It's been seeral years now, and still think Zeinab Badawi doesn't pay attention to what the Laureatues are saying. When camera focus on her, while getting and answer, she's constantly looking at her notes, like checking boxes about what she needed to say and what comes next, very little engagement. Also I don't mind editing these videos short, but please, have a longer conversation, as much as the Laureates feel (say 2 hrs), and later just make a less than an 1hr video!
Every year she irritatingly asks about application stuff. And every year the laureates answer that they do fundamental science, without any thought of application. Science doesn't necessarily need an application ! Why doesn't she understand??!
Nice initiative. I'd suggest in the coming years you get Science based popular writers or journalists to moderate . Zain seems to rush these great minds as if it's a movie interview! We need people who can actually break down these issues more fundamentally also providing a broader perspective. I wouldn't mind someone like Lawrence Krauss, Neil Degrasee Tyson, Lisa Randall or other popular scienc writers
They obviously ignored your advice. In the 2017 round Rainer Weiss told Zain that she hadn't listened properly to what one of the laureates had just said. So clearly it's bothering some of them too.
funny thing: 2019 they still dont care about how bad host is) every year i try my best to ignore her SAME behavior: waving your hands, constantly looking at notes, interrupting people, terribly awkward to finish the answers of the winners or insert their own lines
@@rtnjo6936 yes I agree, its shamefully to see that kind of behavior. It needs to be someone who can dig into concepts, otherwise, the main reason why they are there is lost.
well you know what guys...dont blame the host. We all know how difficult it is when managing the talk between so many great minds at the same time. She tried her best...just to keep the talk concise and cater to...basically all ppl.
Student questions and statements about young scientists etc are so unnecessary. I want to hear the laureates talk about their research and challenge each other on ideas.
Just came back here to say that Bob Wilson (mentor of an Economics winner in the video) just won a Nobel prize himself for Economics. 14:58 if you want to see the moment where he's being appreciated here
The journalist was pretty bad, not understanding what these people were trying to say, going in a silly methodistic manner. The best thing thing would have been to let them talk amongst themselves.
Some of the worst consequences of Brexit will be in the sphere of science. To that extent Brexit is a fit subject for scientists to discuss because it will directly impact the sciences. You could justifiably say that Brexit is not only political and an attempt to characterise Brexit as only political means gagging scientists. So I found your remark more telling about you than your remark was telling about her.
This is disgusting. The fact that everyone was silent for awhile after the qus was asked showed that it was an inappropriate topic that no one was expecting...
How does this woman get the chair? You need an intellect to chair theses men -someone who already understands how to access their minds. Prof Jom Al-Khalili would be excellent.
Great -- Great news. Great work -- Great Nobel Minds. Dear respected, honourable and beloved Noble- Laureates Sir/ Mam, at first heartiest Congratulations. We proud to see videos. I m from INDIA.
Ross Healea wouldn’t that be epic? I think we just found an untapped niche right there. I mean people are into long form podcasts as it is. why not turn it into a group thing?
My time is well invested here! DOES ANYONE KNOW THE FEMALE STUDENT WHOSE NAME SOUNDS LIKE "Kirsten Copeland"? She wears glasses in this footage, and she mentioned her PhD (in economics, I guess!). I want to read what she writes.
I believe as quoted by many whom i knew that one of major difference between Laureates and other is Laureates have freedom and time with no such interruption in life, where other who may achieve beyond struggle on daily base to move ahead and face daily opposite sides, if we put this in a small scale urban example and define the overall life cycle not all subject define the same input and output within the question whom and why which define underline in-between
Well a Chinese black trans woman unified gravity and quantum theory but the academy are sino-trans phobic white supremacists so obviously they couldn't nominate her
Kristine to answer your question you cute btw. In my relative mind. Don’t worry about how that makes you feel it makes me happy lol how do you react to that. People are unwillingly going against factual evidence in 2016 to present day for a number of possible reasons maybe infinite. No one can honesty really understand someone else’s mind. But taking a number of general views and understanding That in the past the same has gone on like Galileo. People went against the idea that the earth wasn’t the center of the “universe” or our solar system because they weren’t informed. They needed evidence to prove it right and to reach a scientific consensus. By time and by people who are associated with pop earth culture. They have the greatest influence on young minds who then grow up to see factual evidence. So now with the internet. False words and phrases can be shown to someone with no understanding or it could connect or stem from a view they believe will never lie to them. Which is a lie. Like religion._. That’s one of my awnsers. I could come up with an infinite amount of them if you have the time 🌎🧙🏽♂️🧿
what is the point of Nobel Minds? Soe Nobel prize winners, such as Paul Nurse and Venki, have said, that many non Nobel prize winners, are just as good scienitists. Many great scientists never win Nobel prizes.
I think people hate the fact that the host is black. They are not aware of this but it's an innate disgust they have. Like how would you expect the topics to be deeper than they already are in this discussion? How long would it take? If you want deeper indulgence, grab a book and study. This is media not a lecture class. Great work Zeina Bidawi... P.S. Also notice how the talk has many scenes cut off for the sake of time I presume. So don't go around saying she is a bad host. Even the Laureates would be disappointed of your view. I noticed a different host last year and that's ok too, no need to compare and shame. Amazing minds in one room 👏👏
Erm, you should watch the 2017 edition. She was told off by Rainer Weiss for not listening to what a laureate had just said and for asking a stupid non-relevant follow-up question. I think she does an ok job, but not better than ok. It is what it is.
i think they will keep having her regardless of public approval. its stupid but shes hosted all of the interviews with negative feedback. doesn't realize the greatness around her or she does but wants to compensate for their intelligence with ignorance and aggression.
Thanks for your kind presentation. May I help those who are commenting and watching this, what are Nobel minds??? It may help the watchers as they may be interested to share Nobel ideas or they might be nobels and didn't realize. We are are born with instinct to take or possess or do something and expect to be paid but special people are those who have the ability to give without waiting to be paid. That's the start of nobel mind. Which can easily be done to those around you, starting from family, friends, colleagues etc Very simple to start the idea Wish you all the best of luck Stay home Stay safe to save others That's a nobel act
