NHL Worst Plays Of The Week: It's 1-on-1 Hockey Time! | Steve's Dang-Its 

"If you're a collar, stay in the frame" Not sure how that works

@@TheMrtgamer translated by Google thats why, Google translate doesn't know wtf they doing

@@TheMrtgamer, hello! There is a little russian slang here - "РАМА" it's not FRAME, rather a CAGE, as some TV commentators say.

Never heard such sentence in Russian.

Моя попытка. Что делает вратарь? Стоит @#$ на воротах!

In one replay you can see one of the players covers his mouth to keep from laughing.

I'm so glad I'm not the only one that notice that. Like both both Teams were like "nah, you guys are on your own on this one"😂

They know Matthew and Brady have probably been nutpunching each other for half their lives😂

xD LOL

"I'm not ur mom"

If you are a goalkeeper, STAND ON THE GATE

If you’re a goaltender stand on the goal

Why are you standing on it товарищ?

That’s a saying guys, in Russian we literally say Stand in goal

@@slava6454 how do you pronounce it?

Lolol cry harder

@@Worrgamesguy I don't have to, look at the standings, nubcake

@@00XNine Still crying about it two weeks later 😂 And I’m good with the standings, you can take the first round exit this time. We’ve won the division like three out of the last five years and got bounced every single year. The one time we went to the SCF, we were an 8th seed.

@@Worrgamesguy and still no cups. But I guess you can raise another banner for your win

@@Worrgamesguy who is *we*? What part do you have in the organization?

Well Gallagher wasn't on the ice so they couldn't call it a no goal

I'm glad I read your comment. I'm having a really hard time enjoying the game I love as of late and for some reason your comment made my entire week. The fact that you are here, alive and healthy (I hope) and commenting on one of my favorite RU-vidr's videos throughout all the nonsense of the world make me smile and I really needed to smile. Wishing you the best!

Well you and this 19 year old have something in common!

@@evann-t2915 damn your last game was in 1979? you a time traveler??8

@@EmberGT3 what? The dude is probably in his 70s... they retired younger back then, between the equipment and the rougher play it took a larger toll on bodies

did the ground cause the fumble?

The Tuck Rule

There was a recent rule change too due to a QB in a college Final faking the slide so he wouldn't get tackled and running in for a touchdown to win the championship

DEZ CAUGHT IT!!!

Was it a 2v5 situation?

yea but like 80 percent of the players on the ice were all fighting so i think that should at least be called for something, i do get like maybe 3-5 but like 8 is a bit much to not call

i saw this take on twitter and want to perpetuate it. a big clean hit shouldn't always end the play, and players should have to change and adapt so they can't do this dumb Scrum thing every time, since the play's still live!

I mean, if you really want to discourage it then make it a penalty. As it stands, if players go after the hitter after a big, clean hit, then it's not really an option for the hitter's team to get involved. Especially in this circumstance. Brannstrom is a tiny man by league standards.

Agreed. I also know that the net was definitely off before the puck crossed the line. That, plus the offside, plus the time it took to review makes a TRIPLE Dang It!

As a Habs fan I totally agree and it's not just being biased there's no way that was on sides.

Because Boston fans being disappointed is always a hat pick

The fact that we get to live in a time where we can see in real time a player and an opposing team publicly go at each other is a hat pick

You'd think Producer Drew would have made sure it was on here.

^

@@xyrolinx3533 not to mention that it decided the game, which was between the two top teams in the division

Wah wah wah 😭

I think they all must have assumed one of the other refs had already blown a whistle. idfk.

Steve's Hat Picks are pretty entertaining, too.

No because in so situations you need review. "Let's say it's Montreal and Boston or Pittsburgh and Philadelphia, it's in OT it can be any teams but these are extreme examples. Boston comes down and scores or Philadelphia scores, but it was scored but the net coming off, the goalie gets hit or offsides , or all of them happened. This is deciding which team in both games make it to the playoffs because of how close of points they are. If there was no review of this situation or any other situation and the goal was offsides but the ref couldn't review it any initial call was on sides this would make whatever team lost that game so pissed . The reviewing is to make the game as Fair as possible if there was no reviews there would be so many problems. In that situation like I said the team would have not have made it to the playoffs because of the ref not being able to review it. I understand that yes reviewing should not be 10 minutes or even 6 minutes but it's necessary to try to at least get the call right. Sometimes even after this long period of time you might not think the cause right anyways and it might have been a waste of time. The main point is if there was no way to review something an NHL goals could be scored from many different ways and it could be counted as a goal when it definitely should not have been and people would go crazy especially if it was a deciding game if which team made the playoffs. And I don't believe that if in the situation if your team got screwed you would be fine because you would have just been that close to the playoffs but you get denied because you weren't able to review it you can't tell me that wouldn't suck but it's your opinion I guess.

It's only a Dang It if the ref laughed in his face...

lmao yea. but also, kadris not that strong.