Тёмный

No, customers aren’t charged an extra fee to use tap-to-pay 

10 Tampa Bay
Подписаться 458 тыс.
Просмотров 228
50% 1

Contactless payment methods, also known as tap-to-pay, have surged in usage since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Contactless payment methods include debit or credit cards that just require you to tap the card reader to pay and mobile payment apps that let you pay with your phone
A post with several hundred likes and comments on Threads claimed that tap-to-pay comes with additional fees that customers would not otherwise be charged if they insert or swipe their card.
There’s no difference in the cost of tapping, swiping or inserting a card. Banks and card networks do not impose additional fees on customers for paying with tap-to-pay cards as opposed to swiping or inserting their cards.
Wells Fargo, Commerce Bank, Citizens Bank and Capital One explicitly state that there is no additional cost, fee or charge for using the contactless payment method over any other method of paying with their cards.
Businesses have to pay something called an interchange fee to a bank whenever they process a credit card payment. Some businesses pass this fee onto their customers either by adding a surcharge or by discounting cash payments, but the interchange fees do not change based on whether a person swipes, inserts or taps their card. In theory, a business could choose to add a higher fee for contactless but it’s not because it costs them more to process that kind of payment method.
MORE: www.wtsp.com/a...
►Subscribe: on.wtsp.com/yo...
►Website: www.wtsp.com/
►Facebook: / 10tampabay
►X: / 10tampabay

Опубликовано:

 

29 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии    
Далее
С какого года вы со мной?
00:13
Просмотров 210 тыс.
Why You Should Buy Everything With Credit Cards
11:52
Wrong Number Text Scam
2:32
Просмотров 1 млн
UK Property Just Changed FOREVER
11:28
Просмотров 634 тыс.
The Golden Migration May Be on Borrowed Time
8:05
Просмотров 97 тыс.