’s not true at all if you have 2 people who are of 50 mix near enough there child will remain at that mixed raced state but just have their own looks
Yeah me and my siblings are all 1/4 black and 3/4 white. My sister looks white, I look arab and my brother looks black lol. We all have white kids though so you’re right
I know what you mean. Family member was a really old Aunt who was white and her husband was chinese. Now their grandchild (my third cousin) looks more white than asian.. Brown hair, somewhat slanted but not really bright brown eyes, really pale skin.. Eurasian? But more leaning towards European?
I love that there are more comments anticipating fighting in the comments than there are actual arguments well, that or people are just liking those comments more
Obviously you are very ignorant of things such as Creole, mestizo, metis, Cajun, maroon and the list goes on and on and on. Stop trying to control the world socialist and accept the will of the Gods. Races as we know them are not going to disappear but new ones are going to come on out it's the way always has been it's the way it always will be. Get over yourself
That's not evolution, that's a physiological response to the lower gravity. Raise any person from the time they are a baby in a lower gravity, and they will wind up tall and long limbed, with low density, fragile bones and under-developed muscles.
Exactly Euro asian - north indians specially kashmiris and punjabia mixed with nepalis Afro asian - diff parts if india e Euro african also mostly in north west parts of india But these racial groups are more common in pakistan
here in brazil at least 80 -90% have some mixed roots, even if they dont look like they would have it. I'm mixed portuguese, spanish, french, dutch and indigenous. my gf is mixed italian, german, swiss and indigenous. my best friend is spanish, indigenous, black and italian, another friend of mine is japanese + italian ... and there it goes... its something like in usa, but in usa they didnt mixed too much at the beggining as nowadays. In brazil they mixed since the colonization, coz portugal had a small population, so they had to mix with the locals in order to colonize, so we are the result of 500 years of mixing, what can happen to other locals of the world in something like 100-150 years coz now its easier to go from one place to another
I am mixed italian, german (maybe germanized poles because i heard that my german ancestors spoke a weird german and came probably from the danzig//gdansk area) and probably some portuguese too because my grandmother's surname had before her wedding originated in portugal and she herself was born in the northeast of the country where most people hhave portuguese decendency.
Have children then! As a french African, I forced myself to have 3 kids (through marriage, of course), I did it for my country. I sacrificed my career, my comfort and even my life. This is my contribution to the world. I can understand that not everyone can have this spirit of self sacrifice.
Every race has its own land, it should be that way and they should stay there, no division, no rebellion, no violence, just look at Japan, a very homogeneous nation, and a peaceful and great one at that, diversity is difference, difference creates issues between each other, wanting to live in peace is not racism.
The modern Japanese are a mixture of Jomon and Yayoi, Jomon came from Siberia and had an affinity to the Himalayas, Yayoi is more related to East Asia, they are homogeneous because they have created a complete fusion of races, but they are not a pure race.
Again, like you said, barring cataclysm, I think the biggest influence on future human divergence besides migration will be birth rates. We all know that Europe and East Asia have very low rates but the rate is trending lower and lower across most regions including Latin America and the Middle East. This means that the future biggest genetic contributors to the global gene pool, and possibly the most economically dominant as well, will likely be those who are as far removed from this trend as is currently possible, namely places like Sub-Saharan Africa and the Philippines.
Africas birth rate is decreasing not as much as Asia but it is decreasing and will level of before end century, China and India alone nearly have 3x the whole population of Africa, along with the rest of the Asian countries I still think that it’ll take awhile before Africa ever passes Asia and possibly may not.likely it may remain relatively equal in the long run, cause Asia is significantly larger and Africa is growing fast but is already decreasing so will likely be equal contribution.
Future? The ones in the thumbnail all look like a normal brazilians for me ...greetings from a brazilian! My ancestors (that I know of) are 3 european ethinicits: portuguese, german and ducth; native brazilian and African (from ex-slaves so I don't know from where but is probably some Bantu tribe)
The one labeled "Euro-african" in the thumbnail does look like the average mixed race brazilian. The one labeled "afro-asian" looks very much like the native amerindians. To be a perfect brazilian ethinic representation just replace the eurasian girl with a western european one, preferably portuguese or italian since those are the two main origins of the european component in Brazil, and there ya go.
@@ChristianDoretti brazil has the largest japanese population outside of japan, and also about 40% of brazil is white... I wouldn't be surprised if white/japanese existed in brazil. Brazil has everything
We are Kazakhs who live in Central Asia of the same race as the Americans, but we have a unique case, European features prevail, even though many have an Asian appearance, but with blue eyes and yellow hair, can it be connected that our ancestors are Scythians? But unfortunately, the Iranians and the world as a whole do not recognize that our ancestors Scythians, even the last film of one of the most popular directors of our country Akan Sataev the film Tomiris was criticized by the Iranians, the film is dedicated to the Scythian Queen Tomiris, it upset me so, because the Scythians are our ancestors! and the Iranians do not want to admit it, but despite this, the Iranians are our brothers, thanks for attention, peace be to you all P. S. Even the girl in the screensaver video where it says euro asian model Ayia Shalkar and she is a Kazakh
As much as I agree that what's left of the orginial native Indo-european populations were absorbed by the Turkic migrations from Eastern Siberia, actually.. you got it all wrong, it's the other way around mate. Kazaks are still overwhelmingly Asiatic as they should be, since the Proto-turkic speakers were predominantly Asiatic. So yes, if you wanna come any close to being a "true turk" then you have to be as asian as possible, whether you like it or not, get over it and embrace it instead of making up an abomination of a psuedo scientific historical narrative and ending up looking like a total pathetic fool with massive identical crisis. Also, "Iranian" is used for the population of Iran today and they are far from being your "blood brothers", even if you were referring to Indo-iranian speakers. Btw the way this is coming from a fellow Central Asian Turk.
@Il Principe Yes, most Kazakhs have an Asian appearance (approximately 70 or 65%) due to the recent invasion of the Dzungars and Mongols, but I’m not saying that before that we didn’t have an Asian gene, just the Turks and the Huns, even the Scythians themselves created marriages with the Chinese and Mongols, took wives and gave daughters , but especially under Genghis Khan there was a genocide of the people of Central Asia and we came to the result of which we see now, but the Caucasian genes are preserved, for example, I have yellow hair, but my eyes are brown and my face is like a European, even every day people confuse me with Russian or German which about in our country a lot
All the races in the thumbnail already exist Euro-Asian: Central Asia African-Asian: Madagascar Euro-African: Brazil, Dominican republic, Puerto Rico and various other countries in the Americas
Ιt's really unfair that all those non whites in Europe are not your property. And that you must pay all those cops and border patrols so those who already are your property, remain your property and you stay out of jail. And what the fuck is "human trafficking"? How messed up is Europe.
@@pac1fic055 it's forced because all the politicians continue High migration from these places even though whole numbers show way over 50% of Europeans in most countries oppose either all of migration or high number of migration from the third world. So the people don't want more migration but the politicians in many countries not all are pushing it down their throats. So yes it's forced.
You are European white, not the only white. There are Whites in Afghanistan/Pakistan /Iran /Kurds /Turk/Arab/Moors. You are Ethnic Whites not the only ones with White Features.
I'm Moroccan,my Ancestry test last year came back 89% North african,7% iberian and 4% west african,it's worth mentioning i have straight light brown hair,blueish green eyes and white skin. This is very similar to the results the majority of moroccans get (you'll find many videos on youtube of moroccans and north africans all of which have received pretty much the same results) If you guys are interested i can make a video about mine. one thing i noticed on all your videos there's always idiots and crazy afrocentrists and eurocentrists who sprout nonsense in the commemt section,like this one guy one time claimed he's north african maghrebi but said he's cushitic 🤦🏻♂️ some straight out lie to your face,so i lol at the afrocentrist wiki educated folks who say north africans used to be black and the eurocentrists who claim egyptians were scandinavian looking both are wrong,we are mediterranean,just like the italians,the greeks,the phonecians the asyrians the spaniards and the turks. it gets annoying when you're the real deal but some poser from atlanta tries to sabotage your identity.
They were different Dynasty in Egypt ? First Amazigh-Berber, then Kushit (during 1 or 2 dynasty), then Greeks like Cleopatre so European, Roman (So European), Persian. Then, arab invade the country and Destroy all.
@@alexanderivkin7086 maybe it's because I'm native Spanish speaker, but in my language, race is only for animals, dog have races, not humans. When someone talk type of human 'races' it just peace me off! 🤦
@@gabrielpinero2543 The fact, that races exist, does not mean hating anybody. Our planet is diverse and this is what makes it so fantastic. And I am German not Estados Unidos American.
yeah, but you guys have no predominant phenotype or shared distinguishing morphology to put you in a clearly separate category. You're still just a mixture of many peoples.
@@visicircle I’m confused. How does this counteract with her argument? Isn’t she agreeing with that idea but stating that it’s been happening for centuries due to the increased mixture in America? That would mean that this isn’t any future news. Not being aggressive just curious.
@@cristianbonilla800 The video is about potential new races in the future. She's saying Latinos are mixed, and thus, some sort of new race. But they are not. If you look at the textbook definition of a human race, Latin America as a whole does not fit the bill. Perhaps some peoples or countries there do. Regardless, she's really not speaking to the video's point.
Euro-african already exists. Most African Americans are mixed and so are the "Coloured" groups on the African continent. Coloured here is not as derogatory as in America but signifies a distinct people group of mixed heritage and culture. Edit: As for Afro-Asian, the AmaXhosas have a clan known as the AmaMolos who are descendants of Chinese merchants/ explorers who shipwrecked on the South Eastern coast of Africa. There are tribes in Kenya and/or Tanzania (up the East Coast of Africa) whose Asian ancestors suffered a similar fate and/or chose to settle down. With Chinese recent business explorations in Africa there are bound to be Sino-African progeny although their identity won't be tied to the established Sino-African tribes and clans. The Euro-Asian admixture... Look at the Siberians and people along the Russian-Chinese border. There's the Mongol border too. The Anglo-Indian mixed communities in India also formed their own identity based on their European heritage. And the reality is that wherever territory is obtained through war there is bound to be offspring of mixed blood. Where territory is acquired through trade, there is bound to be offspring of mixed blood. Wherever humans migrate, mixture will happen unless old cultural identities and customs are strictly adhered to (us vs them mentality). This is easy to do across colour lines but not so across ethnic lines (among people of the same skin color and features; because that's what race is: an attempt at systematically categorising humans based on their skin tone and features).
Waldo Adams well I wanted to give an opinion but you already wrote it.👍 For me there is only human race. All this stuff have always existed, unfortunately mostly through war. And I feel Europeans like England, France or American (USA) know this and they try to keep their white (race) I should say, while most Africans or in Latin America, mixture still exist, and america is like the old Europe, Asia or Africa they’re gaining a new culture because mixture is still happening, but at the cost of eliminating another culture (Native Americans)
Waldo Adams don’t forget brazil, 45% of their population is mixed race predominantly European and African descent, with some indigenous American/Indian ancestry.
Yinksy93 Indigenous are not from India. False label for the past five hundred years because Christopher Columbus thought he was in India when he landed in the Caribbean.
Yinksy93 And dominican republic, cuba, puerto rico, suriname, guyana, columbia in America and south africa, Madagascar, Reunion island, mauritius island in Africa ...
Waldo Adams Most African Americans are not mixed. Admixture has a different meaning to being mixed race. The things is African American is an identity that includes black (those of predominant African descent) and those who are mixed race, due to the so called racist “one drop rule”.
They already exist. They’re called Latinos aka the most mixed ethnic group in the world 😊🌍 I’m Mexican and my genetic makeup is Native American, Spanish, British, Irish, Jewish, Indian, Middle Eastern, and Black.
I'm Black and do not nor will I ever identify as African. 1.) Africa is a continent full of many ethnic groups which vary by region and even country. 2.) In Africa there is no Pan-Africanism. Only your tribe for example Nigerians would be Ibo, Igbo, Yoruba before being Nigerian or African. 3. I've done extensive research regarding my family tree predated the transatlantic slave trade. And they start with Mullato people meaning they were already mixed. My European heritage wasn't due to rape as these mixed race people were married 4.) No confirmation of any full blood Africans born outside of the United States. ( All my ancestors were born in the US) So for me to claim African heritage would be insulting as I having nothing to claim other than someone telling me I just because I'm Black. I'm very proud to be Black. I do not hate Africans( I love them very much) nor do I deny that I descend from them.... I'm 10+ generations removed from it as well as my European and Native American heritage as well. I claim my Blackness Because that's what I know...All of the beautiful struggle it is.
5aral we are superior and that’s why you’re jealous and you just admitted it. Right now the tide is turning and we’re waking up and that’s why spineless cowards like you are mad. We will defeat you. There isn’t going to be a blob race with a low iq like you.
Mixed human here 🙋🏻♀️ My dad is “Hispanic” (which isn’t a race as you said in the video, thank you for that because some people don’t actually realize that, and my mom is white) I am: •••80% European••• -50%northwestern European (from my mom) -30%Southern European/Spanish (from my dad) •••15% Native American Indian••• (From my dad) •••And the other 5% is a mix of south Asian, middle eastern, and African. (Also from from dad)••• Sorry I just find thus stuff fascinating and I love the mix I am! ☺️💚 no one can ever tell exactly what I am and I love it!
@@ChristianDoretti So You're saying my race doesn't exist? There are literally all types of people in South Africa. Do Some Research Buddy. Don't go on the internet and argue about stuff you clearly know nothing of.
There actually is a lot of evidence that U.S. dialects (both regional and social/ethnic) are still diverging in the vernacular. (I'm counting things like "black culture" vs. "white culture" as ethnicity to differentiate them from race, which I define as socially significant phenotype difference)
Go bake a cookie guy chill out the fun is just beginning. Learn to truly love yourself and the cultures around you and you'll never fear and you will feel true peace and security with life. Don't waste your whole life fighting a race war.
I think both India and China are almost as diverse when it comes to the genetics of their population. The difference would be that the Chinese had a Dominant group i.e. the Han Chinese who managed to assimilate most of the other groups in that country into one unifying Chinese culture. Whereas in India no such group was able to be that dominating and hence there are both genetic and cultural differences between various groups in the country. One of the reasons for this can be that India wasn't really one united political entity for most of it's history(only the Mauryans, Guptas, Mughals and the British Raj were able to unite the entire country, with the Guptas and Mughals still not being able to conquer some regions of the subcontinent). Whereas China has been more consistent in having empires that were able to unify the whole country.
China is anything but diverse and multicultural, is that a joke? china is literally an ethnostate, same as south korea and japan. Almost zero genetic variation
@@el_iron_duke China isn't diverse, 90% of the population is Han Chinese. India on the other hand is crazy diverse, even Indians don't fully understand what happened there.
So basically this video is talking about the "future" when this has been happening in Latin America for hundreds of years! 😂 That's why in Latin America nobody is really white, nobody is really black, nobody is really Arab, nobody is really Asian... We are a mix of this beautiful world!
@WhiteNationalist Portugal Bison Yeah, you can see the same in places like Dominican Republic, Cuba, Puerto Rico and some places in Colombia, they aren't that beautiful as ignorant people say.
WhiteNationalist Portugal Bison someone can look pretty outside and terribly look ugly inside once you get to know their outlook in life, tendencies, behaviors. No one group of people totally look pretty not all Asians look pretty not all blacks look pretty and not all whites look pretty. To you specifically without trying to be offensive only maybe 1% percent of white girls look pretty to me and I don’t think white guys are any different. And maybe in those 1% are arrogant, self centered, self entitled and materialistic. Again I’m not trying to be offensive but you as a self described “white nationalist” I thought you might need to know to be white isn’t automatically qualification of being pretty or handsome. I would choose some black or brown girls over some white girls in a heart beat and vise versa.
Well, my family may have already done that! My father was full Indigenous American of half Comanche (his mother) and half Abenaki (his father), my mother is half Irish, her mother having immigrated here as a teenager and almost immediately afterwards, she married my grandfather, who was Italian with some possible Austrian ancestry in there somewhere. My ex-husband is half Cuban on his father's side, with his grandmother being Afro-Cuban and his grandfather being much more Spanish in his lineage, my ex's mother is German, Irish, and Scottish. My son married a woman who is of almost half Nigerian descent, with some Congolese thrown in from her father, and English, Irish and German from her mother. Hopefully, one of my very racially blended, beautiful, and brilliant granddaughters will fall in love with, oh I don't know, but perhaps someone from Japan or mainland Asia!
Many developed countries are melting pots. Among many races, Mongoloid race is easy to be extinct by interracial marriage ; Eastern Asia ; CN, MN, KR, JP. | Пeрeмога Үкраїнi!
@@sKTkC Everything he said is objectively true and backed up by fact, its merely his opinion that White people should stay with their own.. Maybe you should address what's wrong with his comment and not let your own emotions dictate whether he's wrong or not. Its not exactly that controversial of an opinion anyway when you consider that other groups do it, like Jews for example.
