Тёмный

Norway Math Olympiad Question | You should be able to solve this! 

LKLogic
Подписаться 2,9 млн
Просмотров 1,3 млн
50% 1

Some of the most important benefits of participating in math Olympiads include: Improving Problem-Solving Skills: Math Olympiads involve solving complex and challenging math problems. This helps students develop critical thinking and problem-solving skills, which are important for success in many fields.

Опубликовано:

 

29 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 957   
@chessandmathguy
@chessandmathguy Год назад
Much simpler to just calculate 2^18 first, then minus 1. I don't see why 511*513 is any easier to calculate than 512*512.
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 Год назад
It's far much easier to use the fact that 2^17 is 131072 (address of start of screen memory in a Sinclair QL), double it and subtract 1...
@trashwebsite_user01
@trashwebsite_user01 Год назад
Exactly what i was thinking 😊
@The_Real_Sensei
@The_Real_Sensei Год назад
How are you going to calculate 2^18 though?
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 Год назад
@@The_Real_Sensei A well known value is 2^16 = 65536. Or more inaccurately, it is well known to those of us who played with 8 bit micros, where 65536 = 64 old kb which is the maximum amount of memory an 8 bit processor with a 16 bit address bus (eg 6502, 6800, Z80, 8080) could access (directly).
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 Год назад
@@The_Real_Sensei Last night we were catching up on an Only Connect episode from 5 or 6 weeks ago. One sequence question was: What comes 4th in the sequence: 65536256, 25616, 164 The answer was 42 as each "number" is made up of a number and its square root, the square root of one starting the next. The first "number" 65536256 is 65536 (2^16) = 256^2 ((2^8)^2).
@yurizappa268
@yurizappa268 Год назад
As a computer enthusiast I remember powers of 2 up to 2^16 at least which is 65536. Then I multiply it by 4 and subtract 1.
@xxxAzhraelxxx
@xxxAzhraelxxx Год назад
So I am not the only one. 🙂
@chrisw4562
@chrisw4562 Год назад
Excellent! My math brain told me 2^10 = 1024, then multiply by 256 and subtract one. Easy.
@TontonZen
@TontonZen Год назад
Same initial reasoning... But then 2^9 is like the max byte size times two which is 512, square that and subtract 1. Rather easy.
@jcb3393
@jcb3393 Год назад
@@chrisw4562 that's what I did as well
@ceejay0137
@ceejay0137 Год назад
Yes, if you remember 2^16 = 65536 then multiply by 4 and subtract 1 is quicker than the method in the video.
@Pasan34
@Pasan34 Год назад
This cannot possibly be a math Olympiad question. This is way too easy.
@cppdeveloper
@cppdeveloper 11 месяцев назад
It's Math in Norway - not in China or USA or Russia. Their approach is like - "choose the only topics in science you want to learn because we think about you mental health in childhood". Study in China or Russia: "Ok, it's 23:00 pm - you can go to sleep for 3 hours. We will continue tomorrow at 5pm. That's why these counties win Olympiads 😂
@animeditstv2628
@animeditstv2628 2 месяца назад
@@cppdeveloper yeah true, in my country, they teach us unnecessary subjects
@valerykreidenko5562
@valerykreidenko5562 Месяц назад
If you remeber that 2^10=1024, 2^18 = 1024x1024/4. The division first will bring ...6 (divide 24 only by 4), then 6 multiplied by 1024 will bring 4 as the last digit. Can be done in the head like 5 seconds.
@Santiago.Ag11
@Santiago.Ag11 Месяц назад
This is cool; using the mathematical principles that we already know in unorthodox ways is a good way to strengthen one's skills
@wayneyadams
@wayneyadams 2 месяца назад
I did this in my head a little differently, but it could be done on paper the same way. Binary numbers are easy to work with and from computer experience, I know that 2^8 = 256, so 2^9 = 512. So, 512 is squared by (500 + 12) x(500 + 12), we know that (a + b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2. The rest is trivial, 500^2 = 250,000. 2 x 500 x 12 = 1,000 x 12 = 12,000, and 12 x 12 = 144. 250 + 12 = 262, so we have262,000 + 144 - 1 = 262,143. If you are not familiar with binary numbers, it is a simple matter to count up, 2, 4, 8,, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512.
@marvaff6878
@marvaff6878 9 месяцев назад
Though there are many ways to arrive at a solution, this one really beat around the bush lol
@navidmohammadzadeh2141
@navidmohammadzadeh2141 Месяц назад
I'd write 2^18 = (2^3)^2^3 =(8^2)^3 = 64^3 = 64 x 64 x 64 = 262,144 ----> then subtract one unit, resulting to 262,143 :)
@thevibetree1
@thevibetree1 6 месяцев назад
you can use congruence of numbers to solve this also a to the n and b to n identity
@mathiq56
@mathiq56 5 месяцев назад
I have math channel,watch please
@ThomasJr
@ThomasJr 24 дня назад
I prefer (2^10)^2 / 4 = (1000^2+2*24*1000+24^2)/4 = 1,000,000/4+12000+12^2 -> 262143 (minus 1)
@frolstty
@frolstty 8 месяцев назад
Thanks, but It isnt olimpic way to do It. The better way I Saw the resolution is: 2^18 = 2*9 * 2*9 = 512*512 = (500+12)(500+12) = 500² + 2*12*500 + 12² = 250.000 + 12.000 + 144. Subtracting -1, we have 262.143 without a lot of multiplications
@shuvankr
@shuvankr 7 месяцев назад
2^18=4^9=64^3=64*64*64=262,144 That minus 1=262,143 Multiplication is cool, it doesn't bite you.. Try it for small numbers. 😉
@vidhyarajendran2263
@vidhyarajendran2263 Год назад
Mam... It is difficult to understand.please explain easily.
@thenetsurferboy
@thenetsurferboy Год назад
She only needs to put = under = and not bring a and b into it
@DoorKaRaahi
@DoorKaRaahi Год назад
Which part you did not understand?
@johnsparrow4627
@johnsparrow4627 3 месяца назад
Is this the intellectual level of Norvegiens? In five second you solve it with the calculator.
@Dalkil
@Dalkil 11 месяцев назад
If this was really an Olympiad question, the level is decaying... 😅
@mantis1412
@mantis1412 8 месяцев назад
((500X500) + 2(500X12) + (12X12))-1
@jimmy21584
@jimmy21584 2 месяца назад
I’m a programmer, so I already have all the powers of 2 burned into my brain. So just minus one.
@bipulbasak1514
@bipulbasak1514 Год назад
I literally multiplied 2 by itself 18 times and found the answer faster than her 💀💀
@boldibrown8533
@boldibrown8533 Год назад
They probably wanted to see how you got to the solution. Just by multiplying 2 by 18 times is not enough for an actual solution.
@marcelolage1395
@marcelolage1395 11 месяцев назад
​​@@boldibrown8533it is exactly the solution. Unless they stated that you needed to use something specific. Computing it is a way to solve
@samueldeandrade8535
@samueldeandrade8535 8 месяцев назад
​@@boldibrown8533 hahahaha. What? Sucessive multiplication is a solution just fine. Stop talking silly things.
@huntbat
@huntbat 7 месяцев назад
@@samueldeandrade8535 the thing is, in an exam, its completely impractical. You don't time to waste. yes i might use it as a last resort but doing this method is much faster.
@samueldeandrade8535
@samueldeandrade8535 7 месяцев назад
@@huntbat man, some people are very fast with multiplications. Also, calculating 2¹⁸-1 shouldn't even be in a test.
@haweater1555
@haweater1555 Год назад
The correct answer, in binary, is: 111111111111111111.
@stiryualaghani8960
@stiryualaghani8960 11 месяцев назад
Thats big brain move
@lnmukund6152
@lnmukund6152 11 месяцев назад
This is wrong answer Mukundsir
@VitorJKhan
@VitorJKhan 10 месяцев назад
No specific easy answer.
@AFff-o4z
@AFff-o4z 8 месяцев назад
Antora islam riya
@austin4768
@austin4768 7 месяцев назад
Yeah I thought this is what the answer was gonna be when I saw the thumbnail - it’s a super boring problem if it’s just base 10
@percykim
@percykim Год назад
Just wanted to share a different approach: 2^18 - 1 = 2^10 x 2^2 x 2^6 - 1 = 1024 x 4 x 64 - 1 = 4096 x 64 = 262 144 - 1 = 262 143
@Andreeditsbr
@Andreeditsbr Год назад
​@bangel7513no!!
@makalaga56
@makalaga56 Год назад
or just 2^9*2^9-1=512x512-1 :P
@abeljacobi4221
@abeljacobi4221 Год назад
@@makalaga56Yes, that’s more straightforward and even easier to calculate than 513x511.
@mohamedrefaei1475
@mohamedrefaei1475 9 месяцев назад
Fuck dis shit
@SuperAnangs
@SuperAnangs 8 месяцев назад
​@bangel7513 only typo
@mater5930
@mater5930 Год назад
Is there a reason why we would know what 2^9 is and not know what 2^18 is? That is really the essence of this problem.
@davidbornstein9197
@davidbornstein9197 Год назад
Yes 2 to the 9 you can do in your head
@mater5930
@mater5930 Год назад
@@davidbornstein9197 You are right. But than the essence of this problem is brute calculation. There is nothing elegant about it. Besides, the power to which a person can calculate an exponent is subjective. Mathematic solutions are most powerful when the method minimize or completely remove the need for brute force calculations.
@jkchandravanshi
@jkchandravanshi Год назад
U r right. It is very simple. 512 x 512 - 1 = 2,62,143
@jkchandravanshi
@jkchandravanshi Год назад
Simply do: 512 x 512 - 1 = 2,62,143 What is the point in beating around the bush?
@mattpantyhose5666
@mattpantyhose5666 Год назад
You're in the internet land. You should know all the powers of 2, up until 10. Because 1024 is an important round number in the world of computer science. :-)
@walterengler5709
@walterengler5709 Год назад
2 to the 18th is 2 to the 16th times 4 (or 2 squared). Anyone with a computer brain knows 2 to the 16th is 65536 (good old computer memory and bits). So times 4 is 262144, subtract 1 = 262143. Everyone should be able to do this in the modern world in their head.
@forcelifeforce
@forcelifeforce Год назад
Wrong! You wrote a stupid comment. Everyone should *not* able to do this in the modern world in their head! The large majority should not be able to do it. Get educated about people and don't make foolish posts such as this.
@theyassinez1
@theyassinez1 Год назад
I'm an software engineer and I still don't remember all the powers of two from the top of my head nor should I have to...
@walterengler5709
@walterengler5709 Год назад
@@theyassinez1 Heresy! Blasphemer! Could not resist lol. I am old school, even know how to use a slide rule lol. It's amazing sometimes describing to some kids these days how the 8 bits are used in all the ASCII font tables. I love flipping a set of text into Ascii on them when they can't find an error and point out how that spot is not a 40 hence it's not a space, it's something else that merely displays as space like which is causing the data issue. They never think of that. They are so visual these days so dependent on all the code we wrote in the past to do everything for them. Sigh.
@sdscode
@sdscode Год назад
Agreed, however the idea is to be able to follow a process more than just express a result, I think.
@Wordsalad69420
@Wordsalad69420 Год назад
@@theyassinez1As a software engineer you should know 2 to the 16 because it’s the size of a short.
@raviedavieu
@raviedavieu 7 месяцев назад
1:02 "As we know, 2 to the power of 9 is equal to 512" fym we know I don't know are we supposed to???? Anyways serious commendments for having that knowledge
@raviedavieu
@raviedavieu 7 месяцев назад
P.S. Dang with the method I used, I got 262655 I wonder where I went wrong (didn't write it down on paper I just used my keyboard to type it out and delete as I went)
@paulwomack5866
@paulwomack5866 11 месяцев назад
Children of the 8 bit era certainly know all the powers of 2 up to 16; So if you already know that 2^16 is 65536 you may as well go for the direct route. Either double it twice, or multiple by 4 (which ever you find easiest) and subtract 1.
@byt5
@byt5 10 месяцев назад
​@@vdamkyна 2 просто умножить...
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 9 месяцев назад
@@vdamky Technically we actually move the digits through the place value columns left (multiply) or right (divide). However, on paper it is easier to move the _decimal point_ than to shift the digits as we implicitly know the place value columns and it is the decimal point that is visible[1] which tells us where the place value columns apply to the number. [1] If the decimal point is not visible (as the number is an integer) then it is taken to be after the last digit which is in the units place value column.
@martschkiperov4694
@martschkiperov4694 9 месяцев назад
even starting from only 8bit 256 it takes shorter time, that was spent in the video
@2002budokan
@2002budokan 8 месяцев назад
I'm one of them C64's 6502 assembler's magic limit was 65535 or 0xFFFF (next number 2^16). 65536*4-1
@petepeterson5337
@petepeterson5337 8 месяцев назад
That's how I did it Paul!
@yvesdelombaerde5909
@yvesdelombaerde5909 Год назад
I do not see how this is more simple than 512x512-1. We all know 2^16=65536, so double it twice in a row and substract 1. More over 513x511 is quite obvious, 1x513 is obvious and everybody knows 13x5=65
@joseguilhermelira9461
@joseguilhermelira9461 Год назад
Prefiro multiplicar 512 por 512 e subtrair da unidade Em duas linhas o problema é resolvido
@editorx2023
@editorx2023 Год назад
Ué... não dá mais de 2 linhas amigo? 4 se não me engano
@evandroa4845
@evandroa4845 Год назад
@@editorx2023 Sim, dá mais de 2 linhas, mas é muito mais rápido que a solução do vídeo. Dá pra fazer em menos de 1 minuto
@Vinicius_A_
@Vinicius_A_ Год назад
Eu fiz 17 contas, mas multiplicar por 2 é muito fácil e rápido, saiu bem mais rápido do que no vídeo, e de certa forma meus neurônios ainda estão intactos
@editorx2023
@editorx2023 Год назад
@@evandroa4845 inacreditível
@aisawaloki1571
@aisawaloki1571 6 месяцев назад
as a programmer, I have remembered many 2^x values without calculating them, for example, 2^24 is 16777216 and 2^16 is 65536. Oh yes, 2^18 is 262144, so if it is minused by 1😊
@佐藤広-q2u
@佐藤広-q2u Год назад
Since there are many similar problems, most people probably know how to calculate them easily without making mistakes. You need not stick to the factorization formula. There are also concrete examples in this comment section. As a solution method, (1) decompose them into round numbers. That is, 2¹⁰ =1024=1000+24, 2⁹ =512=500+12, 2⁸ =256=250+6. (2) subtraction should be avoided, and addition should not carry over (no overlap of the same digits). It is unavoidable that there is a single overlap in this problem.
@Dhritiraj_Deka
@Dhritiraj_Deka 11 месяцев назад
This is how we make an easy mathematics question into a complicated one
@ClaudiuColteu
@ClaudiuColteu 9 месяцев назад
This is click bait or padding on the back making you believe that you can understand an Olympiad problem. Seriously a square minus b square is 6th grade regular curriculum.
@aumotion
@aumotion Год назад
we might know 2^18 = 2^(6*3) as being the number of RGB colors you can encode when each Red, Green, Blue color component has 6bits resolution (64 levels) and that number is 262144 ... at least people should know 2^10 = 1024 and 2^16 = 65536 ;)
@oneyearstranger
@oneyearstranger Год назад
Pragmatic reasoning.
@YourSource777
@YourSource777 Год назад
65537 is 2^16+1 is well know prime number.
@StressFreeLife-n1r
@StressFreeLife-n1r 5 месяцев назад
I have more options which is easier and faster than her. She is using longest and complecated method.🙁
@Gredddfe
@Gredddfe 11 месяцев назад
This one is hilarious. When I saw it I thought, surely you just solve it using arithmetic? But hey if there's a trick to working with exponents of 2 I've love to know it. No - you go through a convoluted process which gets you nowhere, then just solve using arithmetic anyway.
@DeeDeifiesGayo
@DeeDeifiesGayo Год назад
We could just do 513x511 and it would be done so much faster ;-;
@eblan7689
@eblan7689 Год назад
I'd better do (2⁹)² - 1 = 512² - 1 = 262144 - 1 = 262144 The rest is not necessary.
@JayTemple
@JayTemple Год назад
Duh, it's 111 111 111 111 111 111. Hey, you didn't specify the number base.
@gamingnarrativesandstories1700
With the base numberof 2, it is easy to double the first at least10 - 12 times. And with pen and paper, you have no problem reaching 18. This is easily grinded out without fancy math shortcuts :)
@GwynLewis-d5h
@GwynLewis-d5h Год назад
Why all the complicated brackets and splitting, adding, subtracting, changing powers? I don't understand any of it. Why doesn't she just go 2*2 18 times and the take one away? I got the answer that way by about 90 seconds and just needed my fingers to keep track of the multiples and my head to multiply by 2. Why make it so hard?
@QUABLEDISTOCFICKLEPO
@QUABLEDISTOCFICKLEPO Год назад
It took me awhile, but I finally realized that this was quite an easy problem, and I thought that I might be able to do it in my head by simply doubling 18 times. Well, I didn't get that far on my first three attempts. but I now know that I can do it...eventually. How far did I get? Thirteen or fourteen times, but that was good enough for me. I now know that I can solve the problem in my head if I try long enough.
@swayam3010
@swayam3010 6 месяцев назад
Hey. Just take the tenth power of 2 i.e. 1024, multiply it by itself, and divide the result by 4.... subtract 1 from the resulting value to get 262143
@renujamwal6694
@renujamwal6694 2 дня назад
@johnfox2483
@johnfox2483 Год назад
Well ... first question should be, what kind of result is expected. Because 2^18-1 is pretty nice. 11111..11 binary is also good. It seems, that normal writing multiplying 513*511 is also trivial. And if I use pretty known fact, that 2^16=65536 ? Two addition and almost done.
@nothing2believe
@nothing2believe Год назад
De tête, la réponse est : 111 111 111 111 111 111 (en base 2). Beaucoup plus simple 😅
@yogeshwarrao1506
@yogeshwarrao1506 Год назад
In 2^n, for n = 1, unit place digit is 2 For n = 2, unit palce is 4 For n = 3, unit place is 8 For n = 4, unit place is 6 This cycle of 2, 4, 8, 6 will repeat for every power of form 4m+1, 4m+2, 4m+3, 4m+4. So if n = 18 it is of form 4m+2 so units place is 4, and subtracting 1 from it will give 3.
@ilishasrivastava6166
@ilishasrivastava6166 11 месяцев назад
lol in India, we use an identity to do 511*513, it's basically, (x+a)(x+b)=x^2+(a+b)x+ab this eases out the calculation so you can do (500+11)(500+13) 500^2+ (11+13)500+ (11)(13) very easy calculations, you can do them in mind 250,000 + 24*500 + 143 = 250,000+12,000+143 =262,143 (we also have a trick to multiply numbers with 11 and rest of the calculations were pretty simple).
@pacogutierrez2484
@pacogutierrez2484 6 месяцев назад
how is the trick of multiplying with 11?
@ilishasrivastava6166
@ilishasrivastava6166 6 месяцев назад
if you have to multiply 11 with 13 just write the first and last digit as it is, that is 1_3, now the middle digit is going to be the sum of the first and last digit, that is, 1 and 3, we know 1+3=4, so 143 is the ans to 11*13. It's a very easy trick, you can solve such problems instantly in seconds@@pacogutierrez2484
@ulisses_nicolau_barros
@ulisses_nicolau_barros Год назад
I love Math, I love your channel and I love you. Many blessings for you, from the heart of God. ❤
@LKLogic
@LKLogic Год назад
❤️🥰
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar
@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar Год назад
Did not know God had a physical beating heart. God is widely advertised as being beyond time and space.
@ulisses_nicolau_barros
@ulisses_nicolau_barros Год назад
@@MyOneFiftiethOfADollar In your conception of God, he doesn't has a heart. And your belief shall be respected. In my conception (Gospel), Yeshua is the image of the invisible God and Yeshua has a heart, hence God has a heart. This is my belief and shall be respected. Also, this is a Math channel, better not talk about such things. (Blessing people is a common thing, to talk about god in a Math channel not.).
@Bob_Ugee
@Bob_Ugee Год назад
This is where I learn my maths...
@pugilemoltobene3708
@pugilemoltobene3708 2 месяца назад
Now, to chunk it in head, multiply (1000 x 256) + (2 x 10 x 256) + (4 x 256) - 1 If you practice chunking, you can do complex math REALLY fast in your head. You’ll also start to be able to memorize really long strings of numbers…like pi! As a math teacher, my students are often dazzled by this; it’s really VERY easy!
@biaohan4358
@biaohan4358 Год назад
Experts in computer hardware in 1990s to early 2000s should know 2^18=262,144 that's the amount of 256MB memory in KB that would show up during start up of a computer of Pentium II/III or Athlon era.
@esunisen3862
@esunisen3862 Год назад
it's 256 kiB or 262.144 kB.
@safakbas61
@safakbas61 8 месяцев назад
She has been trying to find the result of the 513*511 operation for exactly 2 minutes since 1:17 seconds of the video. If she writes these two numbers one under the other and multiplies them, she can get the result in 20 seconds.
@AlanCanon2222
@AlanCanon2222 Год назад
It's a lot easier to solve if you just know your powers of 2 up to 18, as any decent computer programmer does.
@mater5930
@mater5930 Год назад
My point exactly
@beragis3
@beragis3 Год назад
Programmers who developed on the PDP-10 which had a 36 bit processor would know that 2^18 is 262144, 1000000 octal and 40000 hex. Especially useful when doing some register arithmetic on the left and right halves of the register in your head. I used to have to do that a lot at CompuServe in the 90's.
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 Год назад
​@@beragis3 I guess you were au fait with 6-bit (sixbit) encoding which allowed 6 characters in a 36 bit word?
@beragis3
@beragis3 Год назад
@@cigmorfil4101Yep 6 bit, 7 bit, 8 bit and 9 bit characters
@Barghaest
@Barghaest Год назад
Even if you don’t know them by heart… working out a power table for two is easy and I doubt they mark off for showing work.
@soundappans6038
@soundappans6038 Год назад
Already we knew 2 power of 9 is 512..then 512* 512 is 262144..finally subtract 1 then we will get 262143
@spigknot
@spigknot Год назад
elegant but Id rather just calculate 2^18 and then -1 at most, do 512x512 -1
@robloxvids2233
@robloxvids2233 10 месяцев назад
262,143. I just doubled 2 seventeen times then subtracted 1. Did it in my head.
@MoritzGruber7
@MoritzGruber7 11 месяцев назад
Some nice tricks, but what about, in this case, just calculating the thing? 2^18 = 2^10*2^8=1024*256=256000 + 24*256. The latter is 25*2^8-256=100*2^6-256=6144. So we get 262144; subtract one and you get 262143, with the "25 and we can make that 100, it's a power of 2" happening in one's head (if you don't get that, you can also easily calculate 1024*256 simply on paper). You would, of course, know the first 10 powers of 2 by heart (they teach that in school, just like the first 20 squares)... but then the solution represented also relies on the fact that you now 2^9=512 by heart. But then, squeezing in a binomian formular was rather beautiful. (I do mean that.)
@scwor326
@scwor326 Год назад
i just love how apparently 2 to the ninth power is common knowledge.
@rcb3921
@rcb3921 Год назад
I don't know about common knowledge, but you can probably count it on your fingers in less than 5 seconds.
@thegreatgario3478
@thegreatgario3478 11 месяцев назад
2^10 is pretty common knowledge (it is how many bytes are in a kilobyte), so dividing that by 2 is pretty easy
@evefroggo4755
@evefroggo4755 6 месяцев назад
See if you play 2048 you’ll already have all powers of 2 memorized up until 2^11, so just take 2^9 as 512, square it, and subtract 1
@marcinantonik4496
@marcinantonik4496 Год назад
Am I the only person that just did the math in my head and calculated the same result? I understand the method behind that, but you can easily just calculate the result in less than 1 minute.
@AnonyoZarifAkand
@AnonyoZarifAkand Год назад
Did you just 512*512?
@markalitheapprenticehacker
@markalitheapprenticehacker 2 месяца назад
I did ut in my head too; I'm a programmer 😊
@unnatiarya6755
@unnatiarya6755 Год назад
U know what 2 to the power 6 =64 and now find 64 to the power 3 and subtract 1. Easy....
@JhunsonAvila
@JhunsonAvila Год назад
U make it more harder than normal solution 😂😂
@RadenVijaya
@RadenVijaya Год назад
Any old school computer scientist can answer it without by without even drawing on paper. 2^18 is close to 2^16, which is the limit of array size in an 16 bit OS. So its just 4x65536 - 1.
@Mike-mc5ll
@Mike-mc5ll Год назад
I doubt "old school computer scientists" participate in math olympiad :)
@nikitabiryukov2468
@nikitabiryukov2468 Год назад
How many people did not understand the beauty of the presented solution! 😢 Thank you for what you are doing! That was pure mind pleasure! ❤
@anatolykatyshev9388
@anatolykatyshev9388 Год назад
I did not understand. 2^18=262144 is not less known fact, that 2^9=512
@bumbarabun
@bumbarabun 11 месяцев назад
I do not understand beauty of writing (512+1) and then explain that it is 513 verbally. Thanks God she did not come with a substitute formula for that.
@billcook4768
@billcook4768 11 месяцев назад
Wouldn’t it be easier to multiply 512*512 using grade school math and subtract 1?
@Cyrus_mitra.
@Cyrus_mitra. Год назад
maths which is the only thing can be done by various methods ❤
@delanym
@delanym 11 месяцев назад
Time to get a girlfriend
@Cyrus_mitra.
@Cyrus_mitra. 11 месяцев назад
@@delanym already have !! 🫠
@ANDMATH2024
@ANDMATH2024 Месяц назад
THANKS FOR NICE SHARING
@LKLogic
@LKLogic Месяц назад
🥰
@НадеждаСемиколенова
Зная степени двойки(а в Российских школах дети это знают, так же как и таблицу умножения) вычислить этот можно за минуту. 2^10*2^8 - 1= 1024*256 - 1= 262143. Привет из России!
@Drak0sha13
@Drak0sha13 Год назад
Даже не зная степени двойки, проще на 2 умножить 18 раз
@Wolf-ln5mk
@Wolf-ln5mk Год назад
Идиот😂
@rafakrasicki914
@rafakrasicki914 Год назад
Explain something to me. How people with such abilities, educated, can support invasion on a neighbouring country? Or wait, maybe it doesn't matter how well one's educated in math... Regards from Poland.
@Wolf-ln5mk
@Wolf-ln5mk Год назад
@@rafakrasicki914 are you asking me?
@PaulGanarara
@PaulGanarara Год назад
можно еще сложить 2 + 2^2 + 2^3 + ... + 2^17, это гораздо математичней
@aalborgfantasy
@aalborgfantasy Год назад
This solution method is like using a chainsaw to cut bread...
@Bob_Ugee
@Bob_Ugee Год назад
Very helpful
@10-4CodyWade
@10-4CodyWade 8 месяцев назад
I just simplified in my head to 512^2 - 1. Pretty easy to multiply 512 x 512 on paper and subtract 1.
@sophiamoratti579
@sophiamoratti579 11 месяцев назад
It is surprising that back in the 80-90s of the last century, almost all schoolchildren (at least in my country) in grades 6-7 were able to multiply 513 by 511 without a calculator and expansion. I think that in 20 years, schoolchildren will not be able to even multiply 500 by 500 without gadgets.
@reddeviliso
@reddeviliso 10 месяцев назад
i don't think that you are good at analyzing.
@JuanEstevaBHIARG
@JuanEstevaBHIARG 9 месяцев назад
I think you must have written your comment back in 2000... In my country, most kids in high school can't solve this.
@LC95297
@LC95297 9 месяцев назад
30 seconds, 6 lines and 6 columns of digits, it's all this calculus takes yet the number of children/students who can't make it as simply as that is exponentiating, so I'm afraid your conclusion is right.
@buket7777
@buket7777 8 месяцев назад
yes that's true ....easily multiplied
@Samrathvk
@Samrathvk Год назад
Instead of going for FOIl 1:43 method.. just multiply 513*511 = 262143
@shibchau818
@shibchau818 Год назад
I wish you were my maths teacher when I was little! I would have definitely developed interest on Maths. You make the problems look so easy.
@piotrprs572
@piotrprs572 11 месяцев назад
rly stupid solution in XXI century. It's almost well know fact that 2^16 is 65536 (256*256) and this you need only multiply by 4 and minus 1 at the end.
@ZIN24031980
@ZIN24031980 Год назад
A very nice solution! Thanks.
@DandoPorsaco-ho1zs
@DandoPorsaco-ho1zs 7 месяцев назад
For those who are used to binary and computers, simply do 1024 (2^10) x 256 (2^10) = 262144, and subtract 1, or start at 65536 (2^16) and double it twice.
@Plastik13
@Plastik13 Год назад
You can simply do a difference of squares : 2^18 - 1 = (2^9 + 1) (2^9 - 1) = 513 X 511 = 262 143.
@igoranisimov6549
@igoranisimov6549 11 месяцев назад
So we "know" that 2^9=512, but we cannot find out 2^18=512^2 so we need to write a dissertation to calculate 2^18-1
@kvr5178
@kvr5178 9 месяцев назад
Как то очень примитивная задача, это для какого возраста? Тем более что сейчас многие знают что 10**8 = 256 или что 10**10 = 1024. Поэтому можно просто в лоб 1024*256-1
@isilder
@isilder Год назад
2^20 is 1048576 , then divide by 4 and subtract one...
@opytmx
@opytmx Год назад
Wouldn't it be easier to multiply directly 512 * 512 = 256,000 + 5,120 + 1,024 = 262,144 and just to subtract 1?
@josemattos8689
@josemattos8689 11 месяцев назад
It's more complicated and longer. If i know that 2 to 9th is 512, just do the 512*512, minus 1.
@nenemtiaof5016
@nenemtiaof5016 Год назад
a^2 - b^2. But the -1 was not squared. 🤷‍♂️
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 Год назад
1 = 1^2 An "implicit" square very useful for such use.
@soljin1010
@soljin1010 Год назад
Much simpler to calculate 2*2*2*... iteratively in your head. Especially if you know that 1 Mb = 2^20 = 1048576 bytes
@todayipaint4667
@todayipaint4667 Год назад
Wow...all this, instead of saying that 18=3x6. Then 2^18 = (2^6)^3 = 64^3
@mi.chal.
@mi.chal. 11 месяцев назад
Who works in IT knows that 2^20 is 1048576. So divide by two twice and you have result :-). It would be 256*1024.
@HristoHristov
@HristoHristov Год назад
1024×256 -1 . I'll calculate this quicker then the slow method in video.
@andrewwebber421
@andrewwebber421 Год назад
Why not just 512 x 512 - 1. Quicker than doing the additional factorisation
@lasithgamingyoutubechannel7399
Yes you are correct, it is quicker mothod
@jcb3393
@jcb3393 Год назад
I just know - from years of doing computer science work - that 2^10 is 1024 and 2^8 is 256. 1024 * 256 is really easy, because 1, 2, and 4 are just doublings of 256 and adding them in different 10s places. then subtract 1.
@mkbachchan5664
@mkbachchan5664 11 месяцев назад
Probably the simplest and shortest way: 2^18-1=(2^9)^2-1=(512)^2-1 Applying Vedic Math: 512*512=524*5*100+144=262144 (which can mentally be calculated in about 15 sec) Therefore: 2^18-1=262144-1=262143
@cigmorfil4101
@cigmorfil4101 9 месяцев назад
Not to me. Growing up in the 70s and 80s, I learnt 2^16=65536 (max amount of memory addressable by an 8-bit processor with a 16-bit address bus), and later 2^17=131072 (start location in memory of the first screen of the Sinclair QL). Thus 2^18-1 = 2^16×4 -1 = 65536×4 -1 = 262144 -1 = 262143 or = 2^17×2 -1 = 131072×2 -1 = 262144 -1 = 262143 (This latter being the easier of the two.)
@Engeryu
@Engeryu 9 дней назад
​@@cigmorfil4101 However, your solution work for this one particular exercice, his way works for every numbers simply. If i put you 7^6, having Sinclair QL memory benefit is useless However if i apply his Vedic Math : - 7^6 -1 = (7^3)^2 -1 = 343^2 -1 - 343*343 -1 = 386*3*100 +1 849 -1 = 1 158*100 +1849 -1 = 115 800 +1849 -1 = 117 649 -1 = 117 648 the addition is equal to the 43 of 343, squared, 43^2 = 1 849
@ballboy2598
@ballboy2598 Год назад
"As we know 2^9=512" So u should know also that 2^18=262,144.... Pointless
@CBE-dy2pd
@CBE-dy2pd Год назад
😂😂😂😂😂
@eliaslopez-cruz2854
@eliaslopez-cruz2854 11 месяцев назад
Easier decomposing 2^18-1 as a difference of squares, then as a difference of cubes times a sum of cubes . At the end: 63 times 73 times 57= 262,143
@knothyself347
@knothyself347 Год назад
Based on the rules of exponents 1 = 2^0. So, my next step was 2^18 - 2^0 equaling 2^18, which is incorrect. Why does this method not wok?
@semakavf
@semakavf Год назад
because: a^m : a^n = a^(m-n)
@knothyself347
@knothyself347 Год назад
@@semakavf I agree with your explanation concerning the quotient law of exponents, but could not the zero power rule apply here? If not, then how can it be said, any base to the power of zero equals one. In math, my understanding is we can use inductive reasoning. Therefore, 1 = 2 - 1. Likewise 2^0=1, so I theoretically should be able to substitute 1 with base 2 to the power of 0. Thus just, a question I have?
@moazamsmachines
@moazamsmachines Год назад
I tired everything like G.P series Limits (calculus) Logarithms Binomial At the end all the results were in the power of 2 some even exceeding 2^18 😅 so its better to learn some power table as 2^10 always helps
@kvr5178
@kvr5178 9 месяцев назад
This seems like a very primitive task, what age is this for? Moreover, now many people know that 10**8 = 256 or that 10**10 = 1024. Therefore, you can just straight up 1024*256-1
@pietrinacuccurazzu2243
@pietrinacuccurazzu2243 Год назад
Answer is 3FFFF (in hexadecimal) 🤭
@_MarianaSilva_
@_MarianaSilva_ 4 дня назад
2^10 x 2^8 - 1 = 1024 x 256 - 1 = 262144 - 1 = 262143 OR 2^12 x 2^6 - 1 = 4096 x 64 - 1 = 262144 - 1 = 262143 I would think like that, because I'm used to calculate until 2^11, so 2^10 and 2^12 are easy. If I didn't feel confident multiplying 2 numbers with more than 3 algarisms, I can separate 18 in 12 and 6, because 2^6 is the last potence of 2 with 2 algarisms, so it's easier to calculate 4096 x 64. I wouldn't use factoration because it's not necessary, and my first thought was 1 = 2^0.
@venkatk1414
@venkatk1414 Год назад
I was hoping for some intelligent method
@deleatur
@deleatur Год назад
Dissatisfied? Find yourself this more "intelligent method" you're hoping for, and make a video
@Styckjunkarn
@Styckjunkarn Год назад
2 up too 18 is 524288, 2 minus 1 is half of 524288 is 262144
@anatolykatyshev9388
@anatolykatyshev9388 Год назад
How do you know that 2^9=512? Did you use calculator? So you can calc 2^18 as well. Do you remember it? But some people do not, and some people remember (myself included) that 2^18=262144
@janosnagyj.9540
@janosnagyj.9540 Год назад
No need a calculator, if you ever seen an 8-bit number, which is 2^8 = 256, then the number you are looking for is simply the double of that. You know, computers are also based on maths 😅
@anatolykatyshev9388
@anatolykatyshev9388 Год назад
@@janosnagyj.9540 Sure. If you know that 2^17 =131072, and I know it, that 2^18 is double.
@janosnagyj.9540
@janosnagyj.9540 Год назад
@@anatolykatyshev9388 You didn't get the point. As I wrote, an 8-bit number (which is 1 byte) has the value of 256. It's not even difficult to calculate it, but who's into computer science knows it even if was just woke up in the middle of the night :) Just like you know how much is 3x3, 7x7 and so on, don't you?
@anatolykatyshev9388
@anatolykatyshev9388 Год назад
@@janosnagyj.9540 Some people have no idea what is 1 byte and that it is 256, others know that 1MB is 2^20=1048576. I do not see a point of the problem to calculate presumably unknown (to whom?) number, using presumably known (again to whom?) number.
@janosnagyj.9540
@janosnagyj.9540 Год назад
@@anatolykatyshev9388 Look, you have seen the title of the video, haven't you? "Math olympiad", right? I think we can assume that those who are interested in these contests and excercises, know also what 1 byte means, and what it's value is... Simple af.
@AndriiMarynchuk
@AndriiMarynchuk 18 дней назад
2^18 = 2^20 / 4 = 1048576 / 4 = 524288 / 2 = 262144. Actually, multiplying by 2 is very simple, so if you have a good trained memory, you can multiply by 2 in memory. Also if there is no rule that requires to provide answer in base 10, you can just write that (2^18 - 1) base 10 = (1000000000000000000 - 1) base 2 = 111111111111111111 base 2 😊
@ShiromiPrasangika-b2z
@ShiromiPrasangika-b2z 3 месяца назад
What is the meaning of this🤨 just use the calculator men😂😎😏
@esunisen3862
@esunisen3862 5 месяцев назад
That's a complicated way to find $3FFFF 😆
Далее
The Most Controversial Number in Math
6:46
Просмотров 1,3 млн
Почему?
00:22
Просмотров 196 тыс.
КАК БОМЖУ ЗАРАБОТАТЬ НА ТАЧКУ
1:36:32
A tricky problem from Harvard University Interview
18:11
1995 British Mathematics Olympiad problem
20:59
Просмотров 153 тыс.
2 to the x = 9, many don’t know where to start
16:17
The Test That Terence Tao Aced at Age 7
11:13
Просмотров 4,3 млн
Animation vs. Math
14:03
Просмотров 70 млн
The SAT Question Everyone Got Wrong
18:25
Просмотров 13 млн
Почему?
00:22
Просмотров 196 тыс.