News18 Rising Bharat 2024 | Disagree with RSS definition of Hindutva, Says Lawyer Sai Deepak | N18V 

Muslims from other countries can not be given citizenship. Bharat is not an ashram for entire humanity. 90% muslims voted for Pakistan. So Ambedkar wanted complete evacuation of muslims from Bharat.

I completely agree with Sai Deepak that we in India have an obligation to the minorities in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan who are being persecuted on religious grounds there.

Sab me quality chahiye, but 4 biwi 40 bacche bhi chahiye🤣🤣🤣🤣

Excellently explained by Jai Sai Deepak. I watched the whole interview. JSD is really putting out historical and constitutional facts.

Mr Tanveer proving their loyality to their religion. How can all religions not treat equally ? -For caa How can all religions treat equally ? For ucc That is the hypocrisy of secular and peaceful community

Sai Deepak's debate has depth, Scholarly, backed with historical evidences. Where as the other man's argument looks shallow. It is characteristic of any ordinary Muslim's argument though he is a Supreme Court Lawyer.

The moment Anas stopped talking about UCC, you realize in principle he doesn't care a damn about equal rights.

26:53 victim card.

Even being at this position he didn't hesitate to play a victim card that I am on fasting so can't speak louder 😂

Hypocrite Anas ki batti gul hogayi UCC Suntay he.

Victimhood started 😭😭😭

What a vast difference between 2 Supreme court advocate, 1 very clear. concise and to the point another trying to spin words and trying to confuse people and failing

That other guy lost debate completely .He is crying from inside .

Anas debating with JSD felt like school CRICKET team competing with best IPL team. Best argument was yes we should move towards UCC but my fundamental rights prevent it so technically they never want UCC as privilege will be gone.

I too do not agree with RSS type of Hindutwa. Their narrative that everybody born in India is completely an illusion, since no non-Hindu would accept the he is also a Hindu because of being born in India. Yes! For an inclusive ideology, it is enough if we say everyone born in India(Bharat) is an Indian(Bhartiya)

Anas has exposed himself by dillydallying on UCC while talking of equality.

I SALUTE YOU, SAI DEEPAK SIR.

Mr.Sai Deepak is a lawyer,he can say exactly what has to be told.he is expert in law language,and dharma also.Diversity comes from Hinduism itself.Hindu dharma allows everyone is free to live his own principles.but not by force and killings.

“Good fences make good neighbors”

We should not see India based on any constitutional perspective because India was not born on 15 August 1947, she is over 10,000 years old the most ancient Hindu civilisation and she was on this planet when no other civilisation or country was there. So we must stop defining India on basis of what happened in 1947.

Declare India as Hindu country as long as we have majority and finish the debate once and for all

UCC ke ate hi...Fatttttt gayi..😅

JSD Sir! Always interesting to listen to, "More power to you, stay blessed. Jai hind!"☘️🫡🙏

Look at the hypocrisy of adv Anas. When Bharat wants to accomodate few handful of hindus in Bharat as per legal CAA norms then he says this is encroachment of right to resources of bharat of bharatiya citizens, but for years endless Bangladeshi and Rohingya Muslims has been infiltrating and living illegally in Bharat, does NOT concern him as encroachment of right to resources of Bharat of Bharatiya citizens.

What Nonsense, "Is desh mein logon ke paas khane ko nahee hai, kyunki aap log dozen ke hisaab se bache paida karte hai". Your community is the main reason for population explosion and job crisis in our country. Instead of fighting CAA, for shortage of resources, control your community's population that is growing in Geometric Progression.

JSD Rocks as usual. But the question is how long are we going to resist? When will the glory age of Bharthiya civilization restart after this battle for reclaimation?

What a talk by Sai. Every time you talk, you excel your previous one. Fantastic.

Brilliant jsd, one question remained unanswered. Loyalty of hindus vs Muslims towards bharat

Yes. Dharma is not the same as religion. The word religion comes from the latin word religare meaning to be bound (preferably by a book with some non existent transcendent god's commandements). Dharma is like the fulcrum of a seesaw. It upholds/sustains stability and harmony of the universe. Every entity in the cosmos has a dharmic role to play from an electron to human beings. Hindutva is nothing but an individual or organization or political party upholding personal, social and environmental dharma for stablility and haromony of the world. Any religion or person (regardless of birtrh) who violates dharma have to be dealt through (sam, dhan, bhed and dand) or (persuade, purchase, divide and create or exploit weakness and punish) depending on the context. This is Hindutva. Ahimsa does not mean nonviolence. It means least harm to a society through dharmic action by Hindutva forces against adharma. Dharmic Hindus are egoless and karma yogis (even if they kill for dharma they are not bound by law of karma or cause and effect - Bhagavad Gita Ch 18 vs 17).

Hindus of Srilanka are not ill_treated or persecuted. And Muslims of Pakistan and Afghanistan are not Minorities and they chose to have a separate land by choice and on grounds that they cannot coexist with us. Why do these Muslims want to take everything to an international forum, so that it becomes an endless saga of talks like Kashmir. If we are powerful, we are powerful to take our own decision and decide whom we want to give citizenship. Let the muslims of Pakistan go to International forums and beg for citizenship in Bharat. Vaise bhi they are an International Epitome for begging and playing the victim card.

The blunder that was committed at the time of partition was that India was not declared as Hindustan, land of Hindus and not ordered not complete exchange of muslims and hindus from both the nations. Had that been done, there would not have been a necessity of caa today.

India was partitioned very strangely where terrorists went to pakistan but their supporters like Owaisis, Anas, abdullahs etc remained in India.

News 18, this is not fair, when you have a discussion/ talk on a particular topic and you invite guests with opposing point of views it makes it a good discussion, intellectually stimulating. Unfair bit is when you put one brilliant mind in this case Sai and a duffer opposing him it makes it very boring. Hopefully you'll keep that in mind in your future selection.

Democracy western construct hai, Anas need to study about indian history, He just need to go back and study class 6, 7, 8,9. In book it is clearly mentioned that first gantantra country idea is in the vaishali. So it is clear that democracy is not western construct.

Why Sonam Wangchuk ‘s demands for #Ladakh are currently #NotFeasible, in the current geopolitical scenario :- 1.Union Territory status of #Ladakh should not be removed as there is a border stand-off along the #LAC, with the Indian Army and PLA unable to resolve the crisis. As long as the border crisis exists, Ladakh needs to be a UT 2.6th Schedule of the constitution on #Ladakh will hamper #Infrastructure development along the #LAC that is required for the quick deployment of armed forces, Especially, when the #Chinese are developing their #Border infrastructure In surprising speed 3.The period before #Article370 when Ladakh was under the whims of the #Abdullah's and the #Mufti's would have been a perfect time to begin these protests. Especially when there was no border crisis along the LAC. why start now? 4.If he wanted to only fight for #Ladakh, why show such an attitude & provide such crude examples of Hindu duties, Ram and Sita? He could have come up with a better example. "They turned out to be such a Ram that they rescued Sita from Ravana & sold her in an open market instead of taking her home."- Sonam Wangchuk 5.There are also ‘claims’ that Sonam Wangchuk was spreading separatism among the youth, and acting as an enabler for various separatist movements across the region.

Stand with Sai Deepak.

Anas Bhai Khud CAA ka topic ghusate ho, phir UCC puchane se se itna taklif kyun

Man, you can't beat J.Sai in facts and articulation 🔥

If secularism means equal treatment of all religions why different laws for different religions like AIMPLB special property rights to that Muslim community organisation like waqf board

If the supreme court has this kinds of Anti Hindu and Anti Nationalist advocates then it really shameful and a serious matter of concern for the sovereignty and security of the country.

Who's that another joker... Seen him for the first time😂

Doesn't anas sound like perpendicular from Gangs of Wasseypur?

JSD is intellectual, he will roast anyone. Need more youngsters of this stature. Don't make Anas kind of goat head to sit beside intellectual.

Derailed discussion on Bharatiyata. J Sai Deepak wanted to stick with the Topic but the anchor is not capable enough. Excellent presentation by J Sai.

Sai deepak rocks🚩🙏

This country has got divided on the basis of religion only...CAA has given a platform to those minorities who persecuted in those countries whome we had connection. Otherwise every one has the scope to apply for citizenship.

India, that is Bharat, has the burden of bringing back all minorities because Pakistan was earmarked for “muslims”. If that is the partition, why is India under the burden of bringing in Muslims in India? We were secular then, and that’s why about 20-30cr Muslims live in India. About as much in Pakistan. The problem today is how minorities in Pakistan are being treated. The problem isn’t why 20-30cr muslims in India are living happily, sometimes aggressively.

*Don't be Casteist Fundamentalist Bigoted "Mazhabi Sanatani." Be "Mukt Hindu" Free from Scriptural Fundamentalism.* There're two versions of Hinduism. One, that's Hinduism, the Religion that's way of Faith. Another is Hinduism, the Dharma which's not Religion, which's not bound by any Scripture or Shankaracharya or Faith, not even by the idea of Super-Natural. I follow that Hinduism of Seeking which's unbound, and Dharma which has no necessary relations with any Scripture, not even the necessary idea of Gods or Super-Natural. That version of the Hinduism is the real Secularism. Secularism comes from Hinduism, the way of Seeking, Seeking the Truth and Conscience. And the ONLY Truth is Science. Secularism comes from Hinduism. And Secularism is the real Hinduism. And the Hinduism of Seeking, has been fighting with the Hinduism of Religious Faith, forever. It's these two versions of Hinduism, that curves the Bharatvarsha. And for the sake of Hinduism the way of Seeking, I must fight Hinduism the Religious Faith, and Clerics and Shankaracharyas and Scriptural Fundamentalism, superstitions. You don't understand, Secularism comes from Hinduism. And Secularism IS the real Hinduism. And if you want the real Hinduism the way of Seeking, then you must fight Hinduism the Religious Faith, along with ALL the religious faiths around the world. Hinduism the way of Seeking is the bedrock of the Bharatvarsha. And we really call that version of Hinduism as Secularism, only. When you're fighting with real Secularism, you're actually fighting with the actual Hinduism. For the sake of Hindu "Dharma", that's Secularism, we must fight Hindu ReligionS along with evil Abrahamic Religions as well. Secular Hindus are the real Hindus. Anti-Secular Hindus are the real enemy of the Hindus. But, we don't need Pseudo-secularism, that's for sure. We must eradicate Islam, the Religion of Terror, first and foremost. We must stop Conversions of Hindus, if we want India to remain Bharatvarsha. We must stop Missionaries and Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Rackets. But without Secularism, India will go down in hell. Secularism is the real Hinduism. For the sake of real Hinduism, Secularism, we shall be prepared to fight even the Hinduism the Religious Faith. *Denounce the "infallibility" of ALL Scriptures, necessarily including Quran and Bible, and GuruGranth, Tripitak, Smritis, and everything else, and be real Secular.* *Liberalism : "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls off." -Carl Sagan* *Even those who believe in GodS are just fine, but those who believe in Books are Dangerous.* *Speak up about Islam. If Liberals addressed Religion of Terror then this day wouldn't had come. Follow Ex-Muslim movement.* *There's no "First Human" in the path of Evolution, ever.* *No Adam, no Noah, no Manu ever existed.* *All Creation stories are false.* *All Religions are false. All Prophets are Frauds.* *All Book bound Religions are false. All books have been disproved by Science.* *Science is the ONLY Truth we Know.* *Follow only Science and Humanism.* *Forget all religious teachings. They're false, all of them.* *"It's called Faith cause it's not Knowledge."* *-Christopher Hitchens* *"There's ONLY one World. The Natural World. And no Super-Natural."* *-Sean Carroll, Poetic Naturalism* *Stay away from Naxal Fraud-Ambedkarite fraud-Islamo-Buddhists Conversion Racket. **#BandeMataram*

17:22 👏👏👏🫡🫡🫡 At least some has the courage to speak out these words.

JSD is a fearless gem!!! The country has been divided based on Religion. The 2nd largest majority of Bharat despite wrongfully remaining since clean exchange of people didn't happen, always plays a victim card despite growth in their numbers. We are only obligated for the Minorities from the Muslim majority countries.

Very good sai we are with you till end thanks for awakening soul of mother india indeed is mother of us all

Anas is classic example VICTIM CARD 💳

Hoping that cji dont become heartless to million hindus facing persecution.

If the news anchor wouldn’t have been there .. Sai would have probably gobbled up that Al Taqiya Rep 😂

Thank you Saideepak bro itwas very insightful

Yesss, debate and the society both very much live, its an outspoken fearless India to the world. Inspiring and to be proud of.🙏

Superb J Sai...too good..keep it up..

1. The basic issue is Hinduism is a different from exclusivist, supremist nature of Abrahamic religions. Therefore, for a country like India with majority subscribing to Hinduism with 35% to 40% being other believers, defining Bhartiya and Bharityata is going to be problematic. But now that we have a Constitution with which no one broadly has much issues ( except for amendments during Emergency times!), we should not bother to raise this question at all but let every one follow the Constitution and the rule of law. However, this is so as long as population structure remains as mentioned above but as soon as it changes to Hindus even becoming below 50%, the Constitution itself may be abrogated in favor of something else!! 2. So rather than trying to answer such divisive questions, we should focus on something more drastic - have a vote share in proportion to the religious structure of the population to preserve and protect the Constitution as as was originally enacted in 1950- that is remove the word secular and socialist from its preamble. 3. We need a clear definition of minority in its various dimensions. 4. We need to remove control over Hindu Temples or have control over all religious institutions. UCC is of course taken as given. After this is done, we focus on our citizenship and call ourselves Bhartiyas or Indians. And religion goes into the private sphere. 5. More importantly, Hinduism must develop a process for conversion from other faiths to Hinduism to have a level playing field. Otherwise, Hindus get converted to other faiths but converse is not possible today, due ot the peculiar nature of Hinduism. This needs to be corrected urgently.

100℅ agreed with J Sai Deepak😊

Jaha minority mein waha samvidhan ko manenge,Jaha majority mein agaye sharia lagu 😂... Ab duniya samjh gayi hai tumhara secularism... No compromise on Hindu rashtra 🚩🚩

Dear JSD, you're like my younger brother. .. when he makes personal attacks about your English, know that his command of the language is poor and when he speaks of your anger, my heart went out to u, for a moment u looked crushed. Tell him it's better to get angry on stage, without aides , ummoving on a chair, armed with only a mike, speaking ibtellectually, than on the street, in a mob of 1000s, brandishing weapobs, screaming a certain Gods name, and getting trained as well as paid for it !!! I wish u said this

Sai Deepak is Genius ❤❤

The only definition of a Hindu is given by VD Savarkar❤

This guy is master in language

Sai deepak always speaks perfectly no one can argue

30:48 no dhruv rathee was harmed😂😂

I gave sai deepak a paper for his speech... Paper silently slid away to the dustbin. .. Now i know why. 😅

AMAZING EXPLAINATION.

Sir, the gentleman on the right, your fundamental right is available in Middle East, please move there and wish you good time.

J sai Deepak is a gem ❤

Being Hindu-something and RSS isn’t spokesperson for me.

20:19 bro u r the one who started talking about CAA and religion and now u r accusing him for that😂😂😂

Love you J Sai deepak ❤

Sai makes sense

anas k anus fat gayi hai

It is getting proved for infinite time that a muslim cannot argue without a victim card😂😂

Sri Tanwir wasvtge one who referred to CAA first and later commented that the debate has moved from Dharma and ended with muslims????

There is no reason why we must waste our efforts to convince a jihadi.

I’m glad anas exposed his eternal commitment to jihad. Dharmic values means nothing to him until islam has a ground to carry on the fight against non believers. Sad part is that, all this is being done by exploiting the full freedom that the constitution gives them. Sick.

The opponent of Sai sounds stupid. Zero logic. He compares w China and Lanka. Lanka problem is Hindus there asking for seperate state. Plus Lanka not converting them to Buddhism. Chinese Buddhists are not linked to India. They are Chinese. Lastly they were never part of undivided India.

RSS approach to Hinduism is not different from his point of view...Sometimes you need to explain what it means actually...That's RSS is trying to unit...Not to disintegrate....

"Secularism" Please make a video on the real intent behind including this word to our Constitution. What are its political ideological, cultural repercussions on the nation. How much destruction did it cause to the interests of 90% of the population in this country. How much time, money, efforts, resources are spent only in the name of "Secularism"...

The 21st century is also about fusion. That doesn’t preclude each individual knowing or practicing the customs of their roots. If Deepak is so assured of arguments why does he raise voice so much. He lost his cool and started attacking. Deepak just knows how to define concepts well and arguing. Read Isha Upanishad. It is about embracing the infinite. Deepak is positing a limited view of the Vedic culture. The culture has been alive and well for millennia. Why do Bharatiya people feel so inferior that they need to create fences? Hinduism has been so flexible and long living. The belief system is so amazingly resilient. No need to antagonize others in today’s world.

It is truth!

How can hindu remain silent when their existence is threatened by any other community

We should not enhance enmity and hatred with our neighbours, that's not how peace and goodwill can be attained.. hate politics not progressive

Concepts of omniscient infiniteness is purely sanatan Hinduism and it's very clear scientifically that there can't be many infinite. Only one manfest in many shapes and forms. All others culture and religion believe in selectivity and boundaries. After invasions and colonization Bharat culture was totally sidelined and promoted their culture and intrests.. Unity in diversity doesn't include, pests, weeds, diseases cancers and trouble maker's.

Sai dipak very clever.hats off to you.respect for Sai dipak.

Good debate

Bhai ki le li Sai ne to.

What BOZO you put against J Sai Deepak?

Send them( you know whom) from India to OIC. Let alone, even think of admitting them( you know who) into India

J sai deepak should've given his books and all the references to the other fellow and he woud've given up advocating altogether. Not at all surprising. History never lies its a fact what they all did during partition and no one can trust them blindly. Marches for gaza is a direct evidence.

So not giving share in property to girl child is Hindu Dharma. Marriage of Widow is not allowed in Hindu Dharma. Polygamy is allowed in Hindu Dharma Morality. Daasi in every temple is morality of Hindu Dharma.

Mr Tanveer must know "Secular" word was not there in Constitution when India adopted it. It was planted by Khangress in 70's

27:03 After killing Hindus in crores, this guys is saying why we are getting angry.

What a fraud that Tanveer is

Fast chal raha hai Bhai specialist in playing victim card.

He must either go debate with Dr Ambedkar or go to Pakistan

Any language is capable of conveying meaning of a word if the word is properly defined.