nonfiction books I enjoyed reading

Подписаться 39 тыс.

Просмотров 1 тыс.

50% 1

Here are some of the non fiction books I enjoyed reading over the past few years.
📚enjoyable nonfiction books
00:00 intro
00:08 Caesar by Adrian Goldsworthy
01:48 the righteous mind by Jonathan Haidt
04:18 mythology by Edith Hamilton
05:45 the language instinct by Steven Pinker
09:53 the portable Jung by Joseph Campbell
13:30 outro
📕 my first book: knowing nothing.
A general overview of skepticism and the implications it has for philosophy, society, and life.
buy here: www.amazon.com/dp/B08ZBM2SY6/
📕 my second book: meditations. A collection of essays that cover various topics like the nature of social power or the cyclic nature of life.
buy here: www.amazon.com/dp/B0CL23VB2J
More of my writings:
💻my website: ideasinhat.com/
#books #nonfiction #booktube

Опубликовано:

12 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 33

@IdeasInHat 26 дней назад

which books did you enjoy reading?

@dkeeks 26 дней назад

Theology, Philosophy, Fantasy

@ananyasaikia6784 26 дней назад

1. Saving Normal by Allen Frances 2. Groowing up human : The evolution of childhood by Brenna Hassett (a bioarcheologist)

@IdeasInHat 26 дней назад

@@ananyasaikia6784 that second one seems interesting, I will look it up.

@bn8418 26 дней назад

Related to the topic of empiricism / pragmatism & consciousness... I enjoyed and recommend 'The Marriage of Sense and Soul' by Ken Wilber. Im curious to hear your thoughts on that book or his 'Brief History of Everything'' by same author. Thank you for your great videos / recommendations by the way!

@IdeasInHat 26 дней назад

@@bn8418 I will look these both up. I think I have seen the history of everything in the bookstore a few times now.

@Ipod2000Z 26 дней назад

decoding jung´s metaphysics by bernardo kastrup. have not read it myself yet, but it could be something to your interest.

@bunnygirlerika9489 25 дней назад

And now I'm probably gonna buy righteous mind on my next book haul, so thanks once again for encouraging my book and reading additcion lol. What would be a good Steven Pinker book to start with?

@IdeasInHat 25 дней назад

I really liked his blank slate, but better angels of our nature is also dope. Either of those would be a good start.

@anjitnarwal6676 26 дней назад

I am reading Metaphors We Live by and The Weirdest People in the World. Great books. I recently read Awe by Dacher Keltner, which was awesome.

@IdeasInHat 26 дней назад

I loved metaphors. I bought both authors other books. Lakoff is a pretty interesting writer.

@dkeeks 26 дней назад

5:57 respectfully, what strong opinions of topics are you referring too? Just to clarify because I don’t know.

@IdeasInHat 26 дней назад

He believes, for instance, that emotions are largely genetic; that adopted children are likely to suffer more abuse from their parents since they are not genetically related; that wars had higher per capita deaths earlier in history than today; that communism failed and had killed millions of people. Etc etc. Soo many, haha. He even wrote an article saying Lakoffs notion of embodied cognition was a rejection of Truth. I could go on.

@dkeeks 26 дней назад

@@IdeasInHat thank you for sharing, I’ll investigate this further for my own knowledge.

@IdeasInHat 26 дней назад

@@dkeeks check out better angels of our nature, and the blank slate. Those are two really good books of his!

@dkeeks 26 дней назад

@@IdeasInHat I did enjoy his End of Enlightenment book and Rationality

@Lee-kf9tq 26 дней назад

@@IdeasInHat communism did kill millions of people. Millions by the nazis, tens of millions in soviet Russia and I don't even know about the number under Mao. That's not a belief, those are facts.

@NoeHernandezPe767 25 дней назад

4:31 wait, “he”? Edith Hamilton a “he”? I feel you’re way too accustomed to male authors, even to the point that again you referred to Edith Hamilton as a he around 5:26

@IdeasInHat 25 дней назад

What do you mean by "way too accustomed"? And yeah, most of the books I own are written by males, but not because I go out trying to buy books written by males. So, I will just unconsciously default to authors being male. Similarly, almost all my law and linguistics books are written by Jewish authors: Pinker, Chomsky, Lakoff, HLA Hart, Dworkin, Barnett, etc etc. But I don't go out of my way to buy non-Jewish authors on the topic. I actually don't care about the authors pretty much at all. I will actually put a book down if there is too much academic narcissism. If I buy a book on neuroscience, I don't want to hear about your personal life.

@mongolianqwerty123 22 дня назад

@@IdeasInHat I would suggest it might be worthwhile to venture outside of Jewish thinking on Law in order to gain wider perspective on the subject. Carl Schmitt's juridical thinking is clearly at odds with Law developed from Hebraic tradition, for example

@IdeasInHat 22 дня назад

@@mongolianqwerty123 Barnett is an American contract law professor. He's not writing from the perspective of Judaism. He just happens to be jewish.

@mongolianqwerty123 22 дня назад

@@IdeasInHat Right, but it still behooves us to read thinkers who don't all belong to the same ethno-religious group on a given subject. Even if ones race or faith or class has no overt bearing on ones argument, it may still inform it peripherally. Secular law was born out of religious law, after all

@IdeasInHat 22 дня назад

@@mongolianqwerty123 If this was about cultural philosophy, then yes. But American contract law has axioms, cases, and rules. So whether a jew or non-jew tells me 1+1=2 doesn't matter. I don't think being a jew biases your opinion on case law. I understand how culture, not ethnicity, can influence beliefs on topics like ethics or religion. But I don't see how it matters when you are communicating a fact.