Тёмный
No video :(

Nobel Prize lecture: Anton Zeilinger, Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 

Nobel Prize
Подписаться 621 тыс.
Просмотров 28 тыс.
50% 1

Anton Zeilinger delivered his Nobel Prize lecture "A Voyage through Quantum Wonderland" on 8 December 2022.
The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 was awarded jointly to Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger "for experiments with entangled photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum information science".

Опубликовано:

 

28 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 29   
@pursuitofcat
@pursuitofcat Год назад
Love his simplicity of delivering "THE" lecture of his life. Calmness, humility, grateful while having a sense of humour as well.
@notanemoprog
@notanemoprog Год назад
🙏🙏
@MikeWiest
@MikeWiest Год назад
30:54 EPR paper citations-wow! Love it!
@sergiomanzetti1021
@sergiomanzetti1021 7 месяцев назад
I mean, except for the physics which is exceptional, this guy speaks with a Schwarzenegger-accent, which in itself, is an additional reason to make him great.
@mishy_mix
@mishy_mix 10 месяцев назад
Someone needs to make a video education of this lectures w visuals. Would be amazing.
@InfoArtistJKatTheGoodInfoCafe
"It is operationally impossible to separate Reality and Information." -- Quantum Information Physicist, Anton Zeilinger 2011 University of South Africa. Professor Zeilinger gave me permission to use this quote in my book on Information Literacy, 2014.
@Falit_
@Falit_ Год назад
one day I will be there
@vishalarya1186
@vishalarya1186 Год назад
Hey I'm there too ,,beside urs next chair
@paulyoung3593
@paulyoung3593 7 месяцев назад
I am there already
@TrippleXD545
@TrippleXD545 2 месяца назад
thats statistically improbable
@Teekles
@Teekles Год назад
A 'perfect' vacuum still contains a huge amount of energy fluctuations, hence virtual particles created via e=mc^2. However, if we are able to create a space with fewer virtual particles than deep space (between two uncharged, conductive plates creating a casimir effect for example) -- it would suggest that the speed of light in this space would be faster than c since the light will not be slowed down by interacting with virtual particles. Scharnhorst suggested this, but it was largely written off as untestable. I posit that we should update our definition of the speed of light, c, to a relative value that depends on the density of virtual particles. Specifically, I would like to know what the speed of light would be in a space where virtual particles are at their absolute minimum (for example, perhaps in the infinitesimally small space between two event horizons right before black holes merge). When c becomes a relative value instead of an absolute, Einstein's transformations might be challenged to produce new physics. Right?
@Simon-xi8tb
@Simon-xi8tb 7 месяцев назад
Right
@hochathanfire0001
@hochathanfire0001 Год назад
Anton Zeilinger, what a name‼️🚬🥃.
@barbarian-furu
@barbarian-furu Месяц назад
what an extraordinary person!
@hochathanfire0001
@hochathanfire0001 Год назад
The quintessential pragmatist; I like 😊.
@globulidoktor1733
@globulidoktor1733 Год назад
Could be Arnold's English-teacher
@wildmanz8233
@wildmanz8233 Год назад
He could give Arnold physics "advices"
@roelrovira5148
@roelrovira5148 7 месяцев назад
Anton, Quantum Entanglement is real not only at microscopic/subatomic scale but also at macroscopic cosmic scale. We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical laws and physical/mathematical equations that are predictive and precise. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA
@onlinelearningguide
@onlinelearningguide Год назад
Great!
@milroynishantha3216
@milroynishantha3216 Год назад
Great All 🙏🇱🇰❤💛
@red-lm2qg
@red-lm2qg 10 месяцев назад
the best lecture!
@Jpetersson
@Jpetersson Год назад
He sounds like Arnold! 😀
@isaacfoot4613
@isaacfoot4613 Год назад
Okay can somebody explain to me what the take from this research is? I'm having a hard time understanding.
@leeds48
@leeds48 11 месяцев назад
Well, the journal Scientific American has an interesting article about it, that's fairly accessible to the non-physicist. Just Google up "Scientific American - the universe is not locally real" and you should be able to get it. Zeilinger's work, in particular, represents a challenge to the philosophical position of Local Realism - roughly, (1) the notion that we exist in a physical universe that exists and has characteristics on its own, independent of our conscious experience/perceptions of it, and (2) the objects can only be influenced by things in their immediate surroundings, and not by something on the other side of the galaxy or universe, for example. We all assume this of course, in our everyday lives. The three scientists honored, including Zeilinger, who has gone the furthest in this regard, have together seemingly disproven Local Realism. According to the article, many feel that their Noble Prize is long overdue. These experiments, and those of others, undercut the notion that we live in real world of physical of time-space. For example, Zeilinger points out near the end of his talk “when you look at the predictions of quantum mechanics for multi-particle entanglement - you can have one measurement here, one there, one earlier, one later - these predictions are completely independent of the relative arrangement of these measurements in space and time.” In other words, they tell us something about the role of space and time - there is no role at all.” Interestingly, it has demonstrated in the last 10 or 20 years in so-called “delayed choice” experiments, such as those mentioned by Zeilinger, that particles seem able to go back in time and change what they did earlier to comport with what humans decide about what and how to measure, later. People use the phrase “go back in time” often metaphorically - what is really being demonstrated is that our experience of linear time is illusory. Zeilinger seems to say at the end of his talk that he favors the idea that what lies at the foundation of our "reality" is not physical stuff, i.e., “matter”, but information - information that constructs the world that we experience. There is a growing segment of physics called "Digital Physics" that holds that we live - if not in a simulation per se, then in something like a simulation, with information at the foundation of it. I don’t know if Zeilinger goes that far, but his views seem to be in that direction. Zeilinger has been overseeing mind-blowing experiments that are changing the way we view our reality. And he’s a really likable human being, too.
@LargePortal
@LargePortal 4 месяца назад
Do you still want an explanation
@bma1955alimarber
@bma1955alimarber 10 месяцев назад
What that is mean the human choices must be considered on three variables?
@aseprohmandar6812
@aseprohmandar6812 Год назад
Good !
@mishy_mix
@mishy_mix 10 месяцев назад
Teleportation is real!! On the subatomic level but still, mind blowing.
@milroynishantha3216
@milroynishantha3216 Год назад
🙏🇱🇰❤💜💛🖤🌟🌟
Далее
New Dyna Skin is OP🥵🔥 | Brawl Stars
00:16
Просмотров 138 тыс.
Sean Carroll - The Particle at the End of the Universe
58:07
What Is Entanglement Anyway? Chris Fields
39:00
Просмотров 270 тыс.
New Dyna Skin is OP🥵🔥 | Brawl Stars
00:16
Просмотров 138 тыс.