NRL 2024 | Storm v Roosters | Match Highlights 

Especially against the Melbourne Storm!

Best comment! 😅

😂😂😂❤

No way near haha he make so many mistake

Yeah, but the greats made mistakes as well so you tell me who doesn't make a mistake in the game? ​@seansmith9435

​@@Djshava no one says that about Walsh

@@seansmith9435does he tho?

He’s a better player 😂

He only got 3mins game time……

He's a little gun

he was on for 1 min and still scored :D

@dazza8389 Got smoked by Weekes though.

@@khankake9576 By who?

He’s a little pocket rocket.

JWH is toxic. If there wasn't such a ridiculous reverence in this game for illegal hits he would be a nobody.

@@Martin-pb7tshave you ever played football?

Yeah Storm have the minor in the bag, Anderson from Belmont NSW. Probably should be playing for the knights.

Defence? What about the speed 🤯

Or sharks for that matter

@@matis9118who did the sharks lose to last year in the finals?

@@mitchcook9563 this year i mean, because dont forget we were seriously dudded against the storm with shouldve gone to spec savers klein letting the harry grant knock on go right in front of him, right in front of the sticks.

Yeah, that run from a standing start was incredible.

Always is. He should be in the origin team. Let’s hope he’s not Injured

He should have stayed at the Knights.

Yep. Let the team down on a number of critical moments. Good when good but that’s not often enough.

Wot u mean dude? They playing the mighty storm relax

2 byes in the last 6 weeks. Not enough field time. Rusty form while faced against one of their top 3 contenders. Hopefully they bounce back.

Who cares if it bounces forward ?

Doesn't matter if it is bounces forward, as long as he passes it backwards

A ball if passed backward is allowed to bounce forward. Not sure if it the same one but there was a pass that was deflected off the hand of a defender which made it look forward.

It was still forward before it bounced.

Why? A lot of the storm team are from NSW. Papy, Welch, Blore, King, Vaalepu, Pezet, Meaney, just to name a few.

​@@SlaintheMhathThey didn't play on Wednesday.

@@themanthemyththelegend4786 And that changes...?

Up The Storm, who cares about NSW

Try July, a betting company donates $5k for every celebration to cancer research or something like that.

2018 wasn't a good year

Pretty scrappy from storm to be honest

@@ItsAleqo What kind of unreasonable standards are you expecting to see? That was easily the best 80 minutes that the Storm have played all year, against one of the teams that all of the "experts" have already got in their grand final.....and this is the team on top of the table. If the best performance by the best team is "pretty scrappy", how would you describe every other game?

@@loxxovvoxxol2896 well to be fair roosters had one less player for 20 min, storm should if wiped them off the park. Watching the game the roosters actually could have come back. I’ve seen Melbourne play much better. They also let tigers out 24 points on them 2 weeks ago…

@@ItsAleqo They haven't played better for a full game this year....definitely in patches, but that's not the same as having their best game. Regardless of sin bins (which the Storm also had) or anything else, they were playing against a very strong team - I wouldn't expect either one to be "wiped off the park", and they only conceded 8 points against a team that was averaging over 32 points per game up to this point. As for the Tigers game, it doesn't really hold much relevance to my original comment (apart from adding weight to what I said), and I imagine that you didn't watch it - the Tigers just about had their best game of the season, and absolutely aimed up against the Storm, which is what most teams tend to do.

And 2:40 "PROFESSUINAL ATHLETE"

Are you serious? Some of the most obvious ones you'll ever see here how are you complaining lol

Typical hens cheating 😂

or players could stop gambling? They know what they are doing, they take the risk. They give up the 10mins to stop the 4-6 points. This is a coaching issue far more than a player/card issue.

@@dazza8389 Best not to mention cheating when you are a storm supporter.

Wasn't their full team, they were missing Jared-Waerea-Hargreaves, and Spencer Leniu

Spencer played?

​@@khankake9576 you got charcoalled chickened 😂 barp barp

@dazza8389 Not a Roosters supporter🤡

@@khankake9576 I wouldn't admit it either 🤣 chin up princess

I feel like chicken 2nite, Chicken 2nite 😂 Hens are 💩

5? You mean 4

@@khankake9576 - well if they meet storm in the grand final and beat them will be 4 they have the team to win it again this year , then i said that would be a good way to end their dominance , unless they make it 5 , but I’m thinking can’t see them winning 5 not after losing 2 more key players?

@@khankake9576 If the panthers had as many "third parties" as the storm and the roosters we could have fought off the poachers and it would be 6, 7, who knows?

Watch the game not the fans.

The weather

We are over seas enjoying the warm weather and will be back soon for finals 😂 Up the mighty storm!

@@saulosiaosi6766 Over 60,000 at the pies v hawks last night.

@@SlaintheMhath what doe's that have to do with the storm?

It’s on 2000 views bro 💀

Hens no chance 😂

No way the chooks make it

After tonight's game, definitely not

@bradmakap Ok, so if it's not a Storm v Roosters GF, then Panthers and who?

@@khankake9576 storm vs panthers Hens are pretenders

To be fair, for the most part the refs had a pretty good game - especially the first half. I agree with your examples, but they were two of maybe three or four suspect calls all game. Usually there would be a dozen or more rubbish decisions every game....to the point where the players have less input to the flow and result of a game than the refs. That tackled in mid air penalty was definitely atrocious though....it came from Ashley Klein in the bunker. Everyone may as well jump just before they get tackled from now on.

@@loxxovvoxxol2896 The justification for the penalty behind that tackle is not so much the intent but the result. Whether Storm intended it or not, Sualii was thrown into a shocking landing.

@@TransientNeurotic That is clear - but doesn't make it right. It has basically always been that way, judiciary punishments are determined by injury caused though that doesn't mean it's a reasonable form of decision making. In this case the penalty occurred after Sualii landed dangerously - only because he leapt into the air to catch the ball after he failed to do so in his first attempt....by that time the defence was right there ready to make a tackle - they can't get out of the way, nor should they. It's unfortunate that he landed awkwardly and I'm glad that he wasn't seriously injured....but that should never be a penalty. I mean, what rule did the defender break? Tackling a player in mid-air? The player leapt over the defender after making a meal of the pass, because he was more worried about his next move rather than securely catching the ball. Or was it putting a player in a dangerous position? The player literally put himself in that position, It's not comparable to catching a bomb and being taking out during a kick chase, and it's not because the defender lifted him in the tackle. It's just not a penalty.

@@loxxovvoxxol2896 by due course of the game, a player was thrown into a dangerous situation. That is why there is a penalty. If we penalised on intent, it’d be extremely open to interpretation and players would be getting questionable relief and penalisation every other moment of the game. The penalty is received because a player was thrown into an extremely dangerous situation (and clearly in pursuit of the ball rather than attempting to jump over the defence and causing it through his own negligence), whether intentional or not is not the case. Many unintentional dangerous interactions occur week in week out and all (that are caught by ref) are penalised.

@@TransientNeurotic No, it was the attacking player that threw themselves into a dangerous position. Every week a ball bounces out of a players hands, yet they don't try to leapfrog the defence in order to regain possession - the defender had every right to be there to make a tackle, and would never have imagined that Sualii was going to make the decision to jump over him. This isn't about having intent or not - simply put, the defender didn't cause the outcome. Sualii was in pursuit of the ball, but there was no way known that anybody could foresee those events unfolding the way that they did. The defender was up and ready to make a tackle, the ball popped into the air (due to the ball carriers "negligence") and had Sualii not left the ground, Meaney would have tackled him as he was juggling the ball....then all we would have heard about that play is how wonderful the defence was by Meaney to have forced an error out of Sualii - instead he jumped up, hit the ground hard, and was awarded a penalty. As for any type of ruling being "extremely open to interpretation", do we watch the same sport? They can't even manage to be consistent with the decisions that they make within an 80 minute game.....or in the same half, what was deemed a penalty five minutes ago isn't one now - it's a weekly occurrence.