Тёмный

NP Completeness 4 - Satisfiability and 3SAT 

Professor Painter
Подписаться 4,7 тыс.
Просмотров 34 тыс.
50% 1

In this video we introduce the most classic NP Complete problem -- satisfiability. We prove that 3SAT is NP Complete by reducing SAT to it.

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 18   
@saakshi.padamwar
@saakshi.padamwar 2 года назад
Best explanation ever. I'm studying for my exams right now and this is the best help I could get on RU-vid.
@haythamadnan3465
@haythamadnan3465 3 года назад
The link you provided is the proof of the Cook's theorem, but could you please share the link of the generic proof of reducing SAT to 3-SAT in polynomial time? Thanks!
@paarak4397
@paarak4397 Месяц назад
today we pass
@solinmaaroof
@solinmaaroof 10 месяцев назад
thank you for the explanation! is it possible to get these lecture notes?
@hjain1011
@hjain1011 3 года назад
Thanks for these wonderful lectures. Also can you share your notes.
@adityapalve3752
@adityapalve3752 2 года назад
U saved me before my exam. Thks a lot.
@miarodgers8922
@miarodgers8922 2 года назад
when i plug this into a truth table, the answers are not the same. is there a reason why it would be wrong?
@derda3209
@derda3209 2 года назад
you made a mistake
@2004seraph
@2004seraph 6 месяцев назад
At 14:42, couldnt you just substitute the terms Xa represents into the formula to get 3-CNF?
@kiran10110
@kiran10110 Год назад
So much clearer now, thank you so much!!
@dezmembrezlogan2347
@dezmembrezlogan2347 3 года назад
Love you and greetings from Romania
@ea5673
@ea5673 2 года назад
So to prove 3SAT is in NP we reduce SAT to 3SAT. What if we want to prove that SAT is in NP? as far as I know every problem in NP can be reduced to the other problems. What about the first problem prove? Its like the chicken first or the egg + which one is the chicken and which one is the egg? Thanks for the great video!
@ProfessorPainter
@ProfessorPainter 2 года назад
To show that SAT is in NP is easy since we can just plug our variable assignment into the truth statement!
@shrutijadhav8766
@shrutijadhav8766 5 месяцев назад
is it not a rule that in a clause we cant have 2 literals the same as here XA is same for last two clauses
@underlecht
@underlecht 11 месяцев назад
You are cool. Thank you. Stuck on your video and very glad i found your explanation.
@craine5132
@craine5132 3 года назад
Can you link the proof you mentioned in the video?
@ProfessorPainter
@ProfessorPainter 3 года назад
Of course! Here is a link to a more easily digestible proof of Cook's Theorem: www.cs.otago.ac.nz/cosc341/proof_Cooks.pdf The actual theorem and proof involves a bit more complexity theory and automata theory than we cover in this course, but the rough idea is to convert every possible problem into a Boolean statement, which should be possible since each problem is a mathematical statement!
@tanvirtanvir6435
@tanvirtanvir6435 Год назад
1:27-2:00 Conjuctive Normal form
Далее
NP Completeness 5 - Independent Set Problem
11:20
Просмотров 29 тыс.
The Satisfiability Problem, and SAT is in NP
10:54
Просмотров 47 тыс.
Лиса🦊 УЖЕ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ!
00:24
Hamiltonian Cycle is NP-Complete (Algorithms 24)
23:17
3SAT and Establishing NP-completeness
10:06
Просмотров 3,9 тыс.
Greatest Math Theories Explained
9:18
Просмотров 100 тыс.
NP Completeness 7 - Clique Problem
10:47
Просмотров 14 тыс.
Cook-Levin Theorem: Full Proof (SAT is NP-complete)
31:30
The Test That Terence Tao Almost Failed
16:55
Просмотров 463 тыс.
The SAT Question Everyone Got Wrong
18:25
Просмотров 13 млн
How to STUDY so FAST that it feels ILLEGAL😳
7:21
Просмотров 1,3 млн