Nobel Minds 2020 

The only reason they went far is because its their job. You will never see anyone without a nobel prize type job, win an award most likely 9/10.

@@VADDY1 don't forget malala (nobel prize peace) without job

Lol

True

I'm surprised they kept her for so long

Of course we do.

Agreed 👍

Zeinab is great you're just hater

Huh? She literally cut off the Economics Laureate at the beginning lol.

Zainab is excellent, in this panel there are only 5 members as opposed to 9-10 in other sessions. Moderation is compulsory if you want the program to stay within 50 minutes

Smh

Wise words from Elizabeth Holmes, CEO of Theranos.

@RTN JO what was wrong with Miss Zeinab Badawi?

@@ayanda1271 she never listened and let her guests finish their thoughts.

@@chilenozo There's only five people. She's holding a zoom session, not as hard as in person with 2x as many people. :/

Yeah, where did she go?

But I too was used to Miss Zeinab Badawi. Change is the only constant and intelligence is the ability to adapt to it. Keep your head up, you too pretty to have it hanging low 🙂😉

nope

as well as other six laureates，Harvey alter、Charles Rice、Reinhard Ghenzel、Jennifer Doudna、Louise Glück and Robert Wilson👌

I know.

roger penrose took part in a nobel prize podcast if u wanna listen

The last one was treated pretty bad tbh

Literature and peace laureates doesn't have a rigorous nomination and selection process as other fields

I was about to ask the same question

More importantly, none of the comments are about the host, who is quiet bland. Give me Zainab anytime. I still found the discussion interesting....

coz she's bad and got replaced

@@badmintongo4832 so right. She was not meant. These isn't CNN, you need a host that can allow them to explain their ideas

It's almost a complete juxtaposition. These great minds don't chase after fame or recognition but pursue progress for the sake of progress. They uphold intellectual honesty to the highest degree aggressively trying to disprove their own ideas until they fail to do so. They do this because it is fun, for the joy and passion of discovery itself. Meanwhile, I could hardly say politics is even remotely close to intellectual honesty or altruistic goals, it's a shame that such virtues are only a "weakness" in politics and winning elections.

Our politic system is broken and it's a system which once in place can't be fixed as the politicians are the only ones who can change it but they won't shoot themselves in the foot all at once.

@@SyenPie If anything I believe the domain of politics can never truly be claimed by the clear scientific mind. By definition, the political arena is an extension of the public mind, where ideas however wrong, stretched out, or malicious they can be are reflected and therefore necessitate a constant balancing act in order to achieve favorable outcomes that in theory exist mainly in the objective and empirical truth. Yet, it would be immature to expect society to operate as one mind towards the pursuit of the scientifically backed truth as not all have devoted their life or day-to-day thinking to this endeavor. As such, to propose the possibility of a scientifically led political world, you would need a scientifically led societal mind - which isn't so far from the truth in most advanced societies but loses its worth when generally accepted notions conflict with popular beliefs. Now, I think it is more favorable to align the chaotic nature of the political, and by extension - of the human psyche- in a direction that favors empirical evidence and honest intellectual progress. If you use the tools that are nowadays employed to create such chaos to make good, maybe there is room for positive change to occur. What are such tools, I have yet to meditate enough on it to give a clear tentative answer but one thought experiment I am going through at the moment is the possibility of using competitive-based frameworks to motivate international policy coordination in pandemic responses.

In future, world will see Laureates get prize in physics while their work will revolutionise the medical science! Physics, chemistry, biology, medicine all are interconnected!

It happens quite regularly mainly due to the fact that Biology and Chemistry are greatly interconnected sciences

Charpentier* and yes what's the matter?

It’s time for the addition of Biology and of Computer Science as categories.

Her discovery was based in biochemistry

Roger Penrose too ?

House

yeh I'm very appreciate the host with her personal vitality and fascination

I will wait

coz she's bad and got replaced

The difference between scientists like the ones on here and politicians is in science you need to be intelligent while in politics the less intelligent you are the better, just being a good talker is all you need. The more intelligent you are the less capable you will be to convince masses into believing the amount of lies you have to tell, at some point the politicians even start believing their own lies.

literature laureates always prefer to be quite with their loneliness and solitariness perhaps，not like science and peace laureates whose work likely to devoted on public circumstances. of course such situation is not absolutely，but frequently

🙂 I miss her too

A great idea, you think perfectly I just don't how to express how I feel greatly for your great idea. Sadly, I don't understand much about software to join you, second I'm trying to be a great physicist and that is consuming mu mind (I'm an undergrad from Egypt) Third : If you didn't do it, for som some reason When I have time, I'll definitely pursue this goal. All luck for you, take it seriously. And keep pushing forward

Facebook is already on that. augmented reality.

Count me in, buddy!

Don’t do it !