NEW Ryzen APU BEATS RTX 40 GPUs! 

Yes. As if apus could beat dedicated graphic cards. Horrendous

Next up NVIDIA next gen performance is up to 5x higher than last Gen. Forgets to say that's when comparing the 4060 with DLSS off vs 5090 with DLSS on performance mode

I didn’t even watch past the ad. Just comments and leaves

next - intel HD graphics beats rtx 5090 at 8K 120

Lol did you watch the video, cope

Power APUs?> I'll welcome that, perfect for HTPC and lounge room gaming.

@@RAM_845 It would mean less power draw overall and more importantly a pathway to have some really capable ITX builds for small areas

@@pgmhg9805 Exactly and way cheaper to build!

@@pgmhg9805 Also, an easier pathway to future upgrades. You just replace the APU a few years down the line, and you get a CPU and GPU upgrade. Add some RAM if you want, which is continuously being improved at this point. DDR 5 is insane compared to early DDR. I remember when PC133 was considered fast.

@@jonathanscherer8567 " PC133 was considered fast", you are old!!!! I remember too, lol, I am old too.

Do you call the 1650 a gpu???😂😂

​@@Rayu25DemonYes

@@Rayu25Demon Yes

@@Rayu25Demon Yes

@@Rayu25Demon Yes

4060 ti almost desktop or 4070 laptop performance

Oh yeah but literally the same power draw as a 4060 ti. They are doing nothing but take a big GPU and slam it right next to the CPU without any Vram and calling it an I-GPU.

​@@TuxikCEthat is what an apu is.

@@kitty.x3 And that is also what people think an I-GPU is.

@@TuxikCE because an igpu is just the overhead term, so theyre even correct

Well sir that is correct Save the environment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Too bad we are using as much power as several countries just for servers well Germany and Japan and that's A lot of people and industry.

those chips are gov subsidized, so they can do no harm😂

CPU and GPU combined, you have to compare both combined against the APUs so it's really mich closer

500w CPU can be used to post news about environment. Can old fashioned pizza ovens do that?

@@Hilman_Faiz yes

"Written for intel, runs better on amd"

They won't.

It's weird since most consoles use AMD APUs. You'd think optimizing for these would be old hat by now.

​@@jonathanscherer8567not any more none of the New gen xbox or ps use apus and ps4 didnt use apu also xbox stopped using apus after 360

@@vekazu_is_great_guy They use a special APU, sometimes described as an SoC, for the PS5. It's pretty much the same story for the XBOX Series X. I'm sure there are differences as these are tailor made by AMD for these consoles. Mobile versions of these have never been released, in part due to the high (for mobile) power requirements. I suppose they'd eat into GPU sales if they were were released for desktops. Though, the current version remains on Zen 2 for the CPU architecture. A Zen 4 version would be nice, with RDN 3.5. We are to dream.

'Yo, pass me an aspirin? It's getting a lil' heated up here.' 💀

broo imagine playing 240 hz+ on a VR headset... things would be soo smoooth and fast

​@@aohjiiWe need headsets to support 10gbps or 20gbps or maybe even 40gbps

nope, the power needed to that would be massive ARM is the future for this kind of thing

@@MitchellTheMitch im talking about stand alone headset with APU's of this calibur we wouldnt need to rely on a PC

That was simply the evolution of iGPUs before the northbridge got integrated in the CPU. There's a difference between iGPU and dGPU. iGPUs don't have their own memory bus and were constrained by the memory controller of the chipset (or CPU for K8 to K10 AMD CPUs), while dGPUs have their own memory bus and memory, even if there were always low-end cards that were really barely better than ATI integrated graphics - intel's integrated graphics were absolute crap before they integrated the northbridge in the CPU aka the first gen core CPU, as they updated their graphics architecture to be finally able to cover generic media operating tasks the need of bottom range GPUs fell off, that's why AMD isn't selling such anymore, plus the fact AMD was already releasing APUs with decent capabilities. Now the Strix Halo is a chip that is worthy of being considered a replacement of more budget oriented CPUs as this thing has a massive size - we've never had APUs with such GPU proportions, what's left for intel styled integrated graphics that are meant for generic tasks. Now the memory bus is still shared, but 256 bit bus - the 7600 has a 128bit bus, the 6700XT has a 192bit one. Now the memory will be slower and shared for both CPU and GPU - so the overall performance slightly so, it's meant for notebooks after all - but that still gives it serious capabilities. Now to break some illusions - it will be quite expensive simply because a chip of such size + the needed system that would likely feature quad channel memory design will demand resources and be more bulky aswell. Still this should be way more flexible than existing solutions, another go for AMD to push Nvidia and intel out of their mobile/embedded market as the latter can't offer such combined solutions. Still we are about to see the usual "rebates" by the traditional monopolists to retain their spot in the market and not allow AMD to return their investments.

@@herobrinecyberdemon8104 I agree but modern iGPUs have come a long way, this will make handheld PC gaming more appealing too.

Yes I remember that , that's the grandfather then nvidia or motherboard makers ditch that, then amd come to the rescue to integrate it instead in the cpu

@@PremiereGameplay4K Nvidia would have kept selling chipsets if intel didn't integrate the northbridge in the CPU and in the meantime breaking the compatibility their previous otherwise archaic designs had regarding platform flexibility. That was the end for Nvidia chipsets and integrated graphics - AMD kept the northbridge for AM3+ so an Nvidia chipset would've been possible, but demand for Nvidia chipsets was mostly on the intel front, knowing intel doesn't make crappy CPUs only. Intel silently damaged Nvidia back then, though it's interesting how those two monopolists would play it now, knowing Nvidia is the only major chip company in the US that didn't fall into losses cause of the crashing of the chip market. Nvidia still stands cause of the monopoly they've established in AI, however Intel has been loyal to the White House for awhile and they should receive more favor cause of it.

@@PremiereGameplay4K ATI Radeon GPU built-in lol IBM computers had them in the past. I'm approaching 40 years old lol so yeah

Cool... Have you tried playing but more demanding AAA sandbox shooting early access games..... For example Scum (0.95). and on what resolution are you playing ?

@@antoniocepaj7544 good question: I forgot to mention I play them in 1080p, and try to reach at least stable 30 fps. Everything as high as possible, differently from most reviews online. I'm no enthusiast; haven't tried any current AAA, but mostly because none have caught my attention. As for 30 fps, it might be too little for some, but playing RE games, and many other its just enough for a decent experience (and ninja theory seems to agree with me though lol). Sure i get way more than that in some, but if i have to choose between quality and performance, I'll push it to the limit (30).

from 1985? fr?

I've been a price to performance guy from the beginning. If Intel or Nvidia do better, I'll choose them instead.

@@malzergski ATI because they were Canadian and underdogs.

@@malzergski Yep! I'm also a value guy ;-) Used different CPU manufacturers and videocard manufacturers without any problems to switch between them.

And more powerful handheld consoles.

Or laptops

i suppose a new type of motherboard should be out that has laptop ram slots

He wants to give people nightmares

@@fade2black001 lol

Why didn't you like am4 apus? The 5600G is probably the best way to have a work pc that can also handle some light games for very cheap

@justmatt2655 weak performance, but an apu like 4060 and 6700xt is acceptable if the price is under 350$

@@Rayu25Demon 5600G is better than UHD730/770

@@Rayu25Demon you are mistaken amd does not make apus for budget people any more expect the price to be 450+ at a minimum

@@justmatt2655Indeed, my entire family is running one or another flavor of the 5600G or 4600G. They couldn't be happier in what is what those PCs offer them (they really do not require more, indeed I'd say they have more powerful CPUs than they need).

It will be portable gaming computer from now on - too bad we're likely to see Nvidia again bribing prebuilt system manufacturers, hope AMD makes sure they have reliable partners to make their systems this time, else Strix Halo would remain in the storehouses.

You would need more ram

That's exactly what I'm thinking. I just upgraded to a 6900xt from a 6700xt. Once they beat out that. I'd totally do a full rebuild into a mini PC with water cooling. Much cleaner and more desk space!! I think a build in something like ther thermaltake tower mini would be cool with an APU like that.

Nah as APUs advance so will GPUs. Maybe at one point APUs will become the norm for consumers but even more powerful GPUs would be made for nerds like engineers,scientists,etc.

@@dripmogus6979 "Time, as always, will tell." 🤷🏾‍♂️

@@dripmogus6979 APUs are advancing WAY faster than GPUs. I'm sure discreet GPUs will continue to be relevant for high-end users, but APUs will most likely eat up the low and mid range within a couple of years at most.

This is too big for handheld. MAYBE a tablet of the largest size - it's minimum TDP is 45W, and will likely require quad channel memory setup. It's meant to make notebooks between budget and mid-range gaming or embedded (now gaming) systems more affordable.

Yeah but if it even achieves even 90% of 6700xt or 4060ti level of performance believe me we are in for a ride.

Exactly my thoughts, but the leaked benchmarks, if true, are full fps video game scenarios, not just math equations. I imagine to achieve these results some expensive system ram will be needed. It's perfect for someone like myself who is a casual gamer. I don't want an external graphics card. I want a system that works for indy games now, and then 5-15 years later it gets reused into a media center PC giving it a 30+ year lifespan. A computer that I can use for most of my life without any downsides. That's an amazing value proposition. The last time we had value like that was the Sandy Bridge 2nd i-series CPUs and the Nvidia 10 series. Once every decade or so a really good deal appears, as long as it doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

​@@Danielle_1234it requires quad channel ran, it will be everything but cheap. It's more of a MacBook pro competitor with good sustained battery life which only Apple offers so it should be priced accordingly

Depends. The cost of moving data between RAM and VRAM is lower when VRAM is where the RAM is, and if those chips use unified memory (meaning CPU and GPU access the same memory directly, with no need to move anything anywhere at all) then it could be a serious performance booster. Moving data between RAM and VRAM in general is expensive

Not really I'm guessing around 500-600€

Still les then an Intel chip.😂

@@xXXEnderCraftXXxindeed😂

Hopefully better performance without draining the battery so quick while gaming.

Better ask if the software is good enough to support it - but Microsoft is pushing support themselves as they began using ARM for their handheld systems, they most likely have agreements with Qualcomm.

wait for the 9k series them build the 7600 and rx 7600 normal or the 7600 x and the rx 7600 xt

@@Keloot but 9000 series apu r as powerful as Rx 6700 so should I just go for the apu instead which one will give me more performance ?

​@@Harsh-io2zg in apus you won't get vram

This will be soldered - it has a quad channel memory interface by all likes and AMD hasn't made such specific socket yet, not to mention system builders would prefer soldered CPUs so that you can't upgrade them.

APU shares with system RAM as its buffer. dGPU has its own VRAM because system RAM cannot cope the bandwidth needed by dGPU.

This is a 9945HX with a massive iGPU - so 900$ minimum, plus it will have quad channel memory layout (4 DIMMs minimum), that also means it won't come for AM5 but embedded systems and notebooks. Still there's a cut down model (those results with 32CUs, with 12 CPU cores), it will be good enough at 700$ cause you shouldn't be expecting the next GPU gen to not come with a price increase. One should be able to manufacture a powerful mini-PC for 1500$ with good thermals and a large SSD.

this channel is latterly only clickbait and thumbnails.

better install 3 phase electrical power. :))

This is a 9945HX with a massive iGPU at 45W minimum and by all likes requiring quad channel memory layout. Forget about tablets and handhelds, notebooks and mini-PCs it is made for.

If you buy an APU then you have the ability to use a GPU along side with it. In BIOS you can also disable the integrated GPU so your processor won't heat up that much and it can deliver more performance

@@xXXEnderCraftXXx was more wondering if it was worth it. Lol

@@mrp782 Well the curent APUs like the 8700g is good at first look but if you ask me you are better of buying a used or just cheap GPU and a good CPU for that price and upgrade the cpu later on. The integrated GPU also uses a part of the ram and it needs high speed ram to perform well while that "well" is still not anything amazing.

@xXXEnderCraftXXx I currently have a 7800xt and need to upgrade my cpu but I'm on am4 socket so I'm looking at going to an am5 or just tossing in like a 5800x or x3d and calling it done for a few years. Till am5 stuff comes down some. Lol

@@mrp782 Well then get the 5800X3D! BTW currently I am on a 3600 and 3070 build.

Imagine the thermals 😂

Then just buy one of those ryzen that already come with basic igpu?

Cores are for multitasking not gaming.

@@JustMyFish and?

For now :)

If the new apu is true then i think the entry to midrange gpus will become obsolete and only high end ones will remain relevant.

@@jessierosenqueen5644 Agreed and that will save PC builders money in the long run and MINI PCs will improve too.

My last pc with an separate Soundcard was back in 2003, every new build after it had a good enough onboard soundcard. And now the GPU and USB can also give audio output. Only audiophiles buy a separate soundcard now. When CPU’s can beat mid end GPU’s, The only buyers of a separate GPU will be the “Graphicsphile” R.I.P. GPU

@@Bintzak You mean A.I enthusiasts lol

Just like "x86 is insecure" but in reality it's "intel's x86 is insecure". Kids didn't learn how to read news and separate third party interests in them - that is basically propaganda.

high cpu power draw is less bad if theres no gpu having high power draw as well, if youre talking about APU's

@@MasterMCGS Watch the video. It's about intel's server chips, APUs are a completely different topic.

@@MasterMCGS I was talking about the segment (first in the timestamps) where he talks about Intel's upcoming new Xeon CPUs. My point being, Intel's power draw has been insane even on desktop CPUs in the past couple of years, so this isn't exactly shocking...

@@TomHenksYT yeah ik about it

Good quality big and probably it's going to be expensive as F... Large server stuff is like way out average Joe's pocket realm 😂 like Google submersible data center 😂