45th meeting between Djokovic & Federer. The head to head was previously tied at 22-22 before this match. My Other Channels: / @kunnu8609 / @kunnu1107 / @kunnu4 No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
My Other Channels: ru-vid.com/show-UCI06Kdk5Gp67dsgrdbh8lLA ru-vid.com/show-UCyJaQIf2CnXT0jELkPeO4CQ ru-vid.com/show-UC101A3qlvu664aOBcjjSMag No copyright is intended, all rights go to its respective owners!
After set 3, I was anticipating a colossal comeback from Rog. He has orchestrated 2 sets to love down comebacks before and we know he's a master performer in 5 set matches. Unfortunately, it didn't happen but the next year he was magnificent against Nadal after playing a brutal match against Wawrinka before the final!
Another super upload! Thank you! Roger's aggresive tactics backfired on him in this match. He missed many shots and Djokovic had an answer for this game that day. He was unplayable in the first 2 aeta and Roger changed tactics a little too late in the game.
Fed was striking the ball well, but tactically he was playing really stupid tennis imo. You can't keep rushing the net on a slow hardcourt like this, especially against Nole. You have to rally from the baseline even if you don't want to, because otherwise you just lose.
Never understood why Roger always tried to blast Novak off the court. Djoko is the best counterpuncher ever. Wawrinka was the only person who could do that.
A surprising statistic ; will take your word for it - and here's another ; in their only two grand slam final meetings , Wavrinka was 100% successful winning both meetings in 4 sets comfortably
A great level from both ; difference btw Stan playing Djokovic & Fed - Stan very consistently kept the ball deep ( not allowing djokovic to step in & hit easy winners ) & , Stan hit flatter and more often more penetrating ground strokes on both sides than did Fed. Although not quite the variety of shot of Fed , Stan match up against Djokovic s relentless back court style quite a lot better
@@theaviator1152 What's the common thing in all the matches you mentioned? They are not in Grand Slams. I do however believe that aggressive tennis is the way for Federer to play agaisnt anyone, especially Nadal.
Lmao best joke ever!!!😂😂😂😂 Federer made djokovic look like a ball kid from the 3rd set until the end: it could have easily gone to 5 sets Even in the first two sets Federer played better but djokovic was great in the crucial points
Horrible match from Federer, his worst AO match against Novak. 58% first serves, 35% unreturned serves vs Novak who still wasnt the server he has become with Ivanisevic, aproaching the net so many times in Roddick fashion(mid court slices ) against the best passer on hard, missing crucial forehands on tight points etc .
That's why the year after he won 2 gs and also the year after another 2 when he was 37, and that's also why novak is 37 and still winning GS's and dominating the tour and number 1 forever lool indeed buddy 😂😂😂
Would anyone mention the age difference between Sinner or Alvaraz when they play with Djokovic? Who are at their peak fitness and about 15 years younger than Djpkovic? Or is the age difference excuse reserved for only for Federer vs Djokovic? Quite convenient. 28 vs 34 compared to 22 vs 36/37.
@@agranshanand well its about experience. Djo beats them like how Fed had a winning record over Djo in the first 28 ish times they met. Youth vs experience my guy. Fed played for so long so djo and nadal got more chances at him
