NEW Swarovski NL Pure 52

Подписаться 454

Просмотров 7 тыс.

50% 1

Welcome again to Optics4Birding, your go-to channel for in-depth reviews and insights into the world of optics!
Today we are excited to announce the release of the SWAROVSKI NL PURE 52 BINOCULARS (available for PRE-ORDER on Optics4Birding.com)
👍 Support Our Channel:
Give us a thumbs up and share this video with fellow birding and outdoor enthusiasts. Your support helps us continue to deliver quality content and keep you informed on the best tools to enhance your nature experiences.
📣 We Want to Hear From You!
Your feedback drives our content! Leave us a comment below with your thoughts on the NL Pure 52 or any products you'd like us to review in the future.
Visit our website at: www.optics4bir... for more information, or if you're interested in purchasing some new optics!
Follow us on our social media platforms to be part of our growing community of optics enthusiasts:
Instagram: www.instagram....
Facebook: / optics4birding
TikTok: / optics4birding
Thank you for watching! :)

Опубликовано:

26 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 28

@ak4939 3 месяца назад

I have the 8x42 NL was was looking at the 15x56 SLC as a supplement, but will now go with the 14x52NL to pair with the 8x42

@별사탕-v7t 2 месяца назад

nl pure 10x52, 14x52 ,10x42 실제 보여지는 모습을 카메라로 담은 영상도 부탁드립니다.

@jimbob4535 2 месяца назад

Hey, low light performance nl 14x52 vs slc 15x56- what is the better bino? On paper the slc is the winner, but would love to hear about a real world comparison.

@swiftusmaximus5651 3 месяца назад

i want to see a comparison test of the Zeiss 10 x 54 Victory HT and Swaro 10 x 52 NL Pure

@Optics4birding 3 месяца назад

Stay tuned!! 🤩

@carlosciurana293 20 дней назад

El Zeiss Victory 10X54 es superior en transmisión de luz, es mucho mejor que el Swarovski NL puré, en luminosidad no hay prismático en el mundo mejor que el Zeiss Victory HT😂😂

@carlosciurana293 20 дней назад

Es zeiss victory tiene una luminosidad del 95% mientras el Swarovski la tiene del 91%😂

@Aag2022 19 дней назад

@@Optics4birdingthanks looking forward to it…I have 8x42 Nikon Edg ii and want my next in 50mm category. This review will be very helpful

@AshK-pg9dy 3 месяца назад

I had a question on hand-holding the 14x52. I could easily handhold the 12x42 NLs, steadily, when paired with the optional Forehead rest. Just wondering if the 14x52 is similar enough from a steadiness standpoint, when paired with the optional forehead rest. Thank you.

@Optics4birding 3 месяца назад

If you were able to handhold the 12x42 easily enough with the forehead rest, you should have a similar experience with the 14x52 and the forehead rest. Increasing the magnification makes vibration more pronounced, but the increased weight will offset that to some extent. Counterintuitively, heavier binoculars can provide a more stable view. And since the NLs are so ergonomic, they are very comfortable to hold steadily.

@Nick-im3ym 3 месяца назад

Interesting, according to Swarovskis website the 10x42 and 10x52 have the same brightness percentage. Unless that’s a calculation taking the exit pupil into consideration…thoughts?

@Optics4birding 3 месяца назад

Great question! You are correct that the 10x42 and 10x52 both have 91% light transmission. But the 10x52's 5.2 mm exit pupil makes it brighter than the 10x42's 4.2 mm exit pupil.

@swiftusmaximus5651 3 месяца назад

trick question. The Austrians are reporting the efficiency of the NL system. They are saying the lens prism system is 91% efficient in transmitting the available light through the ocular. A 50mm lens is going to have more light to transmit than a 40mm. a 360 HP 4.0 litre engine vs a 450 HP 5.0 are equally efficient, but the 5.0 is bigger....get it?

@Nick-im3ym 3 месяца назад

@@swiftusmaximus5651 I’m picking up what you’re putting down. Nice analogy lol

@carlosciurana293 20 дней назад

@@Optics4birdingel zeiss es superior a Swarovski tiene 95 de luminosidad noy prismático.que supere al Zeiss😂😂

@mrh9635 3 месяца назад

Can't wait to hear how well the 14x52 handle without a tripod.

@progradepainting3755 3 месяца назад

Check out the jay Scott outdoors podcast, they just covered it, and the consensus seems to be they’re good for hand holding, and excellent on a tripod.

@AshK-pg9dy 3 месяца назад

@@progradepainting3755 I did not see a proper response to this question on the jay Scott podcast. I found I could easily handhold the 12x42 NLs, when paired with the optional forehead rest. Not sure if it is the same with the 14x52......is it steady enough, if paired with the optional forehead rest ?

@ngalloy8696 2 месяца назад

😊Is it NL 100% Edage to edage Sharpness same as EL or did u Fail again?

@GaryPatefield 3 месяца назад

Image stabilisation! Losing money keep bringing super expensive stuff out that doesn’t have stabilisation.

@redacted2618 3 месяца назад

Image stabilization isn’t everything. Glass quality matters a lot, especially if you are really stretching the distance out. A steadier image doesn’t matter if it’s a cloudy one, and I always have a tripod if I need to have a shake-free view. Are image stabilized binoculars bad? No, and they definitely have advantages. However, if you’re looking at Swarovski, and especially if you’re looking at higher powered ones like the new 14x52, you’re probably in the market for the best glass you can get your hands on. If Swarovski (or any of the adjacent top brands) comes out with them, then I’ll consider looking at a set. However, if it’s anything like rangefinding binoculars, you lose some optical quality with the addition of the on board electronics required to function.

@jasonhiggins6431 3 месяца назад

All the image stabilisation bins Iv used have been garbage , just adds weight complexity and cost , just a silly idea best left in the past 😂

@GaryPatefield 2 месяца назад

@@jasonhiggins6431you haven’t used them if that’s your impression

@GaryPatefield 2 месяца назад

⁠@@redacted2618I am talking about same glass quality as any sensible person would have assumed !

@jrnumex9286 Месяц назад

@@jasonhiggins6431 sig sauer zulu 6 gen 2 IS freaky good. still planning to add 14x52. dirty harry thug "i just have to know"

@Latitude2010 3 месяца назад

Lovely review indeed. Could u pls review the NL 12X42 ?…thank U!

@Optics4birding 3 месяца назад

Thank you so much! We did a review for the NL 42 separately before we knew about the NL 52. It isn't specific to the 12x42, more of a general review for the entire series, but hopefully it helps! Here you go: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ypAwgy7wK1I.html