Ok. The Seestar is Impressive. Deep Sky, Lunar, Solar, Planetary Review

Подписаться 46 тыс.

Просмотров 24 тыс.

50% 1

Impressive smart telescope for under $500, the Seestar is available here: bit.ly/3pKO8r3
📋 Written review: www.galactic-hunter.com/post/...
💪🏻 Found this helpful? The best way to support us is through Patreon: / galactic_hunter
✨ Become a lifetime member of our Premium Astrophotography Course: www.galactic-hunter.com/galac...
🎨 Our PixInsight Processing Guide: www.galactic-course.com/colle...
📚 Learn more with our books: www.galactic-hunter.com/books
Galactic Hunter was created by Antoine and Dalia Grelin, a stargazing couple from Las Vegas, NV. We do our best to publish entertaining and helpful Astrophotography content, through videos, written tutorials, books, and more. The main goal of this RU-vid channel is to help as many beginner astrophotographers as possible in this difficult yet rewarding hobby. We hope our content will help you reach new heights in your deep-sky imaging journey!
00:00 - Introduction
00:31 - Unboxing
03:02 - 1st Use and Specs
05:15 - Deep Sky Imaging
07:12 - Planetary Imaging
07:34 - Lunar Imaging
07:54 - Solar Imaging
08;20 - Conclusion
Website: www.galactic-hunter.com
Facebook: / galactichunter
Instagram: @galactic.hunter
Starting Astrophotography, a Complete Guide: www.galactic-hunter.com/post/...
Beginner DSLR Astrophotography Equipment Guide: www.galactic-hunter.com/post/...
The equipment you see in most of our videos: www.galactic-hunter.com/blog/...
Disclosure: Some of the links on this channel's videos are affiliate links. This means that, at zero cost to you, we will earn an affiliate commission if you click through the link and finalize a purchase.

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

5 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 34

@JanosBarabas 7 месяцев назад

Just a tip I have learned: for better planet images, first center the planet and then change to Lunar mode - then you can decrease the image brightness so that the planet is not overexposed.🙂

@DeepSpaceAstro 7 месяцев назад

It really is amazing what these smart scopes can do. Like you mentioned, they're not replacements for our traditional setups but I think they'll help get a lot of people into this awesome hobby!

@hanamichizakuragi5021 5 месяцев назад

i completely agreed with you , that the important aspect -

@RevZafod 6 месяцев назад

Great presentation! I have two tips to add. Before going to Solar, start in Scenery to raise the scope to install the solar filter. Only then switch to Solar, to avoid pointing at the sun without the filter. At the beginning of every session, do a compass calibration. It only takes a couple of minutes, and speeds up the scope locating objects; especially the sun and the moon.

@aw7425 7 месяцев назад

Well done review. Thank you Dalia and Astro team

@icyxxxxx Месяц назад

Very cool!

@0815mkl 7 месяцев назад

@GalacticHunter The bad noise in the corners might come from the fieldrotation as this is an Alt-AZ mount. The corners don‘t get all the exposures and so you get the noise gradient when you stretch the image.

@jims9982 7 месяцев назад

Great review. I received mine recently but have not had much imaging time due to clouds here in S. Texas. I like it because it's lightweight, simple to use and I can easily take it over to friends homes and set it up in no time for show and tale.

@jeremydene24 7 месяцев назад

Cool review. Thanks for sharing. Point of information. The bubble level on top of the tripod is designed to level "just" the tripod itself before attaching the unit to it. 👍

@void_presence 7 месяцев назад

ordered one of these a few weeks ago; company says eta for shipping is next month so ...patiently waiting

@remimag1012 7 месяцев назад

Any uptade with the planetary mode ?

@jtepsr 6 месяцев назад

so after you take the dso’s, do you still have use deep star stacker and another editor like pixinsight or ps

@GalacticHunter 6 месяцев назад

You don't have to, the image right out of the app will look fine depending on the target, but if you decide to process the data on your computer you will get muuuch more impressive results

@dennisrogers6786 7 месяцев назад

They are designed for EAA astronomy, not astrophotography, hence don't need an EQ mount as its designed to view objects live, but can take the individual fits and process them as you would astrophotography. The beauty is can setup and get going in 2 mins, whereas a good rig can be a good 30 mins or so, so reluctant to take it out of in an hour or 2 you know will be cloudy, as Seestar or other smart scope in and out in 2 mins so gets more use. Have known people with serious astrophotography gear sell them, due to a pain setting up and time consuming and gone with the likes of Stellina, Seestar and other smart scopes as so quick and covenant and great if you go camping, or an overseas trip, etc. Much easier to use. But no wont replace a serious rig, but can see their popularity grow due to convenance factor

@jasonpierce4518 6 месяцев назад

my gear is over 2k. selling it and getting a seestar. the difference in the photos isnt enough to warrant the price and trouble of the setup.

@paiute6911 7 месяцев назад

Great job Dalia! I have a co-work who has young kids that are starting to develop an interested in space. They are looking for a telescope for casual use. In your opinion would this be a good choice for a novice looking to show their kids some deep sky objects? Thank you and clear skies.

@GalacticHunter 7 месяцев назад

Yes I think this is great for kids, as long as they understand how to use the app!

@anucha98 7 месяцев назад

Can it charge and operate simultaneously?

@RevZafod 6 месяцев назад

Yes.

@PresleyTV 7 месяцев назад

I just watched your EV Scope review before watching this one of the SeeStar. Thank you for both. I am leaning toward the EV since it has an electronic eyepiece for the grandkids. The oldest is 5. The size of the SeeStar is appealing also. For kids and for the 2024 eclipse -- I'm interested in which you would choose.

@mikesaunders4694 6 месяцев назад

Levelling the cat might be tricky 🤔😉

@meibergstrmandersen9181 7 месяцев назад

Nice :-) and cool curious cat 😂

@icecorebaby 7 месяцев назад

So SeeStar or vaonis Vaspera?

@jasonpierce4518 6 месяцев назад

someone else did a video on comparing all the robot scopes side by side. check it out. seestar seems best for price for performance.

@hmuphilly9129 7 месяцев назад

Any idea when mines going to ship though?

@matt420740 7 месяцев назад

Contact the retailer you bought it from and ask them. Leaving a comment on this video isn't going to give you an answer. And I don't know why you think it would.....

@hmuphilly9129 7 месяцев назад

Sarcasm buddy And frustration

@TheTeaguecowley 7 месяцев назад

Why 2 megapixels? Why?

@0815mkl 7 месяцев назад

50mm apperture is about 2.5 to 3 arcseconds of optical resolution. So the sensor is a good match. Maybe the IMX174 sensor would also be a good match, but that would mean a bigger sensor and maybe a field flattener already, means a more expensive optic and higher price point. Basically the same thing with the Vespera from Vaonis.

@itskubamazur 7 месяцев назад

it does dithering automatically, so you can easily drizzle image while stacking on your own to achieve better resolution. its optics has potential to do 2x drizzling and I have good experience doing so

@jasonpierce4518 6 месяцев назад

comparing it to photos of an 8se and some other telescopes that are 1-2k in price along with the other parts. just wow. so. i think some of the telescope manufacturers (especially the 5k robot ones) are going to really hate this product as it just roasts their pricetags for the same are almost the same photos.. aside that it also does daytime photography and it also will do mosaics soon. no need to build that observatory in your backyard now. lol. course a lot of guys have more money than brains. but the rest of us dont like spending that kind of cash.

@jsamc 7 месяцев назад

Put the darn thing on a table already.

@abulka 6 месяцев назад

What is the benefit of that? Just curious. Easier accessibility for the user? Better stability? You’d think the earth would have fewer vibrations than an elevated table structure.