Not Being Very Friendly 

😂😂😂

Right….and talkin bout she doesn’t have online banking? You can set it up….its doesn’t take that long? 🤨🤦🏾‍♀️ She is a liar 🥴

I personally do not think she looked 😞 defeated.. it appears to me that she doesn’t have a conscious. Look at her she doesn’t appear to feel phased by her conduct she feel entitled to the things in the storage ( remember she wanted to make a profit in order to make a profit you would have to put in the least amount of money down on the storage unit. In this case she put in $490.00 and she had the mitigated gall to sue the lady for $1500. For her own property.. and to top it off she lied to make it appear that the money HRA put in was from her bank account.. that why JM asked her to produce 🧾🧾🧾🧾 from her bank account to prove that she paid the storage fees. She is the kind of scammer who will look for anngles in a ⭕️ to wiggle their way out of their lies. But people who creat Ponzi schemes to extract money out of people always get caught in a web 🕸️🕸️ of lies. Now remember she did this to her friends who gave her a place to stay when she was homeless.. and this is how she repaid them.. why couldn’t she have said I’ll help you out like you helped me when I was homeless.. isn’t that what friends do for each other they look out for each other in times of need.. how pathetic.😫 American Greed is one of the most powerful show created check out those episodes. This lady has nothing on those scammers.

She claims everyone else lying but her

I was coming to say this exact thing. The defendant wasn't even telling good lies. She was telling lies that were EASILY proven.

😂😂 @ 6 piece chicken dinner

@@NaturallyPrettyBrownK26

Not a 6 piece chicken dinner ...I want Cole slaw and jalapeños with mines 😅

Want my address now?

When she said that she hoped to make a profit I saw it as a refreshing dose of honesty, but also pretty crappy to do.

I disagree. I say do a better job at finding people you associate with. I am a harsh judge of character yet have a large friend group. I have trusted them with tons of money in cash and them me. Nothing has ever been taken, any loan has been repaid and monetary gifts remain monetary gifts. If you care about yourself you should better assess people you hold close.

And don't leave your items without paying it. Both of them are trifling!!

Legit, love my brothers to death ... 😅 Oooooof

The plaintiff got scanned by the lying defendant

Dependent is such a Nasty woman. Nasty

Nope

Plot twist: May have done the same to the so called abusive boyfriend

@@devgoodman They ALL claim to have an abusive boyfriend! It's NEVER them.Smdh.

Exactly How tf did the judge just ignore. That’s insane. The plaintiff should’ve Sue for pain and suffering..

DV = ? 🤔

THE NERVE..!

@@crackerjacks6789domestic violence

I’m sure the domestic claim was a scam too

she only did it because she knew the defendant was lying

Yeah, to not contact her friend (P’s husband) suspppppicious!

no, she did she got about 490. back from the plaintive,.

Sounds like an opportunistic move.. thanks for the clarification.. Harvey said she only paid 490 bucks of the storage unit. I see how she tried to gain control of the unit because her valuables are more than likely are more valuable..but to lie and and try to sue for 2100.00 for the unit is outrageous and then lie that she paid ( HRA portion plus the 490.00 ) is insane she thought she was slick but she did not know that the lady knew that HRA made the payments. So to me she was compelled to say she wanted to make a profit off of the storage unit. She wasn’t being honest by letting her true intentions be known this it was her slick way of getting the judge off of her back. Nor did she call her to let her know she said she abandoned her things. He behavior is despicable because these are the people who gave her a place to stay. So she decided to use the storage unit as leverage. I thought it was unusual for her to pay for a storage unit when she had no place to stay she inserted herself into a situation that wasn’t any of her business 😮

@@marilynwillett804yes not the amount the storage was worth nor the 1500.00 she was seeking. 😅

yeah that makes a lot of sense.

Yup I've know this for years

What is hra

How did she get that?? They won't help you with storage here in California.

@@moniqueengleman873Move to New York?

She knew.

@@fitnessfocused no way. I love my life here.

Never heard of public assistance paying for storage units.

That's Curt in the introduction. For many years in between Doug's time in the hallway, Curt also did Doug's job.

I caught that too. The way she accused the P of ‘choosing to not go back to her apartment’ and also pretending that she didn’t know what “bicoastal”means.

@@cindymann3673 that bicoastal comment was so weird. Cause the judge is also bicoastal

RIGHT ✅️ I would never put my item in someone else storage. This is going to be loss for the plaintiff.

Good observation!

No you're most likely in the wrong skin

The defendant is on assistance and the only way to get the government to pay for the plaintiffs storage. The defendant had to put it in her name.. So she lied and said the plaintiff let her put her stuff in her storage, because she was homeless, staying with her/plaintiff, she lied and told the welfare office that the plaintiff moved and the the defendant lied and said the Plaintiff “abandoned” the unit and in order not to lose her (defendant) stuff.. she needed the assistance to keep her own stuff.. so thats how she was able to get the welfare office to pay for it.. That’s exactly what happened.. She a liar and scammer and she should have paid the plaintiff for lying to the judge.. SHE WAS LYING AND IT WAS CLEAR AS GLASS.. not sure why The judge played blind on this case.. People are sick.. she will get hers though.. up man beating the breaks of yo ahh, the plaintiff let you stay in her house, without even knowing you.. bee had the whole place to herself.. and she does this.. THATS BECAUSE SHE DONT KNOW THE PLAINTIFF AND HAD TO EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO HER.. THEREFORE SHE DIDNT CARE.. ALL SHE SAW WAS DOLLARS.. That lady husband asked her to help someone who he knew and obviously trusted.. and she took advantage of the the situation. SMFH It’s ALWAYS YO OWN PEOPLE, yet they always crying about Dwight man.. At this point ( for decades now).. Nobody does another black person worse than another blk person.. SMFH

​@@Roblox-c5rFacts

@@INDIGO.GODDESS_573 so she has a job as stated. Airline attendant. Scamming the government. I know why.

Me too !! I live in California and they definitely don't help you with storage fees. Every time they (the city) cleans up an encampment and tosses everything. Tents, beds, cooking stoves..... Everything

JM really shows her biases often - from my perspective, she really gave the P undue pressure/sass for the majority of her testimony.

What are you saying? The plaintiff was locked out for 2 months. The defendant wanted to keep her stuff and sell it. In her words the plaintiff “abandoned” her stuff! But the defendant was lying the entire case! So what’s weird?

@markgiles6568 I think you should re-watch the episode. The plaintiff only paid for July/August. Every month there after was paid for fraudulently by either an agency or scammed check. Remember, there was an issue with one of the checks the defendant claimed she paid. BTW the defendant was a piece of 💩. Nevertheless, the plaintiff received access and got her belongings back without paying any additional money. That's why it's weird, in my opinion.

@@nicolesmith583 the defendant took the plaintiff off the account, which she couldn’t get access into the storage unit. So the judge ordered the defendant to take her name off the account so the plaintiff could now pay and/or get her stuff and/or put in another lawsuit if things are missing! Because the defendant said she was just going to sell it. Neither party won. The defendant was just trying to keep the plaintiff stuff and also counter sue for 2,000 when she herself didn’t even pay for the storage unit. The plaintiff couldn’t get any money because she don’t know if all her stuff is in the unit or not to say it’s gone. So that’s a lawsuit for another day. Yes, the plaintiff only paid for 2 months. Yes, the defendant was writing bad checks and lying under oath. But she also took the plaintiff name off the unit to gain access. The plaintiff never got her stuff until after the verdict.

@@nicolesmith583 look at 15:24

U haven't watched judge Judy much if u think MM interrupts

She sure does she makes me sick! Rude and loud and arrogant as hell just like Mathis. And to the silly commenter above, bringing someone else to the conversation never changes the facts about the original statement. 🥴🥴🥴

@@jennybarstow1447there isn’t real logic in your statement, because there is no mutual exclusivity between the judges; however, IMO, JJ interrupts when litigants do not answer her questions or try to give more (unnecessary) info.

Public Assistance programs can and may pay for storage units for those who are unhoused or transitioning to new housing. NYC has some of the best programs in the US.

@@fitnessfocused Lots of shelters don't allow possessions, so that sounds like a life-saver.

Girl she knew.

That's ridiculous if the person is employed as she was, plus she was or is married I suppose her husband had no income. @@fitnessfocused

@@marilynwillett804 I think they just pay random bills as an act of charity but I think the real story is that the defendant knows exactly who that organization is and since the storage unit was in her name they were paying it on her behalf. It would only make sense being that the defendant was a DV situation, she probably claimed she had to go to a domestic violence shelter or stay with family and those are her thins to get them to pay the bill.

Just remember this when ya spouse don't tell u where the stash at 😅😅😅

5:32 She's saying she thought the stuff was abandoned to defend the fact that she never contacted or reached out to the plaintiff. 5:48

I imagine so. I don't think I've ever seen them call someone and they are unavailable, so I expect they would.

I have seen someone not answer ​@@michelehemlokhexwhite4310

I def think soo 😂 I was thinking the SAME thing!!! Cause it was a coincidence that he was looking at that case in the moment she called 😅😂

She never said that stupidity what is your problem.

She/he didn't drink the kool-aid like YOU obviously did. ​@@marilynwillett804

Defendant is a liar

😆😆😆Milian needs to get over herself.

@@marilynwillett804 - uh, it’s called “sarcasm”, ever hear of it? Oh and she never said “don’t be nervous or anything, but this is Judge Milian” -that’s what I was joking about!! Geeze, get a sense of humor! Sooo, I guess my question to you is: what is your problem??

Well we know why! She just doesn’t want to easily allow the plaintiff to win her case SMDH. She ALWAYS makes it difficult for some! ALWAYS!

She doesn't like giving black women large amounts of money. Idc. I said what I said. I honestly tried to not see it. But she does it every time

Hurt people hurt people 😢

While dicking the plaintiff 😂

Dear black people...why does EVERYTHING have to be about hair???? 😅

@@a.konadu4010 Because of your fake WIG obsession! Every other race is proud of their hair. The very same hair YOU covet! Get it??

Agreed that defendant is a Weasle

That’s how I feel. She only wanted to make a profit AFTER the girl was about to lose her stuff. Maybe she took the girl name off, maybe she didn’t but the girl should have went to the place in person. It’s a two month span with no payment. She knew what was at risk.

not true, there are many exceptions but definitely do not trust any trump

Harvey gives an update at the end. The defendant was able to prove she made some of the payments and won $480 in her countersuit.

Thank you can't believe I missed that part ​@@voycedatruf

I mean of course the defendant would have a right to sell the stuff if the plaintiff had actually abandoned her stuff. She literally lied and said she paid $2,100 for the plaintiff. Yet when the judge kept asking her for proof from a bank statement she said she didn't have it & didn't have online banking. She was lying, she only paid $400 something it was confirmed at the end. Government assistance paid the rest. The defendant's plan the entire time was to lock the plaintiff out of the account, make it look like she abandoned the stuff so she could sell it.

Name one "sistah" that doesn't claim to have been in an abusive relationship? It's NEVER them!

greedy defendant…..definitely not a friend

Facts! Lol