Not Every Man is Obsessed with You 

Consent is not needed, because it’s reasonable to not expect privacy in a supermarket.

If she did it in America then its allowed. It is her right to. If I am missing your point, please try to make it more clear. I am not being sarcastic. This is a no bullshit zone

@@BadMannerKorea I would go a step further. It doesn't matter if it's their "property" bc we don't live in a plutocracy

@@BadMannerKorea right, but doesn’t mean it still doesn’t bother some people

@@corvusheller328 I think the point is that she was wearing tight clothes, filming everyone around her for an internet audience, but upset she gets looked at? Maybe I am just some old grumpy guy, but in my life the men and women I have known that were traumatized by ... (this is the internet, let's say they were traumatized by inappropriate behavior) would usually go out and about only if they had to, in baggy clothes. That is what upsets me most about this, vying for attention and taking it away from people that were and are actually harmed.

Couldn’t possibly be staring at the camera that some rando is using in a grocery store

That's what happens when TikTok brats fall madly in love with their own female plumbing.

imagine someone is not only staring at you but staring at you through a camera, you'd glance uncomfortably too, I know I would

People like this are making me dislike social media more and more.

@@seanhuke8260 Social media itself is neutral. It's the attention starved brats who abuse it that are the problem.

He was probably looking to see when she was going to be done. That's what everyone does when they're waiting in line for a register to open up

Even if he was looking at her ass (he was, for a second), whats wrong with that? its a glance, girl has a fantastic ass on leggins, sue him.

When men start refusing to look at women, they will cry that men think woman or so beneath them that the refuse to look at them.

Even if he did look at her who cares I love people watching he didn’t do anything out of the ordinary

Most guys his age don't find women who are "inked up" attractive anyway.

I'm looking through you is what I tell em.....

Daaaang!!!!!!! THAT!!!!! THAT RIGHT THERE!!!!!! 👍👌

Excellent. Even morgan freeman isn't safe

😂😂

People are so in their heads these days

Her brain only thinks about herself so why would she think others aren’t I had a mate who was convinced I’d woke up on his birthday fully aware of the fact it was his birthday and then purposely made sure I didn’t see him that day or wish him a happy birthday 😂 the idea I wouldn’t be aware like he was aware was one he wasn’t going to believe, I didn’t see him for about a month around it, I said to him when it’s your birthday nothing happens to me it’s just another day. I don’t take note He would let me down last minute every year on my birthday cus he just couldn’t be bothered and thought I was getting him back, truthfully speaking he wasn’t that important anymore and I just didn’t realise or see him anyway, but he never accepted i was unaware because i didn’t realise. They are only aware of themselves, you aren’t living when you’re not with them, only they are really living. Weirdos. Special case I call them. Different rules for them. When they take from you now they’ll be owed later.🤷

Maybe she does

@@corvusheller328 huh?

@joshuakelly9390 my bad. I misread your comment and then responded inaptly due to it. Pardon me

I would be looking at the camera cause I would be annoyed at getting filmed 😅

It's because they are not paying customers for her OF. They need to give her the $10 a month like all the others😐😐😐

WTH are you taking a selfie in a car

@@thing1thing2themediamaniac43sometimes good lighting

@@thing1thing2themediamaniac43 well, when I dress up nice to go somewhere, it's a semi-private place to take a quick picture of the makeup and hair I worked hard on before I go join people in a public setting where I can't take a photo.

i havent taken a selfie in like 8 years.

They can’t produce good content. Fucking influencers 💀

i agree

Wannabes

so true

Men can't be women. Women can't be Men. Trans doesn't exist. It is made up bullshit.

Same, honey.

I agree! I am older and I still appreciate good manners. I also enjoy a man opening my door for me, yes I can open it myself, but it just is nice and I like it. Thank you for being a gentleman, we all need to appreciate and be nice to each other.

Fr it IS getting out of hand

Funny. I always thought of myself as a side character.

@@mssophiad03 You are the main character in your own life; we are all side characters in the grand scheme of life.

​@Esmeralda-2003 thats probably a fucking lie

​@@Esmeralda-2003or maybe not

I’d assume you had a father active in your life

@@Joe-hz1nw kinda, when I was younger he was mostly at work and we only really saw him on the weekends.

Unfortunately, manners, morals & shame have all been thrown out the window with yesterday's trash.

​@@Rojin_04 To provide for you, kid.

👍

I’m a woman and I totally agree. I know we’re not supposed to say this, but they are literally asking for it.

Here's how you respond to that: "I AM NOT INTERESTED IN YOU!" Then, after yelling that out - yes, even if you're in a library - simply walk away. She looks like the harasser then, which she is, if it's truly as ridiculous as you make it sound.

😂 that’s funny. These women are crazy.

"Oh that poor bastard"

Ya I love it when I have zero interest in a woman and just being nice, and she feels she needs mention her BF lol.

@@buckjones4901to be fair, 99.99% of my stories involve my husband

That’s the biggest thing you’ll learn as you get older is that people generally DON’T care about what you’re doing. The guys in the gym are just trying to do their workouts. Plus they’re pointing a camera at someone and the OTHER person is the creep? That’s strange behavior. She’s holding up the line and has a camera.

AMEN!!

EEE HI V!!!❤​@@YourFriendlyNeighborhoodHuman

I agree Terry Bogard. They are doing everything they can to make themselves look unapproachable altogether. Which is working.

Well quoted👌

This is a good comment and I 100% agree

I'm a little more enthusiastic for the day that an influencer non-consensually films the WRONG person and ends up creating a documentary of their own m***er. I feel like that only needs to happen once or twice for people to start checking themselves, so here's to hoping.

Not just women! It's everywhere

I feel bad for them. When they lose their good looks they will lapse into a state of severe depression.

That woman should go to prison for 20 years. When she's out, she won't be anything resembling hot anymore.

@@krikeydial3430 THE WALL gets them ALL!

​@@BryceShamwow Well, all those prisoners will have their way with her. It'll make her feel validated.

Or its the men they actually like

It's that women have figured out that women band together when one of their group is attacked, and men instinctually want to protect women. So the knee-jerk reaction to a woman playing victim to a man is extra attention and a witch hunt against the man. I'm pretty sure this exact dynamic is the basis of the oppression Olympics in modern feminism.

She isn't mad. She's just competing with other women to see which gathers more looks from men.

Yep, same women show everything for 4.99/mo 😂

Narcissists are evil and unaware when it comes to it.

And that’s why an ever increasing amount of men wont help women with anything

I think he was looking at the camera to see if he was in the shot, if I saw a camera pointed in my direction I would move around trying to not be recorded

My view is that he's likely entirely innocent. But if he was looking? People have eyes. If you had a dude in a mankini, men and women would find themselves looking at things they really, really don't want to. A certain amount of looking would then be involuntary. There's a difference between someone who looks, tries no to, but would try harder if you were facing them. The motivation to not look requires that you accept that your gaze innately impugns or degrades, OR you're polite enough to try and make the other party feel comfortable and not demand their time or attention. Someone looking a little is different to someone walking behind you catcalling for 10 minutes ("situations that would warrant outrage"). I'm not a neurologist, but I had some idea that the brain has different systems working in competition. So I must respect this person would perhaps be concurrent with the animalistic. I think it might be outdated as model, but the old suggestion seemed to be that the reptile brain was nearer to the brain stem. I'll put it this way. In a romantic understanding you could view humans as half way between animals and angels. Expecting them to behave like animals has issues (to put it gently). Expecting them to behave that perfect angels that don't see physical beauty (until they're given permission to) might also be unrealistic. I just think if attraction is innately insulting, that would be bad news for marriage. A couple years back there was a UFC weigh in. After the male fighter removed the bulk of his clothing for the weigh in, one of the ring girls looked like she was about to swallow her tongue. It was... odd. But I don't think she should have gone home, taken a whip, flagellated herself until her back bled, while thinking "YOU HAVE SINNED! SHAMEFUL INSECT. SIN!".

They don't think like that. They don't care. Older = "creepy"

Your point perfectly describes “crying wolf”, a concept entirely lost on this exhibitionist.

Plus that man who was just trying to work was absolutely correct; he was sexually harassed. In some jurisdictions, that would even be considered sexual assault due to the rather extreme and graphic nature of it. If she was a man doing that to young women, she'd be on a registry. That woman is disgusting.

He should sue her.

@@beththomas8430nothing will come of it cause the victim is a man

It sounds illegal, honestly.

​@@jesshallock5346definitely illegal she is monetizing him without a realease form signed etc he definitely has a case

Unfortunately it's so many of them nowadays

It is illegal in many places in Europę. You can film crowd without asking for everyone's permission, but cannot film and post single person without her or his permission.

while i agree with most of what you said, personal privacy ends the moment you leave your house and enter the public domain.

@@lawrencecrocker4870 Might be too difficult to change the laws specifically to address this issue. But with the internet drastically changing society we need to take privacy into account. In my opinion this is a mild form of slander.

@@katiestevenson8920 ya it would be even harder now. imagine having to get the consent of every single person in a shot to be able to post anything. nothing would be postable lol

Love that one too

Haha, I love it! 😁

That’s great 😂

Better still when your wife isn't around and they're staring at you and waiting for you to say something to them, then far from that, not only do you not say anything to them-you don't even give them the slightest glance. I actually had that happen once where I think someone was recording. After I had passed, she asked me to reach something (I'm 6'3") on the top shelf for her; I assumed it MIGHT have been a legitimate ask, so I reached it and held it in an outstretched arm behind my back for her to grab without even so much as glancing at her.

100%

Which is EXACTLY why she posted it. Rage bait.

​@@mamsy1169 Do you condone the act?

Very toxic especially those people who’s just there in the groceries filming and doesn’t buy anything, they looked like a clout chaser seeking attention they think its cool nah they just get themselves embarrassed.

He’s probably waiting for her to get out the way

I mean, you don’t have an expectation of privacy when you’re on public but I still do agree with you.

You have to ask permission in the US regardless, some states have individual laws of their own which are a slight variation of everywhere else based on local decisions but in the UK for private use you don’t have to ask permission, filming in certain places, public spaces, parks, Government and State organised events (the coronation etc.) and properties stadiums and arenas sell tickets with legal wavering of rights. You’re much more free to film in the UK because the government and councils own more land and are responsible for more situations. In America private business is more responsible for, what the British government has some control over, they take the permission away in every contract. It’s common sense things you can’t film in schools or into private properties There’s less of a culture to sue, you could go to the law, but the courts wouldn’t pursue something without evidence of damages or harmful consequences, or intent to follow you, how viewed it is or is likely to be. I had to look up if you can record phone conversations the other day it’s not illegal to record sound or picture, it becomes illegal through distribution and is only valid if damages are proved, you won’t get much punishment or compensation though, they make it not worth it.

I mean that's true, but then it just is creepy. That dosn't mean it's intented to be. How about we make a social rule that sais you can only look at a stranger for 15seconds or so. Especilly a woman. And then you know they are there so you can go about your way without doing that again

Well remember this generation rarely heard those phrases, they were told they were special and unique.

@@catsaresocute650 " mean that's true, but then it just is creepy. That dosn't mean it's intented to be. How about we make a social rule that sais you can only look at a stranger for 15seconds or so. Especilly a woman. And then you know they are there so you can go about your way without doing that again" How about not creating any more stupid rules?

Anyone ever stare, but not seeing? You are thinking about something, or exhausted, and don't even realize someone is in your line of vision? I have...and remember apologizing, because it seemed like staring, but, no, just spacing out.

@@JS-jn8ku Well yeah, but you appolised and moved on to do something different as soon as you realized. That's still going to make her feel bad ofc, you but it's the best you could do

That's only if it is proven to cause monetary damage (or property damage). Psychological annoyance is hard to prove.

@@DDD11239damage to reputation?

@@DDD11239 There'd also be a case to be made if it damaged a person's relations with a family member somehow.

2.99 dollars per month 😂

She isn't made his looking but getting free product 😂

This is an excellent observation.

Could be a jail time day for me. I am sick of these lunatics.

Its illegal right filming someone without consent

That is just outrageous! You should at all times close your eyes when you're in line!

You sicko!

I'd stop doing that unless you're not particularly concerned to end up in one of these videos. Just pick a fixed spot and stare at it and completely ignore anyone who happens to be looking at you. That might seem a bit overblown just to avoid being featured in this sort of video, but most people probably deserve to be treated that way for some other reason, and I have no desire to have small talk with anyone anyway, so these sorts of influencers encouraging sociopathic/avoidance behavior only benefits me. You can still be polite and hold doors, return shopping carts, etc...just look completely away from the person while you do. It's actually pretty fun to try because you have to fight your natural inclinations to glance at someone, at least, so you can make it kind of a challenge. In fact, maybe even come up with some sort of reward you get if you go an entire day without directly looking at any woman you don't know; that could make it more fun.

Where I live you can technically film someone in their house as long as you're not on their lawn/property

That’s what I thought watching this…same with Australian film & television

@@brennanthabault1351 Where is that so I can never go there? That's creepy.

@@tearsong8744 America.

And you should continue look at whatever you want to lol. Don't let this bother you it's not illegal to look at somebody.

Yeah, I have that too. If I think someone looks interesting or attractive, I;ll just sorta zone our and observe everything about them. I don't even realize its creepy, often.

In the gym is more of a problem. Since before smartphones women went there fishing for attention more than doing any workout, it was kind of ig before ig for them, but the recording of it is new. I don't personally care for them nor look their way but I absolutely hate when people record me in the background.

I must admit I am a people watcher. I love sitting on a bench and watching them walk by. My youngest son gets upset with me.

@@dj393 It sounds like you're kind of a pervert and now normal people are getting caught in the crossfire, on camera, no less, thanks to you. Good work.

Such a good point!!

If I had an independent gym, then I'd sue on two grounds: 1.) She didn't have consent to film my property; she's also portraying my members negatively. 2.) She didn't have consent to use her filming of my property for commercial or self-promotional reasons. Either way, I don't go to the gym anymore; it's not worth it.

@@brandonjames412 At my gym, I kid you not, there a sections with tripods, cameras, gym pros posing...all while people are waiting for set bench or the weights they're hogging. And it's strange, cuz it doesn't matter the time, they're ALWAYS there lol

@@lilshrek369 I'd just stop going to that gym, or any gym, for that matter. I can get my cardio outdoors, and even if I exercise less, dying of an early heart attack is better than dealing with these people anyway.

Love this! This is the way. I’ve considered wearing a mask and hat anytime I’m in public because the amount of people on their phones is crazy. I don’t want myself or my child recorded or photographed to be put on the local Facebook hate pages etc. Not to mention the hidden cameras for “pranks”. Dystopian.

Honestly at one point it looked like he might have been trying to get up the courage to ask her to stop, and since it's heavily edited I have to wonder if he actually DID ask her to stop and she clipped that out and posted this for vengeance.

Uh, I'm "older" and I check out women all the time, and in fact it's a natural occurrence to look at people we find attractive. There's even studies on it. It's basic evolution, biology, and psychology.

@@BadMannerKorea Same. I don't even realize I'm doing it sometimes because I'm usually thinking about something else while my instincts act in the background.

@@BadMannerKorea Resist and overcome your biological impulses; they're outdated and useless for survival, anyway.

Exactly. He didn't even look at her, he looked at the camera. Probably because it was on her phone and the screen showed what she was recording. He waiting in line wondering why this self-absorbed twat's filming him.

Exactly! He’s wondering why he’s being recorded not ogling her.

Really the old guy is probably looking and wondering what the heck is she doing, he should have said "hurry the F up bimbo!" Instead he was being polite and waiting.

😂😂😂💯

I was thinking the same thing. To me, he is clearly looking at the camera, not her.

You're really rolling the dice on that one for convincing a jury

@@evanaltman9286 How hard do you think it would be to find 12 people who either hate influencer culture, or are jealous of an influencer's popularity? The hard part would be finding a jury unbiased at all.

@@iamjacksselfloathing4857 I think you'd have trouble getting to defamation; although, it could be easier if the influencer in question speaks as to the 'FACT' of what someone who is staring at her is thinking, rather than her opinion. As long as she's only speaking to her opinion, then the video is actually evidence in her favor (as opposed to against her) and would only really hurt her if she used the video to make an incorrect factual assertion about the person. Beyond that, the person filmed without their consent would have to be able to prove some sort of material (read: financial or personal) damages as a direct result of the defamation, or they wouldn't have a cause of action. The good news is that juries in civil suits (though most don't make it to a trial) make their decision on a standard called, 'Preponderance of the evidence," which in this case, would mean that they only have to believe that the person was more likely than not defamed; they don't have to believe that the person was defamed beyond a shadow of a doubt. Also, the number of jurors and percentages might vary, by jurisdiction, but civil juries often don't have to unanimously find in favor of the Plaintiff. 3/4ths seems to be fairly common, so if twelve jurors, you would need nine. One thing that I think some people forget is that these stores/gyms are OPEN TO the public, but aren't considered public venues, in the strictest sense. I'll tell you this: If I owned an independent gym and an area influencer made a video like this (without my permission) about one of the other members, I'd talk to an attorney and try to find some grounds to sue her ass for loss of business. My case would be that she didn't have my consent to film there; she didn't have consent to use my gym for commercial purposes AND she has caused great financial harm to my business because people are afraid to become members of my gym due to being worried about being captured in one of these videos. I'd obviously find shills to lie and say they would be members of my gym, but are worried about being on such an influencer's video.

Because they are not actually observing their own surroundings, only their surroundings as it relates to seeking attention. Honestly, a serial killer could walk up to her outside of the camera shot, and she would never know.

@@maryrichardson1318Very interesting theory. I cryptically wonder if it has been tested.

I can't help to observe my surroundings, it helps me learn more about my surroundings. xD

Because from the time they were 2 they were raised with a phone in their hand so actually standing quietly and patiently waiting using the time to think and observe what is going on around them is a foreign concept.

Because, they failed to study basic biology, regarding 350+ million years of survival evolution.

🤣🤣🤣

Yep. She clearly didn’t just “notice this while editing”. She’s been filming him the whole time and looking at the Picture in Picture and reacting to him live. 🤮

Right! People should start suing for defamation of character and bullying (publicly humiliating them on the Internet), harassment whatever

It's crazy this putting their whole lives on display sometimes means they're not embarrassed by anything. And if they are they retaliate by calling it bullying. Yes shaming was not always nice but it did help society be more normal.

I'm curious what they are doing specifically that's illegal. Filming other people?

@@davidlynch1958 Holding up the counter for content. Annoying other people in line.

@@davidlynch1958 They are a breach of public nuisance laws. Filming people in public, who are an unwilling and unpaid participant, for a video (especially one that is being monetised), is a breach of the public nuisance laws. So they are a public nuisance.

@@MustardSkaven Exactly. You got it. They are a public nuisance.

There’s no law like that in America. If you are in public , then you can be filmed.

For me, when I'm looking at people, I'm usually thinking... that was a choice.

I look at people too, I’m a forgetful person, sort of like Dori, I hate it when someone greets me and have no idea who they are, so I tend to look around mentally preparing myself incase I see familiar faces so I have time to organize my memories 😂

@@Ka_tari_na Yes! A fellow Dory! It can get annoying sometimes, especially, in my case, being better with faces than names.

🎯

We are so past the normal exit, we passed that ages ago.......😮

Unfortunately

Normalcy ended 17 years ago

And likely no influencers filming themselves lol

@@kermitthefrog2311 cross my fingers every morning.

@@CoffeeMugTwentyFive 😂😂

I used to go at 3am when Walmart was open 24 hours.

@@sci-fi.tsunami It's a good strategy.