I want to thank everyone for the kind comments and early support here on this channel. This video marks roughly 3 months on RU-vid and the feedback has been so exciting. You guys are great and it is greatly appreciated.
Great informative video Josh, especially for all those who are new. Tried to photograph small birds with the Z6II last week and it was a struggle. Big birds work like a charm, as long as they are close enough, but from a distance you can simply forget it. Nikon seems to be a vloggers brand atm and not for professional photographers. Tried all sort of settings but there are none that match Canons settings to flying objects, especially those that come towards you, and if you shoot during a rainy day you will struggle with sharpness issues as well with the Z6II. My fox picture on instagram (2nd acc) proves it, even if the animal was standing just 30 feet away. Overall, I think Nikon has to work more to make their cameras comparable with the R5/R6 from Canon and A9/A9II/A1 from Sony.
I'm looking to go Sony + 200-600mm as I'm hearing great things from that camp and with a fully articulated screen it checks off a lot of boxes for me in the vlogging category as well.
@@saarikkophoto Right now I'm debating A7C now or wait and see what new A74 brings (also talks of a a6000's series camera that might fit the bill). The A7R4 is amazing with the 200-600mm but a bit on the pricy side for me right now. I would NOT suggest any older Sony that does not have the new FZ1000 battery as that was a game changer in battery life for Sony mirrorless cameras.
Hey, honestly the swap has gone amazing for me. I mostly do landscape and portrait shots but I dabble from time to time in wildlife and so far going from the Canon 6D Mark II to the Nikon Z7II has been an unbelievable improvement. My only complaint is the lack of lenses in the Z mount and the cost of the Z mount primes plus the massive file size but thats a given. The autofocus on the Z7II is fantastic for most of the wildlife shots I have tried like black bears and deer.
That is a great example of where they are strong. I agree that the sensor on the Z7II is fantastic but it would struggle with the small erratic stuff too. Indeed a great camera.
A good honest review that should ensure all Nikon owners to follow this channel. To many are sweetening the capabilities of cameras and lenses (regardless of brands) making the users questioning their own capabilities to the point where the hair turns grey. Nikon have a lot going on and probably have one of the best bodies around and more important the best raw files out there. When they get the autofokus sorted on par with the competition, there nothing holding back for going all Nikon. The lenses for the Z line, all though kinda ordinary looking, delivers high quality results paired with any Nikon Z body. One can hope that the R&D working on the Z9 comes up with a competitive AF system that also can trickle down to the lower end models. I'm not a Nikon shooter but the camera world needs Nikon as a contender to the two brands ahead now. Go Nikon!
I appreciate you saying that. People need to understand that the cameras are excellent. the autofocus is not horrible. It is fine, just not really on par with the more expensive cameras. I'm sure there will be continuous improvements.
Video is almost a year old, but it was good to review it. In a few days, a new firmware release will hopefully improve my Z6ii once again. I have discovered the Riverwood Conservancy west of Toronto in Mississauga and need the stimulation and exercise. Got really lazy during the pandemic and need a drastic change. Little things like better focus will get me outside a lot more. New fluid head too. Your videos have been a real treat and inspiration for me. Many thanks.
Thank you for the candid report. I am a bird photographer and have a Nikon D500 and I am wanting to switch to mirror less. The Nikon Z6II was on top of my list but I do want good birds in flight shots. Looks like I need to do more research. Greatly appreciated.
I'm on a bridge camera so I can't comment from personal experience but I watch a lot of morten hilmer on youtube and his main camera is also the Z6II. He doesn't do as much bird in flight as you do but someone of that caliber choosing to use the Z6II for photos says a lot to me.
Thank you for an honest review . I shoot a Z 6 , have not tried shooting birds in flight yet . Thanks for mentioning that technique is key , great reminder .
I went to the same process… from d850 to Z6… but keeping the 2 cameras… there is an learning curve… more than people think… I sold those 2 cameras and bought the Z7ii… with a learning curve also! I grab more and more on focus pictures… because… when the Z grap a focus, it is really good! It is also lens sensitive… my 500 pf works really good… my 300 pf was so-so… I sold it. I also learn to ease more the m/a focus… with the hi light contrast, it works easier than expected!
It's an absolute joy having people like you on RU-vid talking about cameras. Such a good feeling compared to click-bating swindlers like Sony Northrup and The Shouting Hairball.
Great video! I’m using the 200-500f5.6 and that one is a slow moving lens😊. But I also own the Z70-200 f/2.8 and with that lens the Z6II transforms into a much more capable camera and almost is on par with my d500 and in some scenarios even better AF. A couple of weeks ago I shot dippers flying in front of me and they fly low and fast over the water I got some pretty nice photos. And hopefully the camera evolves more with further firmware updates.
Johan: I am doing mostly Sports photography and I am debating selling my D500 and just using my Nikon 6 II, but the key much like bird photography is better glass and the firmware update did help and the better glass is a must but also much more expensive. Debating getting the Z70-200 f/2.8 and selling the D500 and all of it's lenses, because the current Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 for a everyday lens is amazing... I should also point out I did try the new Nikon f/c and was shocked at the autofocusing on it.
I went from D5600 to the Z6ii so it’s a massive improvement to me. I agree it’s hard for BIF but I’ve been trying with the tracking mode which I think I am getting the hang of (slowly).. hopefully future firmware will get the Zs up to near the Cannons soon. I couldn’t justify the expense of changing brands, and really I’m very happy with the Z6ii, just envious of that BIF focus...
Keep trying Tod just remember for BIF you are the tracking system. Wide area small and the subject filling half the box or more and you are in with a shout.
Thanks for sharing your journey on the transition to mirrorless. I can’t add anything on the birding side of things since I haven’t gone down that rabbit hole, yet. But I also have done the transition from DSLR to mirrorless with Nikon cameras. A year ago, I bought a Z6 to replace my D810 primarily for night photography and video. There are a bunch of examples of time lapse videos on my RU-vid channel. Also, recently I added a Z7ii for landscape and macro plus changed out 3 lenses to the new S-line format (f/4.0). The Z6 is far better than the D810 for the formats mentioned above and is much easier to use. And the Z7ii is a huge upgrade on photo quality and ease of use. I wasn’t all that happy about the number of $ required to switch over but I figured it was better to take the financial hit then spend years moaning about the quality out of the DSLR camera. Good luck with your new camera.
G'day Josh - Thanks so much for the frank and open discussion on your experience with the Z6ii. I've slowly moved up through the DX line-up as my photography has improved and I've wanted more from my cameras. I started with the D5300, then D7500 and finally to the Z50. Front and back focus issues with the D7500 (along with a desire to make it easier to produce short videos) prompted my move to the Z50. I usually have it paired with a Tamron 150-600. The speed (or lack thereof) of the autofocus is quite frustrating. BIF moving across the frame are generally ok, however once the subject is moving toward or away from me (at any speed), the Z50 just can not keep up. I experimented by photographing a moving dog with the kit lens (sans FTZ adapter) and it still struggled with maintaining focus. Stationary subjects are ok, however "stationary" is not what most wildlife generally prefers to do. The comment you make regarding regarding the price point of these cameras is one that is so often overlooked. I regularly read comments like "Just get an R6!", which is in a different market to the Z6ii. By the time you add a couple of the amateur canon lenses and spare batteries etc, you are still looking at over $6,000 - an incredible amount of money to pay, particularly when one is not only an amateur but also has invested in glass for a different system. I have been waiting to move up to full frame mirrorless, however given the challenges Nikon has in managing the mirrorless autofocus, I believe it is better to wait and see what happens in a few years.
I am very cautious before making any upgrades or considerations. I am confident that the Z6II is a great camera and will suit most needs. remember, small bird in flight photography is the ultimate test on any autofocus system and no company has it truly perfected. I guess my point is, with good technique and proper settings, the AF system on the nikon mirrorless systems is totally fine. Perhaps not that of the $6500 sony but still adequate.
Great explanation of the focus issue. I found the dynamic af to work better on the Z6II when there is a busy background. I keep hearing of rumors of a 2.0 firmware release that's supposed to get us bird tracking. Keeping my fingers crossed.
I use a D7500. I just traded my 6 years old sigma 150-600C for a used but in absolutely fantastic condition 200-500. And I am still in awe! 200-500 is silent. It is slower than 150-600 but wat more accurate and hunts a lot less. I am happy with my combo. Since Mirrorless is the future, I really want nikon to release a mirrorless version of the D500, something like what they did with D500 & D5. An APS-C version of Z8 or Z9 will be fantastic! I don't really want to let my 200-500 go. It is an amazing lens.
Just bought the D850 to round out my cameras as I already have a D750 and D500. Was looking at the Z7II but your exact problem of birds in flight stopped me at this point. Love the D850 and all it does along with the 500mm PF.
I have the D5 and I have never missed my target for action Fotos. Why should we have absolutely to change, with a camera which have a bad AF for BIf.? 1.the argument of the bad AF in video for DSLR is not relevant for me. Have we all suddenly forgotten, that the professional video cameras worked before and still now with MANUAL FOCUS. of course it's harder to focus, but the films of those who use the MANUAL FOCUS are not too bad. Don't you think so???? 2. We work almost all day on computer screens, on phone screens, on tablet screens, on television screens 😱😱😱😱 When we took a Foto, it was the only moment in the day, with the DSLR, that we see the birds in flight, in the real life, not on a screen, like with the mirrorless. My God is it absolutely necessary to see all the world, all the life on a "fuck.." screen???? Because the entire world decides for more money, to switch on mirrorless????? Should I throw away my new mountain bike, because it works only with the " manual" strength of my feet? Because I would declare :this bike has no electric motor assistance (like the AF assistance in the vidéo of mirrorless). No doubt it is harder to use a manual focus, but you have much more flexibility for artistic effects 😊😊! I don't know if one day, I will switch for mirrorless. Why have I to do this?? I think that the D850. D5, AND D500 were and still are under the best cameras in the world. Those who want to make videos with them, can learn To use manual focus. Thanks for having read me 😊bye.and first of all, thanks Josh for this absolute honest review in which you don't try to hide the défauts of the z6ll. I think that the person who wants to keep his Dslr has very good arguments 😊👍
Solid & fair real-world review! I think some (not most) of this is a learning curve / muscle memory (took me a few weeks after I moved from DSLR), and some of it is realizing what the Z6II is - it's a superb enthusiast & pro-level all-arounder. When you get into the small / fast / erratic BIF niche - it's not matching the D500 or D850. One thing to note is that some F lenses take a bigger AF speed hit than others on the FTZ. The 600 f/4 is measurably slower - the 200-500 performs almost identically between F and Z bodies. I have a 70-300 AF-P (latest version) that is amazingly fast on my Z6II. Steve Perry ran some interesting tests on this a little while back. For action I'm generally in Wide Area Small, or Dynamic. If you have a clean background, even Auto Area does well. I do not use Subject / Eye Tracking for fast movement (it's amazing for just about everything else). Curious where you ended up setting your AF sensitivity (mine is currently at 3... is that optimal?)
I have always bumped the AF sensitivity to 4. 3 is good but I want it to be a little stickier. I just release the button when I want it to let go and acquire a new target. Thanks as always Craig.
D500 and D850 are doing a great job. Z6 for filming is great, but is second choise for action photografy. Z6 is first choise for everything else. No need for anything else. 40 years with Nikon and still loving every day the use of the brand, camera's and its lenses.
Hi, I have been using Z6 for almost a year. I struggled with focus as well. It doesn't have the animal eye detect autofocus for animals and birds other than cats & dogs. I would recommend that you check focus speed settings in the camera. You will get far more better results. Nikon Z6II is far more better than Z6. I have observed that with busy backgrounds, dynamic AF works best. With clear background Wide angle and Large angle AF works very well. Honestly I am very happy with my Z6. Over the last one year I have got some amazing images. I am looking forward to buying Z6II and Z7II. However I am just waiting for Nikon to launch few more lenses and the new camera. Basis the pricing I would go ahead with the purchase. What worked for me apart from the camera was understanding the behavior of the birds. I knew that at some point it would move towards the direction and i was ready with my camera. However, I have used R5, R6 & A9II (Borrowed) and the experience was out of the world. I am Nikon fanboy and I love the colors and picture quality offered by Nikon. The camera would grow on you soon and you would love it
Just heading out for a wildlife trip in Scotland... renting Nikon Z6ii to check it out, with Nikon 500pf to accompany my own D500 with 300pf and 1.4 teleconverter. I will be using wide area af small or large for BIF, as I see how I get on with mirrorless! The AF in Sony and Canon is very enticing but I like Nikon glass and ergonomics. However, if I am not impressed with the Z6ii overall and AF, then my patience with Nikon will probably run out end of 2021. I hope Z9 and possible major firmware update close the gap very significantly or Z9 overtakes! Like you said in an earlier video a great optical viewfinder is a lovely experience and I will be interested to see how I like the Z electronic version, which I know has been well received even if its resolution is now surpassed by Sony and Canon. I like your video technically and your straight honest and engaged presentation. Go well Josh, Bruce.
Thank you my friend. Just temper your expectations. the Z6II is a wonderful camera until you start photographing fast twitching small birds. good luck on your trip in Scotland.
Oh I am struggling to choose my first FF mirrorless! R6, Z6II, A7III? My head is gonna blow! 😅 I want quick transition between photo and video, but also be able to get birds in flight. I just cannot make up my mind! Nice video👍
The recent firmware updates has improved the AF in the Z6II significantly. I can shoot live dance in dark theaters with only a very few missed shots. I haven't tried this for bird photography, but this is completely different scenario.
Just added a Z6II as a companion to my D500. The D500 with the 200-500 f5.6 purchased for BIF + other wildlife. Will use the Z6II for everything else + wildlife requiring a silent shutter such as ducks on a pond, close in. Stayed with Nikon bc of all the Nikon glass I own plus my familiarity with years of shooting with Nikon. Just now tooling up with these two cameras as I stepped away from photography for about 10 years and now back in, so I don't have a lot of field experience with my decisions yet. Have been concentrating on gear (Robus 5570 Tripod, f-stop 70L camera bag, BH-55 ball, Induro GHB2 gimbal). I felt it was important to break into the mirrorless scene now as it appears to be the future for photography at the present time. Was considering the D850 as a companion to the D500, but opted to go mirrorless with the Z6II. I think too many people jump ship with brands bc they are impatient. The big three right now for mirrorless, Nikon, Sony, and Cannon, are in the hunt with Nikon trying to play catch up (Which they have done with the Z9). Next it will be Cannon jumping to the forefront, then Sony, then Nikon etc. etc. etc. If you are comfortable with a brand stick with them............ they will eventually respond to the competition. Those big 3, Nikon, Sony, and Cannon all make superior products! Stick with your brand.
So many tools out there to make our hobby easier and comfortable. The mirrorless cameras are great but have their trade offs. Be sure to use those video features. They are fantastic!
Glenn, A year or so later how do you feel about your combo of Z6II and D500 for wildlife? I was going to go Z8 (pre-orders started yesterday) but it is a ton of $. Much like yourself, I am now thinking of keeping the D500 for BIF etc and getting a Z6ii for video, silent shutter and low light. Instead of the 200-500 I use a Sigma 150-600mm.
This was a great video and I loved reading the comments. I am not a wildlife photographer, but portrait/studio photographer. I would like to do more photojournalism and switching from single point focus to auto focus is a challenge. I have a D4 D850 and D800. Bot a z6 and now z6ii. I'm struggling setting up function buttons for fastest use and customization of features. Reading the comments below helps me see that some of it is not user error but most seem to agree firmware upgrades are needed. I LOVE the color/ergonomics of Nikon and don't want to switch brands. The responsiveness of the D4 makes it hard to switch to z6ii but I really do love the color and z glass. I did a test shooting both 105 macro and 70-200 mm of flowers. I did notice the 70-200 was so much faster and more responsive and the bokeh had a dreamier quality and the sharpness edged out the macro - it just didn't shoot close enough. Nice to know it wasn't me, that the ftz seems to lag in responsiveness. Really enjoyed your videos and if you would make a video on how to set up best setting for auto focus and custom buttoms I'd be grateful. Keep up the great videos!
You are too kind Karen. I had another 7 minutes in this video that I cut out last night. It highlighted AF modes, controls, and menu set-up. dang it. I should have left it in. The button customization is much better on the D850 IMO. the only good point is that the info button menu appears in the view finder and you can access the typical stuff and change it on the fly without taking your eye off the EVF. Just a matter of practice, I program the two front buttons to spot metering controls and AF area control. those are the two adjustments i am making most often in the field. definitely improves my workflow. Thanks for watching.
No I didn’t make a switch and I’m glad I can still continue to enjoy all my DSLRs. Mirrorless system is just too small to work with. I love my D850/ D4s/ D5. Mirrorless will never give me the same feel.
As i told you in a previous post, I own a z6ii . Still struggle with it but must say that te autofocus when it requires focus, its just dead on , thats what I love . The evf is great but sucks when you have the sun from behind (you’ll know when it happens) I like the 14fps mode , love the ergonomics, that’s just some things i love and obviously the video mode and eye autofocus is nice . The thing that frustrated me the most is the fact that it just sometimes don’t require focus on a small bird in a bush , you can see the bird moving in the bokeh , the branch in front of the bird is perfect in focus while the bird stays out of focus, would love the canon algorithm for this focus system (should be possible with the dual processors) just maybe we will be surprised in some next firmware update , that’s where my hopes at and would love to have a 200-600 z lens Until then it’s just a good overall camera, not the best but just a very solid overall camera with outstanding iso performance By the way , Steve perry goes in dept on focus on the z cameras, really useful Love your channel keep up the good work
Josh, I enjoyed your video and I can relate with you on the cost vs performance. I shoot mainly birds/wildlife, and some landscape. I am not a videographer. When I do shoot video I shamelessly use my IPhone 12 with a gimbal, and it works for me. I started with Nikon out of the gate with the D70 original and used it for about 9 years capturing family vacations. I sold it and bought a D5300 which i still use and get some good pictures with it. It was my travel camera. Now its my wife’s camera. I bought a D500 and matched it soon afterward with a Sigma 60-600 lens. The D500 is my main wildlife/landscape camera. I like the speed of the stutter and focus, and it works well with the Sigma lens. I bought the Z6 when I retires a couple years ago and wanted to go mirrorless. Sorry I did so far. The Z6II came out shortly later and now I am stuck either selling my Z6 I bought a year and a half ago for half what I paid or selling something else to buy the Z6II. The battery life issues with viewfinder and slow focus of the Z6 using my sigma lens makes the Z6 a no bueno for bird photography for me. I will probably still be using the D500 for years to come, I can’t find a reason to sell it. I like what I have heard in the Z9 but my financial advisor (my wife) is probably not going to approve that purchase at this time. So I’ll wait a while. By then they’ll have the Nikon Z16 out. Bottom line as you point out is composure, and technique most cameras made today will take great photos. I get some great shots still with my D5300 I can put on my wall…Anyway I enjoy videos and advise videos. IF you go Cannon or Sony though you will be dead to me, nothing personal just can’t afford to make the switch…
I was considering my D850 for. Z6 ,thanks for saving me the disappointment I can’t afford that lesson Love my D850 for bird’s in flight. Ps I don’t do the video
This is one man's experience, and opinion with my Z6. I too, bought it to get into video. I too am just a regular guy photographer. I don't do enough birding, but I love to photograph birds. I also love to shoot sport, and fast action. Small, darting birds, fit into this category. The Z6 is a fantastic camera. It does nearly everything I need it to do. It does very well as a video camera for my needs. My issue with the original Z6 is that it doesn't track very fast action well. I used it this past winter to photograph migrating bald eagles. For most action, it tracked. When the eagles were diving for fish, for example, the camera simply couldn't keep up. I have a 300mm f2.8 VRII that I use alot. I also use it with a teleconverter. But just the 300 with the FTZ, and the Z6 struggles staying locked on to fact action. I have the same issues when my 70-200 f2.8 is attached. I enjoy shooting dogs, not exactly small song birds, and fast action with quick dogs, also, a challenge with the Z6. All is not doom and gloom, for slower wildlife/animal action, the Z6 works great and the output is gorgeous. For contrast, I have used the D850 for birds in flight, staying on topic, and it tracks better than the Z6, in my experience. You can shoot birds/action/sports with the Z cameras. I have some terrific keepers, but technique and knowledge of your subject in front of the lens is critical. That said, I rented a D850 recently to shoot a premier motorsports race in Texas, simply because I was going to be working too hard, and I couldn't stomach misses that weren't of my doing. I think Nikon is on the right path. The Z9 is going to show us what the future of the trickle down technology will be going forward. I'm going to keep my Z6. I love the ergos and the advantages mirrorless brings to the table. I'm waiting for a Z7 III that I'm hoping with have the autofocus skills of a R5...
@@BayouJosh the autofocus system of the D500 was trickle down. The D780 has some of the Z technology in it. I think the Z9 will be a home run for Nikon. I think the average photographer will benefit from the technology going forward. I don’t need the camera to do everything for me. Would do I want from the Z cameras is for the autofocus to acquire faster and stay locked on to a fast moving subject when I hit AF ON, the way their DSLRs can do it. Keep up the good work!
2024 got a z6 for 800 with extras and MINT-- now with all the firmware updates AF is like the 6ii works fine sure it aint a Z8 but i do not see why not most birds or other things moving.
Another great video !!! I switched from Nikon to Sony about 4 years ago before it was really popular to shoot Sony for wildlife. Matter fact I got laughed at by a lot of the Nikon and Canon shooters I knew and they called me crazy for switching lol ....Sony only had the 100-400 at the time for wildlife. My reason for switching was kind of similar to you, I started to get into Video, the D500 and the D850 were not cutting it for video for me and Nikon didn't have a mirrorless at the time. I have to say I am happy with my decision 4 years later . But I will always have a soft spot for Nikon they were my first love in photography . Keep up the great work I don't shoot Nikon anymore but enjoy watching your videos 👍
I'm stick with my D500 for now. I hope the next Z series camera is designed with wildlife/action in mind. A mirrorless D500 if you will. But with the two expeed 6 processors and full frame.
Great video, I kept D500 for BIF, but everything else and I mean everything else the Z6ll is fabulous. I am still thinking with dual processor, their will be some firmware updates.
I have been shooting small birds in flight with Nikon with the likes of the D4, D500, D850, z7 and z7ll for well over 20 years. My experience has been exactly as you have described with the Zs. However, I knew what to expect with the z7 and z7ll before I bought them as there limitations for fast action has been well documented. The camera is unmatched for most other photo demands. I purchased a used A9 and 200-600mm lens for fast action and have been smiling ever sense. I am happy to be a two system photographer. Don't hold your breath waiting for the z9 with fast action expectations. Better chance in looking for some hot dice at your local table. Note that Steve Perry and many other fast action you-tubers have also given up on the Zs for fast action.
Absolutely agree with all you said. I still have my D500 and the Z6ii but hardly picking up the D500. I take a lot of birds in flight and have found the large area at to be really good, including in busy backgrounds. The tracking isn’t quite as good as the D500 where the bird is small or some distance away but have found the auto area auto focus to work well, even with swallows against a busy background. Z6ii is brilliant for landscape.
My transition to mirrorless is similar to yours. I have the 850, sold my D810 and replaced it with the Z6 (first version) for its video and high ISO capabilities. I felt it would compliment the D850 and it certainly has. For BIF I almost always grab the 850. But I have gotten a number of awesome in flights with the Z6. I mostly us Matrix tracking mode for BiF but have used Wide mode with success too. I recently purchased the Z7II and have been blown away by the detail and image quality along with the AF. The first thing I did when my Z7II arrived was download both Z cameras with the latest firmware (1.20 for the Z7II) update. The Z7II’s AF is so much quicker than the Z6. Still not to the level of the R5 and A1. I’m waiting for another firmware update or the Z9/Z8. Make sure your camera has the latest firmware!
thanks Randy. Yes, i downloaded the newest firmware day one. The z6II autofocus is much better than the z6. I'm not saying it is horrible. I'll definitely get some keepers with it. It just isn't as snappy as the D850. I think it has more to do with that FTZ adapter and older Fmount lenses than it does with the firmware at this point.
I've never owned a DSLR. I started with Sony's A7III which remains my main camera. Pre Covid, I did anime conventions, comic-cons, primarily cosplayers. I also did macros with toys. Post Covid, I've delved into streaming, flower photos, and occasionally pets. Overall having started with mirrorless that's all I am experienced with in the field. However, being in a store where I can play with Canons, Nikons, Sony, Panasonic, and Fujifilm cameras allows me to get an idea of how a DSLR performs. I will admit the D850 takes a fantastic photo, and its focusing within its zones is not bad at all. The 5DmkIV is also very good. I respect DSLRs fully. However with Mirrorless dominating the markets now, I know that the DSLR's days are numbered, just like how SLR's were when digital became prominent. If I were given the opportunity with a DSLR, I'd love to give it a try it out but since I'm invested in mirrorless, I will not be buying a DSLR.
2 important things you do mot mention with reference to AF, is the firmware version you are using (I belive 1,5 is te latest) and the FTZ adapter for F lenses. According to Steve Perry, the adapter are slowing down the AF speed in some cases (Prime lenses)
I definitely would have to agree that Nikon mirrorless is not up to snuff when it comes to in-flight bird photography I know there is no way that I could do it. As much as I love Nikon and defend it I do not deny that it fall short in this realm but all the indications are that the Z9 will be out in a few months and Nikon has never made a full size professional body camera that did not have spectacular auto focus that was class leading. Good luck Josh one thing is for sure and I guarantee you that the lack of auto focus capability of this camera will hone your skills and make you a much better photographer
I switched from a d5600 to a z6ii. I don't have a lens good enough for birds in flight, main lens currently is a 35-150 2.8-4. i wasn't sure which platform I'd be going with so i decided to pick a camera body before i started getting lenses. Ultimately, went with the z6ii and love it. It has nikon quirks that I've grown acustomed to, but, very happy with it. Now for the long journey of lens acquisition
@@BayouJosh I'm in love with it. I went woth nikon initially so i could use my late grandfather's lenses, which i used when he taught me photography. Though, th e first thing i inherited from him was his sony a100, which he bought new. Not a bad camera still, actually. I've gotten some great shots with it.it certainly feels old though at this point. I enjoyed your video
I have been using the Nikon Z7II since the middle of December. I have had more successes then failures with the system. What I've learned through it all is that it requires an adjustment in technique. Whereas with my D500 I can shoot mostly in 3D focus mode with the Z7II I have to become much more considerate of several of it's focus modes.
@@BayouJosh yes i don't do video's i did like the layout on the z6ll but for me the AF was way better on the D500.. your RU-vid video's are Brilliant and i like the way you say the Truth about the camera keep them coming will look forward to seeing the next one
I made the switch where I sold my D850 and got the Z7ii. I also sold all my F lenses beside the 300PF, 180-400 and 600FL. The Z lenses are fantastic. The 14-24, 24-70 and 70-200 outperforms the F lenses by far. Even with TC the 70-200 is brilliant. I have high hopes for the upcoming 400/f2.8 and 600/f4. Imaging if the 400/f2.8 performs perfect with both the 1,4 and 2,0 converter!. The files from the Z7ii is excellent, perfect colours and easy to post process. So far so good but then we have the AF and the lagg in the viewfinder. Shooting the Z7ii in full burst (10 FPS) isn’t a nice experience. It is impossible to track wildlife because of the lagg. And the AF is a struggle, the singelpoint AF (in AF-C mode) doesn’t work as good as in the DSLR. So for wildlife the Z7ii is not the right tool so I am happy that I kept my D5. But I have signed up for the Z9 and Nikon have to get that one right!
Thanks for your honesty. I made the switch also. Bought two Z 50 for video and EDC. A Z 6II for portrait and event work. I have much work to do figuring out which focus mode and features work best for me. Your video is interesting to me because I have to contend with portrait subject that want to move around for a more active look in their images. I’m going to try setting up for a wide area grab to see what happens. Thanks for sharing.
BiF is something I'm also struggeling with my Z6 II. My D500 is much more responsive in aquiring focus and tracking the subject. Problem with the Z6 II is that in auto area AF where it's easy for the photographer to track a subject the camera has problems to find the subject other than the Sony A, A9 II or the Canon R5/R6. I'm still hoping that with a firmware version 2.0 we will see something close to the Sony's or Canon's algorithm in the Nikon's auto area AF. The processing power should be high enough. Until then I'll try and learn to achieve the best results I can. As I do not have to earn money with my photography it's not a big deal to me.
Great video Josh !! great content , love the honest facts. good going . I am still in Dslr game , but like you said still waiting for something bigger from Nikon to make the switch, not worth changing all the glass if I move to another ecosystem , i think I like what I have
I had the exact same impression with the z6ii. Got it when it first came out- never used a z6 but the way Nikon marketed the dual processor I was all about it... and then when I actually got the camera as far as still photography it was like someone poured cold water on a hot flame.... video however was simply amazing. If I was a videographer I would have kept it for sure and I may add back in the future if Nikon doesn’t release the Z9 one of these days- I’m wanting to do video... I just couldn’t justify the expense for my work at the time I got it due to the still photography AF. To the z6ii’s defense I’m coming from a d5, d850, and d500. Hard to compare any still photography to those AF systems. That being said- I have used a R5 several times and it blows my mind how snappy and accurate the AF system is for stills. I have so much invested in Nikon I’m really hoping they can pull it off With the z9. Anyhow- nice to know I’m not alone out here in the gear experience world. Always enjoy the vids. Cheers!
it seems to be a theme for D850 and High end DSLR users. Good not great is really all I can say. I did get some pretty good images but it certainly left me wanting.
I tried Nikon z6ii but finally decided to move to Sony system. Bought A9 and 200-600 mm and right away getting much better photos. Mainly using for bird photography specially Osprey and Kingfisher. I will now try video too. I was not heavy invested in Nikon long lenses. I still love my Nikon D750 and some prime lenses. I am planning to very soon sale my rest of the Nikon gears to buy A7R4 with 70-200mm lense
Good choice! I wish I could say something contrary. however, what you're saying is so true. It used to be we all had to work at getting great images, now just us nikon users are struggling with this AF that was considered state of the art 4 years ago. Crazy how the world changes in 4 years.
There is a definite learning curve between the Z's and the D850. There are positives and negatives. The limiting of the AF area in a DSLR I think is what really helps it feel like the AF is better whereas you get 99% coverage with the mirrorless or whatever, so you feel like you "miss" more. It really forced me to learn and stick with back button focusing and AF-C wide mode which is not something I'd typically ever use with the DSLR's (or the 3D equiv). Guess my point is the longer you stick with it and challenge yourself, the more you'll relearn the autofocus. After two years with the Z system and the last year on the Z system exclusively, I feel my hit rate with birds/wildlife is equal to what it was with the D850.
First, let me start by saying thank you for your channel. It is helping me to get back into photography after a couple of years of throwing my camera in the corner. Now I am ready to shoot again with a new found creative passion. This is what happens when your focus is NOT steered in the right way. Just a couple of questions; 1. Have you tried the Z7 II? 2. Do you have any regrets for selling your D850? I ask because I am looking to upgrade…
David, that is so kind of you to say that. The D850 and the Z7II have the same sensor. I regret that i could not keep the D850 and buy the Z6II. I'm not rolling in the dough and needed to compromise. The image quality is fantastic on the Z6II as all full frame 20-24MP nikons have been. The only downside is the Autofocus is just a little slow with my big Fmount glass.
I am in agreement with you as to your observations. I bought my z6 II in Oct 2020 and made the switch to the Canon R5. I was waiting for the firmware upgrades on the z6II. I was hoping the April release would up the ante a bit when it comes to autofocus for birds. It did not. Had the r5 for 2 weeks and loving it.
As someone who shot a lot of M43 stuff the last couple of years I feel your pain. I recently bought a Canon R6 with the Sigma 150-600 EF primarily for BIFs. It is kind of spectacular at that. I imagine a native Canon RF lens would be even better. But I still continue to shoot with my Panasonic G9 and Leica 100-400mm and have refined the settings to the point where it is pretty decent for many birds. Image quality in good light is equal to the R6 or, in some cases, a little better. Once you begin to lose the light the Canon takes a big lead. For BIFs it just work a lot better. Except for hummingbirds. For some reason the Panasonic animal detect AF loves hummingbirds. Canon not so much. Again I am using an adapted 3rd party lens so your mileage may vary. I have been mirrorless for a number of years and I don’t miss an optical viewfinder anymore. The difference between the relatively new Canon versus the 3-4 year old Panasonic viewfinder is really noticeable. They have similar specs but they are a lot different when you are actually looking though them. Canon by a mile. I am completely brand agnostic. I don’t really need a lot of lenses for birds. I could really see the Canon R5 and the RF 100-500 as a great choice for birds but at more than double the cost of what I’ve got now. Despite what all the reviews say I prefer the 4K60 video from the little G9. So for the meantime I plan to keep using and shooting 2 different systems. It’s hard on my poor brain with controls in different locations but I like both of them and can make use cases for both.
I think I might have mentioned this in the last video, but whatever, I’ll say it again…I used to own a D500 and absolutely loved that camera. To me, it’s THE BEST APSC DSLR ever made for photography. I got rid of it when the pandemic started, which was a bummer. My wife owns the Z6, so I would borrow her camera whenever she wasn’t using it. The only glass she has is the 50mm f/1.8 F mount and the 24-70 mm f/4 Z mount. I did attempt to do some bird photography, which was extremely limited, but I did capture some nice shots. I will say, it didn’t acquire focus as fast as I would like for how close the birds were. Scenery included mallard ducks, Ring billed gulls, a great blue heron, and American coot. Some were floating across the water, some were sitting, some were walking around, and some were flying by slowly all shot at a lake near my house. Last week, I finally was able to purchase my own camera again. I actually jumped over to the Fuji XT4 with an 16-55mm f/2.8 and a 70-300mm f/4-5.6. Still waiting for the 70-300, but I have a feeling it’ll do exactly what I need it to do for the budget I had. No clue where I was going at about this comment, but hopefully something got across 😆
Mirrorless comparisons aka Mathieu Gasquet tested the original Z6 and Z7 and it scored among the highest mirrorless cameras for birds in flight. Mark Smith also did some good D850 vs Z7 tests with solid results for the Z cameras, showing not much disparity in terms of autofocus performance shooting osprey in challenging conditions. The latter was also before firmware. Seems comparable results are achievable then.
I am getting better results everyday. Osprey in flight is much different than Killdeer and Swallows. The D850 just did better with smaller birds. It acquired the target a little faster. it just takes a fraction of second with the smaller birds to make or break a shot. As seen with the seagulls, the slower steady flying birds are easy and no problem for the AF system. I even had good results with the Red wing black birds. I'm sure my hit rates will keep going up the more I use it. excellent image quality though.
@@BayouJosh Fair enough. The comparisons I listed here place the z6 among the best in mirrorless cameras for birds in flight. Hopefully you can feel good about your decision moving forward.
I think your Eat Sleep Ski needs an update to either Eat Sleep Bird or Eat Sleep Photograph. Another fun video. I enjoyed your tip / how you set up video when arriving on scene. I switched to Sony back in 2016, although I did own a D850-sold it for an A1. I think your experience is pretty typical of a learning curve. You’ll get the hang of the settings you need and enjoy, plus as you said it currently meets your needs-all that matters!
Great video. BIF is really THE ONLY major differentiation with most modern cameras IMO. Dynamic Range, Noise, blah blah, all cameras can take great photos, but the ability to snap and follow small to medium sized birds is a tough ask (with good keeper percentage that is). I got an R6 as I couldn't responsibly afford the R5 and I/we got lucky that we have pretty darn close to the tracking AF system of the R5 in the much cheaper body, my guess is that Nikon will steadily improve its AF algorithms and the Z6's will benefit in the near future. The video of the Z6 is great and noticeably better than the 850 on screen. Bonus pro tip: Not sure if you misspoke but your "Barn Swallow" photos were actually Cliff Swallows! Add it to your list!
Thanks for the ID. I'm a bird guy. You'd think I would be a little better at that. 😆 I think I'll be taking more video than stills in the future. I just need to spend more time with it.
I think as you say, but in different words, that the Z6ii can’t be “all things to all men”. It’s a great all rounder at a terrific price point. Remember that many shooters are using Z glass and when the 200-600 Z is released and they pump up the autofocus tracking to make optimum use of those twin processors, then you might have your Nirvana ! I shoot nature hybrid with a lot of bird shots but not squally in flight. Very happy with my Z6
Yeap, tired of waiting for the Z7ii, Patrick from my neighborhood camera shop called me.."you want the z6ii? I got one" ... charging the battery right now. Super excited to go out take some photos... (R6,R5,A9 user) First impression as the battery is charging... 1) the body feels great; grip is best out of S,C,N all three. 2) Build; solid - feels like a solid body, buttons feel excellent and locations are easy to reach. the Z lens 24-70 has a very good solid build feel; better and different than the other brands especially with that extra click for travel setting - i keep twisting the barrel to feel that dampened click...addicting. Can't wait to set the "focus" setting when the battery is charged.
@@BayouJosh I just took some sample images of my dragon fruit smoothie on my desk; Wow. the colors out of the Z6ii is AMAZING!!! compared to my Canon R6 and Sony A9.... i am amazed, it's MORE beautiful straight out of the camera. Just told all my friends.
For BIF, no doubt the upcoming Z9 is going to be the ideal tool for the job (assuming you have a spare $6500). I'm hoping Nikon either releases a Z8 line that sits between the Z7II and Z9 in terms of price and features, including AF tracking, or issues firmware updates to the existing Z6II/Z7II that improves AF tracking. Like you, I've had no problems at all using Eye AF for people with the Z6 and Z7II, but I would love to see it work for wildlife as well. I suspect they are working on that now.
Exactly. The Z6II just isn't made for fast action. The Z9 will be. And Nikon has always made a highly functional camera line that sits just beneath the flagship model. It wouldn't make any financial sense to discontinue the Z8 line. Everyone just needs a little more patience.
Hello, same experience with the Z6II, BIF AF is not yet up to DSLR level. So I kept my D850 along side with the Z. On the other hand the Z has it's advantages for wildlife, one of them being... silence! Another one is the absence of back or front focus issues. Also, walking with the Z6II and the 500 PF is a charm. The coming firmware updates will probably slightly make things better but not bring the Z on par with the Canon's or Sony's. Nikon would need a new sensor for that.
Picked up a Z5 over the weekend, and a struggled with focus on Barn Swallows. Pulled out my D500, and immediately got them in focus, but forgot to increase the shutter speed. Used my 200-500mm lens on both.
Thanks for the video, I’m right in the process from d850 to Z. I had to sell my Sigma 150 -600 to buy the Z 7 II and did keep my D850. Now on a 70-200 2.8 having the same experience to shoot birds in flight with the Z AF,
I must say from the offset that I do not shoot video and my D500 is fantastic for sports action and wildlife and if I want to go full frame I use my old D3s. Both cameras are large and heavy and wanting to get into mirrorless technology I purchased the new Nikon Z6II just before Christmas, so I have been using it for a few months now. Love the ergonomics, build quality, image quality, menu system are all what we have come to expect from Nikon together with the longer battery life it should be an amazing camera !!! However the auto focusing is the Achilles heal and is not on par with.either the D500 or the D3s in tracking moving subjects, I do hope Nikon can "fix" this in a future firmware upgrade because for a sports photographer this is annoying.
I learned a couple of tricks in the AF yesterday that really helped. I'll be doing a follow-up on this in the future. still not on par with the D850 and D500 AF but much closer than I originally thought.
I‘m Nikon shooter since 2004 and I started with a D70 while switching from SLR in those days. I usually keep my gear as long as it fits my use case, so before buying the Z6II this year there were only two other Nikons in between those purchases. I‘m an urban and street photographer, often shooting in low light, so I don’t care that much about the AF nailing fast moving objects. Although I did some sport events and it was good for me. I‘m very well pleased with the image quality, though. Specially in low light and high ISO. Don’t see neither Canon nor Sony in this class equal it. So I don’t care about them.
As a Canon user I get a little worn out on the Nikon stuff, but I get it. We all get comfortable with a brand and trust me, Nikon makes awesome products (as do many others). When I get into the mirrorless game eventually, I will consider all brands and really do the homework to be sure before I invest my hard earned penny’s. It will be easier to change brands because I will need all new lenses any way I go. Bottom line is I appreciate your reviews and they will give me better insight when I can afford to make the leap! Thanks buddy 📷
Thanks for watching Eric. Having used the R5. I just want you to know you cannot go wrong with that camera. Far superior to the Z line right now. However it is nearly 50% more in cost.
@@BayouJosh Right! I saw your review with the Canon and yes budget is a big deal for me as I’m a hobbyist with a very conservative allowance for gear in general. Thanks again!
Went mirrorless 4 months ago with the Canon R5. Definitely not perfect but I’m having a lot of fun with it. For me, mirrorless is just more enjoyable. And yes, the ergonomics are way better. My D850 with the battery grip was a brick!!
Love your truth in advertising, I have the D500 and D850 and love both of them, the video aspect of the “z” line is tempting but I have no clue as to editing ect. Struggled deciding weather to get the D850 or go mirror less, chickened out and went with my comfort zone, D850. Looking forward to your adventure with the Z6ii. I hope to also learn from your experience. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks Craig, I still have no idea what I'm doing when it comes to video editing. Lightroom nearly everyday for 8 year now trying to learn adobe premier pro....so intimidating. learning as I go.
Sticking with my D500 with a z50 as a backup and for video. Probably going to stick with that until, hopefully, a Z70 baby z9 comes along next year. Saving for a 500mm pf!
I’m learning landscape photography with a D5200. I love the camera and the DX lenses. Sony system will probably be the future upgrade for me as considering buying used gears.
Great honest review... I switched from the D810 to the Z6. The image quality is great but the autofocus system is faulty, at least compared to what Sony and Canon offer. They have made a noticeable improvement for autofocus in video though. Nevertheless in professional situations the autofocus had made my life miserable. It’s complicated...
im heading up from DSLR to Mirrorless and also looking to go full frame. Ive read reviews and watched reviews. A lot of what i’ve read and seen comes down to some of the same things you’re saying. i waited until the Nikon mirrorless cameras came out, and issues resolved with them. I photograph minor ice hockey, and when the spring hits i’m focusing on birds and nature. So this video and a few others say. the camera isn’t the greatest . i thought about a D850 or even keeping with DX and a D500 or 7500. But i shoot some video and want wifi because my current camera doesn’t. I don’t want wireless G. The cameras i mentioned, the technology is much older. i may switch systems to Canon R5, because there is one dedicated focus point you can select which helps with tracking. The speedlites i have are dedicated to Nikon. So it means switching out those too Thank you for the video.
@@BayouJosh Im looking at the Sony A7Iii. Not the “R” or “S” series. Checking prices of lenses and speedlites etc. Nikons system is too new. So you can’t get third party lenses from Tamron or Sigma for the Z series. Tamron has some different focal lengths.
Really appreciate the review and candor. Not trying to butter your bread, but if you captured some Barn Swallows and some panic-stricken Killdeer while handholding the 600mm f/4, then I will say that your technique is sound. Looks like Z6II's AF is still a version away from predictable, but still a platform you can rely upon while in the field. I am also guilty of being a Nikon fanboy and very forgiving, but in full disclosure...I came from Pentax, where you addressed AF issues by stopping down to 7.1.
to be fair. I captured those two shots with the 200-400 f/4. Not exactly the best lens for handholding but a good 3-1/2 pounds lighter than the 600 f/4. ;-)
totally agree with you, the z6ii is not a wildlife camera for birds , one reason i think theres no lenses in the wildlife category atm from nikon, there really going to have to sort out the autofocus before wildlife shooters even consider shelling out loads of money for a proper wildlife lens, i for one won't be until it improves allot. your the first person to admit the fact it currently is poor or no improvement at all over dslr models like the d500 etc.
I'm still using my Nikon DSLR. I'm not switching to mirrorless until we get better AF, no blackout in the EVF, less delay between the sensor and the EVF and better EVF resolution and better screen resolution on the back screen. It would be nice to get 4:2:2 10 bit @ 60fps internally & externally. Is that the Z8? I don't know, but is what I what I expect to make the swich from DSLR to mirrorless. :-)
Thanks for sharing your experience with great comments...I still have my D500 & haven't made decision to upgrade to mirrorless yet so I was interested in your comments...I am only a hobbyist so not in a hurry to make any change to my gear.... thanks again for video... cheers 😀
Yes, a lot of commentaries over RU-vid from fellow photographers saying that the Z cameras are not suitable for BIF photography. I'm amazed, being Nikon who it is, their engineers have not yet cracked the correct algorithm for animal tracking autofocus. One wonders if they have true interest in investing in such capabilities. Nikon has been always a hardware company, great cameras, great lenses, but one would think that with Sony being the first to really bring tracking autofocus to life, that for the other companies would be easier to follow up. Well, Cannon did, and apparently, they surpassed Sony with the R5. Cannon R version was a complete fail, but the R5 and R6 nailed it! Nikon have now the second version for their Z6 and Z7 and were not yet able to crack the tracking algo. We will need to wait for the next firmware versions to see what they do. The tracking issues are pure software based, not hardware based. The second version have 2 processors, 2x the speed, there should be no problems in processing the tracking calculations. Is just a question of the engineers being capable of coding it. So many kids out there, programmer genius, is it possible that Nikon cannot find one able to crack this?
I don't know the science behind any of it. I just want them to work. and realistically. the Z6 autofocus works fine. It is just behind the new crazy expectations set by Canon and Sony. It's as though, if one company starts making self driving cars, are all companies that don't make self driving cars obsolete? That is kind of the way it feels.
Recently purchased the Z50 with twin lens kit and FTZ adapter, and recently a Tamron 100-400 lens. Nikon really needs to be more forthcoming with what it is doing, otherwise it will be left behind. Rumours of firmware updates, and the Z9, and is there a Z8, and a roadmap for lenses? This is all are just a fog. If people jump to Sony or Cannon they will not jump back in a hurry. Common Nikon communicate with your market. I am very much a hobby photographer and it will be one thing or the other, not a bagful of cameras and glass. As my interest went to birdlife and BIF I am already looking to give up on the Z50. Sony looking the best option at the moment. Good options with the A7 iii orA7R iv, or even the A6600 and good glass options. Will Nikon support the Z50??????
That was something to be expected. On the positive side though there are a couple of considerations to be made here. Nikon so far has been only making 'minor' upgrades on the AF (i.e. if you noticed it was the 2nd number the one that changed - you want an upgrade where the 1st number changes). When that comes I think Nikon will make the best of the 2 Expeed processors powering the Z system. Secondly, try setting AF to the fastest mode possible (and the camera to RELEASE rather than FOCUS). Not many people know that the AF is actually faster on Nikon but if you have it on Focus Priority (and not on Release Priority) the camera will not fire as many shots thus you'll be losing shots and the chance to get that shot perfectly in focus - if you catch my drift.
so true. That is a great point. I do leave it on focus for single shot. AF-s. mostly because that is my landscape setting and the landscape is not going anywhere.
must be left on AF-C all the times for action and wildlife photography. Leaving the AF on RELEASE PRIORITY allows the camera to take a shot even if Focus hasn't been confirmed by the camera, but this doesn't mean that the subject isn't in focus. In any case more shots means more chances to get your photo tack sharp. This is particularly true for Nikon DSLRs lineup, but I take it that with Nikon's mirrorless should work pretty much the same. @@BayouJosh
@@BayouJosh That being established, I still get more keepers with my D500 and the 500PF. I have experienced a few too many missed shots because of the “wake up” time of the Z7II,… BTW; LOVE your thoughtful video style.
I have been on mirrorless for very long time now. Early adopter I must say. I always had a EM1.3 and OM1.1 for some time now paired either Canon or Nikon. I always was struggeling with the Olympus to catch fast moving subject. Even the OM1.1 was bad at AF tracking. So after the Z6 excursion crap and having had a stellar Canon R6, I thought to give the Z6ii a shot as the Z-mount has quite improved now. Good image quality, good lenses and a really sub par AF-C mode. Yes, the Z8 is much better, but its way over size, weight and price I would accept. My hope now is the Z6iii. Yeah, Canon R6 mark II would have been the perfect match. But it is way more expensive than my little Z6ii. The 300PF and the 500PF are sooo good, Canon has nothing in this size and weight. Yes, the Z6ii has a crappy autofocus which make me loose a lot of wild life shots and on top its 14-Bit frame rate is nowhere near the Canon. So, Nikon, give me that Z6iii with the AF from the Z8 and I am sure this will be a different story
Hi Josh. I own a D850 and Z7ii. My experience is like yours. Video on the D850 is a struggle and a pleasure on Z7ii. However for birds i continue to use D850. Focus just cannt keep up and it takes time to switch between single point and large area on the Z7ii but its a button on the D850. Im waiting for the right upgrade to fully transition. Keep up the great videos.
Well, I was hoping that you were going to tell us all the little tricks you figured out!! Maybe they'll come in the upcoming weeks as you try more things? I also have the Z50, as I was hoping that it would be the new version of the D500. Not quite yet. When I am using the Z 70-200 f/2.8, with and without the Z TC-14 or Z TC-20, acquiring focus is snappy. When using lenses and the FTZ, things do slow down and more hunting. Really waiting for the Z 100-400mm, or the Z 400mm and Z 600mm primes and any new firmware updates that come out with those lenses.
You and me both Andrew! There really are no tips and tricks. Just technique and patience. The auto focus modes are pretty straightforward and unfortunately, the FTZ slows things down a bit. Specifically on those big lenses. I really don’t experience it much with my macro lens.
@@BayouJosh Check this video out! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-YqKaUjjaA70.html Steve Perry showed this and I had not seen this information! May be useful for you considering lenses and FTZ adapter.
I shoot people so I can’t comment on your critiques but I just want to say for the record for what i shoot I LOVE my Z6 and Z6II. So many of the clickbait you tubers just trash the Nikon z system and it’s frustrating because having it myself it’s clear they are spending any real time with the camera.
It really is a great system. I just get so frustrated when people say it is not up to the level of the $3800 R5 and $6500 A1. Of course it isn't. But I assure you, it is enough for most everyone. birds in flight is the ultimate strain on an AF system and just because this is not perfect for that does not mean it isn't an awesome camera.
I have a D500 and I'm thinking about adding the Z6 II to my camera bag. I'll keep the D500 for birds and airshows though. I was surprised when you said you got rid of your D850, but I understand the financial aspects.
That's my setup as well. D500 and Z6ii. I love both cameras. I agree that Z6ii with 2x processors has more potential. Nikon needs to hire Cannon firmware writers.
Great and honest review. I also got Z6 II, previously I had only M50+70-200 2f8 IS but I wanted upgrade. Z6 II with 24-200 was my starter pack, I love size and weight but I was hoping a bit more from autofocus. After 10days I'm thinking about moving to R6. My 14days trial period to decide if I keep Z6 II is nearly over. Nikon in AFC mode, I never know if image is in focus, there is always red border... In AFS its clear, when its changed to green border its ready to take sharp image. Im not shooting wildlife (yet) but my 2 sons are sometimes "faster" than 2 tigers :-) Everything else is fantastic, especially with current price dropped to 2.5kEur Z6 II + Nikkor z 24-200 f4-6. R6 is 2.7k with RF24 - 105 f4-7.
I think you may be able to fix that in settings. I use AF-c with Shutter release set to go off regardless of focus being acquired. I'll dig through my settings and see if I can find that exact setting.
@@BayouJosh Short update after 10days with R6. I miss results of Z6 ii, colors mainly 🤷♂️ I love to shoot directly to jpg. With r6, no matter what profile i tried, it didnt looked what i was expecting. Z6 ii is much better. I was thinking its caused by kit lens, so rented for whole weekend rf 70-200 2.8. Lens is really pleasure to walk with, acceptable size and images, bokeh was fantastic. When i put z6/ R6 pictures side by side...i love z6ii. And autofocus, r6 is really fast but i think i was overexpecting r6 results. Sometimes i was struggling/fighting with camera... it just didn't see small object in fron of me or that camera logic was too "inteligent" and my focus point just move a bit... In this case i really missed object tracking of z6 ii, just pressing ok and camera was ready for new target. And point about continues autofocus in r6...its not much better vs. Z6ii. I got same success rate, also many out of focus shots, running kinds in the park. Most probably im going back to z6ii...well now even thinking about z5.
take photos with the D850 and video with the z6ii. The Z6ii video autofocus is superb with the z lenses as they use far superior silent motors. If you use the F lenses with the FTZ you get the same autofocus hunting issues as with the D850 as the issue is the autofocus motor drives on the f lenses.
I really like using the mirrorless system most of the time, but I always end up falling back to the optical viewfinder of the D500 or D850 for anything that moves. It's just the way my brain has been wired for shooting stills I guess.
I have the z5 and I only use the 9 point focus option. With that it works great but you have to ensure the mid point is right on top of what you want in focus.
Thank you for this review I have been looking at switching my A7riv back to Nikon Z7ii because I love Nikon. But currently I don’t think I can give up that autofocus.
