News to Go is the daily morning newscast of GMA News TV, anchored by Howie Severino and Kara David. It airs Mondays to Fridays at 9:00 AM (PHL Time) on GMA News TV Channel 11. For more videos from News to Go, visit www.gmanetwork.....
One day when time comes, I'd tell my kids that, once, there was a senator from Iloilo who never got the chance to be the president of this country despite being the fittest.
Sen. Miriam: Will you please stop emphasizing your word like this it startled everybody. HIM: I just read softly your honor. ME: Repeat it for how many times and laugh 🤣
He was not tried based on evidence, THIS WAS TRIAL VIA PUBLICITY... gross miscarriage of justice 💔💔 nakakapang diri that our so called Legislatures do not know how to construe, apply and follow the law THEY MADE!!!!
Note that an impeachment trial cannot be purely objective unlike a normal trial in a court room since an impeachment trial is a quasi-judicial and quasi-political. An impeachment trial in the Philippines is considered quasi-judicial and quasi-political due to its unique nature that combines elements of both the judicial and political processes. Quasi-judicial: An impeachment trial follows a structured legal procedure similar to a regular courtroom trial. It involves the presentation of evidence, examination of witnesses, and arguments by both prosecution and defense. Impeachment trials apply legal standards and constitutional provisions to determine whether the impeached official has committed "high crimes, betrayal of public trust, or culpable violation of the Constitution." This involves interpreting the law and the Constitution, akin to a judicial process. Quasi-political: Impeachment is ultimately a political process initiated by elected representatives in Congress. It reflects the will of the people through their elected officials and often involves partisan considerations. Public sentiment and political factors can influence the outcome of an impeachment trial. Politicians may vote based on their party affiliation or public pressure, making it a political decision. Differences from a Regular Trial in a trial court: In a regular trial, a jury of IMPARTIAL individuals typically determines the verdict. In an impeachment trial, members of the Senate act as jurors, but they are not impartial, as they are elected officials with their own political affiliations. Impeachment trials often have a lower standard of proof compared to criminal trials. In criminal cases, guilt must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt," whereas impeachment may require only a "preponderance of evidence" or a simple majority vote for conviction. The outcome of an impeachment trial can result in the removal of an elected official from office, which has significant political consequences. In contrast, a regular courtroom trial typically results in penalties like imprisonment or fines but doesn't directly affect an official's position. In summary, an impeachment trial in the Philippines is quasi-judicial because it involves legal procedures and the interpretation of the law, but it's also quasi-political because it's driven by political considerations, partisan influences, and the ultimate decision of elected representatives. This duality distinguishes it from a regular trial in a courtroom, where impartiality and strict legal standards are paramount.
@@firefirefire3277haha thank you for lecturing me about what an impeachment is 😂 safe to assume na you’re either a law student or a polscie hehe or baka grad 😂 but based on how you explained it im leaning towards polscie hehe but i can go as far as 1st year law student 😅good job
Note that an impeachment trial cannot be purely objective unlike a normal trial in a court room since an impeachment trial is a quasi-judicial and quasi-political. An impeachment trial in the Philippines is considered quasi-judicial and quasi-political due to its unique nature that combines elements of both the judicial and political processes. Quasi-judicial: An impeachment trial follows a structured legal procedure similar to a regular courtroom trial. It involves the presentation of evidence, examination of witnesses, and arguments by both prosecution and defense. Impeachment trials apply legal standards and constitutional provisions to determine whether the impeached official has committed "high crimes, betrayal of public trust, or culpable violation of the Constitution." This involves interpreting the law and the Constitution, akin to a judicial process. Quasi-political: Impeachment is ultimately a political process initiated by elected representatives in Congress. It reflects the will of the people through their elected officials and often involves partisan considerations. Public sentiment and political factors can influence the outcome of an impeachment trial. Politicians may vote based on their party affiliation or public pressure, making it a political decision. Differences from a Regular Trial in a trial court: In a regular trial, a jury of IMPARTIAL individuals typically determines the verdict. In an impeachment trial, members of the Senate act as jurors, but they are not impartial, as they are elected officials with their own political affiliations. Impeachment trials often have a lower standard of proof compared to criminal trials. In criminal cases, guilt must be proven "beyond a reasonable doubt," whereas impeachment may require only a "preponderance of evidence" or a simple majority vote for conviction. The outcome of an impeachment trial can result in the removal of an elected official from office, which has significant political consequences. In contrast, a regular courtroom trial typically results in penalties like imprisonment or fines but doesn't directly affect an official's position. In summary, an impeachment trial in the Philippines is quasi-judicial because it involves legal procedures and the interpretation of the law, but it's also quasi-political because it's driven by political considerations, partisan influences, and the ultimate decision of elected representatives. This duality distinguishes it from a regular trial in a courtroom, where impartiality and strict legal standards are paramount.
I miss the days when news organizations made these funny/satirical stories on politicians. Ngayon kasi takot na silang maka-offend eh. At tayo namang manonood eh mabilis ma-offend.
I just noticed how nice as a reporter is Bam Alegre. Though the reporting style is somewhat similar to that of ABS CBN's Marc Logan, Bam Alegre does it better in my opinion. :-) This news is entertaining. This is a news about Philippine Politics. Yes, Philippine Politics is really entertaining. Take note, many of our Politicians are once movie stars and showbiz personalities!
Nakakatawa lng sa kanila at sa iba.. Pero ang kawawa ang mamamayang pilipino.. Ganito pala mga binoto niyo.. O natin kasi hindi nman lahat binoto ntin diyan
Hindi po eto nkakatawa.... Malaki po ang ginagastos ng bawat senate hearing/inquiry.... Sa bawat session, marami po ang mapapakain natin ng may dignidad. Sana maunawaan nyo po
This video was created to highlight the comedic moments in this event. You could go watch an entire supreme court trial and rarely spot moments like this (evidently, why this highlight video was created). Watch other trials instead of comedic highlights.
Edi panoorin mo laht mariosep. Highlights toh eh. Bata hay nakow. Akala mo naman may alam sa impeachment trial, Taga react kalang dn naman kapag may pagkakamali un gobyerno naten puro reklmo tanong may ambag kaba para magreklamo
magandang timing lang ang iniintay ng mga taong nagmamahal sa bansang Pilipinas... sa tingin ko wala pa sa timing para tumakbo si bongbong as pres this decade.. marami pang pilipino ang kailangan matauhan at matutunan kung sinu sino ba talaga... ang nagmamahal sa bansang Pilipinas.. masyado ng malawak ang pagmamanipula ng mga alagad ng mga taong gumagamit sa administrasyon sa kasalukuyan.. tatak nlng sa utak na "ang isang bansang desiplinado matinding kalayaan ang natatamo"
