Oceanbird: The Genius Ship That Will Revolutionize The World 

I fully agree!

A wind powered boat that travels into the wind rather than against it is fairly new 😂 it’s not thousands of years old, and it’ll last a longer than a sail. Plus the Wright brothers only successfully flew with an airfoil plane in 1903, which is what this ship would use to harness the winds energy (creating air pressure) rather than wind resistance. Don’t breed pls and stay in school

What makes you think that this ship can sail against the wind? Also on half wind coarses the high freebord will cause a strong leeway drift. Nothing is mentioned on how to ensure stability. Yaghts have keels. How deep a keel woul this ship need. It is a pity that they didn't show more of the RC version sailing Riggid "wing"-type sails are also not new. Telescopic sails are. That however does not yield a revolutionairy concept

I would absolutely love it if we had this shit right now. I could imagine a prototype happening very soon. It’s simply a case of slowly scaling it up. I wouldn’t be surprised if the ship could even be 100% or nearly 100% clean if it relied on also solar to provide the necessary additional electricity. Considering the sales will comprise about 90% of what was previously done by the fossil fuels, it makes sense that remaining 10% could be switched out with batteries and solar energy. I look forward to seeing one of these ships in person. Will definitely need one of them up and operational before the end of the decade or we are in deep trouble.

Hard to argue with your conclusion. Human nature vs Mother nature. We only think we're winning.

We had Tea Clippers over 250 years ago you muppet. It's not innovative.

@@markjones1337

The concept is at least 250 years old you cretin.

I CANT BELIEVE OUR DECADENCE, our auto manufacturers are putting out 700-800 horsepower cars from the factory , i dont understand our societal unconscious consumption,

With more hemp, we wouldn't be in such a hurry.

Sir, talks a lot.

I agree, imagine if these Ships were invented 250 years ago?

Funny how we were told in the 70s "we have hit peak oil". But today we still somehow manage to use far far far more of it, yet never seem to run out. It's almost like the earth has a infinite supply, or maybe even produces 'fossil' fuels' as a natural circuit. I wonder how many dinosaurs actually walked the earth to fill seemingly none deplenishing oil wells.....all over the world.

@@markjones1337 it's why we have spiralling out of control catastrophic climate change . The oil industry Has killed us all for a few decades of fat dividends and the wealth to buy all politicians and media ..so dumb !

@@MyKharli really. Well I suggest you have a team on the The Club of Rome documents from the 1930s, where they stated " we will use the climate to control the masses".

@@markjones1337 gosh you use the latest information i see , well done .

None of what you just said makes scientific sense, and no-one familiar with what the words you're using mean, or how the scientific method operates, would take those claims seriously or promote them. The claims about how physics works featured in that particular faction of pseudoscience cannot be reconciled with how matter and energy behave in the lab or when observed and measured in nature. Whereas the descriptions of how matter and energy behave, as used by climatological models, _has_ been tested by empirical experiment and observation. To introduce new physics they'd have to show it actually happening in real life and measure it. But that won't happen because they're apparently not interested in making scientific sense, and the fake hypothesis is aimed entirely at people who aren't interested in or familiar with science.

I bet you think the Earth is flat too.

@@Will-xk4nm What you believe is religion. What you think is opinion. What you know is science. Here's what we know. Fact 1: Remove the Earth’s atmosphere or even just the GreenHouse Gases and the Earth becomes much like the Moon, no water vapor or clouds, no ice or snow, no oceans, no vegetation, no 30% albedo becoming a barren rock ball, hot^3 (400 K) on the lit side, cold^3 (100 K) on the dark. At our distance from the Sun space is hot (394 K) not cold (5 K). That’s NOT what the Radiative GreenHouse Effect theory says. EVIDENCE: RGHE theory “288 K w - 255 K w/o = a 33 C colder ice ball Earth” 255 K assumes w/o keeps 30% albedo, an assumption akin to criminal fraud. Nikolov “Airless Celestial Bodies” Kramm “Moon as test bed for Earth” UCLA Diviner lunar mission data Int’l Space Station HVAC design for lit side of 250 F. (ISS web site) Astronaut backpack life support w/ AC and cool water tubing underwear. (Space Discovery Center) Fact 2: The GHGs require “extra” energy upwelling from a surface radiating as a black body. EVIDENCE: According to the K-T atmospheric power flux balance, numerous clones and SURFRAD the GHGs must absorb an “extra” 396/333/63 W/m^2 LWIR energy upwelling from the surface allegedly radiating as a black body. These graphics contain egregious arithmetic and thermodynamic errors. See ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0Jijw7-YG-U.html Fact 3: Because of the significant non-radiative, i.e. kinetic, heat transfer processes of the contiguous participating atmospheric molecules the surface cannot upwell “extra” energy as a black body. EVIDENCE: As demonstrated by experiment, the gold standard of classical science. For the experimental write up see: principia-scientific.org/debunking-the-greenhouse-gas-theory-with-a-boiling-water-pot/ CONCLUSION: No RGHE, no GHG warming, no CAGW or mankind/CO2 driven climate change.

@@nxgrs74 LOL, CopyPasta pseudoscience gibberish. You aren't impressing anyone. You might've found that BS impressive but I don't.

@@nxgrs74 LOL, Principia-Scientific is incorporated in the UK for Charitable Purposes. It is literally a church front pretending to be a scientific endeavor. LOL you are trying to push rightwing religious ideas about science by citing shady websites.