OJ Simpson Deposition - (Day 7) Feb 23rd 1996 - Part 2/5 

I'm not too sure, he is stupid...... poor man, being influenced by a group of haters & a brought in 'Prositute'

I was watching the trial back in the days and I believed and wanted to believeit was all a setup, I could not imagine that a world class athlete could be a killer. But after the the latest interview he gave., I think differently. Looking back, there was just too much evidence, even Robert Kardashian had his doubts

MrJParkes he knew that blood had been found, and he mentioned nothing about not being involved. He also knew how she died by then....it was after her funeral he went on the bronco chase.

A great point. LAPD screwed up by framing a guilty man.

Just like when they told him his ex wife had been killed. He didn't ask which one.

YOU ARE A RACIST MORON

he reminds me of the jolly green giant 'look up oj way up....lmao

You guys are ridiculous. They didn't fit because they were too small. Anyone with that bad of arthritis would know if his knuckles swelled so much that gloves wouldn't fit he wouldn't be able to use his hands. Furthermore, the jailhouse doctor submitted a statement to the court saying that OJ received and took his medication every day. But those who want him to be guilty so bad they completely disregard the facts of the case.

Yap they had him stop taking medication for it also. O.j also knew that the gloves were wet from the blood and people no also that leather when it gets wet shrinks.

Reflects on he praises them a lot maybe as an act so hes covering for his false projected image he portrays

A small concession to help him manage his guilt. Apologizing for something meaningless.

🤭👍

during his criminal trial i wondered that. there were times when the details about Ron's death were almost putting a smirk on his face.

He wasn't proven guilty beyond A reasonable doubt by a reasonable jury....,... ...

@@meirdaniel7515 wasn't proven guilty doesn't mean ur innocent, just means they didn't have enough to convict u or the jury was a group of morons. I'm betting on the latter of the two. Everyone knows he did it. He will face his maker one day and I'd hate to be him. Peace out

@@markmac2206 hmm i have not catched that... Wish if you could share a link with timestamp

Yes.. in civil case you can force defendant to testify.. in criminal court he had the option to not to

yep there was a long table in the room and they were at the end of it.

@@octoman511 is there a judge and jury also in this? Nobody is visible hence asking

@@fatsonot181 no, it’s a deposition, not trial.

@@sww3405 then who decides the case if no judge or jury? Who sees the deposition. It's not just for the camera. It is a trial, not a criminal but civil case. And the Goldmans won.

@@fatsonot181 in a deposition, it’s just lawyers and the witness/defendant in the room. No jury and no judge. The lawyers use the deposition to ask the witness/defendant as many questions as they can in the agreed upon amount of time (whether hours or days). The judge can watch the tape but I don’t think they have to unless there is an issue raised by the lawyers. The jury won’t see a deposition u less it’s submitted as evidence during the actual trial. And yes, the Goldman’s won the civil trial that came after this deposition.

Funny thing is on the 30 for 30 Goldman tried to make it seem like OJ was in there laughing and not taking it seriously but the lawyers were the ones joking back and forth with each other.

@@flunder50 lol. Does it make you feel better to Iie? Fred Goldman said OJ was flippant and gave mostly short “no, maybe, yes” answers to the questions specifically regarding his whereabouts on the night of the m*rders. He also said, “nothing was serious to him” about that line of questioning. These characteristics are correct as OJ was vague, evasive, and playing games. You can whine, Iie, and defIect all you want but it will never change the fact that OJ m*rdered Nicole & Ron.

@@blue-calla whine? He was found not guilty right? That's a fact that you and others seem to be whining about 26 years later. He literally said he lied about EVERYTHING and didn't take it seriously. Then they proceeded to show a few times where he was laughing to accentuate the point. Yet Goldman's lawyer was joking throughout with Ojs lawyers. But like everything in this case people like you ignore what's on the record. Get over it. #notguilty

@@flunder50 ICYMI, I responded to & corrected your comment where you were whining & lying… 27 yrs later. And you’re still whining & lying. You brought up the verdict. A not guilty verdict does not mean innocent, lol; the jurors stated it was payback for King. It also doesn’t change the fact that the irrefutable & overwhelming evidence and facts prove OJ committed both m*rders. That’s why the defense team & their “experts” were forced to admit there was no framing or planting of evidence and their only fact-based argument was the mishandling of evidence; but they admitted the mishandling wouldn’t have added or removed DNA profiles. And that’s why they made the case about racism. #CopeHarder

@@blue-calla you can't correct something that's not wrong. But let me correct you. One juror said it was payback for King. ONE. Not the jury. There were 3 jurors who weren't black. Did they want payback for King too? The star witness in the prosecutions case perjured himself. He just happened to be the one who found some of your "overwhelming" evidence and is on record for admitting to planting evidence then proceeded to plead the fifth on that question. The entire forensics department was overhauled because of their incompetence. The media made reference to how many black and white jurors there were. The media had polls based on race whether he was guilty or not. And the prosecutions star witness was a genocidal racist. All facts.

😅

Kato heard 3 thumps on the wall, not from the AC. And if he climbed the back fence why didn't he go in either of the side doors? Why was there blood in the driveway? Why was there no blood in the back pathway he ran through? There were leaves and berries in that pathway. If he ran back there it certainly would've gotten on the soles of his shoes. Why were there none tracked in the house? I know why. With Furman planting the glove they had to come up with a reason for OJ to be back there, even when everything points to him not being back there. You guys are so desperate for him to be guilty you completely ignore the facts.

If that happened then some blood would have been found on the AC vent... I think he flushed down his blody clothes or something that rattled the sewage pipes and Kato felt there was an earthquake

@@flunder50 And you are so desperate for him to be innocent you are ignoring EVERY obvious piece of evidence that points directly to one person and one person only; O.J. Simpson.

@@BrookeRainwater regardless of what me or you believe he was found not guilty. In the American justice system, if you are not proven guilty YOU ARE INNOCENT.

It's called duping delight. He's proud of what he did

Lol

He was running on adrenaline too.