NO TIME TO DIE Ending Explained | Movie Breakdown, Spoiler Review And What Happens Next With 007 

Daniel Craig is my favourite 007.

Brosnan was your favourite Bond? Is that a joke?

I think it was great. That being said they don't have to make every movie stick to continuity. As far as I'm concerned Daniel Craig and the James Bond stories that he has done don't have to fit in with the previous James Bond story that all. Personally reboot the series if they want to. Give a different take on James Bond the same way they've done this with Batman since 1989. James Bond for me is like a comic book don't look for continuity just enjoy the story as it is. They don't need to make James Bond a code name. And personally if they're going to do other spy stories. Show us what the other 00 agents are up to. For example in the film goldfinger James Bond talks about 008 and M even says 8 will replace him because he's more of a careful guy. Be great to hear his story. Or this new lady who replaced bond is 007 for a bit. What's her backstory tell a completely separate movie or maybe even a TV series. But it's been on for almost 60 years now no need to be a slave to continuity. Enjoy the James Bond story for what they are. Escapism....

I was definitely fun to watch but it wasn't. Not to talk about the ending of course, but they went with a more "scary" approach in some scenes. In some scenes it fits but they mostly had it when Safin was in the scene. Long story short: it ain't bad but not as good as earlier James bond movies. Edit: wow just realized I wrote Safin wrong

@@jewelrybag4557 Sometimes, it depends on what you grow up with and the first one you see. I'm mid 30s and Brosnan was my first Bond so I like him the most. Sean Connery is a legend and set the standard all others followed. However, my formative years were enjoyed by the Bond that jumped off a cliff following a runaway airplane with a motorbike and falling into it and flying off for the beginning credits to kick in.

same

No time to watch. Going straight to the spoilers

@@DrJams sad

I cried as well, because of how shitty and GIrl PoWeR driven it was. Absolute shit bond movie. Cant wait for all the powerful girl power bipoc 007 movies that are to come.

Enough to make a grown man cry 😣

The irony is that 160 minutes is plenty of time to die, and there is no time to die like the present. My interpretation is that the villain of this piece is hidden in plain sight. Ryan Haney killed 007. You are a Bond villain. You manipulated MI6, CIA, Blofeld, Spectre, Quantum, every major character and Bond himself. You destroyed Aston Martins and Vauxhall Bridge, caused the biggest single movie explosion on film, M to say “eff”, and Dave Bautista to have an entire vocabulary made of one word. Ryan Haney persuaded Freddy Mercury to kill the world, and Bond, by drawing Bond to an island holding the cure. Ryan Haney, in my assessment, manipulated EON, the writers, the financiers, the studios by paying for a ticket and buying a Blu-ray. The Blonde Bond’s first mission, just like Brosbond’s, was a successful reboot, despite inconsistencies. More please. Ryan Haney inferred he wasn’t bothered about the DB5 or M because the film was awesome, which it is by the way. So Quantum took the stuff that made CR popular, rather than the stuff that made it good, and used Ryan’s tacit approval to head in the new direction. EON assumed the finger lickin good recipe was the fancy packaging, not the chicken, QOS was no time to fry… The proof is the short running time and lack of story. And Ryan got to Bond himself. Craig famously said on set “look, we aren’t exactly making Live and Let Die here!” Craig went Lazenby. And they cast Gemma Arterton as a black Shirley Eaton. Kind of. You fools. In 2012 Ryan fed QOS to the sharks in the tank when he weaponised nostalgia and good will, by sacrificing James Blonde’s ties to the world which went before because it wasnt enough. The evil Ryan replaced the DB5 with one stolen from 1960s Pinewood and tried to kill a fake Connery in Blonde’s ancestral home. Ryan was paying to watch history destroyed because Blonde has seen Home Alone too many time on his own. To paraphrase Mr Big aka Dr Kananga, Bond must die at all cost. M payed the cost: was replaced, and Moneypenny became Ms Yummyhoney while Craig was morphing into a twin of Sid James, the strain turning his face into a hazelnut of trauma. Great bloody film though. Ryan made me pay three times to watch the sky fall, while I tumble, or did I fumble, with a football, eating apple crumble, with Wilfred Bramble… to the tune of (cue Telly Savalas as Dr Evil) ONE BILLION DOLLARS. Not bad. Dr Ryan Kerchingfinger wasn’t happy thought. Because he had to drag the corpse of Sam Mendes from the shark tank and give him CPR. “I want to see the instruments of Armageddon,” he ordered. We have a proper Bond now, a proper Ms Yummyhoney in a proper office with a proper desk with a proper door into a proper office with a proper M and an a proper Q. Now give me a proper Blofeld. And I demand you do it as subtle like they would in Fast and Furious. I want a proper old school Bond movie with a proper old school Bond bird with a new Oddjob Jaws Mr Kill Red Grant bad ass. I want a one take opening shot in many takes, an overblown song, and overblown plot, and over blown bang, followed by another overblown bang and come very close to a C Bomb. You did this, Dr Ryan. You got Spectre aka Europe to blow up Britain in an anti-Brexit - or is it pro-Brexit? - plot, at the hands of the evil, lesser spotted step brother who wasn’t an iconic baddie. Honest. It was Blofeld after all, who was pulling the strings of Spectre which was pulling the strings of Mr white who was pulling the strings of Mr Frenchman who was pulling the strings of Quantum who was pulling the string of Mads! No wonder he wept blood. It was all too much for Blonde. He wants to end it all. But the stakes are now so high the whole world must die too. Ryan Haney wants JB to be crucified on a cross made of success at the expense of restraint. Bond can’t attempt re-entry this time, he must succeed at all costs, even by sacrificing the good will of the demographic who have benefitted from the Craig era, that is, the demographic who wanted Quantum and then disowned it when they got it. If Bond rises from the ashes it will be because fans of Bond, not Craig, carry him to place of resurrection. These fans trusted Bond through trips to space, clown outfit bomb disposing, explosive toothpaste, bad cgi, terrible cameos, one terrible but strangely hot Christmas, and a multiple double-taking pigeons and bystanders examining their wine bottles. Bond has always returned. He wasn’t “woke”’when he quit the fags, or when Tanner was black, or when he cut down from four shags every 120 minutes to two. Nor was he sexist when Moneypenny was suddenly foxy with Dalton, nationalist because of his choice of parachute. Racist while in India. Or anti-French. Actually I don’t mind him being anti-French. Nobody likes cheese-eating surrender monkeys. My point is that Ryan, and myself, and everyone who enjoyed James Blonde so much that we fed him to the sharks have a story arc of our own to complete. Our super-villain gets to be like Danny Boyle. We will not kill 007. We will pick him up, dust him off, slip Craig a brown envelope and say Live and Let Die. Diamonds Are Forever. Charles Gray knows this underground lair where characters can get a make over. Connery found Blofeld there once, killed him after a bender in Vegas and then developed a case of Roger-Moore-tis so bad that Blonde was scared of it! I love Live and Let Die. It is refreshingly self-aware, dangerous, exciting and… fun. The worst moments of the Craig Five were those where they developed, like Mr Big who wanted Bond dead at any cost, a terribly inflated opinion of itself. At time of patriotic loss when the figurehead dies there is a rallying cry in old England that serves as a watershed between two eras: The King is dead. Long live the King. In our case, Bond is the King. And James Bond will return.

It felt like 10 minutes.Wonderful.And my £5 cinema ticket felt like a £50 cinema ticket. Loved the movie and will see it again. Although I didn't see the point of Nomi been in the movie.The Nomi character was a distraction to a great movie.

I honestly didn't realize it was 2:40. It felt like a solid 2hrs, maybe 1:45

@@itstrueitstrue5958 Ummm, did you mean to type all that stuff to me? Do I know you? Is that some kind of inside joke I'm not privy to?

I thought it dragged 1-2 times. But it didn’t feel like I was sitting there for 3 hours at all.

lol ugh. Vomit..

I didn’t enjoy her presence in this movie. In my view the wrong choice

I absolutely second you in all... Daniel is the best Bond ever, Paloma blew me away (if only it was literally, 🤣🤣😂😂) and Casino Royal is by far the best of the Bond movies. I recently have seen Goldeneye and though I like Brosnan too that was like kindergarten compared to the Daniel Craig era. Roger Moore was very right when he said that Craig IS Bond. Cheers from Stuttgart, Germany

Yeh, I think the film would've been much better if Agent Paloma was the new 007 that replaced Bond in retirement instead of the Lashana Lynch agent, and then have them both after the scientist w/o Bond knowing that she was the new 007, competing w/each other to nab the guy. That dynamite chemistry they have would've made for some great scenes together, seeing as how Bond was no longer with Madeline at that time.

The writers are kicking themselves now 😂

Ain't nobody got time for that!

"Hey M! WATCH WHAT I CAN DO!!!!" *Dies super badass and heroically*

I got goosebumps reading that 🤣🤣 fucking Genius you are 💯💯

"Roll Credits"!! 😂

It was a great film but we left the cinema deflated and very sad….crazy right 😢

Bro. Since your a childhood fan of the character, so am I. Wanted to know your opinion on, what if James had to be portrayed by a non white person for thebnext 4 to 5 films. How would feel.

@@tigertankralfnutcrackerlet5461 we all bro.

True men cries at the end of this movie, not only because the ending itself is touching but as you mention is the end of a character of our childhood. If he had survived those explosions and somehow get rid of the nanites that would make a bad ending, made everything possible on impossible scenarios (That´s other franchise haha). I think he died standing like a macho not with the dignity I would want but diying standing.

@@allhailtheking1492 Excellent question! That character would not be "James Bond." It would be like watching a movie about King Henry VIII where he was Asian but everyone else was English. Huh? Whites are accused of "cultural appropriation" for eating "non-Western" food or for wearing Asian clothing or Mexican hats -- and thus offending entire cultures; having someone non-white (Asian, Black, Pacific Islander -- you name it) playing Bond would be "cultural appropriation," too -- but in reverse. (Look at the movies from Hollywood's past -- and it's truly embarrassing to see whites portraying Asians, Indians, and even Blacks. Example Mickey Rooney portraying Mr. Yunioshi in "Breakfast at Tiffany's" -- horrifying! Of course, no self-respecting Japanese would portray that character, either.). Would that be any less "offensive" (where's the Constitutional protection against that, by the way?) It just would not be James Bond. If I want Chinese food, I prefer to have it prepared by a Chinese, ditto for Japanese food, Mexican food, or whatever food. Just "feels" more authentic if the person preparing it has a lifetime of experience with that food (flavors, textures, ingredients, spices, preparation methods, presentation, etc.). Same thing with James Bond. I have no problem with a non-white portraying a heroic character like James Bond, but with a different name -- and "double-oh" number!

I don't think Rami Malik was utilised properly tho... His on screen presence even left lesser than dominic Greene

Agreed, and it reminded me of the non eon bond film that ripped off Thunderball. Its too bad because in this movie, the bad guy barely had any back story. Every other movie, you could understand where he got the money he needed, why not government intelligence agencies on all sides decided to step in (not hard to notice an evil lair on a deserted island in a contested zone), and where his goal came from. In this movie, the bad guy just existed for Bond to have a target.

I Agree 100% This was prolly the only thing that pissed me off in this movie! Repeating history is not too bad, as long as it's not heavy handed. Naming Dr. No would've made Daniel Craig's Arche come full circle. Since "Dr. No" was the 1st official Bond film

Awful villain. No real character introduction or depth except from the fact of us knowing his family got killed like any other cliché villain and he’s the one that ends up killing Bond

Dr. No as well as Blofeld with his poison castle from You Only Live Twice

Damn, I didn't realize that 😯😕😂 Good context clues!

I'm still mad about Tony Stark.

In a way same with Logan

That’s an interesting point. I think it points to a cultural value shift where we see that a leading action man hero can now also be driven as a father, and protective potentially caring father, and not just the playboy sexy womanizing who is forever with a woman and not with a family.

PS I also see that it’s interesting the way both movies opened the possibility for a daughter to pick up the mantle and not just the traditional cliche of a son.

This film is the set up for the next FEMALE 007 film..

@@Tony-1971 Like the op says, unless 007 is James Bond, a MALE, suave, cool agent, then the franchise is dead, simple as. Ian Fleming would turn in his grave if he knew they were butchering his character in such a way just to be woke like every other failing franchise.

@@dstr001 I agree with you. But its plain to see where its going. Bond is dead.

@@dstr001 The franchise ended whit pierce brosnan.

@@bhh8005 stop the hate on craig and move on. Films are not here to define us.

is this a paid comment? lmao

@@HaiderAliKhan Yeah, no kidding. Although, it seems more of a BS, ass-kissing comment so that the OP gets more attention to his channel than any kindness to HS or Paul. I adore HS but it isn't the only recap channel that any of us watch. All this makes me do is think that the OP, "Evil" is a pandering tw-t.

What?? Are there others??😂😂

True

True

This is funny but I don't think they'd ever have an American Bond

If it were me, I’d go the X-Men First Class route…take it back to the 60s. My choice would be Finn Jones of Peaky Blinders and Animal Kingdom. The only draw back is now comparisons to Kingsman will probably be made…

Daniel Craig became an American citizen, so technically they already have

James Bond has been a 40-ish MI6 agent for about 80 years now in the stories; and about 60 years IRL. Just because he dies in 2021 it doesn't mean the franchise is over. He can appear in any time between WW II and 2020, as a different actor, without breaking the timeline. Or, they can simply ignore the ending and a new young James Bond can carry on into the 2030's and 2040's without missing a beat. ACTING!

I wrestle with Book Bond (including the Gardner run) vs. Movie Bond every time I watch a Bond movie since 1971. I had high hopes for Daniël Craig after "Casino Royale," but was severely dissappointed by what followed. "SPECTRE" especially was a grave dissappointment for me. Blofeld was not half as threatening as he should have been and never became such. I think that a serious take on Fleming's Bond Books would be a succes, and it could even ster a coloured Bond without affecting the Bond Saga. "No time to Die" borrows heavily from "You only Live Twice" - the Safin Garden is de facto the suicide garden of Blofeld in the Fleming book. Also the music and backtracks to "On her Majesty's Secret Service" (one of my favourite Bond films, despite its reputation) where heavy on my mind. Long story short (too late?) I was seriously dissappointed in the movie.

@@rudolftrost3534 you should stick to star wars and game of thrones i guess

@@Akhtar93 I hate Star Wars (I truly do) and despise GoT for its deviations from the books. Lets each of us stick to our expertise and Fields of Knowledge, shall we?

…me too. I felt so sad for Bond. Craig portrayed his pain beautifully; he looks at his daughter and thinks what could have been - and later, for one moment when they’ve almost all escaped, he thinks he has found what he’s been searching for since his parents died…love and a family, but no, it’s all cruelly taken away from him…when he realises that he will never ever be able to touch or be anywhere near Madeline and his daughter ever again - it’s truly heart breaking 😢

Madeline and her daughter could have gone to the Clinic in Havana for DNA structuring from Die another day.. Fooling the nanobots. They will become useless afterwards. Unless that’s a different Bond universe.

@@PercyLeon1 Yup, with the advancement of vaccination, surely Q and his team can teach Bon'd white blood cells to eat all these bots. They are mechanical robots nevertheless. Surely they will loose power and die naturally. I don't buy how these bots will live eternally in a human's body.

@@jimcowan6472 hated the ending. Bond has never given up. And that's what he basically did. Plus he works with some of the clevest minds in the world im sure they could have made a cure... but no he gave in, a move totally out of character. Its put a damper on the whole franchise for me.

@@danielbarrass4402 he was dead and he knew it. Nothing to be done.

Just came back from the cinema and completely agree. Felt like I barely knew the villain at all

Malek killed off Spectre as revenge for Spectre killing his family. And why did Spectre kill his family? Because the family refused to provide them with the poisons necessary for their evil plots. And now Malek is pursuing those SAME evil plots? Does that make sense?

Frankly I didn't understand any one of the villains actions or motivations except for the initial one - revenge. And he got that. Why did he "save" Madeleine? Why was Bond that important to him that he dreamt up that convoluted plan to make him suffer? Especially as it was obvious a that point they were both going to die, one way or another? And was he really going to kill billions of people because he thinks people want to be told what to do and to die without warning? Just writing it all of as generically mad/evil seems a cop-out

@@kwhatten Sure it does, we don't know what his family did, we just know they didn't want to work with spectre, maybe he's just continuing his family legacy, maybe it's just the only thing he knows how to do, maybe he wants revenge against a world he feels is unfair, while it's not something we'd do, we're not crazy or at at least that crazy.

Malek's accent was horrid. Very hard to hear anything he was saying with the bad accent that didn't at all ever sound natural. Bond should never die in any Bond movie. His character is immortal. Too girl power driven and woke.. Shit Bond movie..

If James was Mathilde's father the nanobots Satin injected him with couldn't kill Madeleine and Mathilde because they would have killed James immediately, so the nanobots must be a fake. And the last words of Madeleine to James "she has your eyes" confirmed him to be the father. So there was no need for him to die, he could have had a life with Madeleine and Mathilde.

@@achimwokeschtla7582 can you elaborate please? He was supposed to program another nanobots specially for this purpose, that's why he used them on Bond, it would his last curse

@@luisfernando55: I elaborated already enough! But for you … as the nanobots affect the targeted person and his/her relatives there are only two possibilities: 1. if they don’t affect him but affect them Mathilde cannot be his daughter 2. if Mathilde is his daughter and the nanobots don’t affect him they cannot affect Mathilde because they are related and therefore cannot affect Madeleine because she is related to Mathilde.

@@achimwokeschtla7582 Wrong, they were genetically engineered from Madeline not James

@@achimwokeschtla7582 You're wrong. The DNA used was Madeline's, not James'. She's not related to him, so he didn't die. Mathilde has half her DNA so she would die. That's how DNA works.

That's my assumption. She needed to be used more and I think that will happen in a spin off movie

I know right! She was unrecognizable to me at first after knives out. But she made one hell of an impression

But no blood after the gunshot. PC?

No time to die was my last James Bond movie that I watched... it's really hard to watch the upcoming parts without Daniel Craig.. so yeah im giving up on James Bond Series, Huge fan of Daniel.

@@wignallyt I think it was because they were transitioning to white snow

@@HaiderAliKhan Why they cast Idris Elba Tom Hiddleston Henry Cavill Cillian Murphy a Tom Hardy Michael Fasbender.

🙄 some people fall for anything

Yep this is a key point. He had to kill himself otherwise his family would never be safe as the virus would endlessly infect people until it got to them. But I don’t think the film made this clear enough.

@@jtlsuk no,it didn't

it did, people just didn’t pick up on it.

thank you - if we consider the probability of matching DNA with all the world population - it becomes eventual that he would contact someone who would killed by the DNA nano's and it would make it's way back to them.

I thought it was pretty clear, they really explained the mechanics behind the nanos extensively. It was so bitter sweet but very smart to make it so it wasnt that he couldnt escape the missile strike but he needed to die, a great end to the Craig bond

Amen my guy🙏

I feel the same! Still processing, mourning, searching for a quantum of solace...

Also still mourning.😢

Weet Ik my friend Weet Ik

Yeah, not every movie has to be a children's film with a happy ending. I think the people who didn't like the conclusion don't really understand the plot of the Craig era. This had to happen. Best possible ending.

@@sensemmosta8019 älä tää oli vitun surullinen ja traaginen mut tää oli myös vitun upee ja paras loppu

@@kassu669 Mua ärsyttää kun ihmisten reaktio on AINA negatiivinen kun protagonisti kuolee. Joskus se on väistämätöntä, jopa kaunista.

Just like Logan and Tony Stark had to die in their movies, Bond had to die in this one. It was all leading up to that.

No Time to Cry

Why did it appear ? 🤔 I don’t recall that

@@mattjackson1732 it always appears at the end of every Bond film. It used to be the first thing that’ll pop up in the credits, but then they moved it to the end; knowing, that people like myself would wait to see it.This is just Daniel Craig’s final film, there will be more.

I stayed to the very end of the credits. Everyone else had left the cinema, I was the last one. Just to see the the words "James Bond will return" :-)

I've watched every bond film in the cinema since my dad took me to see Live and let die. There are elements of the Bond films that actually make me emotional and give me goose bumps, such as the gun barrel sequence, the "James Bond theme", the names Bond etc. This includes the James Bond Will Return moment, now at the very end of the credits and waiting for it is an event in itself ( god help anyone, if they chose to squeeze past my seat at that moment lol) As someone who has grown up with Bond, these highlights are the film constants, no matter who plays 007, or how good or weak the story is and why I will never class "never say never again" as a Bond movie.

It has NEVER said “007 will return” at the end of one of the films. It has ALWAYS been “James Bond will return” The only change was not adding the name of the next film to be made as soon as they ran out of official Fleming material .

Damn!, come to think of it, they really did an ‘Endgame’ on this one..But then again James Bond will be back..

How’s him dying a fitting ending? They could’ve written a better ending for him where he gets to go home with his family. I think a happier ending would’ve definitely made the film better especially since it’s Daniel Craig’s last Bond movie.

@@ShaneYeBoy Nope the ending we got is perfect. If we had this exact same movie except he survives, it would've made no sense

@@robby4245 How would it "make no sense" for an ending in which he survived? The director wrote the story to make it so he dies at the end so obviously if he didn't die without changing the writing it wouldn't make sense, but that's not what I'm saying. They could've wrote it in a way where he didn't need to die. Honestly idc about this anymore

Agreed

True would have been good

I agree

I agree.

Don't forget about Felix Leiter.

@@vicentekokaly322 she did say Felix

That's very touching. They went beyond the story Fleming gave us...

@@marcobalcazar9184 ...and Fleming stated several times that he would like to kill him off... some kind of love-and-hate-relationship though

@@armiyaaneel9898 actually he ;)

The little Mathilde is so cute and lovely! 😍

No time to die is worst 2.craig movie after quantum of solace

@Revenge Class Only ending

@Revenge Class Not paying to see this hot mess.

@@tmmartinesq.6216 How did you know it's a mess?

@Revenge Class Explain why it's the worst

I agree with you 100%, and yes, Cavill would be a great Bond!

I agree

Richard Madden is mine

I agree but they could use bond name as a tribute to him since the only ones who know of his death are in the room at the end I’d rather they reboot it again

@@phadelic I think they can do whatever they want to now, and I think they do away all the familer Things we expect from Bond.

Possible movie title: Commander Bond 👍

That would be awesome

Agree

She was used to remind bond of Vesper. And we saw how Bond could've kissed her at the end of the mission but he decided not too

yeah I'm gonna miss Daniel Bond! not seeing a new Bond's film with him again feels like I've lost a friend forever

Same

❤ the gorgeous looking woman & fancy car 🚗 at card game

Even Idris? You remember how angry all you fanboys were when Idris was just rumored to play Bond! 🤔

@@Luvie1980 Idris can be 007 , but never James bond! And im black! lol..Im not down with just pleasing political groups. Entertainment should just be entertaining. I was mad at the Daredevil movie when they made the Kingpin black! And im sure im going to be mad as hell when Indiana Jones 5 comes out too! I damn near miss the 80's!🤣😂🤣😂

Would have enjoyed Idris as bond but 10/15 years ago, far to old to take on the role Would need to be someone in their 30s

It's not "a puff of smoke". We clearly see Bond standing as the missiles impact right in front of him. Lots of missiles exploding about 10 feet in front of him and moving right up to his body as the screen goes white. He's dead. OK, we didn't have a shot of his severed head rolling along the ground but face the facts... he's dead.

@@wignallyt As soon as I get the Blu-ray I'm going to thoroughly analyse that bit in slomo. Don't be surprised if he's not dead...

As long as they don’t bring back drippy Madeline that would be ok by me!

You forget that he wanted to die. He was poisoned with a skin transmitted weapon that would target his the DNA of his lover and his child. It was unremovable, so he killed himself. If not for that, even with bullet wounds, he would’ve figured out a way to escape.

@@wignallyt exactly nobody could have survived that.

Exactly. That's why I loved Goldeneye so much. Brosnan was full blown 007 at the beginning.

And I agree on the code name theory, that's retarded. We even know Bonds parents are called Andrew Bond and Monique Delacroix Bond

To get that we need to reboot tho

@@AmazingJoe96 No reboot just Bond in his prime nothing else.

@@CrADrafgo that bit was cool the whole pre titles sequence

@James Owle, I totally agree with you. Bond could have had a "happy" ending like in TDKR. For me, they have spoiled the future of this franchise.

Daniel Craig was never Bond. He is a Girly Man. None of his villains are memorable . Best bonds : 1, Roger Moore (great wit .great villains ) 2. Timothy Dalton ( was too dark for the general public but was the truest Bond according to the novels (source : Roger Moore's book.... Bond on Bond) 3. Sean Connery (letdown by the technology of the 60's......... great Bond but the movies weren't as enjoyable) 4. George Lazenby (OHMSS was a good movie) 5. the downhill slide begins.......feminists, Girly Men Spies, female bosses...... Csino Royale didn't even play Bond Music.......Where's my Chunder Bucket?

are you a she-male? omg

@@volvojohn9036 Clearly you wish that I was. You're showing your true gay ways. Also Volvos are only for gays.

@@peterkramar6555 LOOL , i think your opinion sucks but go off man. Feel free to quote more books to tell me how wrong i am xD

@@peterkramar6555 @volvojohn wasn't even responding to your comment, but to the original comment by @Rayford Parker. So, I guess that does make you a 'she-male' since you responded to it.

At the end of the book 'You Only Live Twice' Bond has amnesia and lives for a while on a Japanese island. He has a relationship with Kissy and she falls pregnant. Bond leaves before she tells him of the pregnancy.

Yeah and look wtf happened in the end Smfh

Exactly. I’ve never cried so hard in my life after a film.

I think the filmmakers want to be free and do any kind of stories they want.

exactly, enough with the gender and race swap, as if being white is evil. how come there are no black or female villains? exactly. let things be. if they want a black hero or a woman, then they should make a new character, like when they were going to use Halle Berry for a new spy.

@@artpena72 she is a spy in an alternate Bond universe.

@@artpena72 thr funny thing is their argument is that its fiction who cares?!! Then i say lets make black panther white then but ofc then they all cry and rage!! Hypocrite woke pieces of shts

@@Alexandryia Exactly. I hate this obsession of having to adapt to todays society to please sensitive people. I HIGHLY doubt they are going to make 007 a woman or of different race. James Bond is James Bond. He has existed since the 60's, and should be untouchable. They will loose so much money if they change his origins.

Completely agree with you, but I think they might actually do that

Agree completely. OO7 is only for James Bond. Not a Charlie's Angel. We love him, not some pandering bs.

JB is a white male. Fleming clearly described his looks. Connery, Lazenby, and Dalton looked the part. Moore and Brosnan too pretty. Craig was not even close, and he's a leftist.

@@thomasmulhall4873 Tf does being a “leftist” have to do with anything stfu

@@ralaperher3650 You don't have the intelligence to understand the answer.

Bond is bond, but in these times everything must bow to the grand political agenda and every piece of media is to be propaganda.

I think you can’t pick Elba. The guy is too old. It needs to be someone younger. If Elba was the pick it should have been done 15 years ago.

Pls don't crucify me, but I would love to see a "007" spin-off starring Lashana Lynch. Less spycraft, more action and gadgets (a good writers room can make it work). Just 1 or 2 films with her, before we start the clock over with a Henry Cavill or whoever the new bond is. Let's shake things up!

Henry cannot act..nope

@@ChineduOpara I think she did a fine job. But personally I’d rather see more of Ana’s character

@@rooster5343 All the ladies could be in the Lashana Lynch spin-off movie. I'd want the entire cast except James himself. Then, at the end of the LL 007 film(s) they can reassign LL to, I dunno, the USA or some other country as a Special Agent. That way we can get a new (male) James Bond to keep the General Moviegoing Public and hardcore fans happy.

The ending was terrible for a Bond movie. Any other movie and it would have been fine. What are they suppose to do next since he is not around anymore?

I hated it. I still hate it. We need Bond.

@@bighands69 because these films have continuity thing, not like the older and boomer bonds.

@@NisseOhlsen there will be a Bond, a reboot new Bond. Daniel Craig can't play the character forever

@@bighands69 Nah, if they did this in Mission Impossible, then yes, that would (and should) kill the franchise. But Bond is a different animal. James Bond as a character has been recast so many times that with each actor is basically a different batch of movies. And it makes it seem that "James Bond" is really just a code name. Bond is one of the few franchises where killing him actually can work. With Craig, they did give him a backstory, sort of an arc as well.

Yep this was the main drawback to an otherwise very enjoyable film

Yeah, pretty much every actor feels like they wanted to do more but had to leave because of superficial reasons so I’m glad at least one got to finish their story

The ending of the movie was weak as hell. Now we have Bond the family and the producers are not going to forget that.

​@@bighands69 We've had that for decades. You not remember James Bond Jr? And anyway, this continuity is done now. The credits state "James Bond will return", not "007 will return", so it's a full reboot. It needed to be definitive otherwise it would have been the same as the other 6 times a run ended unceremoniously.

@@Lanosrep A full reboot will mean every character has to be replaced. So do you think Amazon paid $8.5 billion to get access to the franchise to do that?

But this was different to the others they were just standalone missions for bond throughout his career with the same people playing bond in multiple films, this had an over arching story throughout his 5 films that's why it has a beginning with casino royale and an end with no time to die unlike the others.

James Bond was great while it lasted.

All the villains, are dead. So there can be no revenge

His daughter is called mat.... something

You are not the only to be out....there are many,many others....this movie is a total disaster...

Daniel Craig never was a "real" bond. So, who cares what he says.

The IED tomb didn't kill him, the multiple grenades didn't kill him, what makes you think missiles can kill him?

4 had nanobots…. Did it have dna targeting killer nano-bots?

@@BartvG88 that's literally what foxdie is

@@BartvG88 yes, it did

I feel Craig was totally miscast from day one. Not remotely Bond to me. In a perverse way his death was the Craig not Bond brigade winning. Go figure! Lol

I always thought Dalton was the closest to the book Bond

For me in my headcanon, The Rock movie by Micheal Bay is the ending for Sean Connery's James Bond. Theres a whole theory on it on RU-vid.

@@Raul_Menendez I can see that. I really like that movie.

@@eachasteriod1334 You are correct.... Dalton was the closest as far as the character in the books. But Connery was the best actor for the role.

Yes exactly!

She says that now but has set up Bond to be just that. They even played around with the 007.

@@bighands69 they played around with 007, because 007 is just a number. A that's it! James Bond is the name, 007 is the code for his Licence to Kill-job. It's not a setup, it's the exact opposite: it try's to make it clear! Just like Skyfall did with the tombstone of his parents.

@@huubhuijbens8816 tell that to the number 42 in baseball

@@huubhuijbens8816 exactly. Remember Goldeneye? The main villain, Alec Trevelyan was designated 006

💯💯💯

Don't worry about Felix, he'll wake up in Westworld with no memory of ever being a spy in the CIA :)

Felix Leiter character was around since the old James Bond novel by Ian Fleming. Was it "Thunderball" , "the Man with the Golden Gun' or "Live and Let Die" did Felix came in ? No disrespect, I thought the original Felix was not an Afro-American.

@@anwaarmohd6498 I think Felix was in the original and first book but I’m not sure which movie he was first in, it was just sad to see his demise

Casino Royale and Skyfall were his best

I think that even though it may not of been the best, the ending was fit for a man that saved the world. He took his own life the most fitting way, by doing what he does best and saving the world. I understand it’s an ending for got a bond film, just not the ending we all wanted.

@@lucasbrown5300 I don't even think he died for much of a good reason. The whole franchise is him being bulletproof and one guy can suddenly shoot him. Also he could continue living in the world without seeing his wife or child until they find a solution. It wasn't a very fulfilling ending to me. He could've died in a much more badass way taking out the villain. Also the villain motive was pretty poor for me.

This was easily Craig’s best one IMO

It's a disgrace to the Bond franchise.....as simple as that

He probably survived the missals land in front of him they don’t actually hit him so he could have survived

This argument is dumb because Craig's Bond was never part of the other line of Bonds which was all one continuous timeline. Craig's Bond was a reboot, and now people are complaining that they're going to reboot it again? Nobody complains about the 20 Batman reboots.

I wasn't aware Batman died in his various reboots! Where is Batman's death?

@@ErnestGoesToMadeas hahahaha

@@bobsmithy9024 LOL. Comic book characters infamously die all the time, and then come back in various rebooted forms. We haven't seen much of that in comic book movies, but Marvel Studios is now starting to dip their toes into that part of comic book lore. People cried about the Lazenby reboot in the 60's, and now that movie is praised as being one of the best Bond movies.

Jesus, I bet you're a joy at parties. You'll get over this Bonds death in a year or so, by which time the new 007 will be announced and you'll be excited again.

Well, contracts govern all this stuff. Besides, he’s been brought back from burning trees safely for quite a while, only way to reduce stagnation is by making him fall out the tree to his death as a lesson for him for always getting into burning trees in the first place.

Who gives a fuck what Billy Wilder said. It was sad and I was emotional but now they can reboot the franchise, it was a good movie even if it didn't follow the guidelines of fucking Billy Wilder

They've never gone as far as killing him though. You don’t kill the character of your franchise, by all means change the lead actor as they've always done but you don’t kill him. Another point is that these incarnations of M, Moneypenny, Tanner and Q have mourned his passing. This means that to start again we need new actors for those roles too. I was ready to say goodbye to Craig but not Fiennes, Whishaw, Harris too! The film was enjoyable as a film but not as part of the Bond franchise IMO.

@@NerdGirlUK I agree, I mean killing superman is not the same as killing James Bond, i think this is a pretty bold move. I though the child was already a stretch but dying took it to another level for me. Will I like was is coming next? Lot of questions. but in this movie eh went from saving the world to a father who is saving his daughter..... again mixed emotions.

Well, James Bond isn't supposed to die. He's just not. He always survives, because he's basically superhero. Killing Bond ruins the mystery

@@NerdGirlUK ah man for 50 years of bond why not? Why does it have to follow the same formula every single time. Its nice to see something completely different.

I think we gathered that I guess we just wanted to see bond have a good ending where he retires with his family and to see him die on the god damn roof of a building

Agreed, I'm hoping the franchise reboots in the 60's. I liked the movie and honestly of any of the Bond's to kick the bucket Craig's makes the most sense as his tenure has pretty clearly been a reboot that's very self contained. Just hoping the vitriol online doesn't increase to TLJ levels, light entertainment should never cause people to send death threats and personally affronted by a movie of all things.

Here's a better idea; stop hiring directors who want to "subvert expectations", and embrace the classic Bond tropes instead of running away from them.

I would love it to be a 60's period piece but it becomes very problematic for the producers when you're making films of this scale. Every car, street, plane, boat etc has to be period which is not possible without tons of CGI or ridiculous expense. It's easier for tv to do that because it's on a smaller scale production wise.

Love that video game and want to see Henry Cavill play Bond set back in the 1960's

@@nicknewman7848 I think you've answered your question here, it's like the difference between the original Star Wars trilogy and the prequels, episodes 4-6 have lots of close ups on just 2-3 actor's physical backgrounds, practical effects, 3d models and traveling matte, the drama is taught and realistic, episodes 1-3 have so much unnecessary world building and spectacle that almost all of the acting comes off as wooden, there's very little actual drama present ( that said 100% better than episodes 7-9). If Eon pictures go for Henry cavill as Bond it'll probably be on the back of his Man from UNCLE, you almost don't notice it's set in the 60's and then of course Mission Impossible too! Bond playing golf with Goldfinger, the tense drama between Bond and Red Grant, any creeping around in the dark from any of the movies all very cheap to create and film.

They find his DNA and clone him.

The missals land in Front of him they don’t actually hit he survived and will return as the same character but with a new acter I guarantee the movie is literally called no time to die that’s just 1 hint

Bond never dies!

I'm fairly sure (1) is what's going to happen. Bond returns in the next film, having escaped from the ultimate deathtrap by some complex pseudo-technical means. The Bond films are never limited by what is possible for a human in a given situation, the franchise is huge business and Bond is the main reason for its existence, so the producers and distributors are not going to kill off James Bond or make a total break with Fleming's white British spy character. Madeleine Swann (nice Proust reference there, I spotted it as soon as I saw her in Spectre) will not be a major character in the next film - she will be written out of the story in some way or pushed to the margins. No Bond girl, IIRC, before her has actually appeared in two different 007 films as the same character.

It’s def far from a perfect movie. It’s the 3rd best out of the Craig run. But in my opinion casino royale and skyfall are miles ahead of this movie.

@@blankname6629 I agree with you on all points. The next one has to be a bit harder, tougher, rougher.

Let him be Superman find someone else

I agree, Henry Cavill would be a perfect Bond.

.....he's too busy raising his "child" by surprise....

I seem to be at the same age like you. TSWLM was my first Bond movie, seen years after it debuted. For NTTD I feel in a completely other way. Craig's Bond is (and was always) different and I love the twists here. This IS Craig's OHMSS!

@@petereggers7603 I am not surprised, I am clearly in the minority, it is what it is, it has ended.

Similar age and completely agree with everything you've said.

Yea don’t u know all other races have to help blacks with everything .. otherwise blacks will protest ..

@@rubenaerts7284 bro get a life, please I beg you

They sholuld bring back Brosnan..as an old grissled Bond..but still has his style and flair

@@rubenaerts7284 Let the next blackpanther be A White Man

@@rubenaerts7284 Not racist but why not make a role for them instead of giving them a developed and well known roles. This is why Daniel Craig was not supportive of the idea of having a female 007 not because it has always been played by a man its because women should have their own character that is connected to them .

same as me

Well she probably has some resentment for whatever reason with Bond, because he's back for a little while

110% right.

Do not think you will destroy it.

@CEO of Secularism not the only. The film was okay but the ending is just awful. They killed Bond with the lazyest plotholes. He asked for rockets. Okay but why? The packing taking time, they could rocketing the ships and many other opportunities. The gunshots are bad but maybe he could survive that.

I definitively was expecting that!

Those nanites must have little Duracell Bunnies in them , as they were suppose to last for ever!