Nobody asked for this lens BUT.. // Sony 24-50mm F2.8

Подписаться 123 тыс.

Просмотров 21 тыс.

50% 1

Why did Sony make a 24-50 F2.8 G lens? Who is it for?
Sony 24-50 F2.8 - geni.us/sMSo3wm
FOLLOW ON
▸ Instagram: / chrisbrockhurst
▸ Twitter: / chrisbrockhurs
----------------------------------------------------------
LINK AND THINGS I USE
▸ LUTs I use to grade - geni.us/phanto... (get 15% OFF with code 'Chris')
▸ Artlist (2 Months For Free!): bit.ly/artlist... - My favourite platform with a huge variety of songs + SFX and unlimited licenses.
▸ Book a Coaching/Gear Help Session - geni.us/coachi...
----------------------------------------------------------
GEAR I’M USING IN 2023 (Amazon affiliate links)
CAMERAS
▸ A Camera - geni.us/S-FX3
▸ B Camera - geni.us/sonya7...
▸ Stills and C Camera - Sony A7IV - geni.us/A7iv
▸ Over the top Dad Camcorder -
▸ Old Full Frame Cam (still good!!) - geni.us/SonyA7...
▸ Cheap APSC Cam - geni.us/sonya6...
▸ Drone -
BEST BUDGET LENSES
▸ 50mm - geni.us/sony50...
▸ 24mm F1.8 - geni.us/viltro...
▸ 85mm F1.8 II - geni.us/viltro...
▸ (all in one -) Sigma 24-70 - geni.us/sigma2470
LENSES I USE
▸ Best All round lens - geni.us/sigma2470
▸ Real Estate Lens - geni.us/Sony16...
▸ FAV Lens EVER - geni.us/Sony24...
▸ The BOKEH lens - geni.us/50mmf12
▸ Close up lens - geni.us/sony90...
▸ B Roll Beast Lens - geni.us/Sony85...
▸ Sharpest Lens - geni.us/Sony55...
▸ Zoomy Sniper Lens - geni.us/sony70...
CAMERA ACCESSORIES I USE
▸ Ninja V - geni.us/ninjavcb
▸ FAV Portable Light - geni.us/p1vlog...
▸ A7iii EyeCup - geni.us/Eyecup
▸ A7iii Grip/L Bracket - geni.us/a7iiil...
MICS I USE
▸ Vlog Mic - geni.us/rodevi...
▸ Podcast/RU-vid Mic - geni.us/sm7cb
▸ Camera Mic - geni.us/smic2cb
BAGS
▸ HUGE Backpack - geni.us/lowepr...
▸ Travel Bag - geni.us/peakde...
LIGHTING
▸ Main Studio Light - geni.us/aputur...
▸ Studio light Dome - geni.us/lightd...
▸ Budget Light - geni.us/godoxsl60
▸ Budget light Dome - geni.us/neewer...
▸ Battery powered Light - geni.us/aputur...
▸ Spotlight Zoom (for pattern on wall) - geni.us/spotli...
----------------------------------------------------------
All gear I use: geni.us/amazoncb
Wedding Gear I use on Kit: kit.co/chrisbr...
----------------------------------------------------------
AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE
Some of the links used in the description will direct you to Amazon, as an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
----------------------------------------------------------
SPONSORSHIP/COLLABS
If you are looking to do collaborations, offer sponsorships, or any other requests, hit me up here: Chris@craterr.com
----------------------------------------------------------
#fx3 #a7sⅲ
If you have a question or want to chat, use the Instagram or Twitter links above, thanks!

Опубликовано:

30 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 125

@Bokehmo 7 месяцев назад

✋ It was me. I'm the guy who asked for this.

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Yes! There you are

@Cristhian_Garco 7 месяцев назад

😂😂

@Glen.Danielsen 7 месяцев назад

We knew it was you Bokeh. . . 🫵🏽

@connormorse4746 7 месяцев назад

If I buy it I was planning on pairing with the 85 1.8

@super_guide 7 месяцев назад

🤣🤣🤣 go get your extremely pricey lens🤣

@gpdoyon 4 месяца назад

This lens is for me. It's relatively compact, light, I've got my wide angle, 35mm and 50mm and it won't break the bank. Bottom line for me, this is my perfect travel lens that I can keep on my Sony A7iv. I can't wait for it to be delivered in a couple of days! Great video.

@MariusXMelisa 7 месяцев назад

I was asking for 20-50, not 24 😂😂😂

@shawnchenco 7 месяцев назад

Love you making the diagram helps give people a great explanation of "why".

@ejschiro 7 месяцев назад

I really liked your diagram and sticky notes segment. Entertaining and informative :)

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Ahhhh Thankyou, that was fun to come up with

@ejschiro 7 месяцев назад

@@chrisbrockhurstabsolutely! I know it's tough to come up with new creative ways to review things and this was perfect.

@SPDTDL 7 месяцев назад

Was all in for the rumoured internal zoom. But it’s a pass for this dust sucker.

@paoloeustaquio2248 7 месяцев назад

Great starter lens. ✊😮 But personally, I'd get the Tamron 20-40mm just because I already own some lenses with the rest of the range. 😅 Also, the compact non-extending/minimal extending barrel of the Tamron will save me some time during gimbal use. Btw, you're spot on with the Tamron 35-150mm. It's like a child you'll love anyway despite the flaws 😅😅😅

@temujen 4 месяца назад

I'm torn between these two lenses and really am stuck. The Tamron is much cheaper, it's slightly lighter, and you get the versatility on the wide end. The Sony will have first party benefits as far as stab, is basically parfocal, but is more expensive, and has that reverse zooming. How are you enjoying your 20-40?

@korn3701 7 месяцев назад

I kinda like this range. Not using 24-70 tho.

@markstpierre 7 месяцев назад

Your triangle was an excellent way to describe why this lens now exists. Well done!

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Thankyou

@tourinojacks5844 7 месяцев назад

GREAT breakdown at the end there! That is CLASSIC! Know one does the breakdown as well as you do, my friend! Love it!!

@Jloudr 7 месяцев назад

I own the 24-70GM1 and 20-70/F4, they are both perfect lens, 20-70 with XD motors, super sharp images, wide enough 20mm, which is quite perfect on 20mm-35mm in my opinions, but on the tele end, I prefer a much shallow depth of field, because most of time are capturing medium shots and close ups, which out focus the background will be better, 2.8 can help in this situations, but 24-70GM1 which is quite heavy in my opinion, even the GM2 version not light enough for me, so now the case I use prime lens such as the FE 24, 40, 50 pancake lens more than the 24-70, but with this 24-50/2.8 coming out soon, I think this is a game changer!

@jackpatmoreinc 7 месяцев назад

Would you recommend this lens (Sony 24-50mm) or the Sigma 28-70mm/Tamron28-75mm lens for an all-in-one, compact lens? I know the Sony is a tiny bit smaller and shorter than the others and you get the extra Sony in-body features (focus breathing compensation, etc.), but you also lose 20ish extra mm of reach and it is a few hundred dollars more. Just wanting an extra opinion!

@TheTechCreator22 7 месяцев назад

Love your videos man. I’m always coming here anytime a Sony lens comes out haha! Congrats on making it over 100K!

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Appreciate you 🙏🏼

@lazibayer 6 месяцев назад

I asked for the lens, but not for that price.

@twentyfifthjt7888 7 месяцев назад

Makes me wonder if a F2.8 35-85mm, 35-105mm, 50-105mm or a 50-135mm is in the works. I'm guessing whichever fits the same size as the 24-50mm 2.8 gets done. I'd love a 50-135mm for travel or a 35-105mm. Though of the 4 listed, the 50-105mm 2.8 would probably be the most compact to engineer.

@andora9695 7 месяцев назад

I prefer way more the tamron 20-40 f2.8 versatility !

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

I like that lens too

@o0YumRamen0o 7 месяцев назад

The Sony A7C&R+24mm 2.8 and 50mm 2.5 or this?? Please help!

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

That is a very tough decision. I’d probably get this

@azizisarif 14 дней назад

outdated design... old design but expensive.. dont like change lenght while zoom in/out..

@aparkproduction49 7 месяцев назад

With the amount of digital cropping/zooming you can get these days, it’s a lot easier to extend your reach on the far side. So this lens actually makes a lot of sense. It’s light, fast, cheap, and covers a big range if you don’t mind a little cropping

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

You get it 💪🏻

@stanleyfamUK 7 месяцев назад

Another no nonsense review (your UK accent is coming along nicely) In the UK it will cost around £800 less than the 24-70, weighs a third(?) less, has 20mm at the end of range missing and will probably suit many on a budget better than the 24-70 that only want to carry either one or two lenses. For an all in one travel lens I have always used a 24-105 F4 (which in the UK is £999 avg) it is stabilised, not as light as the 24-50 but not heavy, plus the image quality is great (photo or video), it is due for an update too. I do some sport photography so will use the normal costly GM zooms and primes for that, but the 24-105 is the one on the camera by default or the 24 gm but that’s another story. So, yes an odd announcement but maybe a wise one especially if part of a bundle, plus on an APSC or a full frame cropped mode lit would give extra range. hmmmm

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

I really would love to see an updated 24-105, I think a lot of people feel that same way

@paulgero 7 месяцев назад

@@chrisbrockhurst another great review Chris....I wonder if Sony would make that updated 24-105 an f2.8 version and make their own type of lens like the recent Canon Z lens offering?

@evenhandedcommentor6102 7 месяцев назад

@@chrisbrockhurst I have the 24-105mm and the IQ is not so hot. People like to complain about the 24-70mm GM 1st version, which I also have. The IQ on that one is much better than the 24-105mm. I've checked IQ on two copies of the 24-105mm and they were virtually identical...and I used MTF mapper, so when I say identical, I'm not just blowing smoke.

@WarChortle 7 месяцев назад

imo it needed IS and be F2 for this focal length.

@juki009 7 месяцев назад

if you do that, it loses its appeal as a lightweight travel lens.

@CAMTechChris 6 месяцев назад

Sure no problem. Just double the size and weight and triple the price.

@dannyboy12244 5 месяцев назад

Does a 24-50 really need IS? Sure nice to have but hardly very important unlike telephotos.

@ZooDinghy Месяц назад

A very clever lens. With clear image zoom you get a 24-75mm video lens that is cheaper and more lightweight.

@halimrahman 7 месяцев назад

Agreed with what you said, we do not need every single item (or in this case, lens) each time Sony releases a new one. I am still using 24-70 GM, the first iteration, and nothing is wrong with the less, only missing the aperture ring. BUTTTTTTTTTTTT, that Tamron 35-150mm, despite its weight, I found it to be much more flexible!

@brettgo1 7 месяцев назад

@Chris - It's not really talked about anywhere, but the new 24-50MM/f2.8 has two "specifically optimized" Linear Motors, not the "XD" Linear motors which are typical on all their latest G-series lenses. That said, I haven't ever seen AF side-by-side between the two types of linear motors. They do say this is compatible for the A9 III at 120fps, so I'm a bit confused. Does "specifically optimized" mean better than XD or worse?

@harryvuemedia5106 7 месяцев назад

It's definitely a great lens for videography with its lightweight, 2 XD-linear motor and its focal length range. It may not be a super popular lens, but just to have another lens available is great from Sony already. I remember back in 2016 when there were only a small amount of Sony lenses to choose from compare to today. No matter the zoom range or prime lenses, its great to see more options of lenses to choose from now.

@one901 7 месяцев назад

I prefer the prefer Tamron 20-40 f2.8 because of the 20mm and it’s cheaper

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Still a great lens

@sergioosergioo 7 месяцев назад

I think I still prefer the Sony 20-70mm f4. I have a Sony a7iv and I make video. I was thinking about buying the 20-70mm f4 because it gives me more versatility and I don't think the ISO is a problem with the a7iv. I don't need the extra bokeh, do you agree?

@cedricthompson140 7 месяцев назад

But with your resolution on the IV is loosing the 20mm range worth it when you can just crop with basically no loss and gain 2.8 over 4

@timothysteenwyk2978 7 месяцев назад

@@cedricthompson140 you can crop an image at 70mm too… if you wanted the fov of 100mm or more, it’d look pretty much worse from a 50mm optic

@RecWaltfilm 2 месяца назад

Great video. You think can perform well for the fx30?

@dariusching 6 месяцев назад

Nice diagram to categorise these lens. I have been using sony 24-105mm G lens which has oss in my a7cii. I find it as the most versatile lens for still and videography. It would probably fall on slightly left centre of your diagram.

@IRFAN-po5sz 5 месяцев назад

Hi bro, I have same a7cll camera. I am confusing to get good lens for videography. I am considering 24-105mm OSS. But also thinking towards much expensive option ( 24-70 gmll) What's your recommendation. Does OSS really beneficial in case of 24-105 ?

@dariusching 5 месяцев назад

Hi, because i dont use a gimbal, i would say the oss allowed me to run (ninja moves) while filming. I can even change my camera stabilisation setting to standard instead of active since the latter substantially crop out the footage. Further 24-105mm has the extra reach to capture from birds or far objects. However, with a min of f4 aperture, it is not very effective to film at night. Something to consider.

@IRFAN-po5sz 5 месяцев назад

@@dariusching thank your for the reply. One more question please, can we use active stabilization option in the camera by using this oss lens ? Someone mentioned that with this lens we can not use stabilization option in the camera.

@dariusching 5 месяцев назад

Yes, you can use oss and active stablilsation together.

@MCCraftAdventure 3 месяца назад

I bought this lens with my FX30, I like the idea of having 35mm-75mm equivalent for wedding events etc. Sony's higher build quality with minimal distortion, and seal connection and weather resistant construction along with the smaller form factor and a f2.8 at the cost of $1000 made this my dream lens for having my first Sony Lens and moving from my Tamron 17-70mm f2.8 Now I will miss the ability of getting extremely wide shots for establishing shots, but I think I'll be able to manage the adjustment since I can have my second shooter using a ZV-E10 with the Tamron for any wide shots. Although I wish they had made this a 16-50mm range at f2.8 because that would have been absolute amazing for not only floggers on a full frame camera, but perfect for APS-C SOLO shooters giving a nice perfect 24-75mm range. I Don't understand why they make it so awkward for APS-C videographers to have a nice Sony G lens Zoom Range without having to choose third party APS-C lenses or FULL FRAME lenses

@Samskihero 7 месяцев назад

Sony zooms are somewhat stale, and this is a good sign! Sony's 24-70 GM II is class-leading because it's near enough one of the smallest and lightest 24-70's 2.8's on the market, but all other Sony's offerings like the 20-70 and 24-105 OSS even their power zooms ENG lenses like the 28-135 are all F4's... It's nice to see a 24-50 G (sadly only 50mm) but actually be a F2.8 and remaining light and small and somewhat affordable! It's a really good step! I'm still dreaming of a 20-70 F2.8 or a 24-70 F2.8 w/ OSS within 600-1000g weight range or a smaller ENG zoom like a 24-105 F2.8 OSS Power Zoom within 1.0-1.6g weight range like what canon recently released, Sony offers so many good zooms but they are F4, This is a nice step to get some F2.8 zooms that remain light and are not exclusive G-Masters.

@Thunderbird1337 7 месяцев назад

It's a very nice compact all-purpose lens for average joe who just want to have one single compact lens for everything. But it's a quite boring and unexciting lens as well. It can do everything, but it's not outstanding in any discipline. The 20-70 f4 makes more sense in my opinion, because for landscapes the 20mm is much nicer and you don't shoot landscapes in f2.8 anyways. And for portraits 70mm f4 is in my opinion a nicer look than 50mm f2.8 (noticeably less background which make it appear more smooth). So the 24-50 f2.8 only makes sense when lowlight is the priority. I'd rather crank up the ISO one stop and have 20-70mm, but just my personal opinion.

@bondgabebond4907 5 месяцев назад

It's like this. Didn't ask for it, thought about a lens like this. So, I'd rather go to a buffet than McDonalds for a good variety of 'good' food. I suspect this and the 20-70 are geared towards the compact cameras Sony has released and will release in the future. Better to have a choice than no choice at all.

@xedarkrunner5167 7 месяцев назад

The price is not great for what it is. It will have a hard time competing with Tamron and Sigma alternatives with the 28-75/24-70 lenses. If it was a small bit cheaper, this would be great for travel especially on an R camera with high MP count, making it more versatile with crop mode without sacrificing too much quality.

@GiNodrog 3 месяца назад

I bit the bullet and bought this 24-50mm actually blown me away with the quality . It's now vertualy bolted on my Mrs A7c.

@SatongiFilms 7 месяцев назад

people who buy primes with f1.4 at any focal lenght they want and then just crop in post 👀👀👀

@smoloms 7 месяцев назад

I’d probably get this lens. Especially with the R variant of cameras. Can just punch into apsc mode for the missing long end. Better for travel. I’ll rent an actual 24-70 for paid work

@soprolakido 7 месяцев назад

Tamron have 17 - 50mm, f4, 599 bucks !

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Great lens too

@Glen.Danielsen 7 месяцев назад

Not sure though about f4 though, darn it

@eryk5342 7 месяцев назад

I bought a7iii body recently and wanted to buy compact fast universal lenses for indoor shooting/ evenings, family events, traveling in group, street photography and occasionaly portraits So all in one. My obvious choice was Tamron 20-40 but I know I don't need 20mm wide, and would like to get that 50mm for compressed look. And there it is, sony releases this glass. My problem with this release is that tamron costs half the price, stands it's ground optically, is lighter and smaller, and doesnt extend that much lenght. So when you ask who is this lens for, it's for me.

@cmck1777 7 месяцев назад

my 24-70 is my best lens but I use old Canon glass because it's a pain to carry around.

@dwightlooi 7 месяцев назад

I have been asking for this FOR YEARS. I have always said that the lens I want the most is a 25-50/2.8 (or even 3.3) that is compact and optically superlative. Why? Because it is the perfect walkabout lens. The 70mm angle in a 24-70 is pretty much useless. If you are OK with shooting portraits at 70 you are OK with shooting it a step closer at 50. I'll gladly trade the 70mm for a more compact dimension. The 2.8 aperture is not exactly fast, but good enough for adequate background blurring at portrait distances which F4 typically isn't. -- I have been waiting 30 years for this lens; I'll buy it irrespective of price and I am rather forgiving of it's (honestly) so-so optical performance. The latter being my only gripe. If this is optically equivalent to the 24-70/2.8 just more limited in zoom range, it'll be worth $5,000 to me.

@felipeescobar1987 2 месяца назад

🎉

@stephen. 7 месяцев назад

If I hadn’t found the Sigma 28-70 for $640 around the holidays, I would have got this lens. It’s a really nice lens for traveling and street photography since it’s light and compact

@nightdonutstudio 7 месяцев назад

I want something like 50-135 f2.8. Sony can you make one?

@TheSuperwals 6 месяцев назад

Du coup, pour aller plus loin : • Comment établir son taux journalier lorsqu’on travaille seul (pas d’équipe à charge) ? • Comment se calcule une cession de droits ? D’avance merci !

@meat_loves_wasabi 7 месяцев назад

If it has excellent performance corner to corner it will be a great lens as I want light & compact as carrying the bulky A7R5 all day is aching .. base on other test vids doesn’t seem promising

@lb_projekt 3 месяца назад

hey Chris hi, I've been following your videos for a long time but I would like to ask you something and I would like you to answer honestly... and I ask you because I have always used Sony and I see that you do too... In your opinion Sony is doing well lately? I mean...more and more often lately I've been asking myself "why did he do it?". And an example of this question is precisely this lens. Why did he do it? Why does it continue to produce cameras instead of lenses that are actually useful? And I'll give you the example of the stabilized Canon 14-35 f4. Or the 24/35/50 f1.8 macro always Canon always stabilized. I have the impression that RU-vid now justifies everything that Sony does but in my opinion you as RU-vidrs should be more independent in reviewing a product that is evidently useless like a 24-50. But I always see that in the end they try to find meaning in what they do and it's not right. Here there are people who spend money on cameras that receive ridiculous updates and after 6 months they see a camera come out at half the price that has more useful things. And above all, many lenses are missing...a 16-70 f2.8 apsc...a 24-105 f4 powerzoom...a 56 f1.4 apsc...a 14-24 f4 with the possibility of putting a filter in front to the lens...these are useful lenses for everyone in my opinion. No paying €1600 for a 16-25 and a 24-50. This is my opinion. But I would like to hear your honest opinion. Thank you

@chrisbrockhurst 3 месяца назад

Hey! I’m not too sure I understand the question here. Can you simplify?

@lb_projekt 3 месяца назад

@@chrisbrockhurst Do you think Sony has been doing a good job recently or is there something you as a Sony user would prefer they did?

@chrisbrockhurst 3 месяца назад

Let’s put it this way, I still use Sony for all my videos and filming, despite having access to many of the other options. As it stands I don’t need anything else right now

@lb_projekt 3 месяца назад

@@chrisbrockhurst Thanks for sharing your thoughts

@markstylezproductions9095 7 месяцев назад

I know Canon's just came out and it took a LONG time to get to, but we all want the 24-105 2.8 now lol

@connormorse4746 7 месяцев назад

People are always comparing it to the mark II, I have the a7c. They aren’t that different right?

@JZBZACK 7 месяцев назад

If this was G Master I’d trade in my GM2 24-70.

@Weedeogram 5 месяцев назад

do more on real world shoot showing the 20mm difference on longer range.

@ibraheemsony9947 7 месяцев назад

It cool because it small good for video and it has oss it would great, if has affordable price.

@cbflazaro 5 месяцев назад

Would be nice a lens like this a bit faster. Even if was F2.2

@WarChortle 7 месяцев назад

Sony's engineering team: Let's make 50mm the smallest lens size and when you extend the barrel it'll be 24mm! That's so quirky... I'm not like your ordinary lens... I'm DiFfErEnt.

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Seems to be the way to keep size down. The 16-35 is the same, as is the Tamron 20-40

@arwennstory1013 6 месяцев назад

this should have been the 20-50 F2.8 🤔

@cameratalk3057 7 месяцев назад

Should have been 24-50mm f2 imo

@chriswittstruck282 4 месяца назад

Great vid thanks! Subbed.

@super_guide 7 месяцев назад

Thanks for honest review, whoever buys this lens will make rebalance gimbal, I need internal zoom

@CAMTechChris 6 месяцев назад

Not true. If you set the zoom to 30mm or so and then balance the gimbal you won’t need further adjustment. I do it all the time with my 20-70 f4 and Ronin mini 3.

@zabirmalik2390 6 месяцев назад

Does this lens have video image ibs ?

@thegigabytesphotographyvid3158 7 месяцев назад

Only here for your video Chris, not interested in this lens.

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Ahhh Thankyou

@abdulrahmanazmi7042 7 месяцев назад

I like your explanation with the diagram. Simple explanation but easy to understand.

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Appreciate you 🙏🏼

@arielbadeo5562 7 месяцев назад

Great video and coverage on this lens Chris!

@cyvidal10 7 месяцев назад

why can't we have 16-105mm F1.8

@peterstrachan1794 7 месяцев назад

I wish Sony would stop mucking about. 24-50mm is a useless range for video work. Meanwhile, the 24-70mm GM II isn't parfocal so is useless for filming actuality or observationally. The 20-70mm is parfocal but it's f4 so harder to match up in multi camera set ups with f2.8 lenses and being able to reduce the depth or field as much as possible is really helpful. So, come on Sony, please give us a full frame zoom with a good range like 20-70...20-100 (ish) would be better...that is F2.8, or even F2.0, and parfocal!

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

The reality is that probably won’t happen, the size will be huge (look at tamron 35-150)

@peterstrachan1794 7 месяцев назад

Only 35mm at the wide end and no aperture ring, the Tamron is utterly useless. I suspect think Sony's development of lenses might have more to do with milking the market rather than what technically possible i.e. providing a 20-70mm f2.8 or a parfocal 24-70mm f2.8, lenses we can actually use. Sony are very close, so should be able to address these issues without producing overly large lenses.@rockhurst

@cbflazaro 5 месяцев назад

20-100 F2 would be about 4 kg

@peterstrachan1794 5 месяцев назад

@@cbflazaro A parfocal F2.8 20-70mm would be just fine. And if Sony can manage a little more range at the tighter end for a little extra weight, even better.

@icedtorres 7 месяцев назад

No. I want a 20-300mm F1.2 and not bigger than the Tamron 28-200. hahahahaha

@Tonyrizk13 7 месяцев назад

We asked for swivel screens with good resolution for years when every camera company already had them. If they really cared about their consumers they would make products that make sense, not toy with us like we’re idiots

@CAMTechChris 6 месяцев назад

Then switch to cannon or Nikon

@howyg101 4 дня назад

@@CAMTechChrisor OM

@hasenmyer 7 месяцев назад

The only way this lens makes any sense at all is if there are other lenses in the pipeline that will compliment it

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

I don’t understand how that makes sense but you do you boo

@hasenmyer 7 месяцев назад

@@chrisbrockhurst Not you BOO, I'll see my way OUT

@fofopho 7 месяцев назад

Love this for the Sony lens eco system

@ToviaSinger1 7 месяцев назад

You are good.

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Appreciate you 🙏🏼

@bluetronikk 7 месяцев назад

Can this be paired with a sony FX30

@CAMTechChris 6 месяцев назад

It’s an E mount lens. All recent full frame and apsc Sony cameras are E mount

@gerardneedham 7 месяцев назад

I don’t go past 50mm for my photography and when I do it’s with a 85mm or 135mm

@synesthesiafilms 6 месяцев назад

Copy Tamron and overcharge.

@adrianvasian 7 месяцев назад

congratulations! you've completely failed to even make a passing mention of the tamron 20-40 2.8. disappointing, complete with a diagram! :))

@chrisbrockhurst 7 месяцев назад

Ahhh I’m sorry my free video doesn’t cover exactly what you were looking for, sounds like you can probably do it better so let me know when yours is ready and viewable and I’ll be sure to stop by and leave a sarcastic comment for you too 😊 .. next time also maybe care to read the title.. it literally says Sony so Tamron wouldn’t have made any sense

@Soul_Visuals_Photography 7 месяцев назад

Just make me a 10-1000mm F1.0. And make it the size of your average. 24-70

@sam78882 7 месяцев назад

What would be a good Sony lens to shoot a video from 6-8’ feet on my Sony FX6 to coy a tutorial video so I can watch and learn pays it when needed please let me know thx