@@seancruz534 bro let it die already it is literally in its coffin waiting to die out that poor meme is on its 3rd last breathe it most likely wants to die
To nogla when he was talking about the angles and the numbers I believe acute and obtuse count as obtuse angles are from 90 to 180 degrees after that point it’s a reflex angle so you are correct but 180 would be the limit as an obtuse angle can’t be 180 or 90 degrees Edit I also forgot to mention right angles aka 90 degree angles count But love you nogla and terroriser hope you have an amazing day you make everyone day just that little brighter
To clarify to the absolute extreme, there are 6 types of angles on the kind of 360° plane Nogla is discussing. 1. A straight angle, this is the only type of angle to be possible at more than one degree but not within a range of degrees. That is because both 0° and 180° angles are straight angles, which most people would simply call lines. 2. Acute angles, one of the sources of confusion for Nogla. These are angles between 0° and 90°, non-inclusive, which means 0° and 90° are not acute angles but literally anything between them (from 0.00007° to 89.99999°) is an acute angle. 3. Right angles, one we're probably all familiar with; these are 90° angles only. While it might seem like both 90° and 270° should be right angles like straight angles, a 90° angle can be marked by two straight lines perpendicular to the lines forming the angle, while a 270° angle cannot. These are relevant in this issue but Nogla probably just skipped over them for simplicity's sake rather than mixing them up. 4. Obtuse angles, the primary mix-up in the video. These are angles between 90° and 180°, not all angles greater than 90°. Counting obtuse angles in the later numbers does not ruin this system for the earlier numbers because they have no obtuse angles. 5. Reflex angles, which is what Nogla conflates into obtuse angles. These are angles between 180° and 360°, non-inclusive as always, and these are one of the 3 types of angles that are not counted in this number system; one I have previously mentioned, straight angles, while the next I have not and is largely irrelevant to the number system, but worth mentioning because it can also be a source of confusion. 6. Full rotation. This is a 360° angle; while it might seem like this should fall under straight angles, it doesn't, and unfortunately I don't have a good simple explanation like I did for 270° not being a right angle. The best way I can try to explain it is like 0° being 3:45 on an analog clock, whereas 180° would be 9:15, and 360° would be 3:15. See how the hands of the clock form the same shape for 180° and 0°, just rotated, while the 360° hands form a different shape? That's the best simplification I have off the top of my head. With all those definitions out of the way, we can better define the angles that need to be counted to equal the value of the number, the defining tenet of this system, as the number of "non-linear angles on a 180° plane"; this eliminates straight angles, which you technically have an infinite amount of any time you are able to form any other angle, as well as reflex angles and full rotations, which exceed the discussed plane of 180° (you could technically count the full rotation as a linear angle as well, as you can only really prove the difference between a 360° and 180° or 0° angle when you're dealing with a change in angle, so static angles don't really differentiate them). TL;DR: Nogla is wrong and anybody bothering to read all this probably would've preferred I called him a nincompoop or something.
@@notnath14 he’s not wrong about the numbers he’s just wrong calling them obtuse is what your saying. You went very far just to try to make a way in which he’s wrong, his point still stands that’s there’s more angles then counted per number
@@scoobsshrooms109 The point of my comment is basically to go into as much depth as possible rather than prove Nogla wrong; my TLDR is just me being tongue in cheek at how much I wrote for something so inconsequential. To be completely accurate here, the idea of this angle rule for arabic numerals being intentional design is at best unsubstantiated, and more likely just a complete myth. However, the rule does work provided you actually outline it properly, which is more the narrator's fault than Nogla's; Nogla's mistake regarding obtuse vs reflex angles doesn't exactly invalidate his argument so much as make the whole situation even more confusing. Basically, Nogla saying there are more angles than the value of the numbers and therefore this is false isn't wrong; it's just right for the wrong reasons. Technically, any static line could be two lines meeting at a 0°, 180°, or 360° angle, so you can argue even a single line has an infinite amount of angles along it, but that would obviously serve no purpose which is why no one ever says this (and Nogla doesn't make this argument, I simply wanted to show why some types of angles obviously had to be exempt from the rule). Nogla saying the greater numbers don't work because they have too many obtuse angles, however, is wrong, because it's reflex angles that are responsible for throwing off the count, but this is just a simple mistake. But once again that doesn't prove Nogla's point against the actual rule, because the rule should specify that reflex angles aren't included, and it was the narrator who left this out so Nogla can't be blamed for that. However, even if the narrator properly explained the rule, while Nogla's logic would be wrong, he'd still be right that the story behind the rule is false; that's because there's no evidence that the numerals were intentionally designed this way, though, not that the rule itself is wrong. The rule holds true but was only applied to the numerals retroactively, so the better point to argue would be that they weren't intentionally designed that way and the rule was contrived to work with the numerals; a very simple argument for this is that the whole thing falls apart the second you aren't dealing with single digit numerals, and arabian numerals were absolutely designed to be used in multiple digit-values.
Gotta love staying up till 00:10 on a Tuesday night to watch David and Brian laugh at some videos and make me laugh along with them. All the love from Dublin lads!
Im glad you made that channel. After all those years of watching your vids, every day I was hungry for more. I loved Terroriser Snapchat vid, vlogs etc. Your react channel has filled that hole. Love you I wish I could get to know you.
13:10 I agree with Brian, it was also the one of the first thoughts that came to mind. “Well this is stupid. How do they do lockdowns? Jesus Christ, what if an active shooter showed up!”
There were 51 school shootings that resulted in injury or death of kids in 2022. There are 115,576 schools in America. The minimum amount of school days legally are 180 school days.
Love how Nogla payed Brian less because he left,AND if that wasn't enough,decides to poke fun of his old haircut by comparing it to a fish,gotta love this man
Feather pillows are awful. They got those random sharp feather tips that stick out and poke you, the feathers come through the pillow at times, and also I'm super allergic to it.
16:50 The rule of the angles on the numbers would be that it can’t be more than 180 degrees. Observing how it’s displayed explains that. So, I don’t really see what it is that you’re refuting.
The truck didn’t disperse the electricity from the strike, it is all the rubber that is throughout the truck like the tires on a vehicle, there is so much rubber like things, gaskets, hoses, weather stripping, interior pieces yeah one of the safest places to be could be in a vehicle because since lightning strikes up, the tires are the very first things that contact the road
9:35 thats a chill cop though and someone who understands bikes, he probs just gave that simple warning because while yes, dude was going fast, he wasnt going stupid fast... cop probably is a very cool person tbh
I really hope that his kid will be of average intelligence, the man does not take a second to think about if he is wrong and often just fights on a hill.
I know the scarab statue that the lady walks around, visited it years ago, it's in Egypt and local story says that if you walk around it 16 or 20 times you will find love.
1:51 it's a compressor stall, it's when smooth airflow over the intake blades gets disrupted by something, usually a bird, and causes the engine stall and then re-ignite creating the backfiring and intense vibrations. it seems scary with the fire and shuttering but 90% of the time it's not a huge deal, recovery is simply pull that engine to idle check the engine status on the eicas then slowly feed the power back in allowing the blades to recover if it does it again then they'll secure and shut down that engine and divert or return to the departure airport, almost all airliners can fly on one engine, the second is just there for better performance so you'll be fine.
1:58 Aviation mechanic in training here. Can say that has to be a compressor stall. Air got messed up in the cycle of producing power to fly. Common on mid range airliners. Usually means that you end up turning around or just finish the flight.
If it makes you feel better, kids have a higher chance of getting struck by lightning than being in a school shooting. Unless they're in a "gun free zone". Then it's more comparable to having a higher chance of dying in a car crash
12:44 problem is that my old school had the same layout for a year, zero ability to concentrate on your own class. Walls were swiftly put up during the summer
"On the way to germany this plane experienced some major turbulance, although no one was hurt the cabin did smell strongly of shit for the remainder of the flight."
I used to regularly escort a deaf customer to the front of the cinema back when i worked in one and he often had that app reading his messages and I could never figure out how it worked till now
So, 7:26 The aircraft has boxes and antennas designed to release static electricity safely. Of course it’s a bit nerve wracking having to fly through clouds and see that but it’s at the same time very cool and satisfying!
17:38 The one and only time I saw one of those vibrating machines in public (they were trying to sell them at a huge mall) I thought let's see how balanced it is when you sit on one side. Damn thing repeatedly flung me into the air and sent me into a fit of laughter.
6:21 Brian they do this everywhere especially highways. Funny cuz If it snows really bad really late or early in the morning the freeway could have 20 in of snow because they have to get together at so early
13:07 My mind was on the people with ADD/ADHD, and how difficult it would be to concentrate when you're hearing all the other lectures....Brian's brain went in a different direction.
