Тёмный

No Means No Until it Means Yes: Persuasion Truth of Authority w/ Kevin Hogan 

Подписаться
Просмотров 4 тыс.
% 78

In Milgram's, Obedience to Authority, you discover that people's actual behavior, is not necessarily similar to what they tell you they will or won't do. The research Milgram did in University, has been replicated in an even more important contexts. "No," is an important word. But most of the time, no doesn't mean what you and I think of as "no." People will definitely take most of their actions long after they have had said "no" several times to you or anyone else. Humans believe that "no" really means no. Compliance to almost anything difficult (positive or negative) will happen after consistent negative responses. Understanding Milgriam's work helps you use influence to have the power to have almost anything you want. Worth a look: kevinhogan.com/power-success/

Хобби

Опубликовано:

 

22 дек 2017

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 11   
@Relle.
@Relle. 3 года назад
I listen to this during my "mommy time". I appreciate the effort and time on you and your team's part.
@KevinHoganChannel
@KevinHoganChannel 3 года назад
Thank you very much!
@hypnoticimedia
@hypnoticimedia 6 лет назад
Why do we take "no" for an answer when they say it is not ethical to do these experiments anymore?
@KevinHoganChannel
@KevinHoganChannel 6 лет назад
Ethics in psychology. The argument is that the impact of having "killed someone" or abused others as in the Zimbardo experiments is too much for the student at University to take into their future. This is a good argument. Milgram wanted to know why/how Hitler's influence on those he dominated allowed those people to kill innocent people. We now know that authority is a big part of the equation. And from Zimbardo we know that we will do whatever roles we are cast to do by society/governments/jobs. "Free will" is pretty much a joke. The Milgram experiment was essentially fully replicated in France as I discussed in the video and it was partially replicated in California a few years ago. I respect the ethicists in psychology but without this knowledge, what we know now would have been hypothetical. As far as "ask until," well that's another thing all together. My suggestion is for most people in most situations to keep on asking! Have a great day my friend.
@hypnoticimedia
@hypnoticimedia 6 лет назад
I added my comment in jest as i am sure you know me well enough to have figured this out :-) While reading your response some thoughts came up. I remember the French study a few years back and i seem to recall that they scored worse (higher obedience to shocking their fellow Frenchmen) than Milgram's 1950's America Study! This is scary to me especially after what they experienced from the Germans in WW2. I think these studies need to be all over the place, every year to keep a reminder of what we are capable of and what we are willing to do as humans. I think we tend to look at what happened in the past as not being us...we are better now...right? No way! as the French study showed. We need constant reminders of our fallibility as humans...not to hide it like some would want lest what George Santayana said continues in a new form "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" Not once every lifetime but everyday!!!
@KevinHoganChannel
@KevinHoganChannel 6 лет назад
It's interesting how psychopathology and sociopathology is now in vogue. Disturbing...to me. I lean toward more aggressive research too. And obviously Europe doesn't have the same lines drawn that the U.S. does and that works fine for me! And yeah, we aren't getting any better.... :-)
@terrifictomm
@terrifictomm 2 года назад
“Free will is a joke!” Really? And why did you decide to believe the evidence for that idea rather than the contrary? No, Kevin, free will isn’t a joke. People without a moral core are. The truth is it’s very difficult for people to choose to exercise their moral agency against The Authority. But remember, 40% of the subjects in America freely chose NOT to shock the person. 12% in France. So often in the social sciences, which live and die on statistics, 51% is treated as a FACT and 49% is treated as an inconsequential anomaly. But as Shawn Achor pointed out in his TED Talk, it’s the 40/12% we should be studying if we want to learn how to teach people to resists immoral Authority.
@KevinHoganChannel
@KevinHoganChannel 2 года назад
I love your response. Free Will as a sole reason for reacting/responding to all the stimulus that occurs daily doesn't work in any math equation. But there is no question that people , or at least some people do make frequent decisions base on non-impulsive reasons. All that said, it is remarkable how people have "calculated" on specific belief about "rigged elections" or ...well you know where I'm going. Tom, thank you for your reply. I appreciate it.
@terrifictomm
@terrifictomm 2 года назад
@@KevinHoganChannel And I know what you’re saying. Free will Is definitely wasted on the mass of men who live by “base or animal impulses” and not by a heptarchy of values. Yet to live by values means living with intention and that takes a lot of energy! Energy the brain desperately wants to conserve. Perhaps it even requires more dopamine as well. There is a theory of ADD which postulates that it is, in part at least, a dopamine deficiency, which is why stimulants seem to regulate its symptoms. ADDers act out because they are trying to feel normal. I know that’s been me my whole life. Stimulants get us to normal. They also destroy our livers. Almost, in my case. Look ! A rabbit! Thanks for your videos.