I decided to watch the entire trial. I was a teenager when it originally happened. Obviously there are certain things I remember being on the news but I'm in my 40s now and a true crime junkie so I thought it would be fun to watch the whole thing, haha. It really is fascinating
Marcia- did you take a jacuzzi? Kato- yes. Marcia- so you sat in the jacuzzi? Kato- yes Marcia- while sitting in the jacuzzi, were you sitting in the jacuzzi? Kato-yes Marcia- were you wet while sitting in the jacuzzi? Kato- yes Marcia- at what point did you dry yourself off? Kato- when I got out? Marcia-when you got out of the jacuzzi? Kato- yes Marcia- just to clarify, you sat in the jacuzzi? GET TO THE POINT MARCIA
@@tirouhimelkonian5672 Go watch his podcasts with Tom Zenner, particularly the recent 2 both with Allan Park. There are telling things I believe that reveal Kato as a fraud. He recalls little details that are now, 30 years later, incriminating to OJ. Yet here, not too long after the crime, he makes no mention. To me it’s not what Kato said, but what he didn’t say and could’ve.
Interesting you say that. Here Kato says he and OJ went into the house to look for a flashlight, get into the foyer, and OJ says forget it i have to go. Then he gets in the limo and leaves. Yet, Allan Park just recently(30 yrs later), says OJ and Kato walked towards the path entrance near the garage, the OJ says I’m late, we have to go, then gets in the limo and leaves. Little details that Kato “forgets” during his testimony. How bad would it have looked if Kato testified that OJ seemingly stopped him from going behind his room.
Did you watch it on RU-vid? I'm looking for it on RU-vid but no luck! I did however see 'The OJ Simpson Story!' Not bad! It was made immediately after the murders... almost a yr I think. That's why it ends the way it does! I want to see 'The People vs OJ Simpson' though!
"Your honor at this time we would like to ask Kato to please remove his shirt " ... "What exactly does this have to do with the trail?" ... " I'm not sure, but it sounded like a good idea" 😅😅😅
@@uziclippe She WAS incompetent, she didn't use even half of the evidence they had at their disposal, she thought it was a slam dunk with even a fraction of it, underestimated the defense. She was incompetent.
@@uziclippe two of the jurors on kim goldman's podcast said they would have went guilty had they used it all. Darden has also said they should have used it all.
"What did OJ order from McDonald's? A big mac? How do you know it wasn't a quarter pounder with cheese? Did it have pickles? How about onions? You said you had a few French fries? How many is a few? Three? Four maybe? How do you know it wasn't five?" Good gosh Marcia! You really wasted a LOT of time with probably the most important witness on the trial. I blame YOU for OJ walking free!
@@joebuffington923 Kato was probably the most important witness on the trial. I believe he has details he never shared. The special guest on my most recent vid talks about this at length.
...she also turned ALL witnesses that didnt fit her agenda into hostile witnesses. Her harassment of witnesses got so bad, Judge Ito told her to stop. She coddled Furhman like he was some alter boy... then tried to save face when he was exposed as a genocidal rogue cop. This pissed her off royally. it was too funny
Yeah, she's so busy trying to look "in charge" with her irrelevant questions that she's fumbling the whole thing. She has no pace or momentum. It's just one inane question after another, parroting back what he just clearly said. It's easy to see why listeners lost interest. She needed to move on and get to the point. I can see that she asked about the bill denominations, and all the other minutia, to try to prove that he remembers things in detail, but her overall performance totally sucked. It may have been a "slam dunk" case in terms of evidence, but not with her presenting it!
Marcia is sooooo out of her league. Listening back for the millionth time and I get second hand embarrassment. She’s horrible. She has zero direction or story she’s trying to build. Massive delays between questions showing she doesn’t know what to ask. Exhibits not ready. Ask vague and irrelevant questions over and over and over again. Then goes back to a totally different subject/time. No idea what she’s trying to portray. Kato is a dunce for sure, but her questions are so bad and so irrelevant that I’d get annoyed too. I can’t imagine the jury not being so annoyed at the waste of time and lack of preparation. In contrast, watch the defense. From day one they were silently building their case against Furman, DNA, timeline, etc. They knew from day one what story they were telling and they were prepared and ready. Yes, OJ did it, but do not blame the defense or him if you’re mad he got off. It’s the state’s job, duty and burden to prove it. They utterly failed and have been crying ever since.
mark helton I watched this trial back then, recorded it on my vcr. but right now I’m seeing Johnny Depp. LoL. And scotch on the rocks in that red cup. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Dixie Deed your comment makes absolutely no sense, Dixie. Because he believes Kato......it means he loves Nicole?? Is that what you are trying to say? It’s just an opinion, that’s all. Kato was believable. Had no reason to lie.
I agree...i watched it then& felt Kato was a sincere,law abiding guy under intense pressure.. Believable! Infact he was struggling to be so honest that bitchy Marcia got frustrated! I like flakely Kato Kaelin!
@Axel Lloret what you saying is based on IF too many IF there the time of murder is guessed can be earlier or later murder could happened before burger.. there are too many variations defense trying to get a grip on every possible thing thats why they involved their race card.. fact is the limo driver couldnt get him on time and that was around the time when murder happened..
Lol oj is clearly innocent. People are weird. Stop being ignorant please. None of the prosecutions arguments make sense. Even the motive doesn’t make sense.
It's funny that OJ never expressed an interest in Me-agyn as she was what Nicole would have looked like if Nicole was actually as "all that" as she was made out to be. Next to some of the women OJ was said to be involved with - Tawny Kitaen, the various Hawaiian Tropic girls and even Paula - Nicole is decidedly plain.
John Puccia well over a year I count pre-trial hearings and such. He was arrested in June '94 acquitted Oct. '95. I should have clarified you little genius. ;-)
Seriously! I'm surprised Clark didn't ask what OJ ordered at McDonalds. "Did the defendant super-size his meal"? "What kind of sauce does the defendant use on his nuggets"? "Does the defendant double dip the nuggets in the sauce?"
Yeah. I don’t know for sure, but I think a judge can overrule a jury verdict if deemed necessary. Might be state by state. I don’t know. But if ever there was a moment that called for it,.. it was this moment. I can’t cite a case off hand, but I’m pretty sure it’s a thing that’s been done before. But my recollection tells me it was the opposite way around... jury convicted, judge overruled and acquitted.
A judge can not overturn a verdict. A judge can reject a plea deal, and has control over sentencing. The appeals process is about changing a verdict. I’m not sure what you mean about jury convicted and Ito acquitted. The jurors made very clear why they found OJ not guilty.
Marcia Clark asked too many dumb as$ questions. She got on my nerves with all those questions. One question in particular that was dumb was about the air conditioner, Where is the front of the air conditioner? In his room, Duhhh! Where else would it be?
Yep, I'm pretty sure Kato was on the phone to his 'friends' trying to get drugs that night. Who else calls 3 different people at night in close proximity.
i'm surprised at how much light hearted banter and laughing took place during this murder trial for the death of two people. even OJ laughing. guess you have to SOME fun
I remember noticing that when I was a kid occasionally watching this trial unfold with my mom. It made me realize that the way we see court rooms and lawyers portrayed in television and movies was unrealistic and that even under such serious circumstances as a murder trial these are just people like everyone else that crack jokes and banter etc.
Winter Harris exactly. We have a two lobed brain for this very reason. Whilst we can be mortified by a situation, we can find humour in situations that come from that mortifying situation. It’s another pointer to how utterly amazing our brains are, and how our brains work through tough times. If we were to dwell on only the bad, and find nothing to elevate us from it, we’d all be insane. Incredible really. No one wants to be happy living in misery. 🌸
Rob Rodriguez funny..my dad would say “never talk to yourself too much in a stressful situation, you probably won’t get the right answer to any questions you ask” and it’s true. That’s why we like to share our problems with someone else. Your mother is a wise woman. 👍🏽
Yes. But I also think the sentiment is that the defense is not engaging so it is hard to track and SEEMS pointless. Whereas when Bailey was crossing Furhman it as engaging and easy to follow
Why do they need to establish a timeline between the phone calls to Tom? The timeline is established already by Kato's phone bill. Waste of 35 minutes .
Rell Davis the DNA wasn't the problem. The defense made the collection of the DNA evidence look like it was done all wrong and therefore unreliable. The defense just made the prosecution experts look incompetent. I really think they spent way too much time on explaining the science and the whole case was just too long. I think if the two jurors had stuck to their guns there would've been a mistrial. And they would've retried him and the dream team would've quit. No real lawyers work for free. OJ wasn't paying them.
Rell Davis - Is a smartphone, like the iphone, "new". The iphone is ten years old. Do you have shoes that are eight years old? If yes, do you refer to them as "new"? DNA was heavily researched since the 1950"s. DNA testing was first used in a criminal case in 1986, eight years before the testing was used in the OJS case. At the time of the trial, the testing was being done all around the world. That's not something new. It was new to the LAPD. They began doing PCR testing in mid to late 1993, but Cellmark and the DOJ had been doing it for years. The first criminal case in the USA to use DNA evidence was in 1987 and it resulted in a conviction. Brennan J - You're correct about so much, but I don't think the Dream Team would have quit, at least not all of them (Bailey was jailed in 1996, so he may not have been available). The juror's "guns" were only loaded with about six months of ammunition, since that's how long they were told to expect the trial to last. If it had been ten to two for a guilty verdict, the two holdouts would have changed their votes as well. Those jurors just wanted to go home. The court had no respect for their time. Instead of repeatedly apologizing to the jury for delays, the court should have recognized the effect time had on the jurors, streamlined the case, and got the trial done in five months, leaving plenty of time for proper deliberation. The civil trial only took three and half months, start to finish, versus the eight and a half months the criminal trial took up. Why the time difference? Ask Ito, he's probably back in his chambers fixing his makeup. The OJS case was more a TV show than a trial. You want to know who killed Nicole and Ron, who brutally stabbed them, fled, leaving their bleeding bodies on the ground at Bundy? Tune in tomorrow, same Bat time, same Bat channel. ~
@@NeverGiddy still it does not matter when DNA was collected because it got contaminated .. they have still same procedure in 2019. Its forensics fault.There is protocol while collecting evidence.Also there were lot of evidence that does not make sense like where glove was found.. dark corner high fence hard to believe that someone could jump over such fence in dark and do not get hurt.What also makes me wonder in this case is how brutally they were killed and clearly said that guy had defense wounds on his hands it must have been struggle yet OJ has only one small cut.Look at size and build of both man and tell me if its possible to do such a crime and come out with simple cut.I am not saying he is guilty or not but i can say i clearly see why he walked away free.
@@mirelapodzic6218 - I watched the trial a couple of times.You say "because it got contaminated" as though it some kind of accepted fact. Fact is, no contamination was proven during the trial. The defense speculated their way through it, it was a suggestion on their part, a necessary suggestion, since if you believe the evidence then OJS is guilty, so the evidence must be wrong. Funny thing in the trial, contamination is like lightning, controlled lightning. It only strikes the pieces of evidence the defense needs. The substrate controls, which are used to make sure their aren't any problems due to things already being on the surface before the blood get there, no sign of contamination, oh, but the samples with OJS's blood are contaminated. OJS did it. He did it twenty five years ago today. It's fairly easy to explain. No fence jumping. He walked free because the jury did not understand the word "preponderance". OJS's guilt is a mathematical certainty. Clark met the burden of proof, but her narrative sucked. Just because you don't have all of the answers you want doesn't mean he didn't do it.
@@NeverGiddy I am not saying he is not guilty or that he is guilty. Jury is supposed to decide on pure evidence or it has to be benefit of the doubt at least . Whole trial keeps me confused like jury too.What exactly is the proof he did it? I am trying honestly to understand. We all leave DNA around home..car etc and it can transfer to others.. what in your opinion is making it so certain that OJ did it besides of media spin offs who made people judgmental even before the trial accusing OJ of murder? I swear i do not see it .Im undecided still to this day on verdict in this case.I respect everyones opinion but i just do not see it. It takes very angry person to kill someone in the way they were killed but according to witnesses he was not angry at all before and during the day when he was at home and before he flew to Chicago.Its not hard to check someones alibi.. but yet for whatever reason they still focused only on his finger cut raising only suspicion.. where are facts thats what i wanted in other word to say. Policeman got discredited ..they could not prove anything.. whole trial was based on speculation.
He was an actor, the cameras didn’t bother him. He’s said what bothered him was sitting across from OJ and having to be involved in a trial in general and he did it all in a borrowed suit because he didn’t own one.
The funny thing is that all the people included in this case were "having thoughts" that he's guilty yet none said it and they're telling it now, decades later...
How did OJ have time to go get food with Kato, come home, go commit the crimes, come back, get rid of some of the evidence, do whatever he needed to do, shower, come down in time to leave for the airport, all within an hour or so. Something is not right about the timeline.
Very very EASILY! I actually visited all of the sites and redid the entire timeline from Rockingham, to the McDonald's on Santa Monica near 26th, back to Rockingham , then to Bundy then back to Rockingham. I started my self guided at exactly 9:10 like they did and actually had time to spare by the time I returned to Rockingham. It helps to see the sites with your own eyes.
@@sdssteward Ok but he should have had blood splattered all over him. He must have showered to get rid of all the blood or at least change his clothes somewhere and then get rid of the stained clothes. There was no blood on his clothing, except for a pair of socks.
@@JL-uo1dithose are ALL great points you just brought up. Hang tight. I'm convinced I can explain the answers to everything you just brought up but give me some hours here. My theory is a LONG one. I'll need to get back to you tonight.
@@JL-uo1di wait. I already answered all of that above. Even the question about what he did with his clothes. Did you even read it? Now....I do have one more layer to my theory. I'll give you that later but as for clothing. I answered that. He stopped somewhere and through some clothing in the dumpster. As for the rest of where the blood went. I"ll get to that later.
They are trying to discredit him by catching him in lie because its tactic to ask same question so often and if he makes mistake so they can say look he is not reliable witness ..he told us 20 minutes ago something different.lol
The prosecution had a display of the crime scene and it didnt contain a garage door in the correct location. If your the detective in charge you should know all the access points to the house.
The defense team made a huge deal about Vannater and the other police not checking other areas of entry and exit of Rockingham, including questioning him about the garage, hence the garage questioning by Clark.
Unbelievable the unnecessary questioning of this witness with these stupid questions about dogs and baggages asking the same questions over and over again a waste of time, I've never seen anything like this even the judge is trying to help the prosecutor,in asking her if she needs the billboard .
The constant interruptions by the defense on nearly every single question is what's wasting all the time. Marcia Clark getting every detail on record and that's her right.
I visited family in California this week and since I've been revisiting the OJ trail this last year, I decided to take myself on a little tour of all the properties involved in this case, the Rockingham house, the Bundy house, the Gretna Green house and the McDonald's on Santa Monica BLVD near 26th. It's amazing how clear the timeline becomes when you see everything with your own eyes. The "self guided tour" has confirmed two conclusions I've always had and also added a brand new conclusion that is downright frightening for Kato 1. Marcia Clark comoletely BOTCHED the part in Kato's timeline where he asks to go with OJ to McDonald's. The awkward pause had NOTHING to do with Kato "overstepping his bounds". It had everything to do with Kato slowing his plans down to execute the crimes. So instead of Marcia making her little snide comment about Kato "inviting himself" and then asking "if he seemed excited to have him come along" in an effort to djscredit Kato, what she should have done is hone in on that awkward pause and allow it to guide the rest of the timeline, which would easily reveal OJ's rush to eat and get the trip over with....BUT......with also the understanding of my new #3 conclusion which I will get to in a moment. 2. The Awkward pause when they got back to the house and Kato started to head to the dining room. Again, it's not that OJ was unwilling to hang out with Kato. The problem is that if Kato joined him in the dining room, he wouldn't have had time to execute the crimes. Let me rephrase that.......IF KATO ATE WITH OJ IN THE DINING ROOM, NICOLE AND RON MIGHT STILL BE ALIVE! 3. This is the big one! They eluded to the fact that the McDonald's they went to was further away than necessary. So why did OJ choose the McDonald's on Santa Monica BLVD near 26th if he was in such a hurry? ANSWER: Because it was near the Bundy house and he was considering committing the crimes with Kato there.....which also means.....he probably would have killed Kato too to dispose of an eyewitness. Chew on THAT one. I think what made OJ shy Way from doing it with Kato in the mix is because he probably figured Kato's presence would make it more obvious that he did it. But I believe....he was at least thinking about it, which is why he chose that McDonald's location.
@@sdssteward I agree everything you said apart from killing Kato, that would be way to dam obvious and oj just isn’t going to kill anyone, oj went to that McDonald’s because he was sticking to his plan with or without kato but was patient enough and quick enough to eat and get kalo to his room. And shibam the murders were rushed glove fell off during it and cut his finger, moving forward he couldn’t of killed kato anyway because the plan was to use kato as the possible killer in throwing the gloves behind his room and banged on his aircon to force kato outside so the limo driver could maybe spot kato at the time of the murders but this didn’t work out for oj but this was ojs way of planning the outcome, anyway it’s all passed now he’s free and has suffered from it and his Childern let them live free and be compassionate in those around oj that had nothing to do with it. RIP XOXO
@@Jscaff859 well. Just like that.....my entire view of this case was turned upside down since I wrote what you saw above. There is a book out there called "Ron's Revenge" by Chris Todd. I have had the pleasure to get to know the author. I no longer subscribe to EITHER of the two common narratives. I believe OJ had an accomplice. His name is Charlie Ehrlich. Remember when OJ said the book "If I Did It" there was a "Charlie" involved? It's the exact same Charlie who was also an accomplice in the armed robbery OJ went to jail for. I highly recommend getting the book "Ron's Revenge" by Chris Todd. It will change everything.
Seems to me Marcia Clark was on a fishing exposition and not very organized. Is this the best that California had at the time? No wonder they got spanked.
They really didnt have much of a case to begin with. All they had was a glove. The blood evidence didnt start showing up for weeks and months later in which the defense was able to provide plausible explanations for all of it.
@op yeah because manipulating the jury with the race card had nothing to do with the prosecutors losing. I've seen interviews of a couple of jurors who said out of their own mouth, that they were going to vote not guilty no matter what as payback for the lapd being acquitted for the Rodney King incident and also that they had no sympathy for Nicole, because she married a black man whom she stole away from a black woman. Also, another juror was a former black panther who raised his fist up in the air after the verdict, displaying the black pride/black power hand gesture So it's really irrelevant how good or bad the prosecution performed because several members of the jury were biased and corrupted from the beginning.
@@Jim.Jim.32 that's a total crock! The idea of the lapd carried out some grand conspiracy is ludicrous. For it to be true, Mark Furhman would had to have known that OJ would have no plausible/legit alibi to plant the so called gloves. The cops didn't even talk to OJ until the next day following the murders, long after they found the gloves at both the crime scene and the Rockingham house, as well as the blood on the outside of the Bronco. That was before Mark Furhman or any other lapd officer knew if OJ had an alibi or not .
@@NomadChristian More like a couple minutes to get to the front door. It's virtually certain Kato was mistaken about the 10:40-45 time frame. He said 2-3 minutes after the thumps he hung up and went with the flashlight. That's exactly when Park saw him and he saw Park, and when Park saw the figure in the sweat suit at the same time. That is fixed by Park's phone record with his boss at 10:54-55, right before he hung up. Kato was always estimating while he was on the call with Rachel. 2-3 minutes before would place the thumps probably at 10:51-10:53. At the civil trial Kato said the thumps may have been around 10:50. If you give credence to Heidstra and Shively as witnesses (considering all the things they said, much of which even regarding Heidstra never was used in the trial), this makes sense.
The prosecution missed so many opportunities with Kato. OJ & Kato weren't friends. He lived at Rockingham because OJ wanted him away from Nicole. Period. The children named their dog after him for goodness sake! Doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that probably didn't go over well. OJ asked Kato for change but he was going to McDonalds. Why didn't he just get change there? The day after the murders Kato was the last person OJ called before flying back LA. He was unreachable so OJ called him again twice during the flight. He'd never called Kato while he was on a business trip. They had nothing to discuss!! Except this time he needed to find out what Kato had told the police. He needed to piece his alibi together.
Yea all those interviews he has given saying oj is guilty..which I believe his is..but Kato has no room to talk I believe he knew much more than he led on...he just treated the whole trial like a joke
Dalisa Wilson Yes I can imagine it was a highly stressful situation...that did not stop him from loving the spot light and acting like a celebrity lol which he was young-er and had less knowledge I suppose but he put himself in it a lot...OJ could have threatened him who knows..but he certainly ate it up.
+lighteyes214 OJ asked Kato for change as he only had $100 bills and they didn't accept that at McDonalds. So he got a $20 bill from Kato. This was addressed more than once, and was in the closing arguments.
Kato was probably next to the limo driver one of the most important witnesses. He lived at Nicole's & was there during the last 911 tape. He also was on the property hearing the loud thuds which led to the 2nd glove. He also was the last person who saw oj b4 the murders. I do see Kato was fumpering & seemed afraid to be more forthcoming Marcia messed up yelling at Kato her own witness then declared him hostile. She wanted him to answer questions the way they rehearsed. Yes he seems not very firm b/c in the time that followed he's Mr firm saying oj did it. Here he wants everyone to like him& when u do that u please Noone either. He was much firmer in the Civil trial
😝 lol 😂 lol 😝 This was simply a multi multi Billion Dollar Murder Mystery Fictional Production & Presentation to the Kool aid drinking gullible fools gossips and looky looze of the USA and Entire Globe as well. Kato was the Jan Michael Vincent and Brad Pitt MVP. Whoever Cast him for this Staged Soap Opera deserved the Oscar it probably received in the Deep States annual awards banquet. I’ve heard Kato has reaped over $50,000,000 in compensation since his day of hiring. Greatest Circular Narrative since the Jon Bennett Xmas fiasco. Well done and Bravo to the ongoing follow ups and cover ups.👍👍🧤🎯⭐️✨🧤😱🇺🇸
I was 11. Vividly remember watching the verdict read in my 3rd period social studies class. And recording the trial on blank tapes summer of 95 so my mom could watch when she got home from work. Really does feel like yesterday..
Unfortunately, after I watched the trial I have to say that Darden and Clark was so bad. I can't even believe how bad they were ... and I'm on their side. No wonder they left their jobs after the trial. And all of these years they are speaking about the trial... please, don't, I feel uncomfortable for you./I don't know if some of you watched Darden interviews in the years after, but they obviously had an affair. No wonder they asked witnesses all of these stupid questions./And Kato is hilarious!
@@jimreily7538 I read his book when it came out & it was very insightful. I think this case was lost by the prosecution but I’m not sure if any of those black jurors would have voted guilty even if there was video of him committing the crime.
Kato said: "you guys are good". LOL NO!!! They weren't! They were TERRIBLE! On BOTH SIDES. Worst lawyer work in the history of law. This wasn't a murder trail. It was a reality TV show and a total train wreck of a reality TV show at that. Embarrassing!
I just watched a recent interview with Kato. He laid the blame on Marcia because she allowed him to be a "hostile witness" which basically turned him into a witness for the defense. This testimony was hard to watch. One would think Kato was the defense's witness. Marcia treated Kato like he was the damn killer! Tough to watch.
It was never really a case to begin with. Oj should have been charged with accessory to murder. Unfortunately they never found the true killers so that wouldn’t have worked.
So a question: why didnt they spray Luminol on the roof of Katos guesthouse? If there was blood then thats that 🤷🏼♀️ and why is there a trace of blood through the ordinary gate if he jumped the roof? And Luminol check in OJs bathroom/shower? Like wtf? Its simple. Also it would have been VERY interesting to see the dogs reaction to OJ after the murderer.
Marcia: What did OJ tell you about the recital? Kato: He said Sidney was great. Marcia: What else did he tell you about the recital. Kato: That Nichole was there … No shit Kato … 😂😂😂😂. Kato played Marcia like a fiddle. He out smarted the prosecutor. It takes a smart man to play dumb and Kato mastered it.
If anyone lost the case it was Marcia Clark with her redundant and non sense questions. She almost acts alike everyone is lying and she's going to get them. Plus the prosecutors just seem inept, stopping and starting, wundering questions.
I just love how despite the fact Goldman and Brown's blood were in OJ's car, the fact that both gloves were on OJ's property and the fact both blood stained socks were OJ's, he was acquitted. Lmao
First off - I'm baffled by your ignorance and the ignorance of those who took the time to "like" your idiotic comment. "The jury was a bunch of racist..." Let's start there, these people's lives were uprooted for a year, and you have to keep in mind the time. This wasn't long after the Rodney King incident and "blacks" in that time, and currently, were/are constantly subjected to judicial bias and institutional racism ESPECIALLY within the LAPD. This case was never about OJ Simpson, it was about "blacks" finally have vindication or what was considered vindication...and any win that was allowed. You are not black, and nor have you ever been so don't pretend to understand the inner thoughts of the black community. When you're constantly subjected to and bare witness to the mistreatment, murder, and violence against yourself, your family, your loved ones...you take any win you can get. Mark F literally said on tape that he has murdered, framed and hated black people...that's not a scapegoat...that's the worst of our humanity. Your ability to pacify his comments are EXACTLY why our society will only decline. Disgusting, apathetic, uneducated, ignorant people just like yourself are responsible for the evil evident in today's society. Read a book, dear.
Luis Gabriel you can blame their detective mark for that. if it wasn't for him being a racist prick and so can found evidence. this shit wouldn't have Ben turned around like it did
Dire Straits no I'm trying to sound smart. I don't need to try to sound smart for you. you're no one to me. you need to chill! your mad, and there's nothing to be mad about. you calling me names and judging me don't faze me. When I said I didn't write anything, I really didn't write or type shit until now. i was completely lost. now i see, if you don't like or understood whatever my little cousin typed then don't respond. Take care, and wish nothing but good come your way! good bye
@@brookehanley3659 Kato said the dog was black, his name was Chachi, and he was a chow @ 1:29:09 Q: AND WHAT HAPPENED NEXT? A: OKAY. THE GATE OPENED AND HE DROVE IN AND THERE WAS A DOG AND I TOLD HIM TO WATCH IT, AND CHACHI, THE DOG, WENT HERE, (INDICATING), AND THE LIMO DRIVER PARKED HERE, (INDICATING). Q: CHACHI THE DOG, WHO IS THAT? A: CHACHI IS A CHOW. Q: WHAT COLOR? A: BLACK.
I remember watching trial coverage on CNN I was a kid. Kato Kaelin 's birthday is March 9,1959 . same birthday and same year like him including: Tom Amandes (TV Actress), Lonny Pride (Stage Actor), Shelley Thompson (Canadian TV Actress), Julian Richter (British entrepreneur), and Barbara Millicent "Barbie" Roberts (fictional character, fashion and style doll .a blonde hair,skinny,and Blue eye female is from Willows, Wisconsin. the doll has created by Mattel co-founder Ruth Handler. took a name after her daughter). Although since he becomes a reality star today.
This case proved nothing but that celebrity gets you a free pass and that racism works both ways. Johnny Cochran was a soulless snake who was not interested in justice. He was only interested in increasing his own fame & profile.
Im from Ireland, in 1994 I was 12, we had NBC and the trial would be on live every day when id come home from school my mother would be glued..I eventually took interest in it..even in Ireland this case was HUGE..my father came home from work the day of the verdict enraged Oj was found not guilty..its only in later years iv looked into it more closely..still a shocking case.
@@strnglhld oh yeah I knew who he was but didn't know much about him, I saw the bronco chase live on the news. Then I watched the whole trial afterwards. We see everything here lol
So you are telling me that pants shirt shoes and murder weapon all fit in that bag? How about bloody towels? ON sure did a phenomal job getting rid of it all..but so sloppy to leave the socks and glove behind? It doesn't seem right
You'd be amazed at what can be overlooked or forgotten when someone is frantically trying to cover all their steps while trying to establish a bogus aliby.
C J why don’t you disprove her thought process/ arguments with a reasonable one. Is it that you can’t ? Please I’ll love to see why you think she’s wrong for making or raising such an argument. Thank you.
1:37:46 Kato talks about the knapsack by the rear of the Rolls Royce. Black or dark color with brown leather patch. It was a foot and a half in length and one foot high. 1:50:38 Kato was going to put the knapsack in the limo but OJ said he would get it. This will become important later.
Questions are relevant in that the answers should corroborate or contradict substantive portions. It is like police ask you the make, color of the car you have identified by license plate.
