NoName (Atheist) Wrecks Gregory, PMars, and Mole (Christian) on The Transcendental Argument for God 

Agreed

He sounds like JRobin, doesn't he?

@@guitarista67 I don't think so.

Gregory is fun!

That was certainly a fun one!

Funny

I don't have a link, I apologize. It's probably something bahnsen related since it's pmars though.

LOL

It is just JTB.

Right!

Your definition is right 👍

Knowledge is generally just justified true belief.

@@realBreakfasttacos Generally it is. Just don't forget about perceptual knowledge, like the knowing of your hands or the knowing of the blueness of the sky. There's also knowledge as skill, which is another cool form of knowledge

@@realBreakfasttacos That's more concise, thanks, I'll use it in future. I understand the content of what has been said most of the times if it's not pure philosophy talks but I lack any background in philosophy so I struggle with the names and labels used

@@grogash90 Don't be afraid to use google or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

LOL

@@realBreakfasttacos Mate,I can’t even see the comments on his post here!,what a triggered snowflake ❄️ 🤣

@@SabracadabrO You should be able to see the comments on here, they aren't hidden.

@@realBreakfasttacos Nope,just checked,its the replies i can’t see,& i can’t comment on his post,Anywhere!,i don’t know why he banned me,but Pinecreak & Dillahunty/JimmyFkface are the same,i’m watchin your Stream Theist Hell Line right now..,they all purveyors of Truth,understanding & the grifter way of”rules for me not for thee🕺🏽Stay Chill\;;/,i subbed fo Satan the Coolest😎

:(

So you do think the laws of logic have some sort of ontological existence outside of a conceptual nature?

@@realBreakfasttacos the laws of logic necessitate a mind which precedes human beings minds. A = A is not identical to what’s being described. So when you say conceptual realm, if that presupposes that only human minds exist, then I’d reject it.

You can say this about anything. He’s just talking about how knowledge works on a view where minds are/or supervene on brains.

⁠@@MadebyJimbobA = A is just a concept that refers to the fact that particulars are always themselves at any time index. What are the laws of logic if not the common sense interpretation? How do they prescribe behavior/properties to particulars?

@@MadebyJimbob What an odd claim to make. We actually invented the laws of logic around 300 BCE. These are used in systems of logic. They are prescriptive laws to systems of logic. They do not exist outside of the systems of logic and our conceptual nature.