NVIDIA’s New Tech: Next Level Ray Tracing! 

I was just wondering about that. Thanks for the correction! Amazing topic too!

100 x lower error is not what the text said, it was 20 x lower error. The 100 x was the speed. 🙂

​@@etmax1 The only time-related words i can see are "At equal frame time" which means the same time in my book. So there are no statements for being slower or faster as far as i could read.

@@321mumm Two Minute Papers acknowledged what I was saying and attributed it to thomasgoodwin2648 (presumably because they posted it first, so I suggest look more closely at what I wrote, or look at thomasgoodwin2648 s post.

Alcohol poisoning imminent

Consistent buzz

it came out in 2019ish.. I have built gaming pc since 1999... ray tracing came out with gaming for all in the 2050 and 2060 series.. i got a 2060 super as soon as i saw it, before the crash for parts

Take a shot every time apple says the "innovated" something that already exists.

So how did you end up in anonymous alcoholic club? Well... here's my story...

Right before that, it also says "in the same timeframe" So two minute papers assumed a linear relationship between error and time, and guessed if you wanted the same quality it would be 100x faster. Although I think thats unlikely

I should have been a little more accurate there, good catch, thank you! Upvoted for visibility and added a note about it in the video description. Update: Removed that part of the video so you won't hear it anymore.

You really think it''l take that long?

⚡😂

Life has always been ray traced throughout history, yet it is only now we must come to terms with the fact the ray is inescapable.

It was awesome when it came out for us on the 2060 series

Try to downgrade the number of objects rendered to save energy requirements if you can.

Rhino? Now that's a software name I've not heard in a long time.

And please. Stop the erroneous RU-vid algorithm needing jump cuts with videos that have nothing to do with what you're talking about. That was kind of disappointing

ooh, what is your game? mine is called #NotSSgame, and I have a similar number of characters and buildings. I have some update vids about it. I hope to see more about your project soon!

That was "two papers up the line" (previous paper)

Love getting traced.

me too!

I apologize as the quality of the video wasn't really what you would expect from us, and thus we removed it.

@@TwoMinutePapers aaww okay 😞thank you for letting us know

Don't worry, someone still has to clean the city... That's our future, us artists are going to finally go to "real work" someday. But you can still create in your free time

@@damianzieba5133 STEM. Someone has to create the AI They're getting paid.

@@damianzieba5133 If you do "real work" you don't have enough free time and energy for the actual creative stuff.

Skill issue

All your Vimeo work appears to be simulations, if you're still doing this then I can assure you are 110% fine for a job. FX with millions of particles, small pieces breaking/colliding and overlapping elements are THE single biggest torture test you could put an algorithm like this through, which currently don't even operate on videos and are unlikely to do so as adding motion into the equation would create even more unknown variables than already. Furthermore, the value of a human performing simulations isn't in creating generic effects, but artistically driven effects which look way more visually compelling. Becoming something like a Senior Houdini specialist is a surefire way to ensure job stability, as that level of intuition when it comes to the simulations, tools and nodes available in meeting a client's need is something an AI would not possess.

I'm not sure that's completely true. For example, I always wanted to be a fiction writer but I suffer from dyslexia. With the help of AI, I'm now well on my way to completing my first novel. It's important to note that AI is a tool that that allows me to bring my thoughts and ideas into the world. But it doesn't simply spit out the work. I still spend many hours planning, developing, guiding, tweaking and editing the entire process. These tools give me the ability to create in ways I could never dream of before. So, I think it's possible that AI will be used to empower new artists who previously faced some physical or mental disability that prevented them from creating in that space before. I believe this technology will create numerous new artists.

The level of paranoia from artists and such is actually precedented and expected. Since the beginning of time doodlers have seen what's coming next and shook their paintbrush at the sky because technology dared to advance without asking for their permission. We're going to be entering the next great era of art with this tech, luddites be damned. Personally I can't wait for the downfall of all these useless art corporations and the resulting freedom of their artists since the level of resources needed to make the projects of today will dramatically drop. Assassin Creed or Call of Duty sized games could become the typical indie project, if they brother to do something that bland and outdated with such powerful tech.

@@uponeric36 If the tools are used correctly, they are nothing but tools and more than necessary for progresse. But as soon as the tool becomes the maker itself, and with the trend going on of everything going down the gutter quality & meaningwise, attention spans getting shorter and shorter with everyday i don't see this advance in a positive light so far. So far what i saw is creatives getting replaced, AI trained on the works of actual human beings- AI is taking away CREATIVE Jobs Not stuff we dont want to do. So yeah, i am not very fond of how the technology is going to be used. A small shiver of hope is there, in the sense that it's just going to raise the bar. But i just don't see it with how things have been going the past 10 years.

@@Jacen777 This for example is a great case, where i hope all the needed funds and research will go into for enabling everybody to create and be creative :)

@@Atimo133 regarding ai trained on the works of humans ... well although it is quite a problem that current ai systems need to scrape the entire internet and hence are not as data efficient as us humans when we take inspiration and therefore it gives the illusion of copyright infringement. It will get solved a few years from now. Secondly , you should not assume that the current AI systems that have such limited capabilities and have such major flaws such as creating artworks of ridiculous quality will continue on that trajectory. Instead we should assume that we really don't know what kind of powerful self-improving AI systems the top AI labs are building in secret so as to not scare the public with their superior-than-human capabilities . Thirdly , regarding ai replacing jobs is a bad thing .... well i disagree. You only say this because you were born in the 21st century where the economic system is completely designed by " human minds" and hence limits your farsight and thinking . No one has said anything about AIs or anyone preventing any human forcefully in a post AGI world from doing any activity they desire. i.e If you want to create games or movies with the traditional human touch or want to continue work in any STEM field then you are free to do so. However It just means that the activities that humans undertake in such a situation will not be labelled as "jobs" but as part of the new concept of "Leisure". That is because you won't be paid money or have to pay money to anyone for any service or product they make. Part 2 : You might think that if that's the case then how will people survive without money ? Well the answer is that money was and is only a theoretical social construct we imagined into existence to facilitate trade of goods and services . It itself never had any value . The solution would be to build a currency-less economic system where the distribution of goods and services are based on concepts similar to the ones found in really creative video games " like level and point" systems. I honestly don't know the answer to what the system would actually look like , but I'm pretty sure that if we have an AI that can end-to end do the jobs of economists with Superhuman creativity then we can then just ask it to devise such a system.

coming soon: create a movie/video game from text 😂

already existed 2023. for commercial use. on video it was shown year or so ago... iykyk

​@@KP-bi6px that exists also like i said above.. 2023. it does exist, in first stages and shown om video if you dig through this kind of nonsense pushed to the top

all above is on video and exists... this guy shows mainstream

@@dertythegrower ah

At 04:05, an example is given where the shadow is the input and the method reconstructs the object from it. The shadow even moves, making the object move in accordance, hence it's some sort of "reverse ray tracing" effect.

might need a different way to represent objects in scene, but if possible, I really like this conceptually.

It would accelerate the process of going from concept art -> usable game asset by potentially providing a good starting point.

@@somdudewillson yeah, I thought about it couple seconds after posting. Designers make character/object designs, give it to 3D artists, they use something like that to make 3d models fast and then just touch it here and there.

@@korinogaro yes, but IN THE FUTURE there will be no concept artists, because we don't need them anymore! 🤓More than that, we will not need any human anymore! An AI for generating prompt, the next AI is generating art from prompt, the next one making models from this art and so on! Wow, what a time to be alive! 😎

The future is diffusion ? Once consistency is achieved you just diffuse the frames

@@raymond_luxury_yacht No, not really. I think that diffusion would be too slow to run in real time. I thought of something like Neural Control Variates, which was also covered on this channel. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yl1jkmF7Xug.html

@@raymond_luxury_yacht No, because I think that process would be too slow to run in real time. There's something called Neural Control Variates, which has been covered on this same channel. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yl1jkmF7Xug.html The only problem is that this AI model is not available to the public.

Nope. We know exactly what 4D hypercubes look like mathematically. It's just that it can't be projected in reality because it requires information that doesn't exist in our universe, i.e. a fourth spatial dimension. No AI will ever fix that.

Blender has subscriptions??? I haven't kept up with it. Last I knew, it was free. Edit: part of me wonders if that was a joke to make fun of other apps.

​@@goldenheartOhI'm surprised as well. Perhaps for fast rendering on distant servers?

If you have a 350 video of an object you already can reconstruct geometry and materials. Photogrammetry can do that, and it's been around for a while.

@@somdudewillson not that thing. xd something like a simple turn around videos without bunch of cam. I should choose my word more clearly next time. noted

The 5080 will probably beat the performance of the 4090, and the 6070 will probably beat the 5080. So in 10 years a 6070 will be more than capable of full ray tracing

What makes you say that? A human can do it by understanding the context behind the image. (If you've seen what a desk lamp looks like, then you can figure out what the back side of it likely looks like, with a high degree of accuracy) AI works in a similar fashion.

@@OGPatriot03 You will never be sure about an invisible side. You can only guess. How do you know this time that desk lamp looks different? There is not even an argument about this. It is just impossible. If a guess is sufficient for you, than that is fine. Or you can use more images.

It’s the spice of life

watch his video from 5 years ago and tell me if its AI.....idiot.

The guy in the lower right? That`s not him, it`s Andrew Price.

​@@priyeshpvthanks! Watching again I can see different words being said though some basic movement is kind of in line with his speaking.