New York Enacts Ridiculous New Gun Laws In Response To Supreme Court Ruling 

Because it's not about protection, it's about power. So really, she's right.. Until New Yorkers decide to make her wrong anyway.

Don’t forget last years most infuriating comment by mr terminator Arnold climate change hypocrite always driving a huge suv..” screw your freedom”

Can't lie that way

Indeed

That was the only word I could think as well. 🗣️INFURIATING ! ! !

The fact that those states like NY and California will not obey the Constitution, the Law of the Land. Just makes them not part of America anymore and must be forced out of the Union.

The tyrant needs to go

Yeah but 1/6 ? Steering wheel? Bombshell testimony? Ahhh just comply with the liberal world order ya peasants!!

They said they don't care. They then said they'll "comply." And of course NY being NY decided to come back and literally f*** all of us in anger. And of course NY being NY as always, finds a way to make money off of it. Make the process lengthy and expensive.

@@chris-dd6uq It’s okay, it only applies if you actually follow that crap. I’ve already been to prison and don’t have a great track record of compliance for “laws” 😂 oh but the law abiders see these people commit open felonies which they skate on and still actually follow their crap 🤣

EXACTLY WHEN TYRANNY BECOME LAW REBELLION BECOME DUTY

And it protected by gun owners privileged by their office. How much you want to bed she has a little high end, subcompact, hammer fired pistol locked up in her house she fantasizes she can get to if someone breaks in?

@DefenderofPoodles: All gun control laws do is restrict the rights of law abiding gun owners. Criminals don't obey laws.

Sorta like them saying for the past 20+ years, "We are not coming for your guns, we just want more safe laws".

As interim governor she should not have any authority to pass laws until she is duly elected

I REALLY don’t like that you have to put names of friends and family on a list to obtain a tool of self defense. I think there’s potential there for a lot of abuses of that information to occur.

And the citizens of NYC need to storm the offices of the demo/rino politicians and use those firearms!

Every day these mass shootings prove why it's more and more important for citizens not to own guns

Amen

More like, "now we see why this current gov't is 100% obsolete, & in line to be dissolved forthwith!"

Eventually we’re going to need the to defend our selves from tyranny

Get out of NY! I see it as a foreign nation at this point.

@@seanld444 unfortunately easier said than done, a lot of us have businesses here or at the very least have jobs we can't easily leave. It's a shame we can't live our lives like normal Americans

If you not from the city you not from ny be foreal for a moment

@@TimmyWells-fs8pqexcept the rules they make effect us in Upstate.

Quoting shit from 250 years ago isn’t helping unless the people help themselves.

@@blackkaiser5653 Stop being so pessimistic!

@@blackkaiser5653 Actually it's a good to remember human nature has always been a factor.

@@blackkaiser5653 pissing on meaningful quotes from 250 years ago isn’t helping

Remember folks they do this crap to not only empower themselves. They do this crap to divide us. Ignoring history only makes us repeat it. When/if crap hits the fan we need to be behind the fan and not in front. Slowly our politicians are turning back the hands of time.

The worst part is that she was never even voted in. Cuomo was so grossly incompetent and perverted that she was appointed to take his place. New yorkers had no say in this tyrants coming to power, talk about feeling helpless, I'm ashamed that I was born in this place.

The next won't be any better. The left owns New York.

We are trying to. Lee Zeldin is running for governer in an effort to return this state to a normal place.

Problem is even if she is booted from office none the other candidates are not much better She is just continuing the legacy of NY governance of the past 30 years at this point incompetence, corruption and tyrannical tendencies

Lee zelden! Let’s gooo!!!

When Trump get in he better arrest these tyrants Asap!

It's called the great reset New world Order attitude

These states are calling the 2nd amendment's bluff.

Exactly.

Democrats don't follow laws, They create them for their benefit and ignore everything else, and no one does anything about it.

Are you new here? Politicians have been thumbing their noses at the constitution for decades.

That's a fact

and reminds us that we always have had 😁😁

Exactly. The right to bear arms is a natural right and pre exists government.

The "people" in the 2A are the same ones mentioned in the preamble and the 1A.

Well said

Also with money, because that’s often the biggest hurdle for the average law abiding citizen to overcome when trying to protect yourself and your loved ones.

Even worse, it's about the corrupt retaining and gaining MORE power.

More like the 2a was specifically designed for politicians like we have now. That's why they're actually "scared" of guns

The left accepts nothing that goes against what they want done. They immediately begin working against laws, handed down, to ignore them and make their own rules. No wonder they support criminal lawlessness.

Gun control is about control

If you live in NY, you're out of your mind and shouldn't be allowed to carry!

California did the same thing

How do they separate PHI to demand your own rights? This will be just another lawsuit and the state wasting much much more money

New York knows nothing is going to happen to them. If they get sued they just use tax payer money to pay for it, government is on their side so no concern from that. The shee.... I mean people aren't going to do anything so no problem from that either. They literally have no reason not to continue shitting on the 2A.

as long as there are cowards raising their hand and jumping up and down screaming "im a law abiding ignorant coward". politicians will control those sheep

The have.

It was in its inception, the 2nd ammendment.

They did. But as long as politics is fueled by conflict rather than solution, and as long as politicians can continue to pass "new" laws (essentially old laws with rewording) to ensure their regular control remains, we're not going to see any alteration. Its a circular fight until you remove that particular "power" from the system. A decision by SCOTUS establishes precedent and removes such laws, and their future iterations PERMANENTLY. But you also have to enforce it by non-compliance.

That's how WE would counter illegal gun laws. Either do what the SCOTUS and the law says or Constitutional Carry would kick in automatically!!!

SCOTUS doesn't make laws. And there is already a law in place, the 2nd Amendment.

Ya but if they can do it in NY or CA they can do it anywhere since it's still the United States. They are literally testing America at its core like dropping bombs on its perimeter while marching in towards the heart of it. This type of governing will spread like a disease in time so we all need to protest it vigorously

Ny is one step up they have to retreat when a robber breaks in California if someone breaks in you could shoot them no questions asked as long as your a legal gun owner

Demorats don't care about the constitution.

Move!

Me too. I live in the south.

Should be but NY will vote her right in anyway; then proceeed to put their masks back on and head for their 3rd booster per her diktat. If she gets elected they should not even give th e pretense of swearing on a bible or upholding the Constitution. It is in direct contrast to the sworn allegiances they have already made to other entities. Entities that have been clear as to their Constitution repeal and replacement objectives.

That's what these democratic DiCKTATORS are doing all over this country. In my State, the people voted in the Death Penalty. WE decided the law. Newsome flat out said, nope, I do not believe in it so....That should be automatic grounds for removal as you are going against the very will of the people and the laws in which were created. But alas, it's the right that is destroying Democracy.

If the government tells you you don't need a gun, you need as many guns as you can get your hands on.

@@bwofficial1776 if the government is attemptong to disarm the population it is because it intends to assault them. They are literally seeking to repeal and replace a social contract that others have already agreed to. Tere is already a Consitutional process if such a change is desired by the population. Requires the 2/3 of states prescribed in that contract. The contract no longer applies? Then no one is bound to any terms not agreed upon. Only domestic enemies would even seek to push the population to lay down to be sacked.

Couldn’t agree more 👍🏼🇺🇸

@FSU Seminoles Please remind them of why they left

@FSU Seminoles Miamian here, they all over South Florida with their libby lefty mentality 🙄

I am willing to bet some of them will bring their crappy voting to the new places they relocate (In which they were fleeing from), they just can't help it and see a D by the name and vote. They don't get it, it's instilled in them to be a Democrat regardless.

Only a felony if you get caught. And someone sees your "concealed" weapon

@@bestever7151 than at that point why even bother with a permit?

Only a felony if there's men in blue that enforce it. From what I hear most are giving a middle finger to the UN-ELECTED POS in Albany.

@@bestever7151 and when something happens and you use it to defend yourself, you're guilty of a felony. See the problem?

Some of those places were already on that list. Any state or federal building, especially a court or anywhere where prisoners may be present for a hearing. Polling places have historically been on those lists. But, you are right. Go anywhere where it's not posted, and you run the risk of committing a felony. But, as Best Ever says, "only if you get caught." Best solution? Move out of NY. True story based on not having guns in a federal building. I was going into Denver to renew my Security Badge. The office is in a state building where courts are. No guns, I already knew that. Parked my truck around the corner, not very far. I was doing this while a supervisor was covering my shift long enough to appear at the office and do my thing. I left the gun in my truck and holster on my belt. Left minimal stuff in my pockets to get through security without taking too much time. Security guard at the door tells me I can't wear the holster. Why? Because someone might slip a gun in there. Ein minuten, bitte! I'm supposed to have confidence in your ability to perform security by you telling me I can't have an empty holster because someone might get a gun past you and put it in my holster?

The amount of cognitive dissonance in this woman is stunning😠

I will not comply 🤷🏻‍♂️

ikr? Justin Trudeau said something similar, lol

Like all the roe vs wade reeeeeeee said i will not comply

If people accept it then it’s too late to free NYS.

And you can bet they will never enforce their own laws against the criminal element.

never believe a person who's top lip never moves when they talk.

She's cut from the same cloth as Pelosi, Perhaps an earlier version of a clone

Disarmament of the population.

She's the reason in some aspects, abortion should be legal...

They aren't convicting 100% of criminals that break the gun laws, but I bet they will have an 100% rate against people with a CCW who go into the wrong store

Maybe we could hire professionals and pay them in home cooked meals and a room of their own. (sarc.)

Herself and her power base.

the point is to kill you yes, you, me, all of us, with restrictions and regulations

More guns, more gun violence. A young woman was just murdered point-blank by her estranged boyfriend. And you want MORE concealed guns!?

Right?

Only the famous or wealthy and those with connections are only allowed to carry a weapon in new york.

Exactly. Unfortunately only criminals who don’t care about laws are able to carry guns. This is how blue cities are run.

Then become a criminal, you know like your forefathers were lol. That’s the idea of being a free man.

Proper cause to me is the 2A. Honestly even though I know I'd be denied. I'd love to move to California or NY for a week just to apply for a CCW and put as the proper cause "The 2A, shall not be infridged dickheads". Then move back to my free state of Utah.

Exactly...that was ridiculous how someone in power says that, and then stays in power...those of us on the right are getting closer and closer to the breaking point...something's gonna tip it over

This is what happens when there's no consequences for their actions because they think they're all above the law. We're literally seeing these politicians tell us 2 + 2 = 5 and we have one half that knows it's wrong and the other half agreeing it's right.

@@dontbeakaren6145 I'd say it's one third believes it, one third knows it's wrong, and some amount of the remaining third are just plain evil with whatever is left are wishy washy and decide how to vote on a whim.

@@Mike_Jones68 100% of registered voting republicans need to show up at primaries to replace RINO’s, and the general election to replace all the incumbent democrats.

And the People be like "Understandable. Have a nice day."

LOL, and how would the Supreme Court enforce that? Wake up!

@@davek5027 so whats your plan?

@@brownass2 more lawsuits

@@brownass2 My plan is to continue doing as I please while I laugh my ass off at all the law abiders 😂. People are so scared of prison they’ll live their entire lives with their tail between their legs. The only free men are criminals, ironically criminals founded the nation.

Open violation of SUPREME Court rulings! The court only has power IF the States abide by the decisions. To my knowledge I don't know what the consequences are for States ignoring the rule of law that they don't agree with. The Maryland AG said plainly, they will not abide by the ruling!!!! Our system is dissolving. get to a State that aligns with your values because things WILL hit the fan. There will be free States and tyrannical States setting up autonomy. We are seeing States on both side doing whatever THEY want.

And it’s little comments like these (which I totally agree with btw) that they will find as “disqualifying” on your social media accounts.

@@JonathanGrandt Bingo! Infringes on 1st, 2nd, 4th and 14th Amendments.

Free men do not ask for permission.

But felons aren't people..

What's the point of the 2A? It seems Americans don't know.

I’ve been saying tarring and feathering of bullshit elected folks needs to come back into vogue for a long time!

So basically 99.9% of them

@@microsoftpain Correct lol.

TERM LIMITS and downsizing the Federal government.

Unfortunately NY has no option for a statewide recall election- Hochul is running for a full term this year; our only option is to vote her out. Unfortunately she won her primary; the Republican candidate is a RINO; NY needs a good leader, and the Libertarian candidate is the only sane one running.

One rep? More like all of em..

Yep they’re wanting to take their ball & go home

There are a multitude of reasons to abolish the supreme court, but abolishing it over their rather uncontroversial ruling on gun rights is not one of them.

Shifting the goalposts? More like changing all the “rules” and the name of the game.

@@ameliam7898 while that is a childish behavior, there's another thing the Democrats can do without abolishing the supreme court: expand it! This is literally how FDR got the supreme court to go along with his new deal and other policies by threatening to expand the supreme court to get what he and the democratic party at the time wanted.

He made a great point in the video. "How can you keep people safe if you don't know where the danger is coming from?"

Many people just want to "feel" safe! The same people bought all the hype about the vaccines without doing a cost/benefit analysis for their own situation and they are the same people who are terrified of being around electrical wires or components even though many people work on those every day. These are irrational people. A rational person would learn the numbers, pros/cons, or how something works and how to stay safe when working around it. People assume rather than learn or ask. Then there are the people who have bad intentions or who are brainwashed. Reality doesn't matter to them, as long as they get the results they want.

She took an oath to uphold the constitution. Everything after that is void

The State SHALL ISSUE AR-15 to all lawful citizens above Age 21, and provide 2 weeks of free training in it's use, cleaning and care. - That's sensible, when every lawful citizen has the ability to defend themselves as well as the constitutional right to defend themselves, the whole state would be safer. And criminals will leave a state that is armed to the teeth. AMERICA: ''Every Man A Rifleman.'' and all the women too ! :-)

freecking-A at least lie to them about the numbers or tell some bullshit anecdotes , I think they believe they are being tuff when they let the mask slip like she did , when in reality it shows their weakness and incompetence. Be happy(but never complacent) bois we are making them squirm!

The state of New York is going to judge people based on their (social media accounts) First Amendment rights, to determine their 2nd amendment rights. People watch more rights eroded, and controlled by the state government.

@@richardkitchens8707 Well put 👍👍👍

Well put. That b🐩h!!!

I like that quote.

I hate to say it but you are stuck with her. NY is now a communist state

Use your guns and take the bitch out

I guess we have to vote Zeldin

Yea this is why I'm proud to live in missouri. Constitutional carry and they signed a bill about not enforcing unconstitutional federal laws

And I had to leave California....and I am glad I did .those states are not America anymore....honestly I hope they leave the Union peacefully if possible

Sounds like a certain Doctor saying "I AM THE SCIENCE" political speech for shut up. Because I said so

@@gjkorfinhays If I was running for her office, I'd totally use this in my campaign ads.

She wasn't elected

The singular characteristic of the Democrat Party is lawlessness. They demand everyone else follow all laws that they, the Democrats, don’t have to follow. They’re evil

Ahh yes, the equivalent of "What's your source? I made it up."

You can tell that he's really angry about it, but he sure does hold back. I don't know how any of us can keep from going insane.

They don't exist, now that the unicorn farts are raining down from the adminisphere.

And if you should ever fall victim to violent, armed criminals and live through it, she'll tell you your personal safety is not her responsibility.

That is why guns need to be available for law abiding folks,for protection from a government that goes power hungry,It is exactly the opposite of left leaning woke pious,inconsiderate folks who especially have protection from others who carry guns.thanks

The Second Amendment is for We the People to PROTECT OURSELVES and OTHERS as well as the State in Which we Reside, which in turn will PROTECT the United States Federal Government in a Time of WAR or OTHER Constitutionally Authorized EMERGENCY!!! One Decision that the USSC has RULED On Several Times is that LAW ENFORCEMENT(POLICE) HAVE NO DUTY to PROTECT YOU!!! USING COMMON SENSE THAT Decision MEANS that YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE for YOUR OWN SAFETY and LIFE!!! I and YOU and EVERY HUMAN on this EARTH HAS the RIGHT BY BIRTH to PROTECT THEMSELVES From HARM from a PERSON INTENT on DOING HARM and NO ONE has the RIGHT to SAY WITH WHAT WE Protect Ourselves!!! "The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the state government. It is one of the “High Powers” delegated directly to the citizen, and is excepted out of the general powers of government. A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it because it is above the law, and independent of lawmaking” Cockrum v State, 24Tex394 (1859). “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials, and to establish them as legal principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections.” - US Supreme Court, West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) "A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution." In the words of Thomas Jefferson: "The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." “A law repugnant to the Constitution is void. An act of Congress repugnant to the Constitution cannot become a law. The Constitution supersedes all other laws and the individual’s rights shall be liberally enforced in favor of him, the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.” -Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) Title 18, U.S.C., Section 241 - Conspiracy Against Rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 - Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law To Understand How the FF THOUGHT about the 2nd Amendment go to this Site: investortimes.com/freedomoutpost/americas-founders-actually-viewed-second-amendment/ CRIMINALS CARRY CONCEALED in PUBLIC all the TIME; nothing is EVER DONE about this and yet the PUBLIC SUPPOSEDLY WANTS the LAWFUL CITIZEN UNARMED!!! Research and Read the Federalist and Antifederalist Papers ANY Business that Forbids the CARRY of Firearms in THEIR Business is RESPONSIBLE/LIABLE for the Customers SAFETY and the SAME goes for GOVERNMENT Property or ANYWHERE the Gov RESTRICTS the CARRY of ARMS!!!.

@@bassblaster162 As the USSC has Stated MANY TIMES!!!! LEOs have NO DUTY to PROTECT you!!!

Yup, no logic whatsoever lol.

That’s from an unelected governor.

I bet if people stop paying their taxes she would care about the numbers

how did she get into office?

@@Sly9192 TPTB's manifesto & (end) purpose.

Vote her out. The democraps are not what they claim to be.

@@Sly9192 Cuomo got ousted for a bunch of sexual misconduct allegations. Now every red blooded New Yorker despised "Prince Andy", but I swear to god Hochul is worse. I've since left NYS and am BEGGING my parents to as well, before NYS bleeds them dry of their savings & rights in their old age.

@@Sly9192 She was appointed by Cuomo before he resigned.

👍👍👍🇺🇸 MAGA for life and ✝️ God bless 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 America and WE The Great people Of 🗽🗽🗽 New York state and NYC and Rochester NY 🗽.✝️✝️✝️🙏🙏🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️‍🔥🇮🇹🇮🇹🇮🇹❤️‍🔥🗽🗽🗽

Don't blame the left for this shit. "Under no pretext must they give up their arms and equipment, and any attempt at disarmament must be forcibly resisted." - Karl Marx

Indeed. Lawful owners by definition are the only ones impacted by these laws at all. Murder, assault, theft, etc are already illegal. Period. Why can't we leave it at that? Why do we need 100 more laws, regulations and restrictions making all this stuff "more illegal"? Criminals don't notice any of this beaurcractic nonsense nor do they care. It has no effect on crime rates _(not that she needs to bother with data anyway of course.)_ It just creates hassle for normal folks ----- which is exactly the point. Maybe try enforcing the laws we have, and stop letting violent offenders off, and we might see some improvement ----- but it's not about improving safety either. See a pattern here?

Come NYS’s recently NEW BAIL Reform our legislators put in is really keeping us safe!!!! There is a crime wave that already hit NYS! How about looking at all the past violent offenders that you just let walk out of jail!!?? Hey Colion Noir and thank you for helping us law abiding tax paying citizens (victims) in NYS. Perhaps you can do another video about NY & Kathy Hochul who wants to “protect us citizens” and perhaps you can look into some other changes Kathy Hochul made along with the legislature in NYS which basically threw out BAIL in NYS, yes including for REPEAT OFFENDERS whom have long records of convictions on their personal arrest records! What this has done in NYS in the last year or two since they put this in action is open up all our jails and let out all kinds of people whom were awaiting trial…. problem is along with people whom might be under their initial offense and have never been convicted whom can’t afford bail, they are also just letting out hard core criminals whom have arrest and previous conviction records as long as my arm! How is this reasonable!!?? How is this making me and my family safe!!?? There have already been several news articles about since they let everyone out of jail because of the new laws in NYS that a past violent offender with previous convictions for criminal offenses was released according to new bail laws and then they went right back out and assaulted some innocent person when they should have been sitting in jail not being able to afford bail waiting for trial on their most recent offense! How the heck can Kathy Hochul say she “has to protect me and my family” when her other laws she and the NYS Legislature recently made is PROVEN to do the exact opposite, PUT MY LIFE IN DANGER!!?? Can you answer that? I sure as heck can’t figure the logic out in the above while also wanting to protect me by taking away my CCP!!! Please help! Please do another video discussing all this in NYS on your large channel so I can post it on Kathy Hochul’s page! ru-vid.comUgkx0a6UzQbtG1hcnzZbNg1oN9Pcnf16pa5t

Yep. Thanks for the reminder.

At least it's in our Constitution whereas I believe the Canadian version does not... It would take a Constitutional Convention of States to amend the Constitution and that isn't going to happen in my lifetime..

Ya u spit that truth !!

@@aaronbode9622 Not good!!

Americans will arm you. Just be sure to reciprocate when 1776pt 2 takes place

Eventually, this will happen. But it will take many years, many court cases and a hell of a lot of money.....much of which will line Democrat pockets and that's the point, yes?

Exactly

Notta, going to happen.

Defending ur life is a privilege?

@@5N3K93 according to NY laws, yea it sounds like it...

Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) "A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the federal constitution." Having to PAY for a PERMT would FALL under this Decision!!!

100% They gave the finger to SCOTUS.

@@Daddy5444 This is a new court... we can keep pushing.

Prison time for public officials who knowingly violate the constitution. Definitely needed.

@@anon_y_mousse Based on what "legal expertise" do you make that assertion? I've already pointed out that Constitutions are deliberately general, and that Constitutional provisions are implemented by means of statutes. Perhaps you should inform yourself of the actual statutes, instead of getting all up in hysterical "arms" by being drunk on the smell of someone's else's cork.

@@jnagarya519 It's not based on current law, it's what I want to happen and my prediction for the result. Surely you understand how that works?

@@anon_y_mousse which said public officials are sworn to protect and defend

@@jnagarya519 nothing in the Bill of Rights is intentionally vague. The are VERY explicit in their language. The fact that politicians and judges have ignored the explicit language, simply shows how tyranny can creep into my government, regardless of the language of the Constitution.

Hochul being the grumpy tyrannical hag she is...

We were founded by Freemasons what did you expect?

Colion and Ted Nugent for President!😁

As I was watching this I said to myself he is definitely pissed the fuck off with New York and that bullshit

The US is still great, you just got a tyrannical administration running it to the ground. Red wave is coming, so hang tough

Authoritarianism. Disarm the population of peasants.

EVERYPLACE IN NYS IS A PRISON.

She see's herself as an empress, not a governess.

It makes sense to the insensate. That's a hard problem to solve.

No, he isn't a cop and hadn't been one for years. He was a politico-cop...a cop whose mission is his career, not a real public servant whose career is birthed by his mission. Most big city and many medium sized city police chiefs are politico-cops, they look good on paper (correct schools, high-profile assignments, and rapid promotions) but ask yourself when did he have any time to do real police work, and then ask him(or her) about the last arrest they made...

@@JD-tn5lz . We called them “climbers” because they have about 6 months in the field then they start being groomed for promotion. They look good and smell good but usually have no street sense, and aren’t respected by their peers. They look better and better through a multi year career because they aren’t in the street (or road) paying their dues with their physical and mental health and wellness.

The law abiding liberty loving American doesn't want this weak pathetic authoritarian to protect us and our loved ones. That's my duty to protect my family, not some sworn public servant that has no idea what America means, no idea what public service means, and doesn't even like why we're Americans. I don't need or want her permission to behave like an American. If she doesn't like why we're America, she can go pound sand, kick rocks, GTFO.

Yes, he was a cop, and yes he was shocked by how much crime was going on that he wasn’t getting a part of the action on, while he was a cop. Although, now that he’s mayor, I’m sure he’s getting every penny of action on all of it.

Thts not true the criminals will be safer to criminal with less resistance to worry about

(New York is a state)

@@WilliamWonka I was referring to New York city, they're trying to make the entire city a no gun zone.

The NY AG is going to be the one in deep shit is my guess.

@Richard Busby are you stupid? The 2nd amendment is explicitly listed in the bill of rights. The whole point of the constitution is to guarantee that the government does not intervene in the exercise of these explicitly listed rights, of which abortion is not one

@Fait Accompli This law isn't a city regulation. It is a state law.

TS/SCI doesn't have shit on NY gun laws. Well said.

Tell us about the rights of the young woman murdered by gun at point black range. Did she have, beyond right to life, ALSO have a right NOT to be a gun--nut?

@@jnagarya519 what about the woman murdered by knife at the hands of her abusive ex while waiting on a permit to OWN a pistol? what about her right to life AND her right to defend herself with a goddamned gun, a gun that would have given her far better chances against her attacker. A criminal using a gun illegally should have no bearing on my ability to own and use mine legally. The additions of these hurdles to make it more difficult and more expensive, arbitrarily i might add, is nothing more than collective punishment. And last i checked, collective punishment is a war crime under the geneva convention. And given that these hurdles impede the basic human right to self defense, add human rights violations on top.

@@killer13324 Yes, we can be certain she wouldn't have hesitated, and the gun taken from her and used against her. "WHATABOUT! WHATABOUT! WHATABOUT! Are you capable of REASON? Here's a clue for you law-illiterate hysterical hotheaded gun-nuts: Every right is inextricably entwined with RESPONSIBILITY. WHEN do you EVER use that dirty word?

Just more of the gaslighting polititians have been foisting on the population for years! Wake up America!

Hyprocrisy at it’s best no elitist one without it. Don’t forget Covid-19

Wish I could like this comment more than once

Could all the violations by her security detail that have concealed carry be an investigative journalists story? Follow her every move for a week tallying the violations (criminal charges) that occur, and provide a middle of the road total of fines that should have been assessed. The public should know how much revenue she and her security detail are not paying. Since these are violations that are making law abiding citizens into criminals and felons.

@@johnkutsch7411 you know, that’s not a bad idea, but doing an elitist liberal, she’ll claim she and her staff are above the law. Laws are for the “little people” not her.

Wish I could pin this comment🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

I wonder if these new laws apply to said body guards, im pretty sure I know the answer but I am curious how fast they would reconsider If their body guards had to go through the classes and recertification, or better yet if every gun the body guards used were registered to the employer therefore making the elite and the ones rich enough to have bodyguards responsible for the guns making them be the ones in those same classes and training and restricted to the same laws they are passing I wonder if something like that would make them change their tune?

And people who have NO common sense.

Yeeee!!!!.... um, numbers of charges don't matter too 🤔So why are they always tallying the body counts?

The left has been doing this for years. Where have you been?

Welcome to the democratic party. Feelings over facts. Mental illness over logic and common sense.

Metal detectors and bag searches...

I'd almost rather die than spend time in Rikers Island while awaiting trial which that alone can take years then however many years in a medium or maximum security prison where you'll almost certainly have to do the gangs "favors" to not get stabbed yourself and those "favors" will just get u more time until you aceue so much time you're not getting out.with that being said I still carry(in nys) because I want to protect my family but yeah judged by 12 in this shithole state(were moving) doesn't honest sound much better

I don’t care what a stupid sign says. If I’m doing errands alone or with my boys, I’m carrying it. I do not rely on others people definition of safety. I have my own.

Come to Utah where the 2a is strictly enforced.we need your vote to keep it that way.

Ya I'd rather be carried by 6 than live the rest of my life not being able to exercise my 2a rights anymore or in prison where taxpayers hv to pay for my encarseration what's the point🤷

Well she wasn't elected, so why should she care? They're all installed anyway. She can say whatever she wants.

She’s a big baby who thinks she’s protecting us apparently. I live in upstate New York and we cannot stand that women.

@@vinnieg6917 she thinks nothing of the sort, this is about disempowering citizens so we can't fight back. She has no good intentions.

@@vinnieg6917 Apparently a good number of you guys love her

But they voted for these idiots.

This is NY unfortunately, and the majority of people are too ignorant and dumbed by drugs and propaganda to understand.