Тёмный

Nuclear powered Planes, Trains and Automobiles 

Curious Droid
Подписаться 1,1 млн
Просмотров 1,2 млн
50% 1

To quote L.P Hartleys 1953 book “The GoBetween”, “The past is a different country, they do things differently there”.
Patreon : / curiousdroid
Paypal.me : www.paypal.me/curiousdroid
You can now translate this and other curious droid videos, see my video about it here • Curious Droid RU-vid ...
That’s definitely something that could be applied our attitude to the newly discovered atomic power in the late 1940’s and 50s.
Within just a few years after the first atomic bombs had been dropped on Japan, it seemed as though the atom would the cure all our all our energy needs with power “too cheap to meter” as was once quoted.
Whilst ships and submarines of the leading navies went nuclear, companies put forward ideas for atomic powered planes, trains and yes, indeed automobiles.
The first idea of using a radioactive power source for a car, in this case, Radium, dates back to 1903 and in 1937 further analysis of the concept thought that it would need 50 tonnes of shielding to protect the driver. But with the development of the small self-contained reactors for ships and submarines in the 1950’s, the idea of atomic cars was back on the table.
In 1958 Ford unveiled a Uranium powered concept car called, with a typically 1950’s futuristic name, the Ford Nucleon. In essence, it was a scaled down submarine reactor in the back of the car which would heat stored water into high-pressure stream which then drove two turbines, one which provided the power to the wheels and the other which drove an electrical generator.
Ford engineers anticipated that it would have a range of about 5000 miles before you would need to nip into your local Ford dealers for the uranium core to be swapped out for a new one.
The passenger compartment was situated over the front wheels allowing the bulk of the reactor and the heavy shielding to be more centrally placed and to keep you as far as possible from the reactor.
As was the optimism of the 1950’s and the naivety of the general public, it was believed that nuclear power would eventually replace petrol power in the future.
Something which doesn’t bear thinking about if imagine that a car crash could turn into a major nuclear incident.
Ford only ever made scale models of the Nucleon as they anticipated the miniaturisation of the reactors and lighter shielding materials. As these didn’t appear and with the public’s increased awareness of radiation and nuclear waste, the project was dropped and the models ended up in the Henry Ford Museum in Dearborn, Michigan.
Now if you thought that the Ford Nucleon was a bit far fetched just look at the French Simca Fulga, a 1958 concept car designed by Robert Opron. This was meant to show how cars might look in the year 2000, powered by a nuclear reactor with voice control and guided by radar and an autopilot which communicated with a control tower. At over speeds of 150 km/h two of the wheels would retract and it would balance on the remaining two with the aid of gyroscopes.
Also in France in 1957-58, the Arbel-Symétric was proposed with either a gas generator or 40Kw nuclear reactor called the “Genestatom”. This would use radioactive cartridges made from nuclear waste. However, the French government disapproved of the use of nuclear fuel in cars and the development stopped.
Of all the land-based forms of transport, Trains were the most likely candidates to be nuclear powered, especially those travelling across large areas where electrification had not been done.
In the US, a nuclear-powered locomotive called the X-12 was put forward in a design study for the Association of American Railroads and several other companies by Dr Lyle Borst, one of the early members of the Manhattan project, which created the first Atomic bomb.
Title: Adam Are You Free?
Author: P C III
Source: www.pipechoir.com
Nightingale sounds from Gerry Gutteridge flic.kr/ps/Mk2zU
License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

8 апр 2017

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,8 тыс.   
@larsinator4397
@larsinator4397 5 лет назад
7:57 General Electric=General Atomic
@ender_slayer3
@ender_slayer3 4 года назад
What would you say if I told you that there is a real General Atomic, and that they have been around since 1955?
@Techblaze21654
@Techblaze21654 4 года назад
That's probably where the name came from
@ender_slayer3
@ender_slayer3 4 года назад
@@Techblaze21654 probably, although tbh I didn't know that they were a thing until i looked into it a bit
@davidmagann1805
@davidmagann1805 4 года назад
Still exists in the Fallout universe!
@katiewoodgate9540
@katiewoodgate9540 4 года назад
@@davidmagann1805 came here to find this comment
@theproffessional9
@theproffessional9 4 года назад
2:32 "voice control and radar" they weren't wrong..
@spacepope-1
@spacepope-1 4 года назад
Just about 20 years or so off
@scottiebones
@scottiebones 4 года назад
It's not truly radar, just passive infrared sensors.
@uwetheiss970
@uwetheiss970 3 года назад
@@scottiebones It is truly radar. For example Bosch produces Radar Sensors for modern cars.
@skpist
@skpist 3 года назад
😯
@mikemisch7968
@mikemisch7968 7 лет назад
True story... I was a research and development electronic technician in 1970 and my boss was an electrical engineer who told me that he worked for 13 years on a government project making a nuclear airplane. After a couple reactor melt downs they perfected the reactors and engines, met all specifications, and even had the airplane sitting in the research hanger ready to install the engines and take the first test flight. The day of the first test flight and after waiting 13 years, when they showed up for work they were informed the project was cancelled. He told me that he really believed that the plane was still around and ready to fly. The only limit on the flight time was food and water and the sanity of the flight crew.
@xavierrodriguez2463
@xavierrodriguez2463 6 лет назад
The plane could land and the crew and food could be cycled every few weeks.
@TheDrummer51
@TheDrummer51 6 лет назад
I had read that the US actually flew a nuclear powered plane but it irradiated everything behind it. Asked an old engineer I knew that worked on stuff like that in Nevada. He laughed and shook his head and said, "That thing was a mess!"
@sloth0jr
@sloth0jr 6 лет назад
... and you can go see the engines today at the EBR-1 National Historic Landmark about 30 minutes west of Idaho Falls, Idaho. They are massive things, about three stories high. inl.gov/experimental-breeder-reactor-i/
@toddkes5890
@toddkes5890 5 лет назад
All I had read about was a proposal for nuclear powered aircraft, comparing them on an economic basis. The comparison was between a nuclear powered aircraft vs conventional, at masses of 2000 ton and 4000 short tons, and seeing what range would allow for more cargo to be carried cheaper. (As a comparison, the max takeoff weight of a 747 is ~500 short tons, while the AN-225 is ~700 short tons)
@sloth0jr
@sloth0jr 5 лет назад
@Ian Mangham Thanks, updated!
@joshhyyym
@joshhyyym 7 лет назад
The nuclear power sources on remote science missions aren't the same as the ones used in power stations or submarines. They are radioisotope thermoelectric generators. They work by capturing the heat from the passive decay of the radioisotope, not by the neutron stimulated decay. Because of this, they can only output a tiny fraction of the power/weight of nuclear reactors.
@ryanbernadett9372
@ryanbernadett9372 6 лет назад
Was gonna say this, glad someone else was paying attention :p
@jeremyO9F911O2
@jeremyO9F911O2 6 лет назад
I can't stand it when people call RTGs as reactors.
@MikemfPanik
@MikemfPanik 6 лет назад
Even a battery is technically a reactor. RTGs are basically magic hot rocks minus the magic...maybe.
@jeremyO9F911O2
@jeremyO9F911O2 6 лет назад
Mike mf Panik indeed a battery is a reactor it combines an anode cathode and closed electrical circuit to create a chemical reaction. But there is no active reaction in a RTG, the isotopes release heat no matter what at a constant rate. The vessel does not change this decay in any way. Therefore RTG is not a reactor.
@sycodeathman
@sycodeathman 6 лет назад
You're right, but I want to point out that fission is very different form decay. Fission happens when a neutron hits an atomic nucleus and splits it into two smaller nuclei, while decay occurs when an unstable atomic nucleus spits out a particle via the weak force. Decay events are always random, while fission events can be controlled via the number of neutrons flying around.
@yangashi
@yangashi 7 лет назад
Meanwhile in an alternative universe.. all cities have been wiped out due to car crashes
@xmasinpacific
@xmasinpacific 7 лет назад
or just waiting in traffic behind rows of nuclear reactors -
@r0nas22
@r0nas22 7 лет назад
asdaffewwerqa asafdaqwrad Russian dash cam videos would be even more entertaining in this universe :D
@TriegaDN
@TriegaDN 7 лет назад
Probably more so, just much higher rates of cancer lol.
@atvkid0805
@atvkid0805 7 лет назад
Nuclear Reactors are much cleaner for our enviornment then conventional engines
@asasial1977
@asasial1977 7 лет назад
atvkid0805 ask Russia and Japan, about how clean they are, New York almost found out as well.
@indicus9075
@indicus9075 4 года назад
My car is fusion powered Millions of years ago some plants stored some energy from a huge fusion reactor then eventually got buried
@samarvora7185
@samarvora7185 4 года назад
No way! Mine too!
@kaikart123
@kaikart123 4 года назад
It's animals you dolt not plants
@kaikart123
@kaikart123 4 года назад
@@tthung8668 "No"
@zolikoff
@zolikoff 4 года назад
It's plants. Fossil oil is from plants.
@kutter_ttl6786
@kutter_ttl6786 4 года назад
@@zolikoff Depends on the fossil fuel. Petroleum and natural gas comes from phytoplankton and zooplankton while coal and methane comes from plants.
@thecapacitor1395
@thecapacitor1395 7 лет назад
Fallout vibes :D
@georgealexoo2996
@georgealexoo2996 5 лет назад
59 years left
@deathclaw6033
@deathclaw6033 5 лет назад
Yeah lol
@ericbarber3420
@ericbarber3420 5 лет назад
AHHH, there’s a deathclaw in the room
@shaunhopkins2130
@shaunhopkins2130 5 лет назад
Grab your rad away and rad x we are going in
@JV-un7qw
@JV-un7qw 5 лет назад
Fallout is commin'
@DannyOvox3
@DannyOvox3 7 лет назад
50s and 60s, what a weird and exciting era
@santicheeks1106
@santicheeks1106 3 года назад
and I think its the best looking era
@bipolarman6737
@bipolarman6737 2 года назад
racism era💀
@davidbuschhorn6539
@davidbuschhorn6539 7 лет назад
We kind of *DO* use nuclear powered cars if you have an electric car and a nuclear power plant.
@cameronlukewilson281
@cameronlukewilson281 7 лет назад
David Buschhorn lol. very indirectly so. :)
@danielmocsny5066
@danielmocsny5066 7 лет назад
Even more indirectly, conventional planet-raping cars burn fossil fuels which store energy from the giant nuclear fusion reactor in sky that reached Earth millions of years ago.
@WestCoastWheelman
@WestCoastWheelman 7 лет назад
My car is solar powered! Millions of years ago, ancient plants sucked up the sun's energy and stored it in the ground as they died and got buried...
@leerman22
@leerman22 7 лет назад
My car is Big Bang powered!
@DrunkenUFOPilot
@DrunkenUFOPilot 7 лет назад
+David Hill: Fission? Nah. Fusion!
@VeritechGirl
@VeritechGirl 7 лет назад
2:33 lol, how cars might've looked in the year 2000! But by 2005, we were supposed to have hover boards and Autobot City!
@itsmetheherpes1750
@itsmetheherpes1750 7 лет назад
they look like george jetson's car :)) and btw, where is my flying car?
@Remaggib
@Remaggib 7 лет назад
To be fair, only a dozen years after 2000 or so, we do have autopilot and other things like that. They were not too far off in that regard.
@JackieWelles
@JackieWelles 7 лет назад
yea and by 2000 we were already suppose to have manned mission to Saturn ! :D but i think it makes sence that people thought so with all the moon landings and etc. they thought technology would advance faster than what we have now.
@LoisoPondohva
@LoisoPondohva 7 лет назад
Marius Snow it's more about economy and political commitment, than technology. With our technology we could do unimaginable right now, if not for lack of finance.
@pauljones3017
@pauljones3017 7 лет назад
Sadly, a flying car's cost isn't as nice as its concept.
@cafeta
@cafeta 7 лет назад
Nuclear Smart Phone!!, there you go!
@caulkins69
@caulkins69 7 лет назад
That would certainly give new fire to the "cell phones cause cancer" people.
@Emppu_T.
@Emppu_T. 7 лет назад
glows in the dark!
@samfisher3336
@samfisher3336 7 лет назад
Honeyyyyyy try not to drop the phone or you will wipe us all )))) And yeah.. phone crash test will be only in arizona desert )))) Dbrand promotion: ( spare us for the sake of jesus )))
@leerman22
@leerman22 6 лет назад
Betavoltaic Strontium-90 batteries!
@richardescobar9306
@richardescobar9306 6 лет назад
cafeta what of you drop it and it breaks
@Antonluisre
@Antonluisre 7 лет назад
> Fallout
@CaptainWalterWhite
@CaptainWalterWhite 6 лет назад
Antonluisre ?
@b1aflatoxin
@b1aflatoxin 5 лет назад
I thumbs down to keep it 76. :)
@Antartnord
@Antartnord 4 года назад
Now we know why cars explode like mini nukes when we shut them. xD
@b1aflatoxin
@b1aflatoxin 4 года назад
@@uku4171 It did work; 2-years ago, ...for 20mins.😉
@boxman2310
@boxman2310 4 года назад
I also thought of that
@Parkettboden
@Parkettboden 4 года назад
The Car at 2:30 reminds me at the Car developed by Homer Simpson
@tomr6955
@tomr6955 4 года назад
Ha ha yes! I wonder if it was inspiration
@globalmillitary9611
@globalmillitary9611 4 года назад
HAHAHA yeah that's what I've been thinking since my childhood
@samcoon6699
@samcoon6699 4 года назад
The Homer!
@alexp6364
@alexp6364 7 лет назад
When Fallout was This close to becoming reality
@Xylos144
@Xylos144 7 лет назад
A correction: the nuclear power on the Space probes come from nuclear-powered GENERATORS. Not Nuclear REACTORS. They operate off of the decay heat of certain radio-isotopes. Namely Plutonium-238 (though Strontium-90 is a decent secondary candidate). While these things are great for space travel, they are literally just solid-state devices, with a lump of radioactive material decaying and emitting heat, and a bunch of thermocouples harvesting about 1000-2000 watts of thermal energy into about 100 watts of electricity. They are not small nuclear reactors - just generators. They do not use sustained fission chain reactions, and they can never be scaled up to provide the tens, hundreds, or thousands of kilowatts necessary to perform transportation tasks. This is an improper analogy, and your very well made video would be improved if this allusion was removed.
@FALprofessional
@FALprofessional 7 лет назад
Well said. Thank you for bringing this to light.
@Xylos144
@Xylos144 7 лет назад
That's absolutely 100%... correct, actually. The only way any space probes past Mars (and recently Jupiter with Juno) have conveyed any information to Earth is through antennae powered by RTGs. The overall SNR you can from a transmitted signal is a function of both the transmission power and receiver power - so with large enough antennae arrays on Earth, and straight empty space from here all the way to Pluto, we can pick up these signals. Communications engineering is a really interesting subset of electrical engineering. But I'm not quite sure I understand what point you wanted to make here. My comment was on the lack of scale-ability for RTG - it's a very reliable, inefficient, low-power method that generates a lot of waste heat (good for keeping computers warm enough to function) and a little bit of power (enough to run small computer, camera, a few instruments, and an antennae - often not all at once). Can you clarify what exactly you wanted to discuss here? To clarify on my end - my insistence on needing kilowatts or megawatts of power refers to running ion engines of any appreciable amount in order to transport larger ships. (Or to power a ship with a human crew, growing food, recycling oxygen, etc.) Ion drives work by accelerating gas to speeds hundreds or thousands of times faster than rocket fuel propellant would leave. Which is great - you can get a lot more push off of the same propellant mass. But moment exchange is (mv) - mass and velocity are directly related, while kinetic energy is (1/2mv^2). So if I want to double my momentum gained from ejecting a kilogram of propellant, I need to double the ejection velocity, and thus I'll double my delta-v. But to double the velocity, I have to put in 4x as much energy. Very quickly, ion engines start to have very large power budgets, and a few dozen or hundred Watts from an RTG just won't be up to the task. Micro-adjustments for deep space satellites - perhaps. But nothing that would involve large probes or human transportation. Anyway, an RTG just can't be scaled up to create kilowatts or Megawatts of electricity. It just becomes impractical. You need a full nuclear reactor, that is producing energy from fission events - not regular nuclear decay.
@nnelg8139
@nnelg8139 6 лет назад
Actually, electricity in nuclear plants comes from a generator too. The generator is basically a set of big magnets spun by a turbine driven by steam heated by the nuclear reactor itself. What's used in spacecraft is called a Radiothermal Generator or RTG, and while it also uses heat said heat is from decay not fission, and the way its converted into electricity is more technical.
@bocahdongo7769
@bocahdongo7769 Год назад
@@nnelg8139 that's more of wording than technicality
@ThePostApocalypticInventor
@ThePostApocalypticInventor 6 лет назад
A great video, very well composed and produced. I really like your work!
@MrVillabolo
@MrVillabolo 2 года назад
I love your name! Would you happen to be related to Dr. Strangelove?
@Pooua
@Pooua 7 лет назад
I always enjoy Curious Droid's well-researched videos. I must object to this video stating that US space probes use nuclear reactors, as those are not nuclear reactors. Thermoelectric generators are not able to be throttled and are fairly low powered (considering that the thermoelectric effect is not efficient).
@LoPhatKao
@LoPhatKao 7 лет назад
RTGs are classed as nuclear reactors based upon their use of plutonium as a fuel source, not how they generate power.
@Pooua
@Pooua 7 лет назад
So, a photoelectric button battery would get categorized as a nuclear reactor, simply because it includes plutonium? What if it contained enriched uranium, instead? The difference between a reactor and an RTG is that a reactor operates based on sustaining an atomic chain reaction (hence, reactor), but an RTG operates by the natural decay of radioactive materials (hence, not a reaction and so not a reactor).
@minorityofthought1306
@minorityofthought1306 7 лет назад
Richard Alexander Nailed it Rick. I was thinking the same thing when he basically said RTG's were nuclear reactors. Now I don't have to post an explanation myself. Thank you. :)
@Virakotxa
@Virakotxa 7 лет назад
Yeah... That last sell part of the wonders of future unshielded nuclear transportation was a bit iffy...
@emokillla1
@emokillla1 7 лет назад
They did launch one satellite using a fission reactor: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SNAP-10A
@trevorreedstudios
@trevorreedstudios 7 лет назад
Your videos truly are a pleasure to watch. Yet another one I thoroughly enjoyed. Please keep making them.
@Moliminous
@Moliminous 7 лет назад
These sound like extra juicy targets for terrorists and military bombing targets
@jimboonie9885
@jimboonie9885 3 года назад
Would still use this over diesel
@william254
@william254 2 года назад
@@jimboonie9885 Why?
@GabrielDeVault
@GabrielDeVault 7 лет назад
Wow, 1st vid of yours I've seen. Excellent material, research, presentation, and an eloquent and hypnotic voice. Subscribed!
@Zeldaschampion
@Zeldaschampion 7 лет назад
So thats why the cars in Fallout explode like nuclear bombs...
@markkostecka1454
@markkostecka1454 4 года назад
just saying the explosion is way to small to create a nuclear mushroom cloud just saying
@sebdom7850
@sebdom7850 3 года назад
@@markkostecka1454 Yeah, also the plasma shouldn't be neon green and lasers shouldn't be red, like Shoddycast said, it's an artistic choice for the fallout universe
@markkostecka1454
@markkostecka1454 3 года назад
@@sebdom7850 the plasma should be purple and the lasers could be any color depending on the Crystal /glass used to make the colour
@sebdom7850
@sebdom7850 3 года назад
@@markkostecka1454 Interesting, the lasers can be that (but they also are a lot slower than they should be), the plasma being green I considered difference between our universe and the Fallout universe, like how radiation can mutate people and be less likely to give them cancer, laser guns having recoil and fusion technology being easier create
@markkostecka1454
@markkostecka1454 3 года назад
@@sebdom7850 the laser guns are Like the ones in star wars but the real life eqivilant is the size of a us battle ship turret and goes the speed of light
@joaosturza
@joaosturza 7 лет назад
explain thorium reactors and alternative space lunch ideas such as skyhooks ,mass drivers,and slingatron
@joaosturza
@joaosturza 7 лет назад
plz
@joaosturza
@joaosturza 7 лет назад
it would be cool
@josephnorth
@josephnorth 7 лет назад
mmm... space lunch.
@marshalclarke5417
@marshalclarke5417 7 лет назад
For alternative Space lunches look by at "Tested". For Space Launch methods look up "Isaac Arthur"
@damonstr
@damonstr 7 лет назад
Hello can you hear me now Isaac Arthur's stuff is great!
@meesalikeu
@meesalikeu 5 лет назад
i really like how these clips are so straightforward and then thats it. right to the point.
@KuraIthys
@KuraIthys 7 лет назад
5000 miles is a pretty unimpressive range considering the complexities of trying to shove a nuclear reactor into a car. Some things were just never that practical. Nuclear powered trains seem like they would still have made some sense. But at scales below that it just seems... A rather questionable use of technology. (and aircraft have weight issues.) Still, even with trains, the idea is rather niche compared to just using an electrified rail network and powering that from nuclear power (or whatever else you may have handy.)
@leonardpearlman4017
@leonardpearlman4017 5 лет назад
I'm with the trains! That niche is definitely there. I'm thinking "Belt and Road Initiative" territory, developing vast barren areas. You see a lot of this in videos from China about new bridges and railways and highways... they often seem to be in surprisingly blank terrain, where it seems like there's nothing but gravel to the horizon....
@tomr6955
@tomr6955 4 года назад
Exactly and you need to fill up water too of course. The amount of miles I do I'd be replacing the reactor fuel every odd week
@irgendwerirgendwo9095
@irgendwerirgendwo9095 4 года назад
What about boats? Some already are 100% nuclear powered
@justushall9634
@justushall9634 4 года назад
Weight issue with planes? The nuclear powerplant, if compact, would be lighter than a heavy load of jet fuel for a long flight. And consider people from low-lying island countries at risk from rising sea-levels due to climate change. Telling those people that a plane that burns normal jet fuel is mor okay than one that burns uranium; is like telling a rape victim that rape is okay, or telling a badly traumatized war veteran (the Iraq War produced plenty of those!) that we should glorify war.
@theoperator3712
@theoperator3712 3 года назад
@@justushall9634 It's not the weight of the reactor that is the issue. It's the weight of the shielding. Unless of course you like getting hit with 1000 rems of radiation of course.
@GhislainBousquet
@GhislainBousquet 7 лет назад
Nice documentation, well explain, fine work. Bravo.
@thedungeondelver
@thedungeondelver 7 лет назад
Two could-have-been's not mentioned: Project Pluto, a nuclear-powered, nuclear armed cruise missile that used a nuclear ramjet engine, would fly at over Mach 3, at very low level. So low in fact that the shockwave from its passing would kill or cripple anyone directly under it - which would have been a mercy, as it would've been spewing lethal levels of gamma radiation behind it. It would be armed with 15 one megaton nuclear bombs that it would use TERCOM and astro-navigation to fly to targets and deploy. Then, once all fifteen warheads were ejected, it would find a final target, shut down the oxygen flow over the reactor, and circle the target slowly. The reactor, now no longer receiving cooling air blasting over it, would melt down. Molten plutonium would literally rain out over wherever the missile was circling, until it ran out of airspeed and crashed creating a permanently uninhabitable crash-site. The other was equally as horrifying _seeming_ but actually quite neat. The Orion project would've used nuclear bombs for propulsion in deep space. By ejecting a nuclear explosive out of the back of a spacecraft shielded by essentially a large "plate", the spacecraft would've been propelled by the oomph of the bombs going off behind it, eventually pushing it to tens of thousands of miles an hour.
@RCAvhstape
@RCAvhstape 7 лет назад
A low-flying Pluto wouldn't kill people from the shock wave, it would kill them by bombarding them with neutrons from the unshielded reactor. Also, one idea for Project Orion was indeed horrifying: it was to use it as a gigantic nuclear missile which would lob a humongous hydrogen bomb high over the USSR whose blast of light and radiation would basically fry a whole continent from space. Closest thing to a Death Star we ever dreamed up, and scared the crap out of President Kennedy and the Orion engineers who just wanted to explore the Solar System.
@GrahamCStrouse
@GrahamCStrouse 6 лет назад
thedungeondelver The Orion Project: Deep space exploration for astronauts who really want to give the remaining population of Earth a giant middle-finger as they boldly go where no one has gone before...
@Ramiromasters
@Ramiromasters 4 года назад
@@RCAvhstape Such bright explosion would make a hole in the Ozone layer which is naturally decayed by UV from our Sun at a slow rate. Nobody would be stupid enough to blow a hole in our own atmosphere's protective layer! People would drag them by the ear and kick them out of office right?
@jf752
@jf752 3 года назад
He did a video on Orion. About 800 nuclear explosions to get one launch vehicle into space.
@markm9125
@markm9125 7 лет назад
Wow, I had not heard about any of this. Thanks for another great article. Keep them coming!
@yunuselhabibi
@yunuselhabibi 7 лет назад
Thank you so much for always making these awesome videos for us. I really appreciate your hard work. Greetings from Germany :)
@Kris.G
@Kris.G 7 лет назад
"Yea, your suffering shall exist no longer; it shall be washed away in Atom's Glow, burned from you in the fire of his brilliance."
@2323BlackCat
@2323BlackCat 6 лет назад
Praise be to ATOM! May division find us both Brother.....
@chumbawaumbacumpa
@chumbawaumbacumpa 4 года назад
I’m still waiting for the narrator to say, “Outstanding move”
@mazharabbasbukhari7390
@mazharabbasbukhari7390 5 лет назад
Wonderful work.your all videos are knowledgdable.
@heyimrobee
@heyimrobee 6 лет назад
Great video, clear and interesting narration. Thanks for sharing it!
@rif6876
@rif6876 7 лет назад
Seems like people in the 40s and 50s viewed nuclear power the way we view IoT - most people think everything is better when connected, no downsides at all.
@herbertdaly5190
@herbertdaly5190 6 лет назад
Most people? Are you sure?
@kefsound
@kefsound 6 лет назад
Just like IoT, it was a security disaster.
@Ty-yt3lj
@Ty-yt3lj 5 лет назад
Yeah people thought 2001 would be a utopia. 1 date. 9/11/01.
@tomr6955
@tomr6955 4 года назад
@@herbertdaly5190 Yes most people. Also everyone loves the cloud. Cloud cloud cloudy cloud
@jesusramirezromo2037
@jesusramirezromo2037 4 года назад
@@herbertdaly5190 Yep, most pepole Remember Juicero?,why would a Juicer, fridge or toaster need internet conection?
@PyreVulpimorph
@PyreVulpimorph 7 лет назад
Great video, but a few comments: Spacecraft do not use _nuclear_ (fission)power plants to generate electricity, but _radiological_ ones that rely on alpha or beta decay. There have been a few test reactors flown in space, but all practical spacecraft either use RTGs or solar. I was also a little disappointed you didn't mention the type of nuclear reactors tested for Aircraft Reactor Experiment. At least in the US, the reactor tested was a _molten salt reactor_ that used liquid fuel. All the other reactors mentioned here (I believe) used solid fuel elements and either water or sodium metal for cooling. But the aircraft reactor, because the fuel was dissolved in a molten salt, could operate at higher temperatures (and thus higher efficiency), low pressure (and thus less deadweight), and, in a land-based power plant, be practically meltdown-proof because the fuel was already fluid and not solid uranium or uranium oxide. Building on the Aircraft Reactor Experiment, the scientists at ORNL ran the Molten Salt Reactor Experiment from '65 to '69 with great success, and this design forms the basis for one of the Gen-IV reactor types proposed in 2002 and are in active development today. Cheers! :D
@survivingworldsteam
@survivingworldsteam 5 лет назад
Pyre Vulimorph; he correctly stated that the reactor proposed for the X-12 nuclear locomotive also used a liquid fuel; name weapons grade uranium in a sulfuric acid "soup." Refueling the reactor would have consisted of replacing the soup mixture; the old mixture would have the waste products removed so it could be used again.
@noop9k
@noop9k 3 года назад
This again. Soviets flew fission reactors to space and even dropped one on Canada.
@LordandGodofYouTube
@LordandGodofYouTube 7 лет назад
I really enjoy your videos, thanks for making them!
@WatchGeek
@WatchGeek 7 лет назад
another great video, thanks for the upload!!
@TiernanWilkinson
@TiernanWilkinson 5 лет назад
Last year I was on a trip to see the 2017 eclipse, taking a road trip to the western US. One of the places we stopped was EBR-1, one of the first-ever nuclear power plants. Outside, they actually have two hulking constructs filled with pipes and scaffolds and a large central cask. These are actually testing armatures to mount a nuclear reactor and several J-43 engines with fuel systems converted to use, rather than combustion, nuclear energy as heat to sustain jet thrust. The whole construct was on rails that ran along the desert wastelands that served as the testbeds for America's burgeoning military in the early Atomic Age. It really seemed a shame that we lack planes or trains that run on nuclear. Shame it seems it would never really work.
@Spacedog79
@Spacedog79 7 лет назад
I'm a big fan of next gen nuclear power but the idea of using it directly in transportation is just stupid.
@yassbeater4738
@yassbeater4738 7 лет назад
Daniel Thompson not if it's done smart, it would be great in airplanes, buses, heavy construction equipment and even trains but I agree small cars should just run on electricity because they don't need much torque.
@Spacedog79
@Spacedog79 7 лет назад
So what happens when that plane crashes? An accident that involves release of nuclear material in a stationary MSR is more or less inconceivable, but put it in a plane and the risk is non zero.
@pllagunos
@pllagunos 7 лет назад
Daniel Thompson with todays technology we could put designs into test in modern computers, that way you would know the best way to construct a very safe nuclear reactor for planes.
@Spacedog79
@Spacedog79 7 лет назад
Firstly flying is inherently risky. You can make it very safe but never 100% safe. Secondly there is no need for it, we don't need planes that fly for weeks at a time these days.
@pllagunos
@pllagunos 7 лет назад
I never said there's need for it, neither that it would be 100% safe. What I said is that it can be done and it could be safe, would it be worth it? I don't think so
@alexpowers3697
@alexpowers3697 7 лет назад
Awesome research and commentary. Thank you!
@AurovrataVenet
@AurovrataVenet 7 лет назад
great videos. very well presented and documented
@jsl151850b
@jsl151850b 7 лет назад
5:36 NBC's SuperTrain? (It was supposed to be 'The Love Boat' on rails) The scale model wrecked during shooting. Would have made a nice Disaster of the Week movie. ALSO...Did you remember the nuclear vehicle from 'The Big Bus'?
@orangie84
@orangie84 7 лет назад
Let's not forget the 1960's bat mobile. Robin was quoted as saying ATOMIC BATTERIES to power turbines to speed ready to move out. Then batman would say roger. So the batmobile was powered by atomic batteries. What ever the heck that is.
@jsl151850b
@jsl151850b 7 лет назад
The novel on which the movie 'When World's Collide' was based had a sequel. On the now defrosted planet they discovered mostly intact advanced alien technology which included rechargeable automobiles. In a manner not explained by the author the batteries combined radioactivity and electricity. Written in the 1930s they had no idea how atomic energy would work.
@RCAvhstape
@RCAvhstape 7 лет назад
A real life "atomic battery" is a radioisotopic thermoelectric generator, or RTG, like the ones flown on space probes. They are basically a thermocouple wrapped around a substance like plutonium or strontium 90 which generates heat from decay. The whole thing is encased in shielding to survive a launch failure and is quote safe to handle if built right, but not very efficient for the weight. So they are good for powering a space probe's electronics, but to power an electric car they'd be kind of weak and heavy.
@jsl151850b
@jsl151850b 7 лет назад
In a 1960s encyclopedia (The annual update?) they had a radioisotope, a phosphor and a photovotaic cell act as a battery for low power applications. Must not have panned out. The radiation degrades the PV cell?
@HC-cb4yp
@HC-cb4yp 6 лет назад
The Big Bus: The greatest, most under-rated movie of all time... Hollywood is probably getting to remake it...
@RB747domme
@RB747domme 5 лет назад
Mr secretary: "We need to planes flying soon as possible." Engineers: ".. but sir, the pilots will all die of radiation poisoning." Mr secretary: "Meh.. the pilots are all expendable. There's plenty more where they came from. Fuckem." Engineers: "..Uhh.. right. Ok then."
@andyspark5192
@andyspark5192 7 лет назад
You show us always something unusual and interesting. Thank You.
@tommynorthwood
@tommynorthwood 7 лет назад
I hit like and you just earned another subscriber. Just wow. Loved it.
@peterxyz3541
@peterxyz3541 7 лет назад
There was a satirical movie from the 70s, a "Greyhound" Bus was nuclear power.
@LarryK518
@LarryK518 6 лет назад
"Wait Doc! You mean this sucker is NUCLEAR!?" ( from the movie Back to the Future)
@glassyxanderplaysminecraft8340
@glassyxanderplaysminecraft8340 4 года назад
Just... Get it out.
@veronicats100
@veronicats100 5 лет назад
This guys videos are absolutely the best.
@96koos
@96koos 6 лет назад
Loving the channel
@44R0Ndin
@44R0Ndin 7 лет назад
IMO the biggest applications for nuclear technology should be terrestrial power generation and space travel. We already have one of these, and the US has successfully tested a nuclear thermal rocket engine.
@YeshuaAgapao
@YeshuaAgapao 7 лет назад
Voyager and other spacecraft use RTGs that run off of radioactive decay, not nuclear fission (or fusion).
@capt.k8577
@capt.k8577 7 лет назад
great throwback video , Thanks
@ezra4no1
@ezra4no1 7 лет назад
Love your videos. Well done!
@SparrowVivek
@SparrowVivek 7 лет назад
Has anyone noticed that he looks like varys from Game of Thrones?
@captiannemo1587
@captiannemo1587 7 лет назад
Yes, many times over...
@FayGonzalez
@FayGonzalez 7 лет назад
Sparrow Vivek I was just about to mention that!!
@1953Johnnyp
@1953Johnnyp 7 лет назад
Are you telling me he may be a eunuch?
@SparrowVivek
@SparrowVivek 7 лет назад
Depends on your perspective...
@FayGonzalez
@FayGonzalez 7 лет назад
let's ask his little birds!!
@FabledGentleman
@FabledGentleman 7 лет назад
This thinking is what led to the fallout games. And oh boy is it awesome :D
@golfzulu5136
@golfzulu5136 7 лет назад
thanks a lot- great show and with the subs nice to follow.
@safetystephen
@safetystephen 6 лет назад
Another great, smart video. Always hearty food for thought and inspiring further reading. Thanks!!!
@callmeplez813
@callmeplez813 4 года назад
The fallout franchise: "let me introduce myself"
@esotericaunbound61
@esotericaunbound61 7 лет назад
Hum . . . A future of self-driving, nuclear-powered cars. What could go wrong?
@geofferzh79
@geofferzh79 7 лет назад
great narration!! I am now subbed
@worldaffairs2557
@worldaffairs2557 4 года назад
nice work I like the video before start watching the video because I know you're making stunning and informative content.
@Patchuchan
@Patchuchan 4 года назад
The super train actually makes sense with Russia I'm surprised the Soviets didn't at least do a conventionally powered supersized train just for their space program as transporting parts via barges was not an option.
@Oligoogletookmyname
@Oligoogletookmyname 4 года назад
No wonder everyone back then thought the future was going to be crazy.
@Adriane8240
@Adriane8240 7 лет назад
Subscribed! Great narrating!
@sterling173
@sterling173 7 лет назад
you're a really comforting narrator
@ronanrogers4127
@ronanrogers4127 4 года назад
“After the Fall of communism in Russia in the late 1980s”...actually, the fact is the USSR was dissolved on 26 December 1991.
@Gauntlet1212
@Gauntlet1212 4 года назад
You could argue that communism died before the USSR dissolved, with perestroika and glasnost. I'm not sure when both were first even mentioned though.
@mousermind
@mousermind 4 года назад
"Fall" does not necessarily mean "end" when discussing history, as the latter is more acute, while many a thing and much time contribute to a fall.
@moosefactory133
@moosefactory133 6 лет назад
I do like the idea of an extra wide train but without being nuclear powered
@rahkinrah1963
@rahkinrah1963 6 лет назад
C.D. -Excellent video. Superb comments!
@MaxoticsTV
@MaxoticsTV 7 лет назад
These videos are so good I get mesmerized and forget to press like!
@acoffeewithsatan
@acoffeewithsatan 7 лет назад
If it catched up we'd live in the pre-war Fallout world by now.
@legolegs87
@legolegs87 7 лет назад
Dear author! Ту-96ЛАЛ (for "flying atomic lab") newer had direct cycle nuclear jet engines, it only had an idle reactor in its bomb bay. The only reason of existing Ту-96ЛАЛ was to test the shielding, so when you say "it had no shielding" you're utterly wrong. The plane had shielding, both lead and composite, both for crew compartment and around reactor itself. Fancy shirt does not substitutes elementary fact-checking.
@DiegoWeissel
@DiegoWeissel 6 лет назад
so the bald guy is making misleading anti-soviet propaganda!!!!
@anthonyxuereb792
@anthonyxuereb792 6 лет назад
Very informative and entertaining, thank you.
@JogieGlenMait16
@JogieGlenMait16 7 лет назад
how do you make such amazing videos, mate? too good. too good.
@eoinforrest4405
@eoinforrest4405 7 лет назад
I don't think you're ever gonna fit a nuclear reactor into a car and keep it that sleek...
@caseyd471
@caseyd471 7 лет назад
Don't forget about the USAF's nuclear powered tunneling machine
@headsink6252
@headsink6252 7 лет назад
I love the soundtrack.... So soothing while watching this.
@guitarfreak521
@guitarfreak521 2 года назад
Great video!
@AH-ym4ro
@AH-ym4ro 7 лет назад
war war never changes!
@kingslushie1018
@kingslushie1018 6 лет назад
ask homann nice fallout 4 reference
@MrCmon113
@MrCmon113 6 лет назад
Every single aspect of war has changed drastically even during the last centuries. You couldn't make a more ignorant statement if you tried.
@Vortex-it6gj
@Vortex-it6gj 6 лет назад
Taxtro the quote is a reference the the game fallout 4 is you’d actually read the other reply’s you would of realised that.
@chadcastagana9181
@chadcastagana9181 6 лет назад
ask homann Yes it does, it kills more people!
@roguetrooper2324
@roguetrooper2324 5 лет назад
C'mon Raiders.....come and get some!!!!
@juancrespo5555
@juancrespo5555 7 лет назад
this guys videos are fucking awsome
@fredlui3900
@fredlui3900 6 лет назад
Great presentation.Thank you
@hujiaming6151
@hujiaming6151 6 лет назад
Great video, really love it.
@VitorMadeira
@VitorMadeira 7 лет назад
4:19 *PLEASE* use (also?) metric system units. Thank you.
@squiddi1393
@squiddi1393 7 лет назад
The research he found was most likely information on the blueprints of the train which of course were American so it was in imperial units. Brits are also pretty familiar with it. Just going to have to research it yourself.
@VitorMadeira
@VitorMadeira 7 лет назад
Man... This is so odd... I feel so bad that such a great content channel like this would feel that way about international users: "Just going to have to research it yourself." Hope he listens and try to help us (non british / non american followers) to better understand the measures.
@squiddi1393
@squiddi1393 7 лет назад
Vitor Madeira Why do you feel bad? Do you know how much of an ass you sound like? It's just one example in one video, who cares. It doesn't effect you at all, we can move on...
@VitorMadeira
@VitorMadeira 7 лет назад
Why not let the author deal with the situation? Please, forget my question here. It was not intended for you. if you don't like it, don't answer. Thank you.
@AMD1
@AMD1 7 лет назад
Vitor Madeira More than just Americans and British understand these​ units. Think of every 1 metre as 3 foot for a general idea. Us non metric users do this when exact measures aren't needed.
@vermas4654
@vermas4654 4 года назад
5:13 The Nazis called. They want their Breitspurbahn idea back
@ucitymetalhead
@ucitymetalhead 4 года назад
the nazis would have added a huge cannon to the train i Imagine.
@vermas4654
@vermas4654 4 года назад
@@ucitymetalhead no there was an actual idea for a railway system with 3m rail width
@LoneWolf-wp9dn
@LoneWolf-wp9dn 7 лет назад
great presentation... i have to say... really enjoyable
@m4rcos_elx95
@m4rcos_elx95 4 года назад
Esse canal é muito bom. Temos poucos canais como esse aqui no Brasil.
@gelistunes
@gelistunes 4 года назад
4:07 A Four Loko unit? Does it run on Four Loko?!
@thomasjoyce7910
@thomasjoyce7910 7 лет назад
Many electric cars today are nuclear or indeed coal powered, funnily enough.
@parkerlamarbrook
@parkerlamarbrook 7 лет назад
Thomas Joyce or by that logic, solar powered in the case of coal/gas/oil.
@fabian1939
@fabian1939 7 лет назад
pbodybrooks or by that logic, fusion powered ;)
@clovers-vintage-all-sorts
@clovers-vintage-all-sorts 7 лет назад
shlibber ?
@Patchuchan
@Patchuchan 7 лет назад
Want a nuclear powered car buy a Tesla and move to someone where which a nuclear power plant nearby.
@Patchuchan
@Patchuchan 7 лет назад
Nuclear energy is the best candidate for base level carbon neutral power generation.
@MacusVinas
@MacusVinas 7 лет назад
Awesome video! Thnks a lot!
@TuffBurnOutTeam
@TuffBurnOutTeam 7 лет назад
Great video
@vedymin1
@vedymin1 7 лет назад
WEN POWER ARMOR ???
@orangesv356
@orangesv356 3 года назад
Maybe someday
@thedarkknight4243
@thedarkknight4243 7 лет назад
Can Thorium be used instead of Uranium and Plutonium, it is safer. Also do a video on Thorium as an alternative nuclear power source
@kokofan50
@kokofan50 7 лет назад
Thorium is not safer than uranium or plutonium based reactors. In fact, thorium is used to breed u233. What's safer are the types of reactors people are wanting to use thorium in.
@Triliton
@Triliton 5 лет назад
Thanks for this video! :)
@RadioactiveSaddam
@RadioactiveSaddam 6 лет назад
Awsome clip.
@josephjackson1956
@josephjackson1956 5 лет назад
6:57 the real chem trails
@d.cypher2920
@d.cypher2920 6 лет назад
Uh, leave reactor in building, and simply *plug into* the tracks for trains, autos, planes, drones etc. *oh, that's what we do now...lol*
@patdohrety2940
@patdohrety2940 3 года назад
How would you get the reactor to power an airplane? A battery bank? You would need a big ole bessy stack of lithium batteries for a purely battery powered airplane. Everything else? Sure!
@d.cypher2920
@d.cypher2920 3 года назад
@@patdohrety2940 lithium ion technology as far as batteries go, is approaching 20 years old now. They can fit the same power density in a film, that has semi flexibility and these are being tested for powering aircraft. Of course the number of aircraft is quite limited, yet it is actually being flight tested. For a reactor to power an aircraft, admittedly: you're talking about using several state of the art technologies. Back in the 60's, they actually tried installing the nuclear reactor into an aircraft, and using the heat to power a set of turbines that powered the aircraft. For reasons obvious, this is simply crazy in my opinion. 😳😂😂 Take care.
@patdohrety2940
@patdohrety2940 3 года назад
@@d.cypher2920 How would the stored energy in the batteries be turned into thrust? Electrically powered turbine engines? Like some kind of battery powered jet engine?
@d.cypher2920
@d.cypher2920 3 года назад
@@patdohrety2940 i believe they're (I'm certainly not an expert, nor anywhere near qualified to give expert advice, etc.) Are using brushless electric motors. >I'll see if i can find a video of the actual aircraft in question....one moment.
@d.cypher2920
@d.cypher2920 3 года назад
@@patdohrety2940 here is one video, from i believe 9 months ago...yet, there are several other videos... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-r2hh_ni-vF4.html
@flashtu
@flashtu 4 года назад
This was really fascinating damn.
@szogun1987
@szogun1987 6 лет назад
Thorium cycle reactor was developed initially as power source for planes, and gave quite promising results.
@jakartagamer6188
@jakartagamer6188 4 года назад
so there's a chance where everything is just Chernobyl?
@Kevin_Morales_Tube
@Kevin_Morales_Tube 7 лет назад
Fallout, anyone...?
@royaliq
@royaliq 4 года назад
Kevin Morales yup
@lobo90000
@lobo90000 6 лет назад
Very good job
@philladdy7339
@philladdy7339 4 года назад
So interesting all the your videos
Далее
What ever happened to Atomic Trains?
14:26
Просмотров 1 млн
Carbonara under PRESSURE @Lionfield
00:44
Просмотров 3,5 млн
This Plane Could Fly Underwater...
9:21
Просмотров 1 млн
You Won't Believe How the First Spy Satellites Worked
10:48
Aerospike Engines - Why Aren't We Using them Now?
13:39
How can you stop a Nuclear Missile?
9:54
Просмотров 6 млн
The insane Russian Concrete Monorail
9:03
Просмотров 929 тыс.
Why French Trains Are The Fastest
15:57
Просмотров 3,6 млн