Boichi is too flashy. He is better at 3 dimensional drawing, so technically he is more skilled. But Oda is better at emotion, storytelling, and composition which are more important.
Definitely prefer the realistic art style,lol would be awesome if they made another one piece which is more grim and luffy is a marine,like everything is reversed.
One piece not looking realistic is one of its major appeals that compliments its exaggerated story. Realistic artstyle in whole of One piece would take away one of its best points
Oda's drawing tells a story, while Boichi's drawing tells the actions. Love Oda and also, 10/10 would read Boichi's version of One Piece. And also his manga adaption of Ace Novel is fire!
Both of them are really great in their own way...i personally like boichi's art in general but the expressions are there in oda's art I'm very happy for their collab in ace's story by boichi's art btw 😂
Long and expressive necks, open eyes(uncovered), anglesl shots , closer to reality faces, use of grqdient textures, complicated shading and a good mean page colour
i dont like how people compare artist that take refrence from the original and call boichi is better like , both did good job bringing reality up in scenery
Oda all the way. Don't forget that Boichi is borrowing Oda's compositions. And Oda's compositions are very strong. I feel like Oda's art focusing more where it should. While Boichi's tries to make the panels looks cinematic and the characters look cool. But Oda is genius enough to understand that cool characters, like cool people, don't ALWAYS look cool. In fact they embarass themselves and look awkward from time to time. And every now and then the moment will come where their coolness shines bright. Not in every single panel though. That's very important to show cool characters being awkward because it makes them human.
@@luizy6701 boichi actually had to do panels like that weekly too for other mangas, and at one point he was drawing one manga and writing and drawing one more
nah u need to remember the mangas are published in a magazine and not in a standalone book. So, manga authors had to really shove up every scene in a page as they only get a limited amount of page in the magazine. If anything, Boichi looks better than Oda, but if Oda had given the time and space then maybe he can make the same quality panels as Boichi.
i seriously love both authors and this is oda's work from 20 years ago, the panel that hits for me is the kuina one, boichi gave that one more life and you kinda remember the promise and the unfortunate end to kuina's dream even if it is memed, and the last one with zoro where, god dam, hes wet, bleeding and crying all while pledging never to lose again with a dynamic angle, really surprised me
I'm actually quite the outspoken hater of Oda's in the earlier days of One Piece, but I must say that I actually liked better than Boichi in some of these comparisons. I think though that still doesn't change the fact that Boichi elevates the experience with a more grounded world, grounded perspective and more interesting angles. Zoro's final crying scene was more epic and impactful in Boichi's style.
Boichi's anatomy and perspective game are definitely on point, but even twenty+ years ago, Oda's ability to show expressions, emotions, and movement are just on another level. What he lacks in the details and dynamic angles, he makes up with the pure character of a scene. The impact of every hit or the movement of every character just carries so much weight. Really sucks you into what are in many cases relatively simple scenes or settings.
Boichi changed his style to do this one piece remake. I think his original style is better and he if had stuck to tk that it would have been so much better than trying to stay too true to the original.
the two styles are totally different, it has nothing to do with it and it has charm, but I would always prefer that of oda, because for me the drawing must be adapted to the scenario, and I find that one piece boichi version is not adapt to the work, even if it draws really well
Good he did, i wanted so see the difference between the boichi one shoot, and the original source. I think that boichi did a good you improving some scenes (and i guess it was the point).
@@adrithmanvik1853 i mean its still distinguishable. i was reading boichi's sun ken rock few months ago and i had a hard time who was who with female characters. but the art is very detailed and amazing
I also see how you're taking early One Piece chapters why aren't you taking the most recent art style of One Piece from the most recent chapters. You do know that an artist improves upon the art as they go with the story the art that you see in the first chapter will not be the exact same what you see in much later chapters as they improve the art style.
I think that the art is not just about the drawing but how you come up with what you draw. Improving an existing work is easier than creating that work in the first place. And comparing a weekly manga chapter to a special edition is pretty unfair. Also, it is obvious from any of their respective works that Boichis drawings are way more realistic and the anatomy is far more accurate but Oda's work has a more dynamic flow along with the most expressive artwork in the manga industry.
Boichi oda isn't good at drawing at all (i'm talking about the him acutally because he was clearly better at drawing before the time skip/marine ford arc)
@@PauloHenrique-rt8fv what I meant is that Boichi's art is evidently "better" so I corrected the initial comment "I love Odas art better" to "I love One piece more"
