Nikon D750 buffer and burst demo 100 frames continuous. 

you're welcome.

Yeah to get high frame rates I think you need to make careful settings choices. Things that mean the camera's computer is doing as little work as possible. E.g. manual focus manual exposure no D-lighting no backup to second card no image review It's not very practical It's been a while since I made this vid and I did it quicly during a lunch break so I can't recall the exact settings, but if you search the DP revieew forums there are lots of tips for getting your frame rate up. I would guess writing a backup to the second card reduces the bandwidth available out of the buffer and probably reduces the number of images the buffer can hold and probably makes a significant difference. And I believe that good class 10 U3 cards make a difference.

Its always the SD card

John Citizen Thanks for your comment John. I don't think most of us use that kin of capability much, but it is nice to know it's there should you need to.

Lucian Virciu No probs, hope it's helpful.

It is indeed :)

It was the BKT, I figure it out! Working now, thanks!

No I've never tried the crop mode.

Well... I laughed. I don't really care if anybody else did.

If you have a point it would probably be clearer if you articulated the point or explained the behaviour you have described. In the mean time I'm glad the video gave you a laugh.

The video didn't give me a laugh. His question "Have you tried the dx crop mode?", after actually watching the video, followed by your reply of "No, I've never tried the crop mode.", when you very clearly did, and replied to him in sarcasm, made me laugh.

Just a cheapo little levelling bubble for levelling on a tripod.

LOL someone who can't understand english. Yes it was 2-3fps but it was continuous at 2-3fps. I didn't claim a frame rate, just that it was continuous for 100 frames. On earlier Nikons in the same market position it would not continue to shoot at a constant/steady slow rate it would pause 10 seconds fire a frame, pause 7 seconds fire a frame etc.

It'll take a million "continuous shots" until the shutter blows out if you don't care about the frame rate.

Correct. Whereas the earlier models at a similar price point would not shoot continuous at a constant frame rate as their buffer would not clear fast enough. That was the point of the demonstration. I did not claim that the camera could shoot continuous at a high frame rate. Just that it could shoot continuous. That was a new thing at the time for DSLRs at the price point.

Probably you didn't optimise you settings. Did you check the settings in the description of this video - including the SD card model.

No debate here (this is my video, for some reason my other account can't seem to post on you tube at the moment). Well not much debate here. Just pop your video up showing us the D810 write rate using SD cards :-) . Yes the D810 with CF does do better it should - it costs more and part of that extra money buy you more RAM. My D4 also has a much higher frame rate and longer bursts - and clears faster especially with XQD. That however does not change the point I was making or the validity of the video. My point was twofold: 1) the D750 buffer performance is better than it was given credit for or the specs might suggest. 2) certain SD cards get you better performance with the D750/expeed 4 than other SD cards. FYI I actually made the video to demonstrate these points to people in some forum who argued that what I demonstrated was not possible - this performance was not accepted at the time and was the subject of debate on DPR as well as other places. e.g. Thom Hogan changed his D750 review on both the area of buffer performance and video bit rate on the basis of this video and other information I provided him. Oh and not every "pro" (whatever that is) camera has CF cards - they're too slow these days. The recent high performance flagship cameras use XQD cards. (BTW the D810 has SD as well as CF has because it's only a semi pro camera.) Oh and did you have an actual point or were you just fan boying your camera or the camera you aspire too?

Hahaha such utter nonsense. Nobody cares if you know some "armchair photographer" who found your review useful. Clearly you took my comment personally although I'm only stating a fact that the D810 does much better with CF than what the crappy buffer on the D750 does with SD that fills up after 2.2 embarrassing seconds lol. LOL 2.2 seconds and the buffer is full. Anybody who thinks that is great must be insane lol. Perhaps you have been into photography for like 2 years since you also downgraded the CF cards which have been used in every pro camera from Nikon at least for the past 10 years. And yes, now we're seeing a transition into XQD cards but so far only the D5 and the D500 have XQD without the option for CF. CF is getting too slow for sure and that's a fact. JFYI I shoot a D3S and 2 x D4S so I'm not "fanboying" anything here at all. Your crappy reply seems to indicate that it's you who are a sad little D750 fanboy who got his first full frame (the D750) for about a year ago lol. My point was only that CF cards are superior to SD and that's why Nikon have been using CF in all the pro bodies so far (now they are switching to XQD). No flagship pro camera made by Nikon has ever used SD cards. You can ask that from your local Nikon authorized camera shop lol. Your reply was so embarrassing that I don't even believe you own a D4. Anybody who owns a D4 wouldn't buy a crappy D750 with a shit buffer that fills up after 2.2 seconds lol. And then make videos on RU-vid trying to pretend the D750 is a badass camera lol.Anybody who uses a D4 professionally would have to be insane to get a shitty D750 with a shit buffer and a crippled buttons controls layout plus a number of other shortcomings such as max 1/4000s. lol. JFYI If I would have to choose between the D810 and the D750 I would for sure take the pro level D810. The D810 beats the crap out of the D750 in everything except built in wifi and the tilting screen. And it's a full time pro camera. The D750 also have the green little AUTO mode setting lol. So I guess that would make the D750 a fully enthusiast point and shoot DSLR camera for those who like point and shoot photography lol.I didn't even bother to read everything in your essay but you better think twice next time when someone gives you a little critique or feedback. Only a true D750 fanboy would make so much noise and trouble like you did lol. The only point I made was stating that CF cards are faster and you acted like a teenager who got bullied by the other boys who got better toys lol. Now sod off and make some more videos about the shit D750 lol. I'll be following you with this or another account :)

Right...

Camera is on. SD is wet . Rough use with the camera . Common 😳😳

Notice how I didn't make any claim that the buffer wasn't filling? In fact if you read the description you'll see where I said: "Note that in all cases, the intial burst is longer than the estimate when you half press the shutter. E.g. In 14bit FX the top LCD indicated 12 frames in the buffer but we got about 18 shots before slowing down." What is the intial estimate when you half press the shutter button? That's the camera's estimation of when the buffer fills. Why does the frame rate slow down? Because the buffer fills. What I said was the D750 can shoot continusously for 100 frames. And it can - as demonstrated. The D750 can continue to shoot continuously (at a lower rate than when there is space in the buffer) when the buffer fills, but still at a constant speed - hence "continuous" That was the point. Earlier models in roughly the same place in the Nikon DSLR line couldn't. Earlier cameras witg SD cards (e.g. EXPEED 3 based cameras) couldn't - and I think earlier SD cards probably couldn't have written the data even if the camera could have. What used to happen with cameras like the D7000 or the D600/D610 was, as soon as you filled the buffer the camera would stop, then start and stop then start, but at inconsistent speeds. E.g. it might pause for 3 seconds for one frame then 1 second for he next 2 frames, then 2 seconds for the next one etc etc. I.e. the IO subsystem of those earlier cameras was not able to maintain a constant write rate once the buffer filled. This changed with EXPEED 4 for both the D750 and the D810. The more constistent write speed also allowed the buffer to recover fasterm than the ealier models.

@@1337flite my d600 is exactly identical ot the d750, if you want i can upload a bideo to show this. Your d750 keeps stopping kust lkke my d600

That would be "waste". As in " you waste of oxygen" . Have a nice day. :-)