Maya Forstater joins Martin Daubney on GB News to discuss the government proposal to update the NHS Constitution for England to reflect the Equality Act 2010 and protect single-sex care.
Peter Tatchell, a man with NO SHAME ! As a leading light in Stonewall which pushed this false ideology that has damaged so many kids, he vocally supported on this channel, should be facing prosecution followed by lengthy jail time.
I noticed when he was asked about the Cass report, he completely ignored the quetion. Just went right back to talking about private rooms for women who didn't want to share the ward with trans men.
Time and time again he brings out the old idea that you can't treat all trans women as a potential threat to women just because of a tiny number of bad apples. Time and time again he has it pointed out to him that it's the same for all biological males, it only takes one for a catastrophic failure and it's actually the basis of all laws. We are not calling all human being thieves by locking our doors. Yet time and time again he comes back with the same old nonsense. He either doesn't listen and learn or he deliberately regurgitates the same shit he doesn't even believe in.
Male pattern criminal behaviour doesn't change in M to F trans people and while most of them may be perfectly fine, the problem is that we can't tell. Until it's too late.
1. UK needed a large scale audit of practice standards and of consequences of those mal-practice to find out what science and common sense already knew. 2. Peter Tachell and Human Rights do not co-exist in the same sentence. What he advocates is absolute lunacy.
Stonewall wrote "guidance" notes claiming the NHS policy meant "gender identity" whenever the NHS used the term sex. And the medical staff just swallowed it without question.
Had to pause this video to comment, I am so shocked! The first time Peter spoke on this segment, apart from his political take on the reason for it, was the first time I have ever, ever heard him say something sensible! Usually he’s all about gender being how you dress, like it’s a costume. While his solution is not necessarily going to be immediately practical, it’s the first time I’ve ever heard him offer one that is an alternative to just ‘trans women are women’ and admit that men and women are different and real women, who are not ‘trans’ and therefore not biologically male, do need privacy, dignity and safety from men when in hospital and by inference in all female spaces. I’m flabbergasted. And impressed. Let’s see what happens in the rest of the video.
And his second comment was ok as well, except of course he’s again forgetting that trans women are men, and men are a threat to women. Becoming trans doesn’t magically eliminate all aggression and predatory behaviour if the man is one of those either. However I agree that trans people in general should not be demonised or disrespected, and also deserve safety from other predatory men. I think that if a hospital has single rooms at all then obviously they will be on men’s and women’s wards. Put the trans in single rooms in the men’s wards. Easy.
There is this thing called science and apparently there are things called chromosomes and apparently these affect how we develop...who would have thought it 🤨
Tatchell has helped turn the LGB movement into a Wifi password for one main reason. To keep himself in well paid employment. Having achieved the main aims for gays and lesbians he was scared of being out of a job. Next thing we know trans people are in on the party.
Peter Tatchell says he sees no problem with men sharing women's spaces, but he's not a woman exposed to a fake woman's penis, or the potential threat posed by a strange man (a very strange man!) sleeping in the bed next to her, is is? In fact, as a gay man, I feel sure he'd like that. He also suggests those trans claiming to be something they're not, could be given private rooms, like private patients, or those receiving end of life care. Is he really so out of touch with reality that he thinks the NHS has the resources and facilities to accommodate such a notion?
No one has thought about the female nurses who will have to go into a private room with a man who's claiming to be a woman to have access to female only spaces. Men like that are, by definition, predators.
Of course Mr Tatchell defends men calling themselves women accessing women’s only spaces and hospital wards. How he can be labelled a “human rights campaigner” is beyond me
What is he talking about ‘there is no proof trans women are a threat to women? A woman was SAd on a hospital ward by a TIM and the hospital didn’t believe her until they looked at cameras.
And several attacks have been carried out in hospitals on adult human females, by “women with penises.” The woke health trusts decline to report these attacks as they don’t regard them as rapes, “because trans women are women and they can’t rape other women.”
No, no, no! That "thing" we warned about happening. It never ever happens! Ever! And when it does it wasn't a real "twans" it was just a pervy man what done it. So that doesn't count. And we are all phoebe's!
Yep, and the judges ruling explicitly stated that the young girl went with the man BECAUSE they disguised themselves as a woman , therefore earning her trust.
Get real, indeed!!! Women give birth and share a ward where male partners of other women are free to visit with nothing but a curtain to separate them in a physically and vulnerable state from men who are strangers (yes, visiting their partners) yet a man who fancies himself as a woman deserves a private room?? Get STUFFED!
Look, we rightly demanded that biological sex be recognised, this has been done (and about time too). But these trans people have to be treated somewhere, they can't be left to rot or die in the street. I will happily support trans only wards if it guarantees that biological men and women have their own wards. I would even extend that to toilets, changing rooms etc - The net result is that all the females in our lives are safer, more comfortable and won't be exposed to biological males. That is our stated aim here...correct? We call ourselves the reasonable, rational side of this debate because we generally are, and if trans people are paying their dues, they are entitled to medical care as much as you or I. They won't have to build anything, they just set a tiny percentage of ward space aside for them.
Thankyou Maya, and to all you wonderful women who continue to fight on our behalf. We've had enough of this man's input and we all know what his stance is on this subject. It's really unbelievable that it has come to this in the first place.
Until Peter Tatchell changes his tune, which it seems he never will, he should not be invited onto television programs on the off-chance that someone will hear him and believe what he says. The reasons WHY men need to be excluded from women's spaces have been explained to him by many women; he isn't pretending to ignore their reasons, he REALLY IS ignoring them. He simply doesn't care about women.
Now Tatchell wants trans identifying men to have the luxury of their own private room whilst the rest of us share a ward with people snoring all night. Nothing's too good for the trans, eh Peter? Anyway. I have surgery coming up soon. Better look out my best wig and lippy.
This would have once been a sketch on a news satire show. Yet, here we are- made to feel THANKFUL for the most fundamental, basic,.and crucial common sense.
Because no one else will make such a spectacle of themself as he does. Well ideas wise, there are those who would make a spectacle of themselves with their attire.
Unless it's a Labour government, then I doubt he would. I don't know what Peter thinks the government should do given that it now cannot deny that it has read the Cass report and is aware of the leaking of the WPATH files,, both of which indicate that trans issues are not, as Peter suggests, a matter of showing love and kindness to a small group of people. Perhaps he thinks nothing should be done until after the next GE, which could be months away. Let's just leave women to cope with things as they are - in the interests of political neutrality.
My 80 year old mother suffering from dementia was on a hospital ward with a 25 ish trans woman in her mind there was a man sleeping opposite her… she’s old confused & extremely vulnerable.
Could it be possible that Peter Tatchell and Stonewall having achieved much of what they were aiming for in terms of the legal position and social acceptance of homosexuals was wondering about his future paid employment? Having adopted the extra letters to include trans sexuals etc his future wages are guaranteed.
"Several Trans Patients" says Tatchel. 0.4% total says the CENSUS with regards to those who don't identify with their assigned gender at birth. A mere 120,000. Non Binary is the largest of theat group. Google of course. So why all the changes Mr Tatchell.
Love, care and compassion is Tatchell's stuck record mantra. Like, who is he trying to convince, himself, us or is he merely talking to the wind. If he believed in what he was saying, he wouldn't have any need to insist on it so much.
Tatchell is hilarious. A lot of things he says - such as "of course biological sex is important" - could just as easily come out of Maya's mouth, and yet he would still call her a vile transphobe. No doubt he will also, for some reason, be immune to the worst of what the gender cult does to those of us who say the same things without the armour he has earned by condemning the likes of Maya before he speaks.
Every time Tatchell comes on, the public needs to be reminded he’s written extensively on how he supports adults having sexual relationships with children.
Peter Tatchell sets off my fight or flight response. Absolutely nothing behind the eyes. Wasn’t shocked to learn he supported lowering the age of consent. 👀
So biological sex 'IS important and the NHS should know if someone is male or female'. Even though this shouldn't need to be formally acknowledged by the NHS, we are in a time when I'm grateful to them for even saying it.
Is he just choosing to ignore the basic rights of women.. I don't care what you think you are, women's loo's are no man's land you don't even think about going in there let alone feel your entitled too, that's beyond disrespectful
I was once admitted to my local hospital with a very painful health condition. I found myself on a ward with elderly men and that was 1997. I was only 35 and I was traumatised enough at being admitted never mind having to sleep in the same room as strange men.
This is so nonsensical that we ever have to debate this absolutely rubbish. Everyone knows that biology matters and it’s pathetic that these institutions have been captured at all by this absolute nonsense. I have no words for Peter and his ridiculous views.
Tatchell has made an entire career out of his sexuality. Never had a real job in his life and still will draw his pension without ever contributing anything positive.
