@@ericday4505 yes. And everytime I do not "agree", I really just worry if that's just because I am just way too simple to see the obvious - as he does. :) At least, and etiher way, there is a lot to learn. Who to turn to in 10 years?
Talking to oneself in the head all the time... Why would one do that, and how could one do that? Where does the inner voice come from and who is listening to it? Are they not one and the same? It's beautiful that Chomsky admits being troubled by that unquietness of his mind.. The voice in the head seems to have a life of its own.. Who then are you?
Paraphrasing Chomsky: the purpose of language is to expand consciousness. Interestingly enough, this corresponds to dr David Hawkins’ words who also lives in Arizona.
the thoughting it related to the ceractivity it realted with the language of course and the language translation our thoughting it golden processe of brain and for the question the answor is in the question.of course all the respect to the father of linguistics modern and grammar generative.
At least for objects, not actions, I think in human's thought, there is no reason to name something as a reference if there is no need to communicate with someone else. So, I think "I like the shit". But I don't make it across if I say to someone else "I like this shit". I need a context or more easily, I need a reference, a name - that's what language's origin is - to name. So structuring or use of language is on the thought of human, that I think Noam is correct. But if you ask me what language is really is and how and why it exists. I think language in general, including animal language, it is still more because the need to communicate, to name things.
the thought like the golden process of minds ✨️ when this human kind strated with this brain story first to thoughting to his ideas to planto writing this plan in paper 📃 to translation this thoughting two inventories fro exemple to creativity in society this how this human kind thoughting and make the creativity
the space of thoughting in this space we have all the informations about the processes of thoughting of his human kind how this human thoughting and thinking and when this human thought it came this informations to brain of this human.
He is wrong to say that "new expressions" are not caused by stimuli coming from the inside or the outside. By the laws of physics, they must be, even if it "feels" to us as if they are not.
Dude "laws of physics" aren't written in stone they keep changing. Also, physics is incomplete and we don't even know how much of it is left to be discovered.
top kek We don’t understand the mechanics of consciousness but we do know, in principle, that it is the result of the brain responding to its own activity.
