I like how it hits ice during the day, like no one was even paying attention anywhere to what was ahead. In reality, the way these ships are built would ensure the ship capsizing early on and much of the superstructure falling off. It would be a messy sinking to say the least and the wrecksite looking like a wrecked city block.
The capsizing would be ensured but slow as the ship has more weight below and how do you know the superstructure would come off? The costa Concordia had its superstructure stay on and even some other ships that went in a storm had scratches and that’s it. So I’m asking how would you know the superstructure would come off? I mean the capsizing is a given though
The breakup of the Titanic was messy and violent as we know, the ship breaking into two main sections and then the fractured end of the stern actually breaking apart even further into two big chunks, likely on the surface. But given the size of the Oasis Class ships and their giant superstructure and complexity amidships (such as the gap housing the park), it’s safe to say that a breaking apart during this type of sinking would possibly be even more devastating and violent than the Titanic’s. You’d likely have chunks of both sides of super structure (which is the equivalent of a 9 to 10 story building) collapsing into the sea as the hull breaks apart. And all of the complex amenities situated within that area taken into account as well. Does not paint a pretty picture. Much worse than what can be shown here.
It was said that the whole ships Rivets that held pcs of the superstructure/hull were of mixed quality , so a hole where it happened is said to be a cause of this defect itself
@@frederikdeschepper7607 That theory has been debunked quite a few times. Titanic broke up on the surface, as noted by several eyewitness testimonies. While the stern did remain attached to the bow via the double bottom, even while the bow section was plunging and completely submerged, the stern was still visible when the bottom of the ship broke and the two halves were separated on the surface.
@@brohawk3671 yes, but according to researchers, the diameter of the circle in which the debris is located is too small and so they think that the titanic broke underwater, of course that has been confirmed some years ago. So maby its not tru but i dont know it animore. XD
Oasis of the Seas actually has 2 less lifeboats than the Titanic had, though each Oasis lifeboat has a capacity of 370, while each of the Titanic's boats could hold 65.
No wonder one of the Titanic survivors couldnt live nearby stadium anymore- the crowd screams reminded him of the victims sinking. This is so terryfyin and this video shows it too well!
I worked as a musician on the Oasis of the Seas. I'd hate to imagine ALL THAT fall into the ocean! But the crew is well trained for emergencies. I'm sure everyone (all passengers and crew) would be able to get off the ship safely. There are plenty of life boats and rafts for everyone on board! Of course afterwards, the wreck would make for the ultimate wreck diving adventures if you're into scuba diving.
@@micahgotracksplays340 drums in a cocktail/ standards band. We performed alot of ballroom dance type stuff and Frank Sinatra type jazz. It was very cool. We catered to more of a senior citizen type crowd. Those older people really know how to dance! 🕺💃
Honestly my first cruise was on its sister ship the symphony!! At the time that was the biggest ship! What a coincidence! Hopefully they never sink they are way more beautiful than what the get credit for
Yes right because historical things are invention for us. we leaned and corrected from previous titanic mistakes.. today’s ships are more powerful and have technology to how cut the ice and service in the ocean.
Nice job. Seems like the simulated sinking of the Oasis was much faster than that of the Titanic which listed but remained afloat for an hour or so before taking it's final plunge into the ocean.
Titanic hit about 11:40 and foundered at 2:20 AM both ships time btw. She should've foundered earlier but the Black Gang in Engineering Spaces fought the seawater with pumps as long as possible at least 1 died as he couldn't be rescued when a coal bunker gave way from water trapped in it between number 5 and 6 boiler room due to flooding
The good news (or better news than Titanic at least) is that is that it cruises 80 degree water and has enough life boats for all. There’s also probably another ship near enough to help quickly with rescue efforts.
The good thing was this happened to Oasis on a day when she apparently had no passengers or crew. She was running on autopilot. It's all good though. We'll miss her, but happy that there were no injuries or loss of life.
You know, I've always wondered how modern ships would've sunk as the Titanic did. This is interesting. Awesome work. Edit: it would've been a terrifying sight to see a massive cruise ship splits into 2/
Reminds me of the Derbyshire assessors animation I've seen on here. "All forward freeboard and reserve bouyancy is lost... The elapsed time, from loss of number one hold, to the sinking of the stern, was about 2 minutes."
This wouldn’t happen. Even if she magically found an iceberg (which is impossible where she is from) and collided and was sinking, which is a lot of ifs, she wouldn’t possible sink like titanic.
Ideally the water tight compartments are built much better than Titanics as that's what ultimately ended here. Basically the ship might have a list but would remain afloat and should be able to return to port. Of course anything can happen but I would hope that something like Titanic can not easily be repeated.
How do you figure? Do you have any idea the revenue this company brings in on a *normal* week? They have 3 other ships almost identical to this one with a 4th one nearing completion as well as their massive fleet. It would be a great blow but they have insurance and plenty of infrastructure to fall back on should one of these Oasis class ships sink.
I have an idea, what if we made boats with outer rings (like an onion) that would be solely for the purpose of disconnecting from the vessel when damaged? I know, it would look like elephant turd, and it would be so expensive they wouldn't be able to make money back on it for 100 years even if they charged 37,000 a night, but hey, at least it still floats
I actually wonder how it would sink in this situation... taking on water initially along the bow. As the bow went under, all those balcony rooms would begin letting in a ton of water and it'd probably sink even faster than the Titanic. All that said, a small iceberg wouldn't do the same damage to an Oasis class ship as it did to the Titanic, so it's probably a moot point. But still, the mind reels...
@@Odelay77 I've heard people argue that if the titanic took a direct hit that it might have faired better. Would have limited the number of sealable compartment that were damaged. I'm sure it would probably still sink but maybe more time fore rescue.
@@Remsster Yeah that's the prevailing theory. Those iron ships were built to bend, not break, on a direct devastating hit. But if you pepper them with bunch of tiny holes, it's much worse.
Actually modern cruise ships are somewhat less "unsinkable" than the ocean liners of the past. Costa Concordia for example could stay afloat with only two of her watertight compartments flooded - while even Titanic could survive with 4 of them
With todays technology a we could escape a disaster would hopefully; and everyone is required join a meeting at their muster station based where their cabin is stating that in an event of a disaster you would come to this location to get onto a life raft. I think that they people go onto to certain life boats based on where their cabin is for a specific reason, it ensures that everyone is in the same place and can be account for. On Carnival cruise they have children under a certain age where wrist bands. However even with all these safety precautions in 2012 we had the sinking of the Costa Concordia and the Sinking of Dongfang zhi Xing.
@@kaiserschlachtfelder and Costa Concordia, which is way more impressive, given that it happened in 2012 and the ship was much bigger and newer than titanic, it's also the only cruise ship that sank, the other were all ocean liners or war ships.
@@matteogamba3236 It is the only cruise ship unless you count Oceanos, but that is debatable. You could technically even call Wilhelm Gustloff a cruise ship, since it was built for that purpose.
I realize that this was merely an animation/simulation. But, with all of today's modern technologies and safeguards aboard one of those giant cruise ships; I would think it would take an absolutely cataclysmic/catastrophic event to sink one of those giants.
I bet real-time simulations of the Oasis Class ships in the very same yet unlikely situation of Titanic would expose the folly of this sim! Besides, in the event an Oasis-Class ship suffered the same run-in with ice as Titanic, her welded modern steel structure would undoubtedly respond much differently than both Titanic's iron-rich steel and her slag-ridden rivets.
Could it be different if it hit a rock? Costa Concordia sideswiped a rock the same way Titanic sideswiped the iceberg, and Concordia sank in about the same time it took the Titanic to sink. I wouldn't doubt that if Oasis started sinking for whatever reason in real life, it might split in half too.
The thought of being on a Big ship sailing in the ocean just gives me anxiety. I'm the type of person I don't like anything I can't just stop and get out of when I'm done.
It is a funny thought to use a modern cruise ship far bigger than the vintage ocean liner and make it sink the same way. But in reality, it would take a long time for that to go down and the disaster would be even more atrocious.
Man thing ship has so much glass that I feel like it would just explode into a cloud of razor sharp death. And the waves where basically be a sand storm of glass underwater.
0:26 Lookouts: Iceberg Right ahead!! Captain: Head to left side!! Oasis of the seas hitting the iceberg: Skeee!!! This ship is sinking!! But she has a lot of weight she could sink
As we all know, the captains are very professional and obviously will not have the ship sink. The ship is worth billions, they will be very careful with it :)
Pardon my language but holy shit that was exceptionally well done and believable You can't tell me though that there isn't some sort of structural weak point in the middle of that man-made Leviathan where if the forces were right it wouldn't snap in two One would hope that we have done a better job of internal subdivision on ships but at the same time the Costa Concordia took a large chunk of rock out cropping in the middle and it still sank Like somebody else said don't you think for a second mother nature still can't bitch slap us no matter how seemingly good the engineering is
Yeah I'm good how are u still have the money for a while and then you will have the money for the next few weeks and we will see how you doing tonight and then you
Not at all, the wide open spaces are all well above water line, and the decks below the water line would be very different and more flooding resistant than the Titanic. The Costa Concordia took about 3 hours to capsize.
Let's not forget that the biggest payouts in the markets don't come from great performances but rather it's great promotions. Stay invested, diversification for streams of incomes is very important And with the right skills and proper understanding of how the market works.
I urge everyone to start somewhere now no matter how small, this is literally the time for that, forget material things, don't get tempted,i became more better the moment i realized this.
In reality any modern ship would capsize during the sinking, much like Costa Concordia. The only thing that prevented Costa Concordia to fully capsize and go under is the fact that it sank on shallow waters.
